Author
|
Topic: Mongolia
|
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478
|
posted 27 July 2005 03:47 PM
Most of the very few things I've ever known about Mongolia are positive associations for me -- very long and often glorious history; apparently very positive emergence from Soviet domination to good relations with just about every other country, in spite of Mongolia's sensitive position; great physical beauty; and so on. Apparently it is a very open, safe, and friendly place for visitors from anywhere to take desert and mountain tours. Some people will know why I started googling about for a little background information about Mongolia today. There are many, many sites, although I haven't found many newsy ones. Perhaps someone else can do better. This Library of Congress guide looks like a good place for anyone who wants to to begin some research. Even just looking at the chronology of important events in Mongolian history is fascinating. I have already learned, eg, to write "Chinggis Khan" and "Khubilai Khan." I also know that the story of the "Golden Horde" has been of major importance in the history of Russia, Ukraine, and Poland, notably. Over the last year, I have read in both the NY Times and the G&M travel sections, I believe, fascinating travellers' accounts of good times in present-day Mongolia, although, as usual, details are escaping me now. Maybe someone here has visited? And maybe my vague impressions are too sunny altogether and someone will come along to correct me. That would be useful too.
From: gone | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
v michel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7879
|
posted 27 July 2005 04:49 PM
I've always been a sucker for travel books, especially travel books by overbearing imperialist British men (I am completely serious, I am not being snide). I don't know why. So my impressions of Mongolia have been colored by that, and are probably totally fictional.I just finished this: link to book The parts that were most interesting where where he talked about the decaying cities and vacuum left by the failing communist infrastructure, and travel to Russia/other ex-Republics to sell black market goods. It was interesting because it was unexpected. When I thought of Mongolia I thought of horses and nomads, not drunk teenagers on trains with bundles of stereo equipment and guns. Otherwise, the author is a big jerk who thinks he can prove his manhood if he rides across Mongolia like the noble Mongolians do. Yet bizarrely I found it impossible to put down.
From: a protected valley in the middle of nothing | Registered: Jan 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'lance
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1064
|
posted 27 July 2005 09:15 PM
A friend of mine from student-press days (who I haven't seen since I can't remember when) spent a couple of years in Mongolia, eventually publishing a book about it.Edit: I just read the quoted sentence. "Like aspirin scattered over a green bedspread"? Oh dear. [ 27 July 2005: Message edited by: 'lance ]
From: that enchanted place on the top of the Forest | Registered: Jul 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
brebis noire
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7136
|
posted 28 July 2005 10:47 AM
Yup, I could've said southern Alberta, too. The movie was The Story of the Weeping Camel Sorry, can't get the link to work. [ 28 July 2005: Message edited by: brebis noire ]
From: Quebec | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Willowdale Wizard
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3674
|
posted 01 August 2005 10:13 AM
it was so cold that:mongolian hitchhikers were holding up pictures of thumbs! the train's optician was giving away free ice scrapers with every new pair of eyeglasses! train pickpockets were sticking their hands in strangers' pockets just to keep them warm! thank you very much. i'll be appearing at yuk yuk's in brampton next thursday.
From: england (hometown of toronto) | Registered: Jan 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790
|
posted 05 August 2005 01:33 PM
quote: Originally posted by Rufus Polson:
Not that that's an especially wonderful thing. I always wonder why it is that *other* people's empires are romantic and full of pageantry, whereas only the current Western ones involve brutality and power-and-wealth-hungry jackals at the top. I mean, sorry, but Ghengis Khan was a much bigger mass murderer than George W. Bush (although admittedly far smarter). So was Alexander. The Mongols depopulated huge areas by the simple expedient of killing everyone and burning everything; this literal scorched earth policy produced territory where Mongol nomads could live but farmers and city folk could not. Eventually, as they got corrupted by their conquests and became what they would have thought of as decadent, they ended up no more objectionable than any other really big boss (that is, still quite objectionable).
I see your point but mine was a rhetorical illustration, not am statement of advocacy. While it is the case that Ghenghis Khan was ruthless, and certainly had a huge amount of blood on his hands, his later bigographer, Jack Wethford asserts that many of the tales of gratuitous Mongol slaughter actually shold be traced to Tarmalane not Ghenghis Khan. He credits Ghengis Khan with the ides of diplomatic immunity, among other things. And interestingly, the scroched earth policy was not simply a gratuitous punishment. It had a direct military purpose, in that by turning large swathes of farm land into grassland steppe, the Mongols created forward base areas for supplying their horses. They didn't do this everywhere and to everyone, but select areas to support future military operations, according to Wetheford. [ 05 August 2005: Message edited by: Cueball ]
From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
arborman
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4372
|
posted 05 August 2005 07:46 PM
No doubt Ghenghis Khan did some nasty stuff - you need to be nasty if you try to conquer the world.Ditto Attilla the Hun. All that being said, as a descendent of Atilla's army (like most Hungarians), I find it interesting the effect of the western viewpoint. While most of us are raised to think of Attilla as a big nasty raider (which he certainly was), in Hungarian the closest meaning is 'a Good Father'. Genghis kicked Euro arse, and as such we have a culturally negative view of his activities. It's my opinion that his conquering pales in comparison to the European 'discovery' of North America.
From: I'm a solipsist - isn't everyone? | Registered: Aug 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|