Author
|
Topic: What is wrong with being wealthy?
|
Slick Willy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 184
|
posted 23 May 2001 04:35 PM
{From the Ontario's Private School Tax Credit thread} Steve22 sez:
[QUOTE] I am a lower income resident living in the city of Toronto. I am dismayed and appalled at this apparrent support for the wealthy Ontario residents at the expense of less wealthy. [QUOTE] This is a bit concerning in that Steve makes out that all the wealthy people in Ontario are Jewish. This just isn't so. As well if there was a flat tax system in place then I would agree that those less fortunate are funding a tax cut for the rich. Fact is we are taxed based on income and property assesment. Think about this. Who would suffer if we removed any tax burden from the bottom 20% of tax payers? Now who would suffer if we removed the top 20% of tax payers?
From: Hog Heaven | Registered: Apr 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Slick Willy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 184
|
posted 23 May 2001 05:41 PM
Though I can not prove that the CJC has not supported anyone other than Jews, I assume that this is their function. Steve states in his message: quote: This list is only the tip of the iceberg, and makes me wonder whether the CJC is only here to protect the wealthy.
Maybe I am wrong and if so I appologize to Steve for my misunderstanding. This is not really my point though. My point is, that some are upset not because they didn't get something, but others did too. Why should wealthy people pay twice simply because they want to give their kids what is in their opinion the best education they can? The public education system in this country is hardly the best. As it is you have a choice of paying for the public school system or the catholic school system. But you have to pay for one or the other. If you want to enroll your children into anyother school system you can pay for it out of your own pocket (which many do) and still pay for the public or catholic system. Why is that concidered fair and why are the wealthy being demonized for it?
From: Hog Heaven | Registered: Apr 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490
|
posted 23 May 2001 05:48 PM
Who cares if the rich guys are Jewish? Would it matter if they all worshipped the Great Potato Chip in the sky?Let's get down to brass tacks and explore some numbers. If you make $30,000 a year and you gotta pay 30% on that income with no exemptions whatsoever, you're on the hook for 9 grand. That's a helluva chunk to take out of someone's income when they're trying to keep their heads above water in the first place. If you make $300,000 a year and you gotta pay 30%, that's $90,000. Big deal. You're still left with $210,000 to play with and if anybody in here wants to whine that you can't live on 210 grand a year, then I submit to you that you need spending cuts. I say raise the basic exemption to $15,000 a year and drop the marginal tax rates at the bottom end.
From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478
|
posted 24 May 2001 11:23 AM
In my reading of history and democratic theory, one of the first purposes of public education is to create citizens. It's not the only purpose; there are many kinds of learning that come together to do this; and I'm not talking indoctrination.But democracies are not states of nature. This is observable, first; and book-learnable, second. They appear in history for reasons; and they collapse and disappear for reasons, a main one being that a majority of citizens no longer understand the basic principles they are responsible for defending, and no longer care to defend them. Democratic rights and freedoms are not self-evident, and can be very difficult to defend. It is very much in my interest that other people's children, all the children in my community, learn to care about those rights and freedoms, not so that they can go about banging their fists on desks and declaring that they know their rights, but so that they will defend mine, as I defend theirs. It is deeply insulting to all adult citizens of a democracy that so many continue to discuss public education as though it concerned parents and only parents. It is also dangerous. Please forgive the temper. I go to cool down now.
From: gone | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Gayle
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 37
|
posted 24 May 2001 11:46 AM
yay skdadl! I have zero problem paying for other people's kids to get educated. Hell, I'd pay extra if I knew it was going straight to the schools. Schools are needed. We have to educate our youth, or we'll end up with a big ol' nation of dimwits. Being just past the edge of low-income into a higher tax bracket this year due to some lovely stock options coming into play, I have to say it's horrible to make $27G and only take home $18G of it. It's still three times as much as my parents make, so to me I'm rich, but when I think that nearly half of my pay went to someone else, it makes me slightly ill. But then I think, well, to hell with it. It's not money I ever had anyway, coming straight out of my paycheck. And besides, it pays for things that affect me in other ways. So then I don't think of it any more and just enjoy what I have. ....i'm not sure i'm saying what I want to say, or that i'm being consistent here. but whoever said i needed to make sense to post?
From: Cape Breton, Nova Scotia | Registered: Apr 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Athena Dreaming
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 435
|
posted 24 May 2001 11:38 PM
Yay skdadl!I mean, really. You think lawyers drop out of the sky? You think doctors appear sometime out of nowhere? You think plumbers and electricians pop fully formed out of the ether like Athena out of the head of Zeus? Uh uh. You want people around to maintain our society? Then we need public education. And we all benefit from it: in the form of educated citizens, in the form of people qualified to take on jobs by which we benefit (unless you don't want doctors around when you get old? or you think only rich people's kids should be able to achieve that?), in the form of children productively occupied and not outdoors bored out of their mind stirring up mischief. The public benefit is tremendous. We ALL benefit; therefore we all pay. Should I pay only for roads I drive on? Should I pay only for sewer pipes I use? Should I pay only for hospitals I frequent? Really. What a ridiculous, selfish and short-sighted argument. Gayle: Every once in a while I feel teh same way. But if you want to feel better about your tax dollars, try the following mental trick. List everything you get for it: Roads. Sewers. Water pipes and treatment plants. Landfills. Electricity generating stations. Doctors, lawyers, accountants (the education thing). Lawmakers. Laws. Police to enforce them. Judges, courts, prisons, guards. Street lighting. Subsidies to the arts. Guaranteed income if you fall sick, are fired, become unemployed for a long time. Maternity leave, for yourself if you want it, for other women if you don't. Garbage collection. Recycling. Collective composting initiatives. Houses that don't fall down. Gas pipes that don't explode. Free doctors visits. Subsidized medication (everyone in Canada gets their drugs cheaper than they get them in the States). Old age pensions. Every four years, a ballot. Town halls and legislatures. Scientific research. Funding for NGOs. Snow clearing. and on and on and on. Really, for all that, $7000 doesn't seem like so much anymore, does it? Certainly it's way cheaper than it would be if we all tried to provide for these things ourselves, out of our own purses. We're all so used to all thsi stuff, we take it for granted; it's largely invisible to us. But our taxes pay for a tremendous number and level of services. Last year I paid about $10,000 in taxes. Worth every penny. (Every time you flush your toilet, you use your tax dollars.)
From: GTA | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Pogo
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2999
|
posted 04 February 2003 12:15 AM
Public education => Public funding Private education => Private fundingIf you don't like what is being offered change it. Join the parents advisory councils or run for the school board. Or advocate someone else who will. Financing private education with public money, erodes the public system. By the way it still pisses me off that Stephen Lewis sent his kids to a private school. Someday I hope I am introduced to him so I can say so to his face.
From: Richmond BC | Registered: Aug 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|