babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » national news   » Ottawa may sell stake in Atomic Energy: Source

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Ottawa may sell stake in Atomic Energy: Source
Snuckles
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2764

posted 19 October 2008 03:29 PM      Profile for Snuckles   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Steve Rennie
THE CANADIAN PRESS

OTTAWA – The Conservative government is considering selling a stake in Canada's federally owned nuclear vendor, industry sources say.

Industry executives involved in talks with Natural Resources Minister Gary Lunn say Ottawa is mulling a public-private partnership for Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd.

Such an arrangement could bring capital – and stability – to the heavily subsidized Crown corporation.

AECL's future has been uncertain since the federal government hired National Bank Financial earlier this year to review the ownership of the company.

The official line out of Ottawa is that the Harper government will consider the bank's findings before making a decision on AECL.

But a nuclear industry executive says Lunn narrowed it down to two options months ago.

"He tended to say, in private, that the first alternative – maintaining the status quo – was really ruled out and it would either be an outright sale or trying to look for private partners to work with AECL."


Read it here.


From: Hell | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
M. Spector
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8273

posted 19 October 2008 03:35 PM      Profile for M. Spector   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The purchaser:


From: One millihelen: The amount of beauty required to launch one ship. | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 19 October 2008 06:14 PM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Only an idiot would do this. The very nature of nuclear energy virtually demands government ownership of this sector, if only because they are accountable (at least in theory) to the electorate and because it is in the public interest that the profit motive be eliminated from this area.
From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 19 October 2008 06:28 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It's all fine, don't worry. Dalton "Bates!" McGuilty paved the way for nuclear expansion by weakening environmental laws in Ontario. His friends in private industry can cut corners to make a buck. Should be peachy as long as the private sector is allowed to be its own watchdog on safety and all that stuff which bureaucrats don't have time or money for while crooking and robbing taxpayers.
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
Papal Bull
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7050

posted 20 October 2008 09:37 AM      Profile for Papal Bull   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Oh, god damn. That is so stupid. Aren't we doing a big, whatchoocallit? NUCLEAR EXPANSION?

Lame.


From: Vatican's best darned ranch | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
Mojoroad1
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 15404

posted 20 October 2008 12:28 PM      Profile for Mojoroad1     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
This is, as anyone who lived in Ontario knows, how Flaherty "balanced" budgets in the Harris years. He's at it again, federally. Sell off any and all govment assets, shot term gain, long term loss. Gee I hope Iran makes a successful bid.
From: Muskoka | Registered: Aug 2008  |  IP: Logged
farnival
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6452

posted 20 October 2008 01:31 PM      Profile for farnival     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
ok, two questions about this....

1. if they are going to privatise it, will they privatise the risk too? Under the Nuclear Liability Act the government of the day assumes most of the risk....love that. kind of like the big financial market bailouts all over the world.

2. if it is privatised, does that mean that without a government stake, we could tighten regulations and oversight to the point of eventually phasing it out, now there would be no "conflict of interest"?

i honestly don't know the answers to this but have thought about it for a long time. any thoughts?


From: where private gain trumps public interest, and apparently that's just dandy. | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
Snuckles
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2764

posted 20 October 2008 06:11 PM      Profile for Snuckles   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
While we're on the nuclear tip

quote:
Saint John -- Two huge turbine rotors destined for New Brunswick's Point Lepreau nuclear generating station might remain on the bottom of Saint John Harbour for a few days.

The 107-tonne units toppled into the water Wednesday as they were being loaded onto a barge.

Irving Equipment spokeswoman Mary Keith said divers and an engineering team are trying to decide on the best method and equipment to retrieve the rotors.

The units had recently arrived from Siemens in Britain and were to be installed during refurbishment of the reactor. Ms. Keith says N.B. Power officials say they may have to reinstall the old rotors to keep the project on schedule.



From: Hell | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 21 October 2008 03:50 AM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
That's going to be damn expensive. If there's salt-water corrosion, the whole damn thing's going to have to be repaired, and given engineering requirements for nuclear facilities it'll cost even more than usual for that kind of equipment.

A private company would have skimped where possible. There's a reason why the China Syndrome was scripted the way it is; a private company's greed outweighed the public good and a nuclear reactor nearly exploded.


From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca