babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » labour and consumption   » Credit Card Company Charges 70% Interest

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Credit Card Company Charges 70% Interest
ReeferMadness
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2743

posted 11 February 2005 10:45 PM      Profile for ReeferMadness     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
A new credit card aimed at millions of low-income families is to charge interest at up to 70% - the highest ever charged by a credit card company.

Rob from the poor and give to the rich.

Click


From: Way out there | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
Leuca
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6495

posted 11 February 2005 11:33 PM      Profile for Leuca     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I am appalled at the rate of interest Banks and large financial institutions are allowed to get away with here in Canada. The rate mentioned in the link is beyond the pale.


I remember talking to a guy that works as a trainer for collections people, and saying that it was understandable that credit card rates be a little higher since not everyone pays back the credit they use. But he was saying that the percentage of people who don't pay is only about 7%, if memory serves. Which certainly would not necessitate the 18 and 19% the banks charge on major credit cards and certainly not the 28.8% charged on department store cards. Which is compounded monthly and in the case of Dept. store cards works out to 35 plus % annualised for those carrying balances. Anyway something should be done about that because people are being taken advantage of.

I sometimes think that if the Bay and Sears weren't collecting exhorbitant rates on their cards they'd go out of business, that must account for a great deal of their profit.

I'm also extremely bothered by many new charges on credit cards these days. Like charging credit card customers an over the limit fee any where from 10 to 30 dollars for the month. It would be better if people weren't at their limit or carrying any balance for that matter, but when they do go over the limit to get hit with an extra charge like that when they are already being charged a very high rate of interest is not fair. In fact it's insidious when you think that they actually can decline purchases that put someone over their limit in the first place. Now they're saying we'll let you go over your limit but we'll charge more, a little fee, for the service/priviledge. How disgusting.

MBNA was the first to start charging this fee here in Canada that I became aware of, CIBC was the first Canadian company to do so, and the Presidents Choice MC which is a subsidiary of CIBC, I noticed the Royal bank has jumped on the bandwagon.

I'm livid about the outrageous interest rates and fees and charges credit card issuers get away with, it's robbery.


From: Toronto | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
Doug
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 44

posted 11 February 2005 11:41 PM      Profile for Doug   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Marketed under the slogan: "Stay in control of your budgeting"

Now that's truly hilarious!
I can't think of a better way to make my budget go out of control than borrowing money at 70%.


From: Toronto, Canada | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 11 February 2005 11:42 PM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
We're talking usury.
From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
Barcode
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7952

posted 11 February 2005 11:49 PM      Profile for Barcode        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
If there ever is an incentive not to use credit cards, or to pay off the balance before interest charges are incurred, this would be the reason. I can understand there maybe circumstances when it is necessary to use a credit card, but avoid using it if possible. I have heard some payday loan companies charge even higher rates of interest.
From: Saskatoon | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
radiorahim
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2777

posted 12 February 2005 12:13 AM      Profile for radiorahim     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
There was quite an interesting documentary on the credit card industry in the U.S. on the PBS documentary programme "Frontline" a month or so ago.

The transcript is at the link below and you can also watch in streaming video as they archive all of the programmes.

The Secret History of the Credit Card

Apparently, the state of South Dakota has become the credit card capital of the USA. All kinds of credit card companies relocated there after the state deregulated the banking industry a decade or so ago. A couple of other states followed later.

Some incredible stuff apparently goes on down there. Let's say you have a credit card with an interest rate of say 10%. Then you have a late payment on a bill...doesn't have to be the credit card bill...it could be any bill that you owe.

The credit card company will all of a sudden jack up your credit card interest rate to 20% because now you're a "bad risk" even though you've been making your regular credit card payments.

Anyway, I'm no expert on banking regulations in Canada, but it seemed the U.S. banks engage in all kinds of practices that would probably be illegal here. Not that I have any great love for Canadian banks...I'm sure they'd do the same if they could get away with it.

Oh yeah...and one other thing. In the documentary they mention that the banking industry refers to folks who pay off their monthly balance very month...and therefore don't pay any interest charges as "deadbeats". Interesting eh?

[ 12 February 2005: Message edited by: radiorahim ]


From: a Micro$oft-free computer | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
Hephaestion
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4795

posted 12 February 2005 02:16 AM      Profile for Hephaestion   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I look forward to thundering condemnations from James Dobson, Fred Phelps, Karol Wojtyla, Cheryl Gallant, the Knights of Columbus, Fred Henry, Bev Desjarlais, Jimmy Swaggert, Tom Wappel, Ferry Falwell, Randy White, Ann Cools, REAL Women and “Crazy Aunt Gwen”, the Ku Klux Klan, the Nazi Party and all those other morality watchdogs on the lookout for pernicious evil that is seeking to corrupt this Christian nation.

I await the national media campaigns, the beseeching entreaties from the pulpit to “think of the children!” and the calls from Stephen Harper to “ethnic and religious groups” that this is a slippery slope that will lead to moral decay, transvestitism and yellow spots on your dinky. (Well, that was just a stab in the dark at what Harper’s gonna say, but I’m convinced by now that even he doesn’t know what it’s gonna be until he opens his mouth, so how am I supposed to predict with any accuracy?)

Anyway, I await the outpourings of scorn, outrage and indignation (followed quickly by calls to amend the laws to prevent this wickedness. For does not that font of all our laws, the most holy, revered wholly revised bible state:

quote:
If thou lend money to any of my people that is poor by thee, thou shalt not be to him as an usurer, neither shalt thou lay upon him usury.
— Exodus 22:25

.... Take that baseball cap off, stand up straight and show some respect!That's GAWD talkin' boyo!

Have no fear, babblers! Leuca and Springy will be along any moment, reassuring us that the general public will not stand for this, and calling for a [angelic choir] Free Vote [/angelic choir] in the House of Commons...

....... just wait......

...... any minute now.....


From: goodbye... :-( | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 12 February 2005 09:12 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Barcode:
I can understand there maybe circumstances when it is necessary to use a credit card,

No it's not. It's never "necessary". I don't have a credit card, and I have all the necessities.

I will never have a credit card again, on principle. I refuse to support such leeches. You know how people feel about boycotting Walmart, the evil empire? I feel that way about credit cards, times ten.

Credit card companies prey on poor people (like students) by giving them limits they can't afford to pay back. As for the middle, upper-middle, and upper class people who get charged usurous interest rates, I couldn't care less. For poor people, credit cards are a trap. For people with money, credit cards are a luxury. People with money can pay through the nose for their luxuries for all I care.

[ 12 February 2005: Message edited by: Michelle ]


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
robbie_dee
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 195

posted 12 February 2005 09:44 AM      Profile for robbie_dee     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Michelle: It's not just the credit limits. Poor and working class people often find themselves in the "sub-prime" lending market. That means they actually pay more to borrow money than rich people. If they have a credit card, it may be the best of a bad set of options. The other sources available may be these folks.

This isn't an apology for getting into debt, nor does it contradict your sound advice that if you can possibly avoid using a credit card, don't use it. I am just saying that this industry is full of predatory jackals and its about time we started regulating them more tightly.

[ 12 February 2005: Message edited by: robbie_dee ]


From: Iron City | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
steffie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3826

posted 12 February 2005 09:48 AM      Profile for steffie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I agree, Michelle, with all you state above. I'd like to add that many people "with money" do not use credit cards; that's how they come to "have" money! pretty simple, really. I don't have any credit cards either, nor do I ever see myself in a position to own/need one.

The people I see (co-workers) who have cards are maxed-out and living far beyond their means. It's scary, really -- they have little hope of ever digging themselves out of this horrible pit of debt, and go on to consolidate loans, switch balances to other cards, etc. in a desperate attempt to do so. It's just sad, and serves to remind me on a daily basis why I do NOT want to get a credit card. (Although I was sorely tempted over Christmas to apply for one, not that I would ever be accepted)

heph: Your posts always make me laugh. You never fail to make your points with flair, cutting through the bullshit to what most of us are thinking but cannot articulate in such an amusing manner. You should start a one-man show! Testify, Brother!


From: What are the roots that clutch, what branches grow / Out of this stony rubbish? | Registered: Mar 2003  |  IP: Logged
James
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5341

posted 12 February 2005 09:54 AM      Profile for James        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Michelle:

No it's not. It's never "necessary". I don't have a credit card, and I have all the necessities.


Well, their are certain things that it is damn near impossible to do without one, including -

renting a car
renting a room (unless you put up $100+ d.d.
any on-line shopping or memberships
reserving air or rail tickets
concert or other "event" tickets
others that don't come to mind before caffiene

quote:
I will never have a credit card again, on principle. I refuse to support such leeches. You know how people feel about boycotting Walmart, the evil empire? I feel that way about credit cards, times ten.

Credit card companies prey on poor people (like students) by giving them limits they can't afford to pay back.


Outsmart the evil empire. If you make sure you pay the balance in full each month, you use their money for free.


From: Windsor; ON | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged
steffie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3826

posted 12 February 2005 10:20 AM      Profile for steffie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I hope to outsmart the evil empire by paying everything in cash, taking the bus if I can't rent a car, and if I can't afford it, do without it. Makes living life a lot less stressful, I think.
From: What are the roots that clutch, what branches grow / Out of this stony rubbish? | Registered: Mar 2003  |  IP: Logged
Hephaestion
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4795

posted 12 February 2005 10:24 AM      Profile for Hephaestion   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Steff: b'LUSSSHHH

*digging toe in carpet*

Awww shucks, m'am... twarn't nuthin'


From: goodbye... :-( | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 12 February 2005 10:46 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
James, those things are difficult but nowhere near "impossible" without a credit card. Ethical consumerism isn't about convenience. It's about not supporting industries that take advantage of the poor.

You can rent a car with a cash deposit. You can shop online with Paypal, which doesn't require a credit card. You can reserve air tickets through a travel agent by paying up front, or by going to the train station and buying the ticket ahead of time. You can buy concert or event tickets with cash.

It's not quite as convenient. But convenience is a luxury, not a necessity. It would be more convenient for me to pay rock-bottom prices at Walmart, but I don't, because I don't want to support them.

Robbie_dee, I didn't want to sound like I was criticizing poor people for getting in over their heads with credit cards. I object, by the way, to you lumping together the "poor and working class" in this context. Lots of "working class" people make very comfortable incomes, if you consider unionized employees like teachers and highly-paid factory workers to be "working class" rather than "middle class". For those with comfortable incomes, who use their regular income to pay for necessities, credit cards are a convenience and a luxury, and they therefore fall into the category I mentioned above of people who I couldn't care less if they're charged 100% interest - that's what they get for supporting such an evil industry.

Anyhow, I wasn't criticizing poor people for getting in over their heads with credit cards. I was one of them when I was a student! I had limits I couldn't possibly pay back when used, and I was one of those responsible credit card users who generally paid the entire balance, or if I carried, paid on time every month and stayed within my means. And then several months of unemployment hit. I used them to live off of, and got in too deep. Stupid? Probably. But I wasn't eligible for EI, having been a student instead of working beforehand, welfare wouldn't have even paid my rent, and the credit was available. And credit card companies KNOW that most students will find themselves in a financial bind at some point or another, and that they will be too desperate to resist the temptation to use their card. That's how they make their money, after all.

Other students I've known in this situation (and I've known too many, unfortunately) have either wound up paying off the debt for years to come (with a bad credit rating due to a consumer proposal and a huge chunk of their monthly income going towards the interest), or declaring bankruptcy.

So even if I become a millionaire someday, I will never support the credit card industry again. I don't care how convenient it is, or how much people insist that it's the only way to build your credit rating. I don't give a flying fuck about my credit rating if it means supporting an industry that I consider on the same moral level as Walmart.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Agent 204
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4668

posted 12 February 2005 10:56 AM      Profile for Agent 204   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Michelle:

You can rent a car with a cash deposit.


Technically yes, but I think the amount of the deposit might put it out of reach of a lot of people.
quote:

You can shop online with Paypal, which doesn't require a credit card.


If you trust it... I've heard some horror stories that make me reluctant to.
quote:

You can reserve air tickets through a travel agent by paying up front, or by going to the train station and buying the ticket ahead of time.


True, but going through a travel agent often costs a fair bit more than buying the ticket directly. You can go to the airport and buy the ticket with cash, of course, but for me that would mean taking a trip to Toronto, Hamilton, or London to buy the ticket.
quote:

You can buy concert or event tickets with cash.


This is true. I generally do.

As for the ethical aspects of it, I think the best way is to pay it off in full every month (and since I seldom use my cards, that's not too difficult). Then you're using their money for free, as James says, and not supporting the industry very much (you still are a little bit though, because they make money off the commissions that they charge the retailers).

Some people may have another option, BTW. Some financial institutions offer Visa/MC debit cards, so you're not actually using credit, but debit. That's the best solution, if it's available to you. Unfortunately it often isn't; back when I lived in Winnipeg I looked into this, but the nearest credit union I could find offering this was located in Kenora. Maybe we should be clamouring for more of this; if I could use debit to buy my plane tickets while avoiding travel agent fees, I would.

[ 12 February 2005: Message edited by: Mike Keenan ]


From: home of the Guess Who | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 12 February 2005 11:03 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
So anyhow, I also support regulation of the industry. But not for the same arguments I've often seen made - that "responsible" card users are being penalized because the card companies are giving credit to people who can't handle it and are sustaining losses on the lower end of the scale. "Responsible" card users can afford NOT to use the cards, and therefore I don't care how it affects them. I care about how it affects the poor.

I personally think that if we on the left concentrated as much energy in boycott movements for credit cards as we do for Walmart and other industries, instead of, oh, I don't know, having our political parties ENDORSING them with their logo, then we'd be getting somewhere.

But at the same time, I do support regulations against usury towards the poor.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
James
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5341

posted 12 February 2005 11:18 AM      Profile for James        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Was just going to post a lengthy response to Michelle's point on ethical consummerism (which I certainly support and try to practise), but Mike said almost all that I was going to say, probably better than I would have.

Just on a couple of points -

The car rental thing: Last time I did that, the deposit was $500, cash. Hoe many people have that lying around ? So, let's say I absolutely need to rent a car to go to a job interview. Unless I have the amount of the rental plus the deposit on hand, no car, no interview, no job.

Paypal: quite apart from the "trust" issue that Mike raises, having a Paypal account requires having a bank account in your personal name. Many people with credit problems won't and shouldn't do that, because the funds there can easily be located and seized by a judgement creditor. So they use bank accounts in the name of a small business or other organization. Paypal won't accept that, as far as I know.


From: Windsor; ON | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 12 February 2005 11:30 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Why would someone "need" a car to go to a job interview? Have buses and trains disappeared?

You're right, it's a $500 deposit. If you can't afford the deposit, then you can't afford to rent a car, because that's how much the deductible is on the insurance if, god forbid, you should get into an accident. That's usually the reason they charge that deposit, to cover the deductible.

As for the problems with paypal, well, then don't use it. There's no NECESSITY to buy things on the internet. I haven't bought anything on the internet since getting rid of my credit cards. I buy them from real live stores, where I can walk to and pay by cash or debit!

I don't think the most "ethical" thing to do is to have a card and pay it off every month. I don't care if you're using their money by doing so. I think the most ethical thing to do is to not give them any business at all. And even if you pay off your card every month, you're still giving them money every time you use it, because the people who take the payment pay a transaction fee for your purchase. So you're STILL supporting the industry with every transaction you make, even if you're not paying interest on your monthly statement.

As for using the VISA/MC credit cards where you give them a lump sum of money (say, $500), and then you get a "credit" card with a $500 limit that you have to pay off every month - that's gotta be the best scam on the poor I've ever seen.

"Hey, I've got a deal for you. You give ME $500, and then you can borrow however much of it you want. But make sure you pay me back the whole balance every month! If you want to keep your money that I've lent to you for longer than a month, I'll charge you interest on your money!"

Unbelievable. No thanks, that's not a "best solution" if you ask me. I'll just keep my $500 under the mattress, and if I need to use it, I'll "borrow" it without interest and pay it back to the mattress when I can.

Also, this argument about buying plane tickets through a travel agent versus buying them with a credit card (I want to avoid the fees!) is the same kind of argument that many left-wingers will not stand for one moment when people use it to justify shopping at Walmart. "I would shop ethically, but then it might cost more!" Obviously we can all come up with some extreme example of a poor person needing to travel by plane somewhere as an absolute necessity, and needing to avoid fees. But for the most part, travelling by plane is a convenience and/or a luxury, whether you're doing it to go on vacation, or to cut time out for business travel, and therefore, that whole, "But it costs more!" argument doesn't cut it.

[ 12 February 2005: Message edited by: Michelle ]

[ 12 February 2005: Message edited by: Michelle ]


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Agent 204
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4668

posted 12 February 2005 11:48 AM      Profile for Agent 204   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Michelle:

Why would someone "need" a car to go to a job interview? Have buses and trains disappeared?


No, but if I had an interview in Elmira or New Hamburg, I wouldn't be able to catch one. That said, I've never needed to rent a car, to get to an interview or anything else. I like having the option available, though, because I'm going to be looking for out of town jobs soon, and I'd like to start looking before I actually buy a car.
quote:

As for using the VISA/MC credit cards where you give them a lump sum of money (say, $500), and then you get a "credit" card with a $500 limit that you have to pay off every month - that's gotta be the best scam on the poor I've ever seen.


You're right, that is a huge scam, but that's not what I was talking about. I was talking about Visa/MC cards that actually directly take the money from your regular account. Like Interac, only you can use it online.
quote:

Also, this argument about buying plane tickets through a travel agent versus buying them with a credit card (I want to avoid the fees!) is the same kind of argument that many left-wingers will not stand for one moment when people use it to justify shopping at Walmart.


Okay, you do have a good point there. However, when you do it through a travel agency you're paying money to a largely superfluous industry (yes, it does create jobs, but not good ones, I don't think; my impression is that most people in that industry don't make a good living at all).

If it makes you feel any better, I keep my credit cards in a drawer and seldom use them. If I didn't have them, though, I'd have had to wait a month or two before I could have scraped together the deposit for my apartment- I had to get a cash advance on my card (and yes, I know, the interest rates on cash advances are even worse than regular card rates, but there you go). And since I was staying with my ex and her mum at the time, it would have been an uncomfortable living situation. For some people (not me, I hasten to add) it would have been downright intolerable. So it's useful to have a card for emergencies.

[ 12 February 2005: Message edited by: Mike Keenan ]


From: home of the Guess Who | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged
James
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5341

posted 12 February 2005 12:02 PM      Profile for James        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:

Why would someone "need" a car to go to a job interview? Have buses and trains disappeared?

What if the employer's place of business is 50 km. from the nearest public transport ? Travel agencies; what of people who would have to drive an hour each way to get to the nearest travel agency? I know many people who are just so situate.

Obviously you have very strong personal feelings on this, Michelle, and I certainly respect that. But I do think that your blanket position that anyone who has or uses a credit card (I don't) is "less than ethical" overlooks the fact that not everyone lives in downtown Toronto or any other large city. Many "ethical" people are in circumstances that would make practising the "boycott" that you would insist on would be much more of a hardship and sacrifice for them than for someone in the "Centre of the Universe."


From: Windsor; ON | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged
Agent 204
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4668

posted 12 February 2005 12:08 PM      Profile for Agent 204   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
More generally, in terms of "ethical purchases", I don't think any of us is innocent. All of us have made a few compromises somewhere. Have you ever purchased anything brand new that you could have found second hand with a bit more effort? Have you ever taken a car when you could have taken a bus? Ever eaten meat (in anything other than a survival situation)? Nobody's perfect, and I suspect all of us could do better than we do.
From: home of the Guess Who | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged
Barcode
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7952

posted 12 February 2005 12:14 PM      Profile for Barcode        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Michelle:
quote:
No it's not. It's never "necessary". I don't have a credit card, and I have all the necessities.

I will never have a credit card again, on principle. I refuse to support such leeches. You know how people feel about boycotting Walmart, the evil empire? I feel that way about credit cards, times ten.

Credit card companies prey on poor people (like students) by giving them limits they can't afford to pay back. As for the middle, upper-middle, and upper class people who get charged usurous interest rates, I couldn't care less. For poor people, credit cards are a trap. For people with money, credit cards are a luxury. People with money can pay through the nose for their luxuries for all I care.


If you're making online purchases for items you can't acquire offline, then a credit card might be a good thing to have, especially if that is the only payment system they have in place. If you need to build a good credit rating, a credit card is a thing to have. I agree with you for the most part, credit cards are unnecessary. You don't get charged the usurious rates if you pay off the monthly statement on time or early. Start small, if you can afford a credit card, and always makes sure there is more than enough money to make purchases, plus enough left over for emergency situations. Build your way up over time in terms of the size of purchases, as you hopefully, earn more money. The people with money are probably the most prudent when it comes to credit card purchases, which is why they rarely run into credit card problems, compared to the other classes. You're probably right about poor people the ones most likely to run into problems with credit card companies in terms of repayment. A credit card interest rate is just another name for service charges as far as I'm concerned.


From: Saskatoon | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
Agent 204
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4668

posted 12 February 2005 12:28 PM      Profile for Agent 204   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Barcode:
If you need to build a good credit rating, a credit card is a thing to have.

I agree, but I've heard that this is double-edged even if you don't use the card. Supposedly having several cards with highish limits marks you as a poor credit risk, because you have the capacity to go dangerously in debt very quickly. Can someone confirm this?

From: home of the Guess Who | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged
Kinetix
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5296

posted 12 February 2005 12:32 PM      Profile for Kinetix     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Michelle, do you know what collision damage waiver is?
From: Montréal, Québec | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged
Agent 204
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4668

posted 12 February 2005 12:34 PM      Profile for Agent 204   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Don't know if she does, but I don't. What is it, and how does it differ from regular car insurance?
From: home of the Guess Who | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged
Barcode
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7952

posted 12 February 2005 12:40 PM      Profile for Barcode        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
collision damage waiver (CDW)
From: Saskatoon | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 12 February 2005 12:50 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by James:
What if the employer's place of business is 50 km. from the nearest public transport ? Travel agencies; what of people who would have to drive an hour each way to get to the nearest travel agency? I know many people who are just so situate.

What if the employer's place of business is 50km from where you live and you have no way of getting there besides renting a car? Then I guess you'd better not apply for that job unless you have your own car, or have enough money to rent a car every single day to get back and forth to work.

quote:
But I do think that your blanket position that anyone who has or uses a credit card (I don't) is "less than ethical" overlooks the fact that not everyone lives in downtown Toronto or any other large city.

I haven't always lived in downtown Toronto or in a large city. I CHOSE to live in Toronto because I knew that I'd be able to find work here with affordable transportation to and from. And I've lived without a credit card in smaller centres too. Golly, what did everyone in small towns do before there was an internet to buy everything from online? I guess they just starved.

If you live way out in the sticks with nothing around that is within walking distance, then you likely either already have a car. Or if you don't, then certainly renting a car on a regular basis wouldn't be an option either. I've known people who lived in the country or small towns and survived without a credit card.

quote:
If you're making online purchases for items you can't acquire offline, then a credit card might be a good thing to have, especially if that is the only payment system they have in place.

I can't imagine what necessities there are that you can ONLY buy online by credit card, except maybe membership to porn sites or something. Oh wait, that's not a necessity! By the way, I'm not advocating only ever buying necessities. I'm all for the occasional splurges. But I would rather splurge on something that doesn't require supporting the credit card industry. And there are lots of them out there.

[ 12 February 2005: Message edited by: Michelle ]


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Mandos
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 888

posted 12 February 2005 12:53 PM      Profile for Mandos   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'm living in the US without a US credit card at the moment. It was very difficult even to get a phone without a credit rating here (I eventually managed after spending many many hours on the problem).

I applied for a student credit card once, but was denied...because I didn't have enough credit. I wonder what they wanted.


From: There, there. | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
Agent 204
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4668

posted 12 February 2005 12:55 PM      Profile for Agent 204   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Michelle:

What if the employer's place of business is 50km from where you live and you have no way of getting there besides renting a car? Then I guess you'd better not apply for that job unless you have your own car, or have enough money to rent a car every single day to get back and forth to work.


For the most part, that's true, but one can imagine a situation where you'd move (or get a car) if you got the job, or (more likely) your car isn't working at the moment.

[ 12 February 2005: Message edited by: Mike Keenan ]


From: home of the Guess Who | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged
Sara Mayo
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3714

posted 12 February 2005 12:57 PM      Profile for Sara Mayo     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Wouldn't taking a taxi be the solution? Might even be cheaper than renting a car.

[ 12 February 2005: Message edited by: Sara Mayo ]


From: "Highways are monuments to inequality" - Enrique Penalosa | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged
Agent 204
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4668

posted 12 February 2005 01:01 PM      Profile for Agent 204   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It might, depending on whether you can count on getting a taxi in time (the reliability of taxi services varies a lot depending on the place and time). But a lot of cab companies charge a lot for out of town service.

I think there is another option for car rental though, if you really want to avoid putting charges on your card and thus supplying the card company with commissions. Can't you pay cash, but give the rental company your card number for security, so they can charge your card if you don't pay up? If that isn't an option, it should be.


From: home of the Guess Who | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged
James
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5341

posted 12 February 2005 01:06 PM      Profile for James        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Sara Mayo:
Wouldn't taking a taxi be the solution? Might even be cheaper than renting a car.

Having your own transportation is an actual stipulated condition of many, perhaps most jobs. I can think of many situations where it would make perfect sense for someone to rent a car for the first month on the job, then buy or lease something economical.

Sorry for the thread drift. I guess I should have started a fresh thread several posts ago.


From: Windsor; ON | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged
Barcode
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7952

posted 12 February 2005 01:24 PM      Profile for Barcode        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Mike Keenan:
quote:
I agree, but I've heard that this is double-edged even if you don't use the card. Supposedly having several cards with highish limits marks you as a poor credit risk, because you have the capacity to go dangerously in debt very quickly. Can someone confirm this?

That makes no sense. Ususally credit is extended to someone who is a good risk. It makes no sense to issue a credit card with the highest limits to people who are obviously poor risks. Credit card companies are a lot of things, but being stupid is usually not one of them. They are just throwing money away if they do this, unless they know the federal government will bail them out, if the credit card payments are defaulted.


From: Saskatoon | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
Agent 204
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4668

posted 12 February 2005 01:29 PM      Profile for Agent 204   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
What I mean is, if you have six cards, each with a $1500 limit, you could very quickly go $9000 in debt with little chance of paying it off. I've been told that this could be a disincentive for someone else to lend you money, since the chance of default would be greater than if you only had one card. But I could be wrong.
From: home of the Guess Who | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged
Barcode
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7952

posted 12 February 2005 01:49 PM      Profile for Barcode        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Mike Keenan:
quote:
What I mean is, if you have six cards, each with a $1500 limit, you could very quickly go $9000 in debt with little chance of paying it off. I've been told that this could be a disincentive for someone else to lend you money, since the chance of default would be greater than if you only had one card. But I could be wrong.

Ok, if you're going that far into the hole, I see what you mean. It makes sense what you say, the higher the limit, the greater the chance of defaulting on the loan. Even if you have bad credit, and you get back on your feet financially, is there a way to repair your credit rating and restore it? I think in the USA they call it a FICO score, and they have methods, but I'm not sure how it works in Canada, because I have been fortunate so far, not to be put in the position of bad credit.


From: Saskatoon | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
radiorahim
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2777

posted 12 February 2005 02:16 PM      Profile for radiorahim     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I find credit cards are a bit like pain killers.

They can be handy to deal with an "urgent" or "emergency" situation where you have a bill that needs to be paid but just don't happen to have the cash.

But its very easy to get into "over use" and then become addicted to credit/credit cards.

If you have the discipline to avoid using credit cards then more power to you (as well if you can endure the pain without pain killers!)


From: a Micro$oft-free computer | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
Barcode
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7952

posted 12 February 2005 02:22 PM      Profile for Barcode        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Michelle:
quote:
I can't imagine what necessities there are that you can ONLY buy online by credit card, except maybe membership to porn sites or something. Oh wait, that's not a necessity! By the way, I'm not advocating only ever buying necessities. I'm all for the occasional splurges. But I would rather splurge on something that doesn't require supporting the credit card industry. And there are lots of them out there.
I wasn't talking about necessities or online porn, which isn't a necessity, but your basic merchant websites, such as Amazon.com,A&B Sound, and places like that. Sometimes purchasing online can be significantly cheaper than purchasing offline, even when you throw in shipping and handling. What you consider essential might differ. There might be for example, some useful or even vital study aids for a course or courses you are taking that you might not be able to acquire offline.

From: Saskatoon | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
Agent 204
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4668

posted 12 February 2005 02:40 PM      Profile for Agent 204   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well, I'm not so sure about that (anything I've ever needed for a course has been available at the university or college bookstore). On the other hand, if the bookstore is taking advantage of students by charging ridiculous markups (as they often do) then supporting it is arguably no more ethical than supporting the credit card companies.

[ 12 February 2005: Message edited by: Mike Keenan ]


From: home of the Guess Who | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged
Barcode
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7952

posted 12 February 2005 02:52 PM      Profile for Barcode        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Mike Keenan:
quote:
Well, I'm not so sure about that (anything I've ever needed for a course has been available at the university or college bookstore). On the other hand, if the bookstore is taking advantage of students by charging ridiculous markups (as they often do) then supporting it is arguably no more ethical than supporting the credit card companies.

Well, for general university/college/trade school courses you might be correct. What about professional or trade association courses? I'm referring to IT certifications, where certain study material resources might only be available online, or the numerous financial service designations that exist? If you plan to obtain one of these designations, or even write the Canadian Securties Course, a credit card might be a good option. I'm talking about courses that are more industry specific, not necessarily academic institution specific.

From: Saskatoon | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 12 February 2005 03:16 PM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Mike Keenan:
Some people may have another option, BTW. Some financial institutions offer Visa/MC debit cards, so you're not actually using credit, but debit.

I've never heard of Canadian banks offering this. I know American banks routinely do this, since it's the easiest way to set up an EFTPOS system for them.

Interac makes these debit-cards-that-look-like-credit-cards rather superfluous in Canada anyhow.

This book was first printed in the 1980s and apparently still exists. The author of that book, in three words, sums up the biggest defect of debit-cards-that-look-like-credit-cards:

quote:
Ths book is a phenomenal expose of what banks and other financial institutions will do to skim money from you. The book is not just about credit card but also about the debit cards referred to in the book at(sic) Financial Death cards.

The problem with such cards is that if someone steals your "credit" card, they can run out your bank account and right into your overdraft. The author of that book tells the heartbreaking tale of an elderly couple who suffered this unfortunate experience, and could not get recourse because they were on vacation and didn't know their cards had gotten stolen (they had gone past the 30-day-dispute-the-charges limit) and were in the hole for $100,000.

Let that be a warning to those who are tempted to agitate for wider availability of "VISA check cards" as they're often called in the USA.


From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Agent 204
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4668

posted 12 February 2005 03:29 PM      Profile for Agent 204   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by DrConway:

I've never heard of Canadian banks offering this.


It's not very common, but I found a link here.
quote:

Interac makes these debit-cards-that-look-like-credit-cards rather superfluous in Canada anyhow.


Except that unlike a regular Interac card, you can use them online.
quote:

The problem with such cards is that if someone steals your "credit" card, they can run out your bank account and right into your overdraft. The author of that book tells the heartbreaking tale of an elderly couple who suffered this unfortunate experience, and could not get recourse because they were on vacation and didn't know their cards had gotten stolen (they had gone past the 30-day-dispute-the-charges limit) and were in the hole for $100,000.

Let that be a warning to those who are tempted to agitate for wider availability of "VISA check cards" as they're often called in the USA.


Yikes!! That's something I'd never considered! Nevertheless, it probably wouldn't happen if you took the card with you on vacation (since you'd know immediately if it had been stolen). Definitely makes me think twice about getting one, though.


From: home of the Guess Who | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged
Hephaestion
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4795

posted 12 February 2005 05:10 PM      Profile for Hephaestion   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
All that aside, getting back to the sheer evilishisness (evility?) of this dastardly scheme, how 'bout we *demand* that the federal government just go all "biblical" on their asses and issue an outright ban on such usurious interest rates?

Or are Leviticus and Paul the only sections of the bible we're allowed to cite, while ignoring stuff like the portion of Exodus above? Why is it one set of moral imperitives when dealing with queers and a whole different set when dealing with the "moneychangers"?

Where ARE Springer and Leuca when you need a good lesson in morality, damnit?!


From: goodbye... :-( | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
ReeferMadness
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2743

posted 12 February 2005 05:19 PM      Profile for ReeferMadness     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I use a credit card for most purposes. I find it is safer and more convenient than carrying quantities of cash. I refuse to use a debit card because with debit card fraud, you are at the mercy of the bank's graces when it comes to getting your money back. I had a credit card when I was very poor as well because it was a ready source of emergency credit. It took discipline but I never got into debt because I wanted something I could do without.

In terms of ethics, I think capitalism itself is in general terms unethical and I don't find the 'normal' credit cards (VISA and Mastercard) any more or less ethical than most businesses. The fact is that by design, business caters to people who have money and are readily willing to part with it.


From: Way out there | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
Agent 204
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4668

posted 12 February 2005 05:25 PM      Profile for Agent 204   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Hephaestion:
All that aside, getting back to the sheer evilishisness (evility?) of this dastardly scheme, how 'bout we *demand* that the federal government just go all "biblical" on their asses and issue an outright ban on such usurious interest rates?


Actually, they already have to some extent (note that the above story comes from the UK):
quote:

347. (1) Notwithstanding any Act of Parliament, every one who

(a) enters into an agreement or arrangement to receive interest at a criminal rate, or

(b) receives a payment or partial payment of interest at a criminal rate,

is guilty of

(c) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, or

(d) an offence punishable on summary conviction and is liable to a fine not exceeding twenty-five thousand dollars or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or to both.

Definitions

(snip)

"criminal rate" means an effective annual rate of interest calculated in accordance with generally accepted actuarial practices and principles that exceeds sixty per cent on the credit advanced under an agreement or arrangement;



Of course, 60% is still far too high, and they should probably amend the law.

[ 12 February 2005: Message edited by: Mike Keenan ]


From: home of the Guess Who | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca