Author
|
Topic: UN Problems In Haiti
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443
|
posted 18 January 2006 10:08 PM
FidelDo you have any good websites for the situation in Haiti. I am not full aware for the situation and I am trying to better understand what the problem is. I have read alot of the main stream media's view, now I am looking for something else to build a better picture.
From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
thwap
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5062
|
posted 21 January 2006 08:36 AM
The UN has consented to allow itself to be used to legitimate the toppling of a duly-elected president and a legislature that (for the most part) was duly elected. [There were a few disputed seats out of several hundred where run-offs needed to be held. The Lavalas winners had voluntarily resigned in order to allow new elections for those seats but the opposition declined. They declined because they would lose (again) and becaue the political "crisis" was being used as an excuse to cut off crucial foreign aid to Haiti and destabilize Aristide.][Square brackets cont'd: Aristide was losing support, but all that can be said about his election was that the turnout was low. Having been forced to introduce some counter-productive neo-liberal reforms, and then presiding over the country in the absence of foreign aid, Aristide's administration became widely criticized and thus defensive. But he was still the legitimately elected president. Whenever I have pressed someone who restates claims about Aristide becoming a dictator, or that he was involved with the drug trade, I receive only the flimsiest of circumstantial charges or absolute silence.] UN forces are being used to decimate Aristide/Lavalas supporters in Port au Prince until such a time as Canadian police trainers can get a domestic Haitian terror force up and running. It is crucial for the US, Canada, and France to wipe out Lavalas in time for an election to legitimate whatever torturing drug-dealing kleptocrat administration we're supporting. All-in-all, a disgusting betrayal of everything Canadians claim to stand for.
From: Hamilton | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
thwap
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5062
|
posted 21 January 2006 10:28 AM
Great Znet link.This paragraph (and the comments of Warren and Phinney) struck me: quote: Canada’s Haiti policy also shows us how deeply-set racist perceptions of other (non-white) countries can be effectively mobilized to advance this concept. The established view of Haiti’s (formerly enslaved, extremely poor, African) population – as “incapable of self-government” – was renewed and refreshed. When Ottawa Citizen columnist David Warren lamented on the eve of the coup that Haiti had failed to create “a people who are susceptible to self-government,” it elicited no particular notice. His racism was echoed more recently by Liberal MP Beth Phinney, who asked during a June 14 Foreign Affairs committee hearing: “How can you change the will of the people [of Haiti] to want to be able to govern themselves?” Such repugnant views require total ignorance of Haitian history, during which the population liberated itself from slavery, occupation and dictatorship, and then managed to democratically elect a president (three times!) that the US government overtly opposed. If the people of Haiti have proven one thing in their tragic history, it is their burning desire – and their capacity – to “govern themselves.”
From: Hamilton | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|