Author
|
Topic: Iraniam woman to be stoned to death this week
|
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138
|
posted 21 June 2007 09:25 PM
I wonder if the UN could send in a task force to rescue this poor woman before these barbarians stone her to death.IRAN: WOMAN 'TO BE STONED' ON THURSDAY Tehran, 20 June (AKI) - Makrameh Ebrahimi on Thursday will be stoned to death in a square in front of the cemetery of Takestan, in Ghazvin province some 100 km from Tehran, for having had a child out of wedlock 11 years ago, women's rights groups in Iran said. The Islamic Republic denies issuing stoning death sentences and carrying them out. Thursday's is the first death sentence by stoning to be publicly announced and rights groups say the population has been invited to participate and throw stones. It is reportedly unclear how many stoning sentences have been issued and carried out in Iran since reports of a moratorium by the judiciary emerged in 2002. The Iranian criminal code states that when stoning is carried out for offences such as adultery the stones should not be too large because "the punishment of stoning is designed to cause the victim great pain before death". In Iran, the convicted person to be killed is wrapped in a sheet and partly buried. Male convicts are buried from the waist down, while women are buried deeper to prevent the breasts from becoming exposed. Iran is second in a global ranking of countries with the highest number of executions per year after China.
From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
trippie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12090
|
posted 21 June 2007 10:18 PM
thank god for all the interferience from the west in middle east politics...Just think how much better things would be if capitalism did not breed so much reactionary outlooks on life... this religious backwardness is a direct result of peoples confusion ... Sending in the UN would be useless... The UN is nothing other then a tool created by the major capitalist countries that helps sustain capitalism... It promotes a somewhat reformist attitude to world affairs....
From: essex county | Registered: Feb 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Steppenwolf Allende
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13076
|
posted 22 June 2007 07:54 AM
She has a child out of wedlock, and their solution is to kill her—in a slow and brutal way to boot.Now, the question I have is how exactly does this type of monstrous "holy" act right out of the feudal Dark Ages differ from the murderous and torturous satanic cult rituals that go on out there? Here's Amnesty International with a run-down on Iran. In addition to being in the top three for overall executions, the Iranian ruling corporate fascistic regime/religious-theocratic elite is the leader specifically in child executions and brutal murder-by-torture, like stoning--and not for violent crime either. In a way, these murderous morons are their own worst enemy, as this just adds more credibility to the equally murderous agenda of those rulers in the West who want to bomb/invade the country. Of course, in such an event, it won't be the ruling elite who suffers, but the working class people who have to always get stuck dealing with the fall-out. Quite often brutality does walk hand in hand with stupidity. I wonder if the UN will actually appeal to the regime to stay this execution.
From: goes far, flies near, to the stars away from here | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
bohajal
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11492
|
posted 22 June 2007 08:26 AM
Stockholm,Do you have a link to this news article? I just wonder if this is from the same source that said Iran was about to make Iranian Jews wear a distinctive garb (and possibly a yellow star of David on their arm sleenes).
From: planet earth, I believe | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140
|
posted 22 June 2007 08:31 AM
quote: Michelle:Are Iranian feminists calling for the UN to bring forth a military force to liberate them?
I was under the distinct impression that all those NATO troops, including thousands of Canadian troops, once they finish "liberating" Afghan women and bringing "freedom" to Afghanistan will be available to "liberate" Iranian women next door by carpet bombing their country and indiscriminately killing civilians as well. No word yet on whether some offspring of the Shah will be available to "invite" the NATO troops to Iran. Re: the stoning ....
quote: The Islamic Republic denies issuing stoning death sentences and carrying them out. Thursday's is the first death sentence by stoning to be publicly announced and rights groups say the population has been invited to participate and throw stones.It is reportedly unclear how many stoning sentences have been issued and carried out in Iran since reports of a moratorium by the judiciary emerged in 2002.
Most of the online information note the high number of executions in Iran, right up there with the US but not as high as China; however it's clear that death by stoning is a rarity. The quote is from an Italian/English/Arabic business website "adn kronos international". It does not identify who funds the website or the source of information about the stoning other than unspecified women's rights groups. [ 22 June 2007: Message edited by: N.Beltov ]
From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140
|
posted 22 June 2007 09:45 AM
Meh. Since Stockholm dragged in Hamas here, and is a supporter of the "moderate" Fatah over Hamas, maybe he can tell us all about the recently exposed Fatah torture chamber, funded by Israel of course, where Hamas members would often simply "disappear" from.A visit to the Fatah torture chamber. It's good to see that Fatah was making such good use of the generous funds from the US, Canada, and Israel. That's much better than the gold plated bathroom fixtures pointed out by Robert Fisk. [ 22 June 2007: Message edited by: N.Beltov ]
From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289
|
posted 22 June 2007 09:55 AM
Really what is the point of this thread? Why are you beating and anti-Iran drum stockholm? Really, I find it disturbingly ugly hate mongering, of the type that does not belong here and which one would find elsewhere on line, in other forums controlled by the right wing whack jobs. Yes, stoning to death is reprehensible, but so is any other form of execution or wars that kill innocents.
From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140
|
posted 22 June 2007 10:05 AM
quote: remind: Really what is the point of this thread?
Starting a thread by proposing the invasion of a sovereign state over a single, horrific execution isn't all that different from supporting another state in carrying out ethnic cleansing and justifying it by reference to other, no less horrific but trivial in comparison, rocket and suicide attacks, etc. It's just more of the same on a larger scale. Clearly, Stockholm supports the "War on Terror" and the foreign policies of US imperialism in general. However, such views are welcome on babble because we have no anti-imperialist guidelines like the ones we have for racist, misogynist, homophobic or poor-bashing vomit. Stockholm will continue to spout this crap because he can. [ 22 June 2007: Message edited by: N.Beltov ]
From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138
|
posted 22 June 2007 10:11 AM
What's wrong with publicizing the horrific atrocities that occur in Iran? This is supposed to be a leftwing progressive board and EVERYTHING that the Government of Iran represents is anathema to anything progressive. That is, unless you can find some weird way of finding some leftwing justification for a a 13th century theocracy that brutally executes people on the slightest pretext and where domestic economic policies have no trace whatsoever of socialism. I would have thought that it was a "no brainer" that if you are "progressive" you condemn women getting stoned to death for getting pregnant outside of wedlock. Instead people react as if I shouldn't be "embarrasing" Iran by exposing the horrors that occur there. If the Government wants to stop being embarrassed in the eyes of progressive, humane people the world over, there is a simple way to so. STOP THESE ATROCITIES IMMEDIATELY. I know some people get into this "the enemy of my enemy is my friend", ergo since the US is at odds with Iran, we are supposed to contort ourselves in seeing something progressive about the Iranian government. Good luck.
From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
Steppenwolf Allende
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13076
|
posted 22 June 2007 10:13 AM
quote: Are Iranian feminists calling for the UN to bring forth a military force to liberate them?
Oh great! Talk about putting out fire with gasoline! The feminists call for military intervention is exactly the excuse guess-who would need to send in the air force and start carpet-bombing. Then comes the invasion and occupation. Then comes the parceling out of assets to corporations and bureaucracies because at least they don't stone people for getting pregnant, etc. Where have I seen this scenario before?
From: goes far, flies near, to the stars away from here | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
bohajal
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11492
|
posted 22 June 2007 10:16 AM
I wonder whether Stockholm's 'concern' about women in Muslim and Arab countries is sincere or is he using the topic as one of his "talking-points" that he almost never fails to raise.Is Stockholm a pro-feminist? Sincere in his concern about the status of women? Pro-feminists and people concerned about the status of women do not use sexist language and do not refer to women as "bitches": quote: Then 80% of CPC members would be saddled with a leader who is a rich-bitch from Toronto who wears lots of jewellery, hobnobs with the likes of Bill Clinton at Gstaad and supports gay marriage! -Stockholm, posted 20 January 2004 04:24 PM
ETA: "And supports gay marriage", said Stockholm. Horror of horrors !! N'est-ce-pas, Stockholm the "progressive" ? --.
[ 22 June 2007: Message edited by: bohajal ]
From: planet earth, I believe | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138
|
posted 22 June 2007 10:28 AM
I agree. I don't think that Iran should be invaded. But I would like to see a commando mission to rescue all the women that are on death's row in Iran as a result of barbarous death sentences for getting pregnant out of wedlock.If any women are under death sentence in Saudi Arabia, then there ought to be a commando mission launched to free them as well before they get beheaded in a public execution. I also believe that any Iranian woman should be given automatic refugee status in Canada since it is clear that just being a woman in Iran means a life of oppression.
From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
bohajal
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11492
|
posted 22 June 2007 10:32 AM
Do you still call women "bitches", Stockholm ?And why is support of gay marriage a negative thing ? .-
[ 22 June 2007: Message edited by: bohajal ]
From: planet earth, I believe | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138
|
posted 22 June 2007 10:39 AM
Since you have purposely tried to distort what I wrote by taking it completely out of context - let me explain:I (of course) am 100% supportive of gay marriage (are you???). I was writing about how Belinda Stronach would likely be regarded by the rank and file members of the Conservative Party, if she had ever become leader of that party. Given that CPC members are largely former Reform Party/Canadian Alliance members and those people are known to have very retrograde views on social issues and probably hate Bill Clinton and "uppity women" in about equal measure - I think it is safe to say that a very large segment of the CPC membership would have freaked out if Stronach had become their leader - they might have even had to recreate the Reform party the very next morning. What all this has to do with Iran stoning women to death is a mystery to me.
From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
bohajal
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11492
|
posted 22 June 2007 10:39 AM
Stockholm,Do you also agree that a commando should go rescue Palestinian children from Israel's barbarity. Here is the picture of Mohamed Dora. http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2001/527/dora.jpg Is this concern about women new to you who calls them "bitches" or a mere "talking point". Do you still see gay marriage as a no no ?
From: planet earth, I believe | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
quelar
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2739
|
posted 22 June 2007 10:42 AM
You have to give him credit though, Stockholm IS right, the stoning of Women, the punishment of Gays, the religious persecutions, arrests of media persons etc. Iran should be sanctioned for this and pressure should be put on them to abolish the death penalty.However, calling for an invasion of the country is stupid for sure. Just a side note on some earlier comments...since Israel created Hamas, should the deaths Hamas are responsible for be attributed to Israel?
From: In Dig Nation | Registered: Jun 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138
|
posted 22 June 2007 10:42 AM
quote: Is this concern about women new to you who calls them "bitches" or a mere "talking point".Do you still see gay marriage as a no no ?
when did you stop beating your wife???
From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323
|
posted 22 June 2007 10:42 AM
quote: Originally posted by Stockholm: I was writing about how Belinda Stronach would likely be regarded by the rank and file members of the Conservative Party ...What all this has to do with Iran stoning women to death is a mystery to me.
I thought you meant Mulroney. My apologies. But when did Ahmedinejad torture Stronach? Do you have a link for that? I can't believe I missed that story.
From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Steppenwolf Allende
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13076
|
posted 22 June 2007 11:06 AM
quote: It just happens that, IMHO, presently "ground zero" in the global battle to give women and sexual minorities equal rights consists of Iran, Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan.
And that happens how? The US & Co. bombing the shit out of them, destroying their infrastructure, over-running them with tanks and troops, setting up bogus "elected" puppet regimes and looting whatever public assets they have and turning them over to mega-corporations with ties to the various governments involved--all while maintaining the less gender-specific forms of oppression like union-busting, no free press or independent judiciary, martial law conditions, etc. Doesn’t seem to have worked anywhere else so far.
From: goes far, flies near, to the stars away from here | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140
|
posted 22 June 2007 11:06 AM
quote: Stockholm: It worked well in Entebbe in 1976 - are you still smarting over that one?
A new low, even for you. That raid killed a number of the hostages, many Ugandan soldiers having nothing to do with the hijacking (sentries, etc.), and at least one of the Israeli soldiers. So you seen to be in favour of state terrorism, violations of sovereignty, etc. I don't see why non-state terrorism should be so objectionable to you or even why you'd make such a big deal about a single execution when 45 dead Ugandan soldiers, 3 dead hostages, and 1 dead Israeli soldier "worked so well" in Uganda. What hypocrisy.
From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
Steppenwolf Allende
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13076
|
posted 22 June 2007 11:21 AM
quote: Originally posted by Stockholm: It just happens that, IMHO, presently "ground zero" in the global battle to....
WOW!!! Stockholm fights oppression!! Hit em one more time for freedom, Stocko!! After all, it worked in Japan, didn't it?
[ 22 June 2007: Message edited by: Steppenwolf Allende ]
From: goes far, flies near, to the stars away from here | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138
|
posted 22 June 2007 11:27 AM
quote: A new low, even for you. That raid killed a number of the hostages, many Ugandan soldiers having nothing to do with the hijacking (sentries, etc.), and at least one of the Israeli soldiers.So you seen to be in favour of state terrorism, violations of sovereignty, etc. I don't see why non-state terrorism should be so objectionable to you or even why you'd make such a big deal about a single execution when 45 dead Ugandan soldiers, 3 dead hostages, and 1 dead Israeli soldier "worked so well" in Uganda.
I guess you must think it was such a damn shame that Idi Amin didn't get to butcher all the hostages in that hijacking as I'm sure he was looking forward to doing. Now, I've heard everything - like we're supposed to feel sorry for the Baader-Meinhof gang and for Idi Amin because Israel foiled their hijacking to be followed by mass murder.
From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560
|
posted 22 June 2007 11:31 AM
quote: Originally posted by bohajal: Stockholm,Do you also agree that a commando should go rescue Palestinian children from Israel's barbarity. Here is the picture of Mohamed Dora. http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2001/527/dora.jpg Is this concern about women new to you who calls them "bitches" or a mere "talking point". Do you still see gay marriage as a no no ?
bohojal, this is off topic. If you want to complain about something Stockholm has written, do it in the thread where he wrote it. Don't drag it around the rest of the forum.
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560
|
posted 22 June 2007 11:33 AM
P.S. N.Beltov and Stockholm are also out of line with posts like this: quote: So you seen to be in favour of state terrorism, violations of sovereignty, etc.
quote: I guess you must think it was such a damn shame that Idi Amin didn't get to butcher all the hostages in that hijacking as I'm sure he was looking forward to doing.
If this thread doesn't become more civil, I'm closing it.
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140
|
posted 22 June 2007 11:37 AM
You're simply an apologist for US imperialism and continuing Israeli atrocities, Stockholm. One dead Iranian is really irrelevant next to justifications for endless killing across the globe. So, how many dead commandos and Iranians would be OK for you to save the one prospective victim of stoning? You do remember why you started this thread, don't you? Supplemental: I don't really have any objection to closing the thread, Michelle. I've tried to disentangle some of Stockholm's convoluted arguments, distractions, and so on, but we always seem to come back to a kind of calculus of atrocities in which certain lives are more valued than others, certain governments can do no wrong, and other regimes are simply a checklist of prospective targets. Stockholm, just like the US (and Canadian) imperialist regime, seems to look at the world through a bomb sight. [ 22 June 2007: Message edited by: N.Beltov ]
From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
Steppenwolf Allende
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13076
|
posted 22 June 2007 11:42 AM
quote: Actually, the real shame in that part of the world is that the one Arab leader who actually had even remotely progressive attitudes towards women was...Saddam Hussein.
Sure, Stock. And we all know what a great guy he was. quote: In retrospect, the western world should have embraced a secular leader like Saddam and encouraged the overthrow of the Saudi government and hope for it to be replaced by a secular government that would be to Mecca like what Italy is to the Vatican.
Ah, that would have been so sweet. The fact is if you know anything at all you know that those regimes were either put into power or backed up by the US/Corporate America machine to keep down their people and keep the oil flowing. The only reason why Hussein went from being good guy to bad guy was because he stepped out of line and invaded Kuwait--another US-backed totalitarian regime that brutally suppresses freedoms and treats women like shit. If you want to believe that the same situation that's happened in Afghanistan or Iraq--with ex-Taliban leaders and drug lord cutting their own deals with the military in order to stay in power as part of that new fraudulently "elected" autocratic regime that has done practically zip for democracy--won't happen in Iran if the US does invade, well, that's your choice. But you will forgive some of the rest of us for not being quite so naive.
From: goes far, flies near, to the stars away from here | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
contrarianna
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13058
|
posted 22 June 2007 11:59 AM
quote: Originally posted by Stockholm: I've been concerned about the status of women and of all sexual minorities for my entire adult life.It just happens that, IMHO, presently "ground zero" in the global battle to give women and sexual minorities equal rights consists of Iran, Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan.
And you do that by... supporting the US and it's funding of the Al Qeada-linked Jundullah (Army of God) terroism and other destabilizing black ops in Iran. What a wonderful way to give women and moderate voices an upper hand in Iran, but not quite as good as bombing the **** out of 'em eh--your concern is unmistakable. Black ops/Jundullah
From: here to inanity | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
bohajal
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11492
|
posted 22 June 2007 12:00 PM
It worked well in Entebbe in 1976 - are you still smarting over that one? I cannot believe you are gloating about violence, destruction, killing and maiming. Stockholm: When I read the website of an anti-semite fellow from my native-country in which he was expressing some sort of satisfaction about "Nazis putting Jews in ovens", I caused that and two other successive sites of his. I also wrote to Ed Morgan (then CJC Director for the Quebec Region), to the embassy of my native-country (gave them his name and city of residence in that country) and to the Ministry of the Interior (public security). When he got "home" for vacation, he was met at the airport and handcuffed. He was monster. So are you, Stockholm ! They come from both sides for sure !
From: planet earth, I believe | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
bohajal
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11492
|
posted 22 June 2007 12:08 PM
quote: Originally posted by Michelle:bohojal, this is off topic. If you want to complain about something Stockholm has written, do it in the thread where he wrote it. Don't drag it around the rest of the forum.
I brought it only as a reference to support my statement. But next time I will just provide the link.
From: planet earth, I believe | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|