babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » What do you think of defectors?

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: What do you think of defectors?
Ibelongtonoone
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14539

posted 15 March 2008 07:50 AM      Profile for Ibelongtonoone        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Cuban Players Fled Their Team for an Uncertain Future

quote:
Although the defection of Cuban athletes from international competitions is not uncommon, the sudden departure of seven players and an assistant coach at a qualifying tournament for the Olympics represented a stunning rebuke to the Cuban government.

I once saw footage of North Koreans scramble over the fence of an embassy, with an ingenious plan using a ladder or scaffolding disguised as something else, it all happened very quickly and all I could think is - please make it, and what bravery and desperation they have. Why should I feel different about these refugees.

quote:
Surprisingly, Prieto and Bermúdez said, there were no Cuban security guards accompanying the team, as there had been on trips to Colombia, Haiti and the Dominican Republic.


From: Canada | Registered: Sep 2007  |  IP: Logged
RosaL
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13921

posted 15 March 2008 09:06 AM      Profile for RosaL     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Ibelongtonoone:
Cuban Players Fled Their Team for an Uncertain Future


Well, it's clear that they hope to become professional soccer players and acquire fame and fortune in large measure.

Why do you want to discuss this?


From: the underclass | Registered: Mar 2007  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 15 March 2008 09:13 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I think this is just wonderful. They are international heroes of the fight for democracy and freedom! They have fled from the land of the slaves to the home of the brave, without a single thought for personal wellbeing - with the spirit of self-sacrifice that reflects the very best that humanity has to offer!

Let me quote the inspiring words of one of the heroes:

quote:
“This could be our opportunity to make our dreams of becoming a professional soccer player come true,” he said Friday by telephone from West Palm Beach.

This shows, in clear-cut terms, the treacherous role that Cuba plays in the world today.

Poor wretches from the Americas and elsewhere, in need of free health care or medical education, are welcome in Cuba.

Budding athletes, looking to go pro and earn a fucking fortune, turn to the United $tate$ of America!

Hallelujah!


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 15 March 2008 09:26 AM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Unionist, that pretty much sums it up. Defectors my azzz.
From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Ibelongtonoone
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14539

posted 15 March 2008 10:28 AM      Profile for Ibelongtonoone        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
So if they wanted to move to paris and study painting, would that be different?

Because their passion is soccer and they dream of playing in a proffesional league, they are just greedy traitors?

I want to discuss it because, the idea of moving to a place where people can fufill there dreams, where ever for whatever seems natural for anybody but not Cubans.

If I wanted to be a concert pianist and had an opportunity to learn at a top school in the US, I would be a traitor to Canada?

The only reason they left the way they did is because they had no other option. I guess could have tried a homemade raft and risked dying but that's probably just as bad in yr eyes.


From: Canada | Registered: Sep 2007  |  IP: Logged
Ibelongtonoone
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14539

posted 15 March 2008 10:33 AM      Profile for Ibelongtonoone        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Btw - it's pretty digusting how you sit in a country with the option of trying to pursue any dream you want and condemn other for trying to have the abiliy to do the same?
From: Canada | Registered: Sep 2007  |  IP: Logged
RosaL
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13921

posted 15 March 2008 10:34 AM      Profile for RosaL     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
They are already superb soccer players. They left for fame and fortune. Building a just and compassionate society is more important than that. (It's also more important than being a good soccer player.)
From: the underclass | Registered: Mar 2007  |  IP: Logged
Proaxiom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6188

posted 15 March 2008 10:41 AM      Profile for Proaxiom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I have two questions out of this:

Is there any reason they couldn't form a professional soccer team in Havana other than the US embargo? If not, then you can hardly criticize Cuba for it.

And why would they need to defect in the first place? Is emigration from Cuba illegal?

Edited to add: It might be worthwhile to compare them to Canadian soccer players who emigrate because the standard of play here isn't high enough, particularly wrt both questions above.

[ 15 March 2008: Message edited by: Proaxiom ]


From: East of the Sun, West of the Moon | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
RosaL
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13921

posted 15 March 2008 10:42 AM      Profile for RosaL     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I have all kinds of "dreams" and not a hope in hell of fulfilling them.
Billions of people all over the world (including Canada and the US) can say the same - and worse.

(There's also the fact that our society specializes in the inculcation of some pretty stupid, antihuman dreams.)


From: the underclass | Registered: Mar 2007  |  IP: Logged
Ibelongtonoone
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14539

posted 15 March 2008 10:43 AM      Profile for Ibelongtonoone        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Nice evasion. Do you think Canadians playing soccer in Europe are greedy traitors or Russians playing hockey in North America or African musicians moving to Canada to play Jazz or whatever - yes they make more money but so what it's about opportunity and especially with athletes it's about playing with the best.

Should citizens from all countries be forced to stay in the country they happened to be born in or just Cubans?


From: Canada | Registered: Sep 2007  |  IP: Logged
RosaL
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13921

posted 15 March 2008 10:46 AM      Profile for RosaL     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Proaxiom:
I have two questions out of this:
Is there any reason they couldn't form a professional soccer team in Havana other than the US embargo? If not, then you can hardly criticize Cuba for it.

As far as I know, Cuba is opposed to the formation of professional sports teams. There are good arguments for this.


From: the underclass | Registered: Mar 2007  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 15 March 2008 10:47 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Ibelongtonoone:
Do you think Canadians playing soccer in Europe are greedy traitors or Russians playing hockey in North America or African musicians moving to Canada to play Jazz or whatever - yes they make more money but so what it's about opportunity and especially with athletes it's about playing with the best.

Oh, I agree. People should be free to make as much fucking money as they want, no matter what they have to abandon or betray in the process, no matter who they have to step on or lie or cheat or steal. If we can't even defend elementary individual human freedom like that, how can we call ourselves progressives? Eh? Hunh?

quote:
Should citizens from all countries be forced to stay in the country they happened to be born in or just Cubans?

Just Cubans. The rest should be allowed to flee.


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
RosaL
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13921

posted 15 March 2008 10:50 AM      Profile for RosaL     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Ibelongtonoone:

Should citizens from all countries be forced to stay in the country they happened to be born in or just Cubans?

If you live in a country that is under siege, that is trying to build a better and more human system, and if you desert that country to pursue personal wealth and some measure of fame, then, yes, you have betrayed something important.

Moving from one "everyone for themselves" society to another "everyone for themselves" society because you think you can do better for yourself in one society than in the other is a different matter.


From: the underclass | Registered: Mar 2007  |  IP: Logged
Ibelongtonoone
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14539

posted 15 March 2008 10:53 AM      Profile for Ibelongtonoone        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
So according to yr logic all Immigrants coming to Canada should be refused because they are just greedy bastards abandoning there home countries - looks you have more in common with conservatives than you'd like to imagine.

But that's not really what yr saying right - it's only bad when they leave socialist paradises for new opportunites elsewhere(maybe their mistake was staying in the US had they defected in say Spain you probably wouldn't care).


From: Canada | Registered: Sep 2007  |  IP: Logged
Proaxiom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6188

posted 15 March 2008 10:55 AM      Profile for Proaxiom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by RosaL:
If you live in a country that is under siege, that is trying to build a better and more human system, and if you desert that country to pursue personal wealth and some measure of fame, then, yes, you have betrayed something important.

It's a different question to ask whether it is right or wrong, and the ask whether it should be prohibited. The idea of preventing people from leaving a situation they don't like is not compatible with even a loose interpretation of human rights.

That said, I thought there was legal emigration from Cuba, which is why I wonder why it wouldn't be available to soccer players.


From: East of the Sun, West of the Moon | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Ibelongtonoone
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14539

posted 15 March 2008 10:57 AM      Profile for Ibelongtonoone        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Proaxim - people don't defect from countries they are allowed to leave -are you really that clueless?
From: Canada | Registered: Sep 2007  |  IP: Logged
Proaxiom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6188

posted 15 March 2008 10:58 AM      Profile for Proaxiom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by RosaL:

As far as I know, Cuba is opposed to the formation of professional sports teams. There are good arguments for this.


There are good reasons to ban lots of things people like to do. Alcohol, movies, television, pornography, smoking, lotteries, etc.


From: East of the Sun, West of the Moon | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Proaxiom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6188

posted 15 March 2008 11:01 AM      Profile for Proaxiom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Ibelongtonoone:
Proaxim - people don't defect from countries they are allowed to leave -are you really that clueless?

This is what I'm asking. Is there a blanket ban on emigration in Cuba? I thought there wasn't.


From: East of the Sun, West of the Moon | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
RosaL
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13921

posted 15 March 2008 11:03 AM      Profile for RosaL     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Ibelongtonoone:

But that's not really what yr saying right - it's only bad when they leave socialist paradises for new opportunites elsewhere(maybe their mistake was staying in the US had they defected in say Spain you probably wouldn't care).

Well, to repeat myself, yes, it's bad when you leave a country that is trying to build a just and human alternative to something unjust and inhumane because you think that the inhumane alternative - regardless of what it does to other people - will give you a lot of money and attention.

I said nothing about socialist paradises. And there are important difference between the Cuban vision and the social democratic vision of the Socialist Party of Spain.


From: the underclass | Registered: Mar 2007  |  IP: Logged
RosaL
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13921

posted 15 March 2008 11:09 AM      Profile for RosaL     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Proaxiom:

There are good reasons to ban lots of things people like to do. Alcohol, movies, television, pornography, smoking, lotteries, etc.


slavery, capitalism, murder, theft, vandalism, racism, ....

Agreed. We can't ban every destructive thing but we need to ban some destructive things.

[ 15 March 2008: Message edited by: RosaL ]


From: the underclass | Registered: Mar 2007  |  IP: Logged
Ibelongtonoone
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14539

posted 15 March 2008 11:10 AM      Profile for Ibelongtonoone        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I should mention I feel for their teammates who they did leave in situation making it difficult for them to compete in the tournament but I think they are wishing them luck and wishing they could do the same.

Proaxim - in the article you'll notice it mentions guards, who were absent when they escaped.

It no different from the athletes who defected from East Germany or the USSR back in the 80's


From: Canada | Registered: Sep 2007  |  IP: Logged
RosaL
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13921

posted 15 March 2008 11:15 AM      Profile for RosaL     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Ibelongtonoone:

Proaxim - in the article you'll notice it mentions guards, who were absent when they escaped.

No, the article said they weren't accompanied by guards.


From: the underclass | Registered: Mar 2007  |  IP: Logged
Ibelongtonoone
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14539

posted 15 March 2008 11:18 AM      Profile for Ibelongtonoone        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Exactly - I said they were absent.

"Surprisingly, Prieto and Bermúdez said, there were no Cuban security guards accompanying the team, as there had been on trips to Colombia, Haiti and the Dominican Republic"


From: Canada | Registered: Sep 2007  |  IP: Logged
RosaL
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13921

posted 15 March 2008 11:26 AM      Profile for RosaL     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Ibelongtonoone:
Exactly - I said they were absent.

"Surprisingly, Prieto and Bermúdez said, there were no Cuban security guards accompanying the team, as there had been on trips to Colombia, Haiti and the Dominican Republic"


Yes, I read that. This is what you said:

quote:
... it mentions guards, who were absent when they escaped

There weren't some guards who were absent during the interval of their "escape". There were no guards at all. If we agree that's what the NYT says, fine. Let it go.


From: the underclass | Registered: Mar 2007  |  IP: Logged
Ibelongtonoone
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14539

posted 15 March 2008 11:36 AM      Profile for Ibelongtonoone        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
If people can'tchooseto take part in the revolution to build a better country or choose to sit out or go elsewhere than the revolution is not the peoples, it's immposed from above.

... and saying it's for your own good you simpletons, just do what we say - doesn't excuse it.


From: Canada | Registered: Sep 2007  |  IP: Logged
RosaL
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13921

posted 15 March 2008 11:39 AM      Profile for RosaL     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Ibelongtonoone:
If people can'tchooseto take part in the revolution to build a better country or choose to sit out or go elsewhere than the revolution is not the peoples, it's immposed from above.

... and saying it's for your own good you simpletons, just do what we say - doesn't excuse it.


Or imposed by the majority? (Does that sound familiar in any way?)

That said, I don't know that it makes any sense to compel participation. On the other hand, you might want to prevent people from leaving, if they are going to strengthen the forces that oppose you. But in this case, I think the former consideration outweighs the latter by quite a bit!

[ 15 March 2008: Message edited by: RosaL ]


From: the underclass | Registered: Mar 2007  |  IP: Logged
Ibelongtonoone
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14539

posted 15 March 2008 11:39 AM      Profile for Ibelongtonoone        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Rosal - I thought absent and not there meant the same thing, so we did agree.


From: Canada | Registered: Sep 2007  |  IP: Logged
RosaL
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13921

posted 15 March 2008 11:40 AM      Profile for RosaL     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Ibelongtonoone:
Rosal - I thought absent and not there meant the same thing, so we did agree.


Yeah. I think we just gave different nuances to "absent". At least we agree on one thing, eh?

[ 15 March 2008: Message edited by: RosaL ]


From: the underclass | Registered: Mar 2007  |  IP: Logged
M. Spector
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8273

posted 15 March 2008 08:59 PM      Profile for M. Spector   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It's the USA, not Cuba, that poses the biggest obstacle to legal emigration from Cuba.

It's almost impossible for Cubans to get an immigration visa from the US government, but Washington has made it known that any Cuban who illegally sets foot on a U.S. beach will be welcome. The 1966 Cuban Adjustment Act* grants special immigration privileges to any immigrant from Cuba. Among other things, it says that Cuban immigrants who arrive at "other than designated ports of entry," with or without legal documentation, are guaranteed permanent residency.

As a result, illegal and hazardous methods of travel to US shores are encouraged, and at the same time Washington manages to create the false impression that the use of these illegal and hazardous measures is necessitated by the Cuban government, which is a lie.

The Cuban government says Cubans who want to leave can leave, but it must be by safe and legal means (not by boats or rafts, but by airplane flight), provided they are guaranteed legal entry to another country, including the US.
----

* This law legalized the status of all those who had illegally migrated since 1959, giving them US residency and the authorization to work. No other group has ever been given this special treatment, nor was it ever given to the thousands of Cubans who had immigrated before the 1959 revolution. The US is the only country in the world with two immigration laws: one for all other nationalities and one exclusively for Cubans.

[ 15 March 2008: Message edited by: M. Spector ]


From: One millihelen: The amount of beauty required to launch one ship. | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
RosaL
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13921

posted 15 March 2008 09:09 PM      Profile for RosaL     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
On "socialist paradises":
quote:
Cuba is neither a heaven nor a hell. So let's say it's purgatory, where they say people go; and from where, with a little patience and the help of a few prayers and whatever else can be done for the poor souls in purgatory, they can move on to heaven. They say there is a way out of purgatory, but there's never a way out of hell. If we are in purgatory, we are not going back to hell. At least we have escaped Satan, and are patiently waiting for the moment of reaching heaven.

Fidel Castro, Cuba at the Crossroads. Melbourne: Ocean Press, 1996. p. 90.


From: the underclass | Registered: Mar 2007  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 15 March 2008 09:19 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I don't see many aspiring pro athletes being welcomed with open arms in U.S. from such bastions of democracy as Haiti, Guatemala, Honduras, or El Salvador. What about their dreams to escape the clutches of third world capitalism? And those wonderful bastions of freedom are only a few day's drive from president Dubya's home state of Texas, too.
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
Proaxiom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6188

posted 16 March 2008 06:13 AM      Profile for Proaxiom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by M. Spector:
It's the USA, not Cuba, that poses the biggest obstacle to legal emigration from Cuba.

Thanks for the info, M. Spector.

I just did some digging to try to get a better handle on the relevant laws, and found the Wet Feet Dry Feet Policy (info from that page has to be taken with skepticism, since it has few citations and it's on a political issue).

It does appear there are a number of legal methods for Cubans to migrate to the US, agreed upon by both governments in 1994. Anyone who meets US immigration qualifications can go, and also there is a 'lottery' among other applicants, but these are effectively immigration limits set by the US.

Based on this, it would seem the soccer players are effectively queue jumpers. It seems strange that they wouldn't have met immigration requirements, though.


From: East of the Sun, West of the Moon | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 16 March 2008 07:03 AM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
That was a good post from M. Spector. I think it's actually easier for Cubans to get into the U.S. than Haitians and other Latin Americans for strange reasons. Some have said it is easier for poorer unskilled Cubans to obtain a travel permit than it is for highly educated and skilled Cubans. The problem with travelling abroad, as it is for anybody else in the world without the means, is money for airfare. I've met Canadians who have never been outside their province let alone another country. In the U.S., a lack of means prevents tens of millions of Americans from travelling abroad. Some 90 percent of Americans are not passport holders.

And oddly enough, Cuba is the only country in the world with political representation in American government. Cuba has been the object of Uncle Sam's disaffection even before 1959. They want to make Cuba a pleasure resort island for the rich. The CIA and Colombian mafia have wanted Cuba and Haiti to be waypoints for running drugs to the mainland. And this covert agenda has nothing to do with freedom or democracy.


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca