babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » labour and consumption   » Wal-Mart vs Microsoft

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Wal-Mart vs Microsoft
xrcrguy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1562

posted 06 December 2002 11:06 AM      Profile for xrcrguy   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Here's the pitch for what could be your next PC: No Microsoft, no Intel -- and almost no markup.


Click

Is this the tech revolution? A computer in every home?


From: Believe in ideas, not ideology | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged
prince
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1341

posted 06 December 2002 04:35 PM      Profile for prince     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Interesting price point and niche market possibilities.

I assume it is easy to add a modem and other components via USB ports? Could make a great gift for a struggling student or someone who otherwise would not use a computer. I am thinking about my mother. I can't see spending $2k on a computer that gathers dust, but $199.00 maybe.


From: Ontario | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
pogge
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2440

posted 06 December 2002 04:40 PM      Profile for pogge   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It would depend on what that struggling student is studying. But for surfing the net, email and writing letters today's low powered boxes are more than enough. The top of the line boxes are overkill.

But don't overlook the fact that these are Linux machines. The learning curve may be a bit higher for a new user here. As much as I'd love to see Microsoft get some real competition, the Linux "desktop" isn't quite as polished yet. It's getting closer though.


From: Why is this a required field? | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged
radiorahim
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2777

posted 08 December 2002 04:18 PM      Profile for radiorahim     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
90% of all home PC users don't need anything more than say a 233 MHz. Pentium.

Have been playing with Mandrake Linux 9 and I've gotta say that Linux is definitely "getting closer"

And if someone is just doing light word processing and a bit of web surfing, with the KDE or Gnome graphical user interface Linux is just as easy to use right now as Windows...so why pay the Micro$oft tax.

Although to a large extent Wally World got rich by using cheap non-union labour and predatory pricing...its not the only reason...they see the writing is on the wall for Micro$oft.

The writing is on the wall for Micro$oft all over Asia, Latin America and increasingly in Europe.

By the way, have a look at this siteRed Flag Linux

This is the distribution of Linux developed by the Chinese government (free to download of course!) in both desktop and server versions. I understand Red Flag Linux is based on the popular Red Hat Linux distribution.

[ December 08, 2002: Message edited by: radiorahim ]


From: a Micro$oft-free computer | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
WingNut
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1292

posted 08 December 2002 04:24 PM      Profile for WingNut   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I agree.
I am thinking that within two years I will have ny office switched over to Linux. I can make the argument on cost alone. With 30 users licensing Windows and Office the cost will be approx. $30,000 to type letters and produce spreadsheets. Get real. Bye, bye, Bill.

From: Out There | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
SHH
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1527

posted 08 December 2002 05:47 PM      Profile for SHH     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
The writing is on the wall for Micro$oft all over Asia, Latin America and increasingly in Europe.
So Bill was right when he testified that not only was MS not a monopoly, but that his company was so precariously postioned in a hyper-competitive arena that it could be outa biz in 10 years?

From: Ex-Silicon Valley to State Saguaro | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged
WingNut
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1292

posted 08 December 2002 05:55 PM      Profile for WingNut   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yes. But that doesn't mean MS was not involved in anti-competitive practices. In fact, as they would say in Law and Order, that would be the motive.
From: Out There | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
SHH
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1527

posted 08 December 2002 06:07 PM      Profile for SHH     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
So MS is on the precipice of extinction and a convicted monopolist. Have I got that right?
From: Ex-Silicon Valley to State Saguaro | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged
WingNut
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1292

posted 08 December 2002 06:09 PM      Profile for WingNut   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yes and no.
They are a monopolistic corporation. Do you deny that when they claim 90% of the desktop market? You would be the first.

They can avoid extinction, however. That is not a foregone conclusion.


From: Out There | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 09 December 2002 06:52 PM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
I assume it is easy to add a modem and other components via USB ports?

Hell yeah. If you want to keep the Linux, just score a Winmodem that has a Linux-capable driver so you can use it instead of the integrated network card, assuming you lack broadband.


From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
radiorahim
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2777

posted 10 December 2002 03:24 AM      Profile for radiorahim     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
So Bill was right when he testified that not only was MS not a monopoly, but that his company was so precariously postioned in a hyper-competitive arena that it could be outa biz in 10 years?

Micro$oft very defintely is a monopoly, certainly in the desktop marketplace, just that the days of
M$ controlling 90% of the market are numbered.

M$ certainly isn't going to go out of business any time soon. They're very cash rich while all of their competitors are spilling red ink.

The one thing that does scare the hell out of them is "open source" software...its something they can't compete with. So they spend a whole lot of time, money and energy these days knocking open source as being "creeping communism" in the software industry.

Have a look at the news stories on Linux.orgfrom time to time and you'll see what I mean.


From: a Micro$oft-free computer | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca