[ 10 February 2007: Message edited by: PAUL FRASER ]

You must have misunderstood the terms when you took out the loan.

about a man named Umang who lost a condo in London - also about a bank.

i think your selection of domain name is wise, in the sense that you have not used the name of the company you are investigating.

my personal experience is that, if a corporate criminal is unable to contest a website on the facts, they will use threats of litigation for trademark infringement. for example, just using someone's name in a directory in a personal website is enough to invite a threat from a corporate attorney.

by documents, i mean cover pages, pages that show how the cases were resolved, pages that are particularly illustrative of RBC's improper practices, and so on.

trust me, this kind of practice can be extremely effective. it helps if you use the Yahoo stock message boards, or a similar forum, to publicize your work.

you will know it has struck a nerve when you hear from an attorney.

it seems like you have your facts in a row (organized, making accurate public statements).

if you have received this treatment, others have received this treatment. in many cases, RBC and thousands, maybe millions of corporations have left injured consumers in their wake. and some of the stories REALLY make the corporations look bad.

joining together to shine a light on it makes a lot of sense.

another sign that your website is having an impact will be if RBC starts advertising on Google, if they haven't already, and then Google de-lists your web page for certain very relevant search terms.

so it's a good idea to bring a digital camera with a tripod & a power supply (or you'll be paying a lot of money for batteries).

quote:

---

The Customer agrees to pay the Demand Installment Loan on Demand

---