babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » What's the story with Falun Gong?

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: What's the story with Falun Gong?
Walker
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7819

posted 07 June 2005 09:01 PM      Profile for Walker     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Thought I'd call on my intrepid and well-connected fellow babblers for help on this.

Does anyone know more than me about Falun Gong (formally known as Falun Dafa)?
What I know is: "Falun Gong is a mind and body practice of meditation and exercise. It is not a religion but has a spiritual element that encourages the pursuit of truth, compassion and tolerance in daily living. Falun Dafa, its official name, means great law. The movement was banned by the Chinese Government in 1999."

The reason I'm asking is because "A Sydney-based Chinese diplomat seeking asylum in Australia claims his country is kidnapping people in Australia and repatriating them and is worried he will now meet the same fate."
Read the rest of the story here.


Now, they stress they are not a political party, so why have they been persecuted and banned by the Chinese govt? There's something missing here, but I don't know what. From a different article: "A spokeswoman for the Chinese embassy last night dismissed the practitioners' claims. "Where is the proof?" she asked.
"Falun Gong is really a cult in China and they do a lot of bad things," she said. But in Australia it was up to the Government and police to deal with them, not the embassy, she said."

The only clue I got recently was a TV news report that showed Falun Gong members holding banners, one of which I am sure said something like 'end to communism in China'.

HELP?


From: Not Canada | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
Suzette
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7708

posted 07 June 2005 10:04 PM      Profile for Suzette     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yes, the Chinese government aren't exactly fans of Falun Gong, and like you I'm quite perplexed as to what their beef is specifically.

Developments in the case of China's former first secretary in Australia, Chen Yonglin, seeking asylum in Australia are going to be very interesting to watch indeed. The Australian government is hopping around frantically trying to make it just go away without offending the Chinese government and threatening the all-important FTA, and juggling this with a desperate need to be seen to be doing the right thing with regards to Human Rights -- an issue they're looking shakier and shakier on by the day.

Hope I'm not derailing the thread too much here; it's just an interesting case in the current political climate. As much as I feel for Mr Chen's desperate situation -- and I'd like to emphasise how much I do empathise -- watching the already harrassed pollies jump through hoops of their own cynical making is morbidly compelling.


From: Pig City | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
sub lite
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8918

posted 08 June 2005 01:11 AM      Profile for sub lite   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Eh, may as well have more posts from Australia.
quote:
Originally posted by Walker:
Now, they stress they are not a political party, so why have they been persecuted and banned by the Chinese govt? There's something missing here, but I don't know what. From a different article: "A spokeswoman for the Chinese embassy last night dismissed the practitioners' claims. "Where is the proof?" she asked.
"Falun Gong is really a cult in China and they do a lot of bad things," she said. But in Australia it was up to the Government and police to deal with them, not the embassy, she said."

Although Falun Gong practitioners also stress that they are not a religion, I think officially they are viewed as such by the Chinese government. As an organized group, not controlled by the government, I believe that they are viewed as a threat. It's difficult to sort out the rhetoric that flies from both sides of the issue.

From: Australia via the Canadian Wet Coast | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
Jacob Two-Two
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2092

posted 08 June 2005 02:22 AM      Profile for Jacob Two-Two     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
They're not even an organised group really. There is organisation involved, but it hardly reaches to the majority of its millions of practitioners. The thing that freaks out the Chinese government is the size. It is huge and growing rapidly despite their best efforts to stamp it out. I think they fear the possibility that all these people could become a political movement, as well as a spiritual one. If that happened, they would be bigger than the communist party, so there is reason for concern. Fascist organisations always hate what they can't control, and if Falun Gong's momentum is not halted, it will likely overwhelm the Chinese elite.
From: There is but one Gord and Moolah is his profit | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged
kuri
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4202

posted 08 June 2005 05:08 AM      Profile for kuri   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
For my research for a course on UK refugee law, I watched a refugee hearing for a Chinese refugee applicant who was a member of a breakaway Buddhist sect that attempted to recruit. While not Falun Gong, it was interpreted as Falun Gong by the authorities.

I don't think Falun Gong are an organized party, but they do try to recruit and convert. That's where the threat is to the Chinese state, as far as I can tell: any religion that tries to convert others is considered a rival organization to the state.

I believe Falun Gong involves some form of exercise combined with religion - kind of a mind/body/spirit discipline similar to other eastern religions. Some Falun Gong refugees have had to perform the exercises in the hearing rooms to prove that they are indeed adherents.


From: an employer more progressive than rabble.ca | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged
Suzette
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7708

posted 08 June 2005 05:32 AM      Profile for Suzette     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Walker! I just love strange coincidences, don't you? Tonight (Wednesday) the 7.30 Report is featuring an article on Falun Gong and the Chinese Government. Should be a transcript here on Thursday sometime, at a guess.

[ 08 June 2005: Message edited by: Suzette ]


From: Pig City | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
maestro
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7842

posted 08 June 2005 08:17 AM      Profile for maestro     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I was given some Falun Gong material by an aquaintance a while back. One bit was a book written by the originator.

He claims we have a propeller in our stomach that whirls around and has some effect on our lives. (I'm not making this up).

It was also clear from the literature there was a political element that was anti-government. I don't know if you could characterize it as 'populist', but somewhat similar in nature, and generally opposed to 'communism'.

My opinion is the followers of Falun Gong are more or less harmless dummies. Nobody could believe half of what was in the great leaders book.

On the other hand, if you can make people believe there's a propeller in their stomach, they would probably believe anything.


From: Vancouver | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
Suzette
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7708

posted 08 June 2005 09:12 AM      Profile for Suzette     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by maestro:

On the other hand, if you can make people believe there's a propeller in their stomach, they would probably believe anything.


Quite right -- such genius could be dangerous.

From: Pig City | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
wage zombie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7673

posted 08 June 2005 01:58 PM      Profile for wage zombie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I guess I'd have to read the book to see the context, but am I the only one who doesn't find the "propeller in the stomach" idea ridiculous? At least, taken on a matephorical level.

How do you think the stomach works?


From: sunshine coast BC | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
Jacob Two-Two
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2092

posted 08 June 2005 02:59 PM      Profile for Jacob Two-Two     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Like most energy work, visualisation is a key technique. The propeller concept is not literal, but uses a familiar dynamic to attune you perceptually to your own body's rythms. I've done the Falun Gong exercises, but haven't read the book or the writings of the leader, so I can't attest to the cult nature of the whole thing. The exercises are good.
From: There is but one Gord and Moolah is his profit | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged
Rufus Polson
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3308

posted 08 June 2005 03:29 PM      Profile for Rufus Polson     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well, aside from the rapidly-growing thing, I think that China has something of a tradition of religious groups turning into populist, often peasant-based, resistance movements. One of the reasons for strong intertwinings between Buddhism and martial arts, despite the essentially pacifistic nature of Buddhism. Wasn't that why the Shaolin Temple was destroyed, back when?

The Communist party themselves started as a peasant-based resistance movement, so I expect they have a healthy respect for the potential of such things.


From: Caithnard College | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
maestro
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7842

posted 08 June 2005 06:48 PM      Profile for maestro     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Pardon me, lower abdomen, not stomach.

http://www.falundafa.org/book/eng/zfl_new_1.html#2

quote:
What our practice does is cultivate a Law Wheel at the lower abdomen, and I personally place it in students during my classes.

While I’m teaching Falun Dafa we place a Law Wheel in you one by one. Some people feel it, some don’t, but most people feel it, and that has to do with people each having different physical conditions. So we cultivate a Law Wheel, not an elixir.

The Law Wheel is a miniature universe, it has all the functions of a universe, and it can operate and rotate automatically.

It will turn forever at your lower abdomen, once it’s placed in you it won’t stop, and it’ll turn like that year in and year out.

When it’s turning clockwise it automatically absorbs energy from the universe, and it can evolve energy by itself, and supply the energy that’s needed to evolve every part of your body.

In the same way, when it turns counterclockwise it sends out energy, and drives used material out of you, which then dissipates around your body. When it sends out energy, it shoots it out very far and brings in new energy again. And the energy it shoots out benefits everyone who’s near your body.


And a third eye as well:

quote:
The Third Eye’s structure used to be the secret of secrets, and ordinary people weren’t allowed to know about it. That’s why nobody ever revealed it. But what we’re going to talk about here doesn’t revolve around those theories from the past. We’re going to explain it with modern science and in the plainest modern terms, and we’ll explain what it’s really about.

The Third Eye we’re talking about is actually located slightly above the spot that’s between your eyebrows, and it’s connected to the pineal gland.

-snip-

When we talk about "opening the Third Eye" it’s about bypassing your optic nerves and opening a passageway between your eyebrows, which makes it possible for your pineal gland to see outside directly. And this is what opening the Third Eye means.


Falun Daft.


From: Vancouver | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
Sisyphus
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1425

posted 08 June 2005 07:30 PM      Profile for Sisyphus     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I think we've more or less nailed a sketch of Falun gong theory and practice, The movement is certainly instructive as a demonstration of how committed people can be to a belief system despite horrific torture at the hands of Chinese authorities.. The linked website is quite tame compared to most.

More than 1000 practitioners have been tortured to death. Apparently, it is the numbers of practitioners along with their criticism (albeit mild and mostly implicit) of the repressive government that is attracting such brutality upon their members.

[ 08 June 2005: Message edited by: Sisyphus ]


From: Never Never Land | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Suzette
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7708

posted 08 June 2005 07:48 PM      Profile for Suzette     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
This is from The 7.30 Report (Aust current affairs show) last night. I've only scanned the transcript quickly, but the quote below sheds a bit of light -- for me, anyway -- on the severe reaction by the Chinese govt.

quote:
JO McKENNA: Dr John Wong, a specialist in Asian history at Sydney University, says the Communist regime began to see the movement as a threat after thousands of devotees from around the country suddenly gathered in Beijing in April 1999.

DR JOHN WONG: The Chinese secret police pride themselves on their intelligence, and their ability to know the movement of the people, to know the organisations, and so on. And certainly, these 10,000 people collect under their nose without their knowing anything about it.


Full transcript here.


From: Pig City | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
maestro
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7842

posted 09 June 2005 02:41 AM      Profile for maestro     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Further to the posted quotes of Dr, John Wong:

quote:
JO McKENNA: Falun Gong was founded more than a decade ago by a former Chinese government official as a spiritual movement combining exercise and meditation in the pursuit of philosophical truth.

DR JOHN WONG, DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY, SYDNEY UNIVERSITY: It is not the kind of religion that you and I would understand it to be such as Christianity. It has a political agenda. And that agenda is to oppose the government or even overthrow it.

-snip-

DR JOHN WONG: I think it is a cult. How would one define a cult? I would say that a cult is a - a belief, propagated by somebody who has a particular agenda in mind, and that agenda may not be entirely religious.


Given the quotes from the Falun Dafa material I posted, I don't think there's any doubt it's a cult. No reasonable person could believe they had a third eye with which they could see through a channel between their eyebrows.

However, I'm willing to accept that most Falun Gong followers are just plain dumb, and are mostly only a danger to themselves.


From: Vancouver | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
Suzette
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7708

posted 09 June 2005 02:50 AM      Profile for Suzette     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
So what is the definition of "cult" we're working with here?
From: Pig City | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
trevor j.
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7852

posted 09 June 2005 03:28 AM      Profile for trevor j.     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Good question. Dr Wong's definition of "cult" would pretty much fit any religion practised in China that wasn't one of those officially approved by the state. Falun Gong beliefs seem fairly nutty, but not necessarily any more so than those of any other religion seen from the outside.

If anyone really needs another link, this Asia Times article, though not particularly new, sums things up quite nicely, and (as far as I can tell) is reasonably free from political/religious bias.


From: No Fixed Address | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 09 June 2005 05:41 AM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
oh never mind. carry on

[ 09 June 2005: Message edited by: Fidel ]


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
Jacob Two-Two
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2092

posted 09 June 2005 05:47 AM      Profile for Jacob Two-Two     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
No reasonable person could believe they had a third eye with which they could see through a channel between their eyebrows.

Like the entire Hindu and Buddhist cultures? Saying it's an "eye" is just a metaphor, as is the "channel". This no different than the development of the brow chakra attained by mystics of these cultures. It's about cultivating the appropriate energy to expand your perception, and as I said before, visualisation of these images helps to cultivate this energy. These things aren't literal in the way you seem to be taking them.


From: There is but one Gord and Moolah is his profit | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged
maestro
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7842

posted 09 June 2005 07:55 AM      Profile for maestro     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Saying it's an "eye" is just a metaphor, as is the "channel".

As the man said, I never metaphor I didn't like.

This is the strangest manifestation of a metaphor I'ver ever heard.

quote:
The Third Eye we’re talking about is actually located slightly above the spot that’s between your eyebrows, and it’s connected to the pineal gland.

-snip-

When we talk about "opening the Third Eye" it’s about bypassing your optic nerves and opening a passageway between your eyebrows, which makes it possible for your pineal gland to see outside directly. And this is what opening the Third Eye means.


Pardon me for saying so, but when someone says something is 'actually located' somewhere, I take them at their word. They believe - or want me to believe - that one can let their pineal gland 'see' outside.

The pineal gland is very important, and is buried deep in the brain, which suggests it is both ancient, and of evolutionary value.

There was a time when the pineal gland was directly affected by light. This could very well account for the 'third-eye' concept.

However, in mammals the pineal connects to the outside world via the suprachiasmatic nucleus which is connected to the retina in your regular eyes. It produces melatonin from serotonin, and helps regulate both circadian rythm and the onset of puberty.

If one could indeed open a passageway between your eyebrows, the pineal would still be in the dark. It's position at the centre of the brain means any attempt to shine a light on it would necessitate making a mess of the rest of your brain. Don't try this at home.

There is nothing in the Falun literature that suggests the 'third eye' or the 'law wheel' are metaphorical. They are presented as being physical facts.

They are not physical facts, they're hogwash. Any reasonable person could, and would, realize that.

However, outrageous claims like these are useful for filtering out those who won't become 'true believers'.

If I say, for instance, that people have a magnetic something or other within their bodies that could be uses to attract money (if they only knew how to use it), most people would think I was crazy.

However, a certain number, perhaps quite small, might believe me.

Having made one outrageous claim, I have now identified those who will believe more or less anything I say.

If I have some other item on my agenda, those who will believe anything I say could come in very handy.

I'll agree that there is no hard and fast rule for defining a 'cult'. However, bullshit like the 'third eye' and the 'law wheel' are indicators. Another indicator is the presence of an agenda that is not explicitly stated.

Falun Gong qualifies under both.

Besides, it wasn't me who identified Falun Gong as a cult, it was Dr. Wong, who was quoted approvingly in another post.

However, as I said, just because they're stupid it doesn't mean they're dangerous.

By the way, that Epoch article posted included photographs of people being tortured. Those photos were of people acting out the Chinese governments treatment of Falun Gong followers.

While everything in the article may well be true, it is certainly not up to any journalistic standard (except Fox, perhaps).


From: Vancouver | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
trevor j.
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7852

posted 09 June 2005 08:17 AM      Profile for trevor j.     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by maestro:

By the way, that Epoch article posted included photographs of people being tortured. Those photos were of people acting out the Chinese governments treatment of Falun Gong followers.

While everything in the article may well be true, it is certainly not up to any journalistic standard (except Fox, perhaps).


Well, the Epoch Times is a funny sort of paper, with somewhat dubious connections, journalistically speaking - both the South China Morning Post and the Boston Globe characterise it as Falun Gong-owned, or at least connected. Which doesn't make their Falun Gong reporting entirely valueless, but certainly likely to be ever so slightly biased. [Edited due to my inability to press the correct damn button.]

[ 09 June 2005: Message edited by: trevor j. ]


From: No Fixed Address | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
rockerbiff
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9273

posted 09 June 2005 01:19 PM      Profile for rockerbiff   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I have been approached by Falun Gong supporters in regard to giving my support for some of their activities. They are certainly on campus here at SFU and have regular events here.

Several issues that raise my suspicions:
1. To produce the amount of media they do [newspapers, full colour magazines etc] they must have a lot of money. When I press the supporters on this they simply tell me "we are all volunteers".

2. The level of organisation in Falun Gong seems kind of obscure. The support is widespread across all kinds of demographics and yet the people I speak to are all x Chinese.

3. Falun Gong's oppression in China seems to be their major selling point in North America - they claim their movement is based on a physical activity but delve in the religious nature as a belief system.

Any ideas on these questions ?


From: Republic of East Van | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
trevor j.
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7852

posted 09 June 2005 05:15 PM      Profile for trevor j.     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
"Abbott, Costello back asylum for Chen"
(No new info here, really; I just like the serendipity of the headline)

From: No Fixed Address | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
Jacob Two-Two
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2092

posted 09 June 2005 06:21 PM      Profile for Jacob Two-Two     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The pineal gland is also considered the "seat" of the brow chakra, which is the chakra of perception. To people of these traditions, light is life energy, similar, if not identical, to the life energy that runs through your body. Again, I haven't read these books, but I doubt that he believes that actual photons are beaming through his head and shining on his pineal gland. It represents the pattern of energy movement that he wants his students to acheive.

I realise all this sounds really loopy to you. That's fine. I'm just trying to make you see that these concepts are considered normal for literally billions of people, mostly not of our culture, of course. I'm willing to bet even the Chinese authorities that are villifying this movement wouldn't claim that he's a quack, exactly. More a dangerous radical. All the stuff that you see as evidence of an unbalanced mind is quite normal in Qi Gong theory, which is highly regarded in Chinese medicine.

As for ahidden agenda, this may be true, but I haven't seen any eveidence of it. What makes you so convinced, exactly?


From: There is but one Gord and Moolah is his profit | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged
NDP Newbie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5089

posted 09 June 2005 06:47 PM      Profile for NDP Newbie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
China's propaganda campaign against the Falun Gong has all the intellectual depth of the racism, homophobia, corporatism, and misogyny that guides the American right.

Incidentally, anybody ignorant enough to associate China's regime with socialism needs a healthy dose of Logic 101.

DEATH TO FALSE SOCIALISM!

LONG LIVE LIBERTY, EQUALITY, AND DEMOCRACY!

[ 09 June 2005: Message edited by: NDP Newbie ]


From: Cornwall, ON | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged
Sisyphus
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1425

posted 09 June 2005 07:01 PM      Profile for Sisyphus     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
From Amnesty International:

quote:
The government's accusations against Falun Gong followers range from ''organizing illegal gatherings'' to ''threatening political stability''. These accusations include "forcefully occupying parks", organising or taking part in ''illegal'' sit-ins, assemblies or demonstrations, obstructing "normal religious activities", having "illegally'' published and distributed books, ''leaking state secrets'', ''harming people's health'' or ''causing deaths'' through the philosophy it promoted.

Though they are probably a bit loopy in their New-Agey cut'n'paste approach to metaphysics and physiology and no doubt are using allegations of torture to direct the spotlight their way (not unlike the Tibetans). I don't find their allegations of torture implausible, given China's penchant for barbarity in response to non-compliance with government edicts.


From: Never Never Land | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
maestro
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7842

posted 09 June 2005 08:00 PM      Profile for maestro     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Again, I haven't read these books, but I doubt that he believes that actual photons are beaming through his head and shining on his pineal gland.

Again, I have, and I have posted quotes from same. The language is very clear. There is nothing metaphysical about the reference to the third eye or the law wheel. They are presented as physical facts.


From: Vancouver | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca