babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics

Topic Closed  Topic Closed


Post New Topic  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Iraniam woman to be stoned to death this week

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Iraniam woman to be stoned to death this week
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138

posted 21 June 2007 09:25 PM      Profile for Stockholm     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
I wonder if the UN could send in a task force to rescue this poor woman before these barbarians stone her to death.

IRAN: WOMAN 'TO BE STONED' ON THURSDAY

Tehran, 20 June (AKI) - Makrameh Ebrahimi on Thursday will be stoned to death in a square in front of the cemetery of Takestan, in Ghazvin province some 100 km from Tehran, for having had a child out of wedlock 11 years ago, women's rights groups in Iran said. The Islamic Republic denies issuing stoning death sentences and carrying them out. Thursday's is the first death sentence by stoning to be publicly announced and rights groups say the population has been invited to participate and throw stones.

It is reportedly unclear how many stoning sentences have been issued and carried out in Iran since reports of a moratorium by the judiciary emerged in 2002.

The Iranian criminal code states that when stoning is carried out for offences such as adultery the stones should not be too large because "the punishment of stoning is designed to cause the victim great pain before death".

In Iran, the convicted person to be killed is wrapped in a sheet and partly buried. Male convicts are buried from the waist down, while women are buried deeper to prevent the breasts from becoming exposed.

Iran is second in a global ranking of countries with the highest number of executions per year after China.


From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
trippie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12090

posted 21 June 2007 10:18 PM      Profile for trippie        Edit/Delete Post
thank god for all the interferience from the west in middle east politics...

Just think how much better things would be if capitalism did not breed so much reactionary outlooks on life...

this religious backwardness is a direct result of peoples confusion ... Sending in the UN would be useless...

The UN is nothing other then a tool created by the major capitalist countries that helps sustain capitalism... It promotes a somewhat reformist attitude to world affairs....


From: essex county | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138

posted 22 June 2007 05:56 AM      Profile for Stockholm     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
In Iran, they seem to have the WORST of both worlds. They have a totally capitalist economy and political system, and there is no "left" to speak of, PLUS they have cruel religious fanatics exercising totalitarian rule.
From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
tzarina
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14098

posted 22 June 2007 06:12 AM      Profile for tzarina     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Religion is worst political ideology possible. No debate, just faith based acceptance.
From: Sarnia | Registered: Apr 2007  |  IP: Logged
Steppenwolf Allende
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13076

posted 22 June 2007 07:54 AM      Profile for Steppenwolf Allende     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
She has a child out of wedlock, and their solution is to kill her—in a slow and brutal way to boot.

Now, the question I have is how exactly does this type of monstrous "holy" act right out of the feudal Dark Ages differ from the murderous and torturous satanic cult rituals that go on out there?

Here's Amnesty International with a run-down on Iran.

In addition to being in the top three for overall executions, the Iranian ruling corporate fascistic regime/religious-theocratic elite is the leader specifically in child executions and brutal murder-by-torture, like stoning--and not for violent crime either.

In a way, these murderous morons are their own worst enemy, as this just adds more credibility to the equally murderous agenda of those rulers in the West who want to bomb/invade the country. Of course, in such an event, it won't be the ruling elite who suffers, but the working class people who have to always get stuck dealing with the fall-out.

Quite often brutality does walk hand in hand with stupidity.

I wonder if the UN will actually appeal to the regime to stay this execution.


From: goes far, flies near, to the stars away from here | Registered: Aug 2006  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 22 June 2007 08:18 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Are Iranian feminists calling for the UN to bring forth a military force to liberate them?
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
bohajal
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11492

posted 22 June 2007 08:26 AM      Profile for bohajal   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post
Stockholm,

Do you have a link to this news article?

I just wonder if this is from the same source that said Iran was about to make Iranian Jews wear a distinctive garb (and possibly a yellow star of David on their arm sleenes).


From: planet earth, I believe | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 22 June 2007 08:31 AM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Michelle:Are Iranian feminists calling for the UN to bring forth a military force to liberate them?

I was under the distinct impression that all those NATO troops, including thousands of Canadian troops, once they finish "liberating" Afghan women and bringing "freedom" to Afghanistan will be available to "liberate" Iranian women next door by carpet bombing their country and indiscriminately killing civilians as well.

No word yet on whether some offspring of the Shah will be available to "invite" the NATO troops to Iran.


Re: the stoning ....

quote:
The Islamic Republic denies issuing stoning death sentences and carrying them out. Thursday's is the first death sentence by stoning to be publicly announced and rights groups say the population has been invited to participate and throw stones.

It is reportedly unclear how many stoning sentences have been issued and carried out in Iran since reports of a moratorium by the judiciary emerged in 2002.


Most of the online information note the high number of executions in Iran, right up there with the US but not as high as China; however it's clear that death by stoning is a rarity.

The quote is from an Italian/English/Arabic business website "adn kronos international". It does not identify who funds the website or the source of information about the stoning other than unspecified women's rights groups.

[ 22 June 2007: Message edited by: N.Beltov ]


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
bohajal
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11492

posted 22 June 2007 09:05 AM      Profile for bohajal   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post
All of a sudden Iran halted the execution because of Western countries' protests.

Sure, Sure!


From: planet earth, I believe | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138

posted 22 June 2007 09:05 AM      Profile for Stockholm     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
The US has a population of 300,000,000 and I believe there were 50-odd executions last year. Even one execution is still one too many - but in per capita terms it's very low compared to the per capita rates in places like China and Iran where thousands get executed every year without even the slightest pretense to having a fair trial - more like a frontier justice kangaroo court - if that.

If anyone saw the film Sophie Scholl about a young student who was guillotined by the Nazis for distributing anti-Nazi leaflets in Munich in 1943 - the "trial" scene is exactly how I picture "trials" in China or Iran.


From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 22 June 2007 09:19 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
I find it very comforting that the United States only executed 53 people in 2006 to Iran's 177. Unless we count the 65 that Iraq executed under U.S. occupation. And the 82 which Pakistan, the U.S.'s main proxy in the region, executed. And, of course, all the hundreds of civilians that the U.S. gets to execute in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere, through bombing raids, without going through the expensive formality of due process.

Thank goodness things aren't as bad in the U.S. as they are in Asia.


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138

posted 22 June 2007 09:25 AM      Profile for Stockholm     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
At least in the US we can have some confidence that the number of executions really was 53. Just because Iran "reports" 177 executions doesn't mean that is all they count. Would that include the Canadian woman that Ahmadinejad had tortured to death - just for his own entertainment?

What about the people Hamas executes with no due process whatsoever - just because some "claims" they are Israeli spies (when in reality people make false denunciations all the time just because they don't like someone and want them to be killed). Should we add that to the Iranian ledger since Hamas is an Iranian ally? What about the executions committed by Iranian Shi-ite proxies in Iraq? Everytime you open the paper there is another story about them blowing up a market place and killing 80 people.


From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 22 June 2007 09:31 AM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Yes, and how many Iraqis have the Americans "executed"? And since you brought it up, I didn't, doesn't Israel regularly carry out extra-judicial and death squad killings against Palestinians. Even if the Iranians trials are a sham, at least they get one.

But instead of going there, we could all just agree religious and ideological fundamentalism sucks and should be fought no matter the origin.

[ 22 June 2007: Message edited by: Frustrated Mess ]


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 22 June 2007 09:45 AM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Meh. Since Stockholm dragged in Hamas here, and is a supporter of the "moderate" Fatah over Hamas, maybe he can tell us all about the recently exposed Fatah torture chamber, funded by Israel of course, where Hamas members would often simply "disappear" from.

A visit to the Fatah torture chamber.

It's good to see that Fatah was making such good use of the generous funds from the US, Canada, and Israel. That's much better than the gold plated bathroom fixtures pointed out by Robert Fisk.

[ 22 June 2007: Message edited by: N.Beltov ]


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 22 June 2007 09:55 AM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Really what is the point of this thread? Why are you beating and anti-Iran drum stockholm?

Really, I find it disturbingly ugly hate mongering, of the type that does not belong here and which one would find elsewhere on line, in other forums controlled by the right wing whack jobs.

Yes, stoning to death is reprehensible, but so is any other form of execution or wars that kill innocents.


From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 22 June 2007 10:05 AM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
remind: Really what is the point of this thread?

Starting a thread by proposing the invasion of a sovereign state over a single, horrific execution isn't all that different from supporting another state in carrying out ethnic cleansing and justifying it by reference to other, no less horrific but trivial in comparison, rocket and suicide attacks, etc. It's just more of the same on a larger scale.

Clearly, Stockholm supports the "War on Terror" and the foreign policies of US imperialism in general. However, such views are welcome on babble because we have no anti-imperialist guidelines like the ones we have for racist, misogynist, homophobic or poor-bashing vomit. Stockholm will continue to spout this crap because he can.

[ 22 June 2007: Message edited by: N.Beltov ]


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138

posted 22 June 2007 10:11 AM      Profile for Stockholm     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
What's wrong with publicizing the horrific atrocities that occur in Iran?

This is supposed to be a leftwing progressive board and EVERYTHING that the Government of Iran represents is anathema to anything progressive. That is, unless you can find some weird way of finding some leftwing justification for a a 13th century theocracy that brutally executes people on the slightest pretext and where domestic economic policies have no trace whatsoever of socialism.

I would have thought that it was a "no brainer" that if you are "progressive" you condemn women getting stoned to death for getting pregnant outside of wedlock.

Instead people react as if I shouldn't be "embarrasing" Iran by exposing the horrors that occur there. If the Government wants to stop being embarrassed in the eyes of progressive, humane people the world over, there is a simple way to so. STOP THESE ATROCITIES IMMEDIATELY.

I know some people get into this "the enemy of my enemy is my friend", ergo since the US is at odds with Iran, we are supposed to contort ourselves in seeing something progressive about the Iranian government. Good luck.


From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
Steppenwolf Allende
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13076

posted 22 June 2007 10:13 AM      Profile for Steppenwolf Allende     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Are Iranian feminists calling for the UN to bring forth a military force to liberate them?

Oh great! Talk about putting out fire with gasoline!

The feminists call for military intervention is exactly the excuse guess-who would need to send in the air force and start carpet-bombing.

Then comes the invasion and occupation.

Then comes the parceling out of assets to corporations and bureaucracies because at least they don't stone people for getting pregnant, etc.

Where have I seen this scenario before?


From: goes far, flies near, to the stars away from here | Registered: Aug 2006  |  IP: Logged
bohajal
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11492

posted 22 June 2007 10:16 AM      Profile for bohajal   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post
I wonder whether Stockholm's 'concern' about women in Muslim and Arab countries is sincere or is he using the topic as one of his "talking-points" that he almost never fails to raise.

Is Stockholm a pro-feminist? Sincere in his concern about the status of women? Pro-feminists and people concerned about the status of women do not use sexist language and do not refer to women as "bitches":

quote:
Then 80% of CPC members would be saddled with a leader who is a rich-bitch from Toronto who wears lots of jewellery, hobnobs with the likes of Bill Clinton at Gstaad and supports gay marriage! -Stockholm, posted 20 January 2004 04:24 PM

ETA: "And supports gay marriage", said Stockholm.
Horror of horrors !! N'est-ce-pas,
Stockholm the "progressive" ?


--.

[ 22 June 2007: Message edited by: bohajal ]


From: planet earth, I believe | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 22 June 2007 10:16 AM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
It is is how you present it stockholm, it seems you are less concerned with the woman, and more concerned with destroying Iran.

Moreover, I do not see you starting threads on how we should invade the USA or Israel! Or even taking them to account for their actions.


From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 22 June 2007 10:20 AM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
(addressed to usual suspect, Stockholm) Fine. Why did you start this thread suggesting that an invasion of Iran would be a good thing? Do you also think that the invasion of Iraq, with hundreds of thousands of casualties, was a good thing? Why would saving one victim from stoning be worth hundreds of thousands and possibly millions of casualties?

Do you really think people are so stoo-pid not to notice that your views are indistinguishable from the views of the rogue state in Washington?

[ 22 June 2007: Message edited by: N.Beltov ]


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138

posted 22 June 2007 10:28 AM      Profile for Stockholm     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
I agree. I don't think that Iran should be invaded. But I would like to see a commando mission to rescue all the women that are on death's row in Iran as a result of barbarous death sentences for getting pregnant out of wedlock.

If any women are under death sentence in Saudi Arabia, then there ought to be a commando mission launched to free them as well before they get beheaded in a public execution.

I also believe that any Iranian woman should be given automatic refugee status in Canada since it is clear that just being a woman in Iran means a life of oppression.


From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
bohajal
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11492

posted 22 June 2007 10:32 AM      Profile for bohajal   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post
Do you still call women "bitches", Stockholm ?

And why is support of gay marriage a negative thing ?


.-

[ 22 June 2007: Message edited by: bohajal ]


From: planet earth, I believe | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 22 June 2007 10:37 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Stockholm:
Would that include the Canadian woman that Ahmadinejad had tortured to death - just for his own entertainment?

You mean Brian Mulroney? He was that way before.


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 22 June 2007 10:39 AM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Canada has already recognized women as refugees by virtue of their gender ... and we didn't have to wait until the threat of execution by stoning was looming. Our country was the first in the world to do so.

Commando raids are a delusion. Such actions disorganize international relations and cause more problems than they solve. They encourage other more horrific covert actions and terrorism as well. I thought we wanted to end terrorism and not provoke more of it.

And if Ahmedinijad is as maniacal as you say he is, why would you want our or allied governments to poke him with a pointy stick in the face? How old are you anyway?


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138

posted 22 June 2007 10:39 AM      Profile for Stockholm     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Since you have purposely tried to distort what I wrote by taking it completely out of context - let me explain:

I (of course) am 100% supportive of gay marriage (are you???). I was writing about how Belinda Stronach would likely be regarded by the rank and file members of the Conservative Party, if she had ever become leader of that party. Given that CPC members are largely former Reform Party/Canadian Alliance members and those people are known to have very retrograde views on social issues and probably hate Bill Clinton and "uppity women" in about equal measure - I think it is safe to say that a very large segment of the CPC membership would have freaked out if Stronach had become their leader - they might have even had to recreate the Reform party the very next morning.

What all this has to do with Iran stoning women to death is a mystery to me.


From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
bohajal
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11492

posted 22 June 2007 10:39 AM      Profile for bohajal   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post
Stockholm,

Do you also agree that a commando should go rescue Palestinian children from Israel's barbarity. Here is the picture of Mohamed Dora.

http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2001/527/dora.jpg

Is this concern about women new to you who calls them "bitches" or a mere "talking point".

Do you still see gay marriage as a no no ?


From: planet earth, I believe | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138

posted 22 June 2007 10:41 AM      Profile for Stockholm     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Commando raids are a delusion.

It worked well in Entebbe in 1976 - are you still smarting over that one?


From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
quelar
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2739

posted 22 June 2007 10:42 AM      Profile for quelar     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
You have to give him credit though, Stockholm IS right, the stoning of Women, the punishment of Gays, the religious persecutions, arrests of media persons etc. Iran should be sanctioned for this and pressure should be put on them to abolish the death penalty.

However, calling for an invasion of the country is stupid for sure.

Just a side note on some earlier comments...since Israel created Hamas, should the deaths Hamas are responsible for be attributed to Israel?


From: In Dig Nation | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138

posted 22 June 2007 10:42 AM      Profile for Stockholm     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Is this concern about women new to you who calls them "bitches" or a mere "talking point".

Do you still see gay marriage as a no no ?


when did you stop beating your wife???


From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 22 June 2007 10:42 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Stockholm:
I was writing about how Belinda Stronach would likely be regarded by the rank and file members of the Conservative Party ...

What all this has to do with Iran stoning women to death is a mystery to me.


I thought you meant Mulroney. My apologies. But when did Ahmedinejad torture Stronach? Do you have a link for that? I can't believe I missed that story.


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
bohajal
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11492

posted 22 June 2007 10:49 AM      Profile for bohajal   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post
quote:
What all this has to do with Iran stoning women to death is a mystery to me. -Stockholm

Your apparently newly acquired concern about women and their status.


From: planet earth, I believe | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138

posted 22 June 2007 10:56 AM      Profile for Stockholm     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
I've been concerned about the status of women and of all sexual minorities for my entire adult life.

It just happens that, IMHO, presently "ground zero" in the global battle to give women and sexual minorities equal rights consists of Iran, Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan.


From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 22 June 2007 11:02 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Stockholm:
It just happens that, IMHO, presently "ground zero" in the global battle to give women and sexual minorities equal rights consists of Iran, Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan.

"Ground Zero" is a very appropriate term for where your kind of rabid hysteria-mongering leads.


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Steppenwolf Allende
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13076

posted 22 June 2007 11:06 AM      Profile for Steppenwolf Allende     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
It just happens that, IMHO, presently "ground zero" in the global battle to give women and sexual minorities equal rights consists of Iran, Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan.

And that happens how? The US & Co. bombing the shit out of them, destroying their infrastructure, over-running them with tanks and troops, setting up bogus "elected" puppet regimes and looting whatever public assets they have and turning them over to mega-corporations with ties to the various governments involved--all while maintaining the less gender-specific forms of oppression like union-busting, no free press or independent judiciary, martial law conditions, etc.

Doesn’t seem to have worked anywhere else so far.


From: goes far, flies near, to the stars away from here | Registered: Aug 2006  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 22 June 2007 11:06 AM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Stockholm: It worked well in Entebbe in 1976 - are you still smarting over that one?

A new low, even for you. That raid killed a number of the hostages, many Ugandan soldiers having nothing to do with the hijacking (sentries, etc.), and at least one of the Israeli soldiers.

So you seen to be in favour of state terrorism, violations of sovereignty, etc. I don't see why non-state terrorism should be so objectionable to you or even why you'd make such a big deal about a single execution when 45 dead Ugandan soldiers, 3 dead hostages, and 1 dead Israeli soldier "worked so well" in Uganda.

What hypocrisy.


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Steppenwolf Allende
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13076

posted 22 June 2007 11:21 AM      Profile for Steppenwolf Allende     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Stockholm:
It just happens that, IMHO, presently "ground zero" in the global battle to....

WOW!!!

Stockholm fights oppression!!

Hit em one more time for freedom, Stocko!!

After all, it worked in Japan, didn't it?


[ 22 June 2007: Message edited by: Steppenwolf Allende ]


From: goes far, flies near, to the stars away from here | Registered: Aug 2006  |  IP: Logged
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138

posted 22 June 2007 11:27 AM      Profile for Stockholm     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
A new low, even for you. That raid killed a number of the hostages, many Ugandan soldiers having nothing to do with the hijacking (sentries, etc.), and at least one of the Israeli soldiers.

So you seen to be in favour of state terrorism, violations of sovereignty, etc. I don't see why non-state terrorism should be so objectionable to you or even why you'd make such a big deal about a single execution when 45 dead Ugandan soldiers, 3 dead hostages, and 1 dead Israeli soldier "worked so well" in Uganda.


I guess you must think it was such a damn shame that Idi Amin didn't get to butcher all the hostages in that hijacking as I'm sure he was looking forward to doing.

Now, I've heard everything - like we're supposed to feel sorry for the Baader-Meinhof gang and for Idi Amin because Israel foiled their hijacking to be followed by mass murder.


From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138

posted 22 June 2007 11:30 AM      Profile for Stockholm     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
And that happens how? The US & Co. bombing the shit out of them, destroying their infrastructure, over-running them with tanks and troops, setting up bogus "elected" puppet regimes and looting whatever public assets they have and turning them over to mega-corporations with ties to the various governments involved

Actually, the real shame in that part of the world is that the one Arab leader who actually had even remotely progressive attitudes towards women was...Saddam Hussein. In retrospect, the western world should have embraced a secular leader like Saddam and encouraged the overthrow of the Saudi government and hope for it to be replaced by a secular government that would be to Mecca like what Italy is to the Vatican.


From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 22 June 2007 11:31 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by bohajal:
Stockholm,

Do you also agree that a commando should go rescue Palestinian children from Israel's barbarity. Here is the picture of Mohamed Dora.

http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2001/527/dora.jpg

Is this concern about women new to you who calls them "bitches" or a mere "talking point".

Do you still see gay marriage as a no no ?


bohojal, this is off topic. If you want to complain about something Stockholm has written, do it in the thread where he wrote it. Don't drag it around the rest of the forum.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 22 June 2007 11:33 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
P.S. N.Beltov and Stockholm are also out of line with posts like this:

quote:
So you seen to be in favour of state terrorism, violations of sovereignty, etc.

quote:
I guess you must think it was such a damn shame that Idi Amin didn't get to butcher all the hostages in that hijacking as I'm sure he was looking forward to doing.

If this thread doesn't become more civil, I'm closing it.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 22 June 2007 11:37 AM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
You're simply an apologist for US imperialism and continuing Israeli atrocities, Stockholm. One dead Iranian is really irrelevant next to justifications for endless killing across the globe.

So, how many dead commandos and Iranians would be OK for you to save the one prospective victim of stoning? You do remember why you started this thread, don't you?

Supplemental: I don't really have any objection to closing the thread, Michelle. I've tried to disentangle some of Stockholm's convoluted arguments, distractions, and so on, but we always seem to come back to a kind of calculus of atrocities in which certain lives are more valued than others, certain governments can do no wrong, and other regimes are simply a checklist of prospective targets.

Stockholm, just like the US (and Canadian) imperialist regime, seems to look at the world through a bomb sight.

[ 22 June 2007: Message edited by: N.Beltov ]


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Steppenwolf Allende
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13076

posted 22 June 2007 11:42 AM      Profile for Steppenwolf Allende     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Actually, the real shame in that part of the world is that the one Arab leader who actually had even remotely progressive attitudes towards women was...Saddam Hussein.

Sure, Stock. And we all know what a great guy he was.

quote:
In retrospect, the western world should have embraced a secular leader like Saddam and encouraged the overthrow of the Saudi government and hope for it to be replaced by a secular government that would be to Mecca like what Italy is to the Vatican.

Ah, that would have been so sweet.

The fact is if you know anything at all you know that those regimes were either put into power or backed up by the US/Corporate America machine to keep down their people and keep the oil flowing.

The only reason why Hussein went from being good guy to bad guy was because he stepped out of line and invaded Kuwait--another US-backed totalitarian regime that brutally suppresses freedoms and treats women like shit.

If you want to believe that the same situation that's happened in Afghanistan or Iraq--with ex-Taliban leaders and drug lord cutting their own deals with the military in order to stay in power as part of that new fraudulently "elected" autocratic regime that has done practically zip for democracy--won't happen in Iran if the US does invade, well, that's your choice.

But you will forgive some of the rest of us for not being quite so naive.


From: goes far, flies near, to the stars away from here | Registered: Aug 2006  |  IP: Logged
contrarianna
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13058

posted 22 June 2007 11:59 AM      Profile for contrarianna     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Stockholm:
I've been concerned about the status of women and of all sexual minorities for my entire adult life.

It just happens that, IMHO, presently "ground zero" in the global battle to give women and sexual minorities equal rights consists of Iran, Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan.


And you do that by... supporting the US and it's funding of the Al Qeada-linked Jundullah (Army of God) terroism and other destabilizing black ops in Iran.

What a wonderful way to give women and moderate voices an upper hand in Iran, but not quite as good as bombing the **** out of 'em eh--your concern is unmistakable.
Black ops/Jundullah


From: here to inanity | Registered: Aug 2006  |  IP: Logged
bohajal
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11492

posted 22 June 2007 12:00 PM      Profile for bohajal   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post
It worked well in Entebbe in 1976 - are you still smarting over that one?

I cannot believe you are gloating about violence, destruction, killing and maiming.

Stockholm: When I read the website of an anti-semite fellow from my native-country in which he was expressing some sort of satisfaction about "Nazis putting Jews in ovens", I caused that and two other successive sites of his. I also wrote to Ed Morgan (then CJC Director for the Quebec Region), to the embassy of my native-country (gave them his name and city of residence in that country) and to the Ministry of the Interior (public security).

When he got "home" for vacation, he was met at the airport and handcuffed.

He was monster. So are you, Stockholm ! They come from both sides for sure !


From: planet earth, I believe | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138

posted 22 June 2007 12:02 PM      Profile for Stockholm     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
YOu don't have to be "backed by corporate America" to be totalitarian, corrupt and to treat women like shit. Look at the government of Iran!
From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
bohajal
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11492

posted 22 June 2007 12:08 PM      Profile for bohajal   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Michelle:

bohojal, this is off topic. If you want to complain about something Stockholm has written, do it in the thread where he wrote it. Don't drag it around the rest of the forum.


I brought it only as a reference to support my statement. But next time I will just provide the link.


From: planet earth, I believe | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Max Bialystock
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13870

posted 22 June 2007 12:10 PM      Profile for Max Bialystock     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by N.Beltov:
You're simply an apologist for US imperialism and continuing Israeli atrocities, Stockholm. One dead Iranian is really irrelevant next to justifications for endless killing across the globe.

So maybe America should bomb Iran eh Stockholm?


From: North York | Registered: Feb 2007  |  IP: Logged
bohajal
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11492

posted 22 June 2007 12:16 PM      Profile for bohajal   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post
Michelle,

Please put this thread -and Stockholm's non-sense- out of their misery.


From: planet earth, I believe | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
Open Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca