Author
|
Topic: Australia: the struggle for equal marriage
|
|
|
|
|
Hephaestion
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4795
|
posted 24 December 2005 12:55 PM
Australian PM faces party backlash over anti-gay marriage stand
quote: Australian Prime Minister John Howard is facing a revolt within his Liberal Party a day after declaring he would never permit passage of legislation allowing same-sex marriage or civil unions.
[...]
The party revolt is led by Liberal backbencher Warren Entsch and nearly a dozen other MPs.
Entsch, who tangled with Howard over last year's bill to ban gay marriage, said Friday that the group is lobbying senior cabinet ministers.
"I am fiercely heterosexual ... but having said that I have some dear (homosexual) friends that have been in relationships a lot longer than I have and are unconditionally committed and I would be a hypocrite if I said those people have less of an entitlement than I would," Entsch told the Morning Herald.
Judi Moylan, another Liberal member said that Howard's stand is putting Australia out of step with the rest of the world, adding that the Government will have to address the issue in the new year.
"It's a matter of fair and equitable treatment of people," she said. "I think a civil union is preferable, and I think it's good for people to make a commitment to the relationship."
But Howard got support from the opposition Labor Party. Leader Kim Beazley said Labor was opposed to gay and lesbian marriage, but suggested the party might support civil unions.
1. Just what does "fiercely heterosexual" mean? Does he growl and bite?! Obviously it's a not-so-subtle way of saying "Hey, I ain't no fag..." I wonder if he'd been speaking up for Aboriginals if he would have described himself as "fiercely caucasian"?!
2. Jeeez, it's sure nice to see that the Australian Labour Party can set partisan differences aside when it comes to keeping the "poofters" down... bastards! [ 24 December 2005: Message edited by: Hephaestion ]
From: goodbye... :-( | Registered: Dec 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
Reality. Bites.
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6718
|
posted 24 December 2005 01:07 PM
quote: Originally posted by Hephaestion: *tsk* Fixed it...
Now how about the title? "Legal loophole may allow marriage in Oz after all." Whatever they have in Australia now certainly can't be called marriage. They may think it's marriage, and we can't stop them from calling it marriage, but it clearly isn't marriage by any rational, logical or legal definition.
From: Gone for good | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crippled_Newsie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7024
|
posted 15 January 2006 07:56 AM
quote: Originally posted by Hephaestion: The government has instructed its embassies in Canada and in Europe to refuse to provide certificates to people they believe are gay stating that the individuals are single. [Emphasis mine.]
Ah, no worries then. As soon as the first straight person is slightly inconvenienced, they'll call the whole thing off, eh? Homophobes just hate it when their persecution of gays actually affects 'real people.' [ 15 January 2006: Message edited by: Tape_342 ]
From: It's all about the thumpa thumpa. | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
eau
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10058
|
posted 26 February 2006 04:52 PM
With God on your side..Australian style..Australian politician Peter Costello speaks.Rejuvenating Christian foundations should help stop moral decay By Peter Costello - posted Wednesday, 9 June 2004 When Jesus told his disciples that they would be witnesses in Jerusalem, Judea, Samaria and the uttermost part of the earth, the known world consisted of the Roman Empire - the Mediterranean and surrounds.
No one in the Roman world, no one in the Jewish world, knew of Australia. From the then known world of the Mediterranean, Australia was beyond even the uttermost parts of the earth. And yet the teaching of Jesus came to Australia. It took nearly 18 centuries. And we can pinpoint quite accurately the first time a Christian service was held on Australian soil. The sermon was preached by the Rev. Richard Johnson, Chaplain of the First Fleet. It was preached on Sunday 3 February 1778 under a large tree in Sydney. http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=2273 Mr Costellos moral highground...like the Bush moral highground..Its always men who seem to set this particular agenda. [ 26 February 2006: Message edited by: eau ]
From: BC | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Hephaestion
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4795
|
posted 15 March 2006 05:05 AM
Gay legislator proposes Private Members Bill to allow civil unions
quote: If Andrew Olexander has his way gay and lesbian couples in Victoria state would be able to exchange vows within a year.
The Member of the state Parliament is preparing a bill to allow civil unions for same-sex couples, allowing them many of the rights and obligations of marriage.
Olexander, who is gay, sits as an independent after leaving the Liberal Party. He has written to all state lawmakers seeking their support for the measure and says that he has gotten enough positive response to believe the bill would pass if it came to a vote.
Olexander said that he has asked Premier Steve Bracks to allow the parliamentary counsel to draft the bill. So far Bracks has not said if he would support the legislation.
[...]
Olexander also noted in the letter that it has been seven years since Attorney-General Rob Hulls promised to refer the matter of civil unions to the Victorian Law Reform Commission.
[...]
As an independent MP Olexander does not need the permission of either major party to introduce a private member's bill.
He said that if Bracks refuses to allow the parliamentary counsel to draft the legislation he would use outside counsel.
Even if the bill were to pass it would not include any of the federal rights of marriage.
Okay, so it's a Private Member's Bill, and it has bugger-all chances of success. And it lacks any real teeth. And it's still only second-best. But it's another push in the ongoing struggle, and every little push forward advances us a little. And even if it doesn't in the short term, it's an indication that we won't ever give up. Ever. Filthy dirtbags like John Howard will lose in the end, and their names will be remembered with the same mixture of embarrassment and disgust as "Bull" Connors' is, or Pik Botha's.
Our people will overcome these dinosaurs, and our pioneering activists will be remembered and honoured, along with "righteous straights" (to borrow a phrase from the Jews) who aided us in our struggles. But we won't be beaten, and we won't quit. And we won't be satisfied with anything less than full equality.
You'd think it would embarrass these "he-men" that they are so frightened by a bunch of 'pansies'... What's funny is that in actual fact, we are tougher than them, a *lot* tougher. And we're gonna win.
From: goodbye... :-( | Registered: Dec 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hephaestion
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4795
|
posted 01 April 2006 07:08 PM
Major inquiry launched into Australian gov't homophobia quote: Australia's Human Rights Commission is beginning a nine-month inquiry into homophobia and will examine federal, state and territorial laws that discriminated against gays, lesbians and transsexuals.The inquiry will be co-chaired by the federal Human Rights Commissioner, Graeme Innes, and its president, John von Doussa. They will hold hearings across the country and are encouraging gays to come forward to tell their experiences. The probe will include workplace harassment, bias in housing, and laws that discriminate against same-sex couples. Innes and Doussa will deliver a final report on their findings to federal Attorney-General, Philip Ruddock before the end of the year.
From: goodbye... :-( | Registered: Dec 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|