59. In this case, the Complainants were never provided with the complaint or even with the specifics of the complaint until after the August 22, 2003 decision. ... There was, in fact, no real investigation. ...

62. ... I find the Complainants were entitled to know the allegations against them and to be given an opportunity to provide an explanation before any decision was taken by the Provincial Executive. The Complainants were also entitled to know the steps in the process and avenues that would be available to them during the process.

Michael Fleming, Associate Chair
British Columbia Labour Relations Board

Amendt v. Hospital Employees Union

[ 02 August 2007: Message edited by: CUPE_Reformer ]