babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


  
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » canadian politics   » Provinces meet on women's issues without Oda

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Provinces meet on women's issues without Oda
Contrarian
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6477

posted 11 January 2007 02:20 PM      Profile for Contrarian     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Hat tip to where'd that bug go? who posted this article:
quote:
The Harper government has shown so little interest in women's issues that provinces have decided to meet on their own to plot a national strategy without bothering to invite federal Status of Women Minister Bev Oda.

The snub follows two recent federal-provincial meetings on women's issues at which Oda put in only brief appearances and displayed "a complete lack of interest," according to Sandra Pupatello, Ontario's minister responsible for women's issues...

...Consequently, Pupatello will host a meeting of women's issues ministers - minus Oda - on Feb. 1 in Toronto.

"It clearly takes leadership at the federal level to bring us together. It is completely absent in my view and we are taking it upon ourselves to say, you know, this is either a priority or it isn't and regardless of federal involvement . . . what are we going to do about it?"...


where'd that bug go? has a discussion going. One of the comments includes the suggestion:

quote:
...Maybe the provincial ministers should invite female federal MPs who support SWC as well for leverage and optics.
Any of you political types know a provincial minister on women's issues?

ETA: or an MP who might ask for an invite?

[ 11 January 2007: Message edited by: Contrarian ]


From: pretty far west | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 11 January 2007 05:57 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Wow. That's really gutsy and awesome on the part of the provincial ministers. Good for them! What a slap in the face to Oda. And how deserved.
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 11 January 2007 07:08 PM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Thanks contrarian for the heads up, no wonder the provinces were mad, this was also in the "where did that bug" go link:


quote:
Because we have ministers who travel literally from coast to coast to coast, a couple of them that take two days just to get there, they were really quite offended that she would come for an hour," Pupatello said in an interview Wednesday.

Their frustration deepened on Dec. 15, when a federally organized teleconference, supposedly aimed at finishing up the agenda from the October meeting, was similarly cut short.

Pupatello said Oda "attended for 20 minutes and then had to excuse herself and insisted that the meeting be over when she left the call."



From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Pride for Red Dolores
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12072

posted 11 January 2007 10:05 PM      Profile for Pride for Red Dolores     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
is it just me, or does it seem like none of the Ministers in Harper's governemnt seem to have no idea what their doing (see the former enviornment minister for example) or do things that in no way reflect the will of the people ? This article reflects the fact that they have shown no leadership on major issues...It is the governemnt's responsibility to care for its people- and for me when they close or cut down organizations that help women this is the equivalent of taking steps to opress women. Imagine the inumerable amount of women and organizatios who benefited from these services and who now have nothing to depend on. And to give no explanation, and to seem to not even have any interest in your portfolio ? I remember googleing Bev Oda, and there doesn't seem to be anything in her past that particularly sujests her being given her current position.
From: Montreal | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged
Contrarian
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6477

posted 12 January 2007 11:48 PM      Profile for Contrarian     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
bump
From: pretty far west | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 13 January 2007 10:20 AM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Pride for Red Dolores:is it just me, or does it seem like none of the Ministers in Harper's governemnt seem to have no idea what their doing (see the former enviornment minister for example) or do things that in no way reflect the will of the people ?


No it is not just you, they have no idea how to govern, what they are doing is playing to their base, so at least they might get their votes again. Then they followed US style actions in Afghanistan, that has simply put all the Canadian soldiers there lives at risk, now they are trying to back track there before it really falls apart. And the rest of the time they are bashing the Liberals.

They are NOT fit to govern, there cannot be a vote of non-confidence soon enough IMV.


From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
DavidMR
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13478

posted 14 January 2007 10:14 PM      Profile for DavidMR        Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Contrarian:
Any of you political types know a provincial minister on women's issues?

ETA: or an MP who might ask for an invite?



I read the article and it's basically quotes from the Ontario Liberal minister of women's issues versus the federal Conservative minister or women's issues staff person, who says it's all just a party political thing.

I don't see mention of any other provincial minister beside Pupatello. You ask if any of us know of other ministers of women's issues, and I have to say that here in BC I really don't know who Premier Campbell has placed in charge of women's issues. Was this person invited to the meeting that Pupatello is organizing?


From: Greater Vancouver | Registered: Nov 2006  |  IP: Logged
Steppenwolf Allende
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13076

posted 14 January 2007 10:30 PM      Profile for Steppenwolf Allende     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
The Harper government has shown so little interest in women's issues that provinces have decided to meet on their own to plot a national strategy without bothering to invite federal Status of Women Minister Bev Oda.

Well hey! I'm sure waiting to see how the Harpsichord and his favourite corporate flack rag the Nazi Post try to serenade their way out of this slap!

quote:
is it just me, or does it seem like none of the Ministers in Harper's governemnt seem to have no idea what their doing

No it's not just you. It's obvious most of them don't have a clue. But it's also obvious that some of them actually do know what they are doing and also know it's rotten. So they go out of their way not to tell anyone.

quote:
Any of you political types know a provincial minister on women's issues?

Well, here in BC we DID have a ministry for women's equality during the NDP government years. How effective it was is certainly a matter of debate. But at least we had one, and in so doing gave the whole idea of equality a much higher profile.

Now, under the BC Liar dictatorship, it’s part of Ida Chong’s portfolio, which is pretty much like not having anyone at all.


From: goes far, flies near, to the stars away from here | Registered: Aug 2006  |  IP: Logged
Contrarian
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6477

posted 15 January 2007 09:51 AM      Profile for Contrarian     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by DavidMR:
...I don't see mention of any other provincial minister beside Pupatello...
Read it more carefully:

quote:
...She said "every minister across the board" concurred with her assessment of the situation.

Indeed, another minister from a province not usually considered adversarial with the Harper government, privately expressed virtually identical criticisms...



From: pretty far west | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
DavidMR
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13478

posted 15 January 2007 08:02 PM      Profile for DavidMR        Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Contrarian:
Read it more carefully:

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
...She said "every minister across the board" concurred with her assessment of the situation.
Indeed, another minister from a province not usually considered adversarial with the Harper government, privately expressed virtually identical criticisms...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Excuse me? You're telling me to read it more carefully? Is that an order?

I have already read it carefully. As I said in my post, "I don't see mention of any other provincial minister beside Pupatello.", and indeed not one other provincial minister is named and certainly none are quoted, as anyone can plainly see. There are only two identified sources, Pupatello and Oda's assistant. As for the excerpt concerning the various mystery ministers it sounds like spin to me.

[ 15 January 2007: Message edited by: DavidMR ]


From: Greater Vancouver | Registered: Nov 2006  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 15 January 2007 08:40 PM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by DavidMR:

Excuse me? You're telling me to read it more carefully? Is that an order?


You know, I've read the article and DavidMR's analysis, and I think Bev Oda is maybe getting a bum rap.

I figure this way: Pupatello is a Liberal. Right? Oda, on the other hand, is a Conservative. With me so far? So if Pupatello is hammering Oda, it must be for the wrong reasons. Probably she's just envious that the Conservatives got into power federally. So maybe Oda means well after all. See what I mean?

Ok.

Now to DavidMR's question, "Is that an order?"

I checked this out, and in some British dialects, the word "order" would be pronounced almost exactly like "Oda". So I think I know where DavidMR is coming from now, although it did take a fair bit of research.

See? I'm learning to read carefully, too!!


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Contrarian
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6477

posted 15 January 2007 11:28 PM      Profile for Contrarian     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Are you trying to be odious?
From: pretty far west | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 16 January 2007 03:15 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Contrarian:
Are you trying to be odious?

No, seriously, I was just trying to say that I Oda great deal to DavidMR's incisive analysis.


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Is this it?
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13083

posted 16 January 2007 06:00 AM      Profile for Is this it?     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Michelle:
Wow. That's really gutsy and awesome on the part of the provincial ministers. Good for them! What a slap in the face to Oda. And how deserved.
More opportunistic then gutsy. You can expect a lot more of this. Both the Liberals in Ontario and the NDP in Saskatchewan are facing elections this year and they'd both rather run against big bad Stephen Harper than talk about their own records.

In Ontario, Pupatello and McGuinty have very little to brag about. Women on social assistance are still waiting for an end to the clawback. Women facing human rights abuses will find the Human Rights Commission doesn't do pursue human rights violations anymore. etc etc etc

It's far easier to dump on Harper than to explain your own failures.


From: Toronto | Registered: Aug 2006  |  IP: Logged
Scott Piatkowski
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1299

posted 16 January 2007 06:54 AM      Profile for Scott Piatkowski   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Contrarian:
Are you trying to be odious?

I think he's being odiferous.


From: Kitchener-Waterloo | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 16 January 2007 11:06 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Scott Piatkowski:

I think he's being odiferous.


That's very odacious of you to misspell odoriferous.

Odam, I'm late for a meeting...


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
pogge
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2440

posted 16 January 2007 01:09 PM      Profile for pogge   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Y'all really Oda cut this out, you know.
From: Why is this a required field? | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 16 January 2007 01:18 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Well, there is that too, Is This It?. You've got a good point there.
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Steppenwolf Allende
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13076

posted 16 January 2007 10:25 PM      Profile for Steppenwolf Allende     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
I checked this out, and in some British dialects, the word "order" would be pronounced almost exactly like "Oda". So I think I know where DavidMR is coming from now, although it did take a fair bit of research.

Actually, that's kind of how it would sound in New York City or Boston as well--as in, "Eh, cun A take yoh Oda?"

Is This It said:

quote:
It's far easier to dump on Harper than to explain your own failures.

Michelle responded:

quote:
Well, there is that too, Is This It?. You've got a good point there.

Yeh. Y' oda know dat, Michelle.


From: goes far, flies near, to the stars away from here | Registered: Aug 2006  |  IP: Logged
DavidMR
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13478

posted 16 January 2007 10:47 PM      Profile for DavidMR        Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Is this it?:
In Ontario, Pupatello and McGuinty have very little to brag about. Women on social assistance are still waiting for an end to the clawback. Women facing human rights abuses will find the Human Rights Commission doesn't do pursue human rights violations anymore. etc etc etc


Why am I not surprised?


From: Greater Vancouver | Registered: Nov 2006  |  IP: Logged
Scott Piatkowski
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1299

posted 17 January 2007 01:20 PM      Profile for Scott Piatkowski   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by unionist:
That's very odacious of you to misspell odoriferous.

I didn't.

Guess you oda me one.


From: Kitchener-Waterloo | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
happy go leftie (Red Tory)
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11640

posted 18 January 2007 01:11 AM      Profile for happy go leftie (Red Tory)        Edit/Delete Post
Those oda's are getting too odious. Why, if provincial women stand up against attacks on women, we oda just slam them.

There oda be no criticism of the Federal policies ever. I mean DavidMR oda not allow it. He oda take offense if you don't like the oda number of vicious cuts to women's issues, minorities, literacy, the court challenges program. Why we oda string those provincial women up for even having the oda-city to dare to bring this up. Why, when oda the fed's just quit the meetings, and the provinces just oda shut up eh David? Why anyone who criticizes the Conservatives oda get told.

Sadly, women's issues oda be important, and who oda give a damn who or how many times the provinces try to bring this up. Oh, but it's not like the Conservatives want to be re-elected Federally, why, they wouldn't oda play to their ideological base, or to the Conservative Party extremists who oppose daycare and believe women oda stay home and have lots of babies.

Why it's oda than you can fictionalize, this picking on those poor little Conservatives just because they want to trounce women and still keep control of the public purse for their sick $60 Billion (more on the way) in single source U.S. military contracts that is more than the Canadian budget can afford. Those provincial women oda get the message: There's plenty more cuts where those came from once the Cons oda get done with their massive military spending priorities. Who says the RepubliCons oda keep their promises to spend only about $17 Billion, which was already set to cause a deficit with their other massive spending promises from the last election.

We oda get used to it right David. We oda brace ourselves for unimaginable cuts, cause we oda not have enough money to pay for this military extreme agenda. Canadians oda get some more surprises when we find out what this big 'advanced' military expansion will be used for.

Such an oda thing to complain about Conservatives. David you oda put your foot down and complain about those dumb provincial women aiming to counter this RepubliCon agenda. Funny, oda be capable of seeing that with Harper it's not just politics, it oda be clear by now that this IS the odeousology of this Party.


From: suburban outskirts | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca