babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Sikhs outraged by new turban search policy

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Sikhs outraged by new turban search policy
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 26 August 2007 06:20 AM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
And the USA in its ever expanding police state have new policies in place to search Turbans and cowboy hats.
quote:
The Sikh Coalition said Saturday it had been informed by the Transportation Security Administration that under its new guidelines, turbans could be subject to manual pat-downs even if their wearers had passed a metal detector test.

"Telling screeners to search people in turbans is the same as telling them to search black people or Arabs or Muslims," Amardeep Singh, executive director of the Sikh Coalition, said in a statement. "The policy allows screeners to single out travelers on the basis of their religion."

The new headwear policy also covers cowboy hats and some berets, the Sikh coalition acknowledged. But it noted that the turban was the only type of mandatory religious garb, the mere presence of which could trigger a secondary screening at security checkpoints.

"Since September 11, 2001, hundreds of Sikhs have been harassed, beaten, and even killed because of the association of their turbans and beards with terrorism," noted the coalition statement. "The TSA procedures put an official stamp of approval on this harmful stereotyping by the public."


http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070826/ts_afp/usattacksreligionsikhs


From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
marzo
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12096

posted 27 August 2007 06:09 AM      Profile for marzo     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I don't think it is reasonable to compare the search of turbans to racial profiling. Some men make a choice to wear turbans but nobody chooses their physical appearance or race-characteristics.
The article doesn't say whether men with turbans are being required to remove them and seemed to suggest a manual pat-down to feel for suspicious bumps. I don't think anybody should be mean or unfair to these guys on the basis of their fashion choice, but it does seem that a turban could be a place to hide something.
I don't understand those guys with their 'holiness hats'. I don't understand why this should be essential to their philosophy and it seems like the issue of 'sacred turbans' causes a lot of fuss and bother.
If anybody thinks I'm being unfair to those guys, sorry, but when it comes to people making a fuss over 'holiness costumes' I just feel like

From: toronto | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged
Martha (but not Stewart)
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12335

posted 27 August 2007 07:51 AM      Profile for Martha (but not Stewart)     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I have a Sikh friend who, as a joke, sometimes embeds a few joints into his turban. Then, at parties, he kinda reaches into his turban, pulls out a joint, and exclaims, "Look what I found!" or words to that effect.
From: Toronto | Registered: Mar 2006  |  IP: Logged
jeff house
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 518

posted 27 August 2007 08:23 AM      Profile for jeff house     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
I don't think it is reasonable to compare the search of turbans to racial profiling. Some men make a choice to wear turbans but nobody chooses their physical appearance or race-characteristics

This idea means that "religion" is a choice; however Human Rights laws everywhere recognize that there is a strong element of identity involved in one's religion. Targetting those who wear a turban, or a yarmulka, amounts in effect to targetting a race or religion.

In Christianity, in contrast, no one has the obligation to wear a cross; however a policy of further investigation for cross-wearers only would be deeply offensive.


From: toronto | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
bigcitygal
Volunteer Moderator
Babbler # 8938

posted 27 August 2007 08:38 AM      Profile for bigcitygal     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by marzo:
I don't think it is reasonable to compare the search of turbans to racial profiling.

How lovely that you don't think it's reasonable to compare the two. Sadly for you, however, racial profiling is what it is, no matter what you think is reasonable or not. Aww.

quote:

Some men make a choice to wear turbans but nobody chooses their physical appearance or race-characteristics.

This phrase stems from the notion that nobody chooses their skin colour because of course if people could choose, they'd choose white.

Buzzzz !!

Sorry, wrong answer, but we have some delightful parting gifts for you.

People aren't targetted because of the colour of their skin. People are targetted because of racism.

Please read that last sentence until you get it.

Oh, and if you tried to say "Because a woman choose to wear a skirt she should expect to have her legs and ass grabbed by men", in other words, she should expect to be a target and to be mistreated, I don't think you'd get too far.

quote:
The article doesn't say whether men with turbans are being required to remove them and seemed to suggest a manual pat-down to feel for suspicious bumps. I don't think anybody should be mean or unfair to these guys on the basis of their fashion choice,
(bold added by me)

If you don't get how offensive it it to speak about a religion in such a way, then I'm not sure anything I say will help. Needless to say, this type of comment is right at home on a site like FD.

quote:
but it does seem that a turban could be a place to hide something.

You're right! It is! Look at Martha's friend hiding illegal substances! Arrest him!

quote:

I don't understand those guys with their 'holiness hats'. I don't understand why this should be essential to their philosophy and it seems like the issue of 'sacred turbans' causes a lot of fuss and bother.
If anybody thinks I'm being unfair to those guys, sorry, but when it comes to people making a fuss over 'holiness costumes' I just feel like

I've found recently on babble there's been a shocking and disturbing disrespect for organized religion. I say this as someone who was spared being raised with any organized religion, (I thank the goddess of cats everyday for this ) and as someone with a huge feminist critique of most patriarchal-based organized religions: mono-, poly-, and pan-theistic. Although that does not include all organized religions, of course.

I see a huge difference between mocking/critiquing christianity, the religion with cultural and colonial dominance in Canada, with a long history and present of vicious genocide on this land, and respecting religions of people who are marginalized in Canada from various racist systems which include being racist against the ways that non-christian religion is expressed either on different days than christianity or with clothing/head coverings that differ from mainstream white christian society.

And there is also an argument to be made for respect for non-fundamentalist christians on the left who advocate for social justice issues and who don't deserve to be lumped in with the right-wing fundies, but that would be thread drift.

There are huge cultural significances to organized religion (chritian and non-christian) for communities of colour. "Going to church/temple/mosque" means so much more than the mean-spirited "worshipping the spagetti monster in the sky" and "holiness costumes" language that gets bandied about on babble at times. Religion can be a way to be with community, feeling a sense of inclusion, even as these same institutions are exclusionary and problematic in other ways. Non-christian queers for example, can find great meaning in their religion while simultaneously having tremendous critiques of it. work for change within it, etc.

The PTB have waited for this moment in history, when state actions that have always happened can now be seen to have legitimacy and can be spoken of as if they're real, by folks on the left, like marzo's "but it does seem that a turban could be a place to hide something". So's a white man's briefcase, but you won't see that law any time soon.


From: It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent - Q | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
jrootham
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 838

posted 27 August 2007 09:05 AM      Profile for jrootham     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I think it is less racial profiling than it is security theatre, although security theatre by way of racial profiling wouldn't be incorrect.

The ostensible problem is that turbans are big enough to hide things in. So if you are going to do security theatre by searching for things you have to search turbans. The racial profiling is a bonus.


From: Toronto | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
1234567
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14443

posted 27 August 2007 09:08 AM      Profile for 1234567     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I really wish they would use the system Mexico has. YOu push the button, if it's green, no worries. If it's red, you get searched, no matter who you are. I like that.
From: speak up, even if your voice shakes | Registered: Aug 2007  |  IP: Logged
Polly Brandybuck
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7732

posted 27 August 2007 04:32 PM      Profile for Polly Brandybuck     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I suppose you have to search everyone, everywhere. If you decide that you are not going to search turbans, it's possible that the badguys would then just put on a turban in order to carry their weapons onto the plane?

And think what the pope could fit into that monstrosity on his head?!


From: To Infinity...and beyond! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
marzo
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12096

posted 27 August 2007 04:49 PM      Profile for marzo     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Bigcitygal wrote:
"buzzz! We have some parting gifts for you..."
blah, blah, blah...

Sorry to hear that you hate me, but I think it's just not worth getting mad about...

[ 27 August 2007: Message edited by: marzo ]

[ 27 August 2007: Message edited by: marzo ]


From: toronto | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 27 August 2007 06:25 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'd be outraged too. Our superminority conservative government doesn't want scrutinizing when they meet behind closed doors with big business and disgraced heads of American military at places like Lake Louise and Montebello. The Sikhs should give them the business and protest like hell. Sikhs are first rate citizens in Canada, more than those bastards.
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
Free_Radical
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12633

posted 28 August 2007 04:53 AM      Profile for Free_Radical     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'll save my outrage for when I get confirmation that someone wearing a fez, stetson, toque, sombrero or baseball cap would not also receive some scrutiny regarding their headgear.
From: In between . . . | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
TemporalHominid
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6535

posted 28 August 2007 06:09 AM      Profile for TemporalHominid   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
there is a great Watchdog in the USA, the ACLU which is watching these developments and challenging profiling and laws like theCLEAR ACT

I have been talking to first nations individuals that have travelled to United States and they are coming under scrutiny too, because of their skin colour, hair colour and eye colour. People of first nations heritage appear to be scrutinized more than Caucasians.


From: Under a bridge, in Foot Muck | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 28 August 2007 02:08 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by TemporalHominid:
People of first nations heritage appear to be scrutinized more than Caucasians.

Not just appearing to but actually have done so as part of ongoing federal policy. But this is nothing new. In certain ways, successive Liberal and Conservative governments in Ottawa have mistreated native people even more so than in the U.S.


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca