babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Bush "assassinated" ... in new movie

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Bush "assassinated" ... in new movie
Joel_Goldenberg
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5647

posted 31 August 2006 09:18 AM      Profile for Joel_Goldenberg        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
A docudrama will depict the assassination of Bush in October 2007, and its effect on the War on Terror. The film will eventually be shown on TV, but premiere at the Toronto film fest. Poor taste?Docudrama
From: Montreal | Registered: May 2004  |  IP: Logged
oldgoat
Moderator
Babbler # 1130

posted 31 August 2006 09:52 AM      Profile for oldgoat     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It's something that could be in poor taste depending on the approach taken, but looking at that link it doesn't sound like it will be. It sounds intellegent and creative. I'd be surprised though if the producers don't run into a lot of problems from a lot of quarters before this thing gets aired, if it get's aired.

The comments at the time I read them (there were 7) were predictably shallow. I particularly enjoyed the commenter who wishes we would all "just get over politics" Thank you citizen, I'm sure the administration and their corporate friends feel the same way.


From: The 10th circle | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 31 August 2006 09:55 AM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I wouldn't put anything past the ultra-right. Nobody's safe with those bastards.
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
otter
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12062

posted 31 August 2006 10:34 AM      Profile for otter        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Bushwhacker is irrelevant. The real problem is the backroom dealmakers who pull his strings, formulate american policy on his behalf and write his speeches. And you can bet they already have half a dozen mindless clones waiting to become future leaders.
From: agent provocateur inc. | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 31 August 2006 11:14 AM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Dick Cheney capable of raw ambition ?. I guess Dubya has two legit excuses not to go duck hunting with the sneering son of a jackal.

[ 31 August 2006: Message edited by: Fidel ]


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
farnival
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6452

posted 31 August 2006 11:19 AM      Profile for farnival     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
i wonder if the movie contemplates the idea that those backroom fixers may in fact be the ones responsible for the assination, right before Bush has to step down (he can't run again), to create a "western martyr" in the War on Terror (tm), ensuring the Republican dynasty continues and the war profiteers continue to reap what they have sown? (queue doomlike music......)
From: where private gain trumps public interest, and apparently that's just dandy. | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
oldgoat
Moderator
Babbler # 1130

posted 02 September 2006 01:50 PM      Profile for oldgoat     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Came across this arcticle in the International Herald Tribune.

quote:
Dale said that the focus of the film was on the assassination's aftermath, as the news media rush to judgment and as investigators plumb America's fear and anger, particularly in communities with most cause to be angry at Bush.

Using actual archival footage as well as computer-generated imagery that, for instance, attaches the president's face onto the body of the actor playing him, the film leaves no doubt that the victim is Bush rather than some generic president.


But Peter Dale, the head of More4, was quoted in British newspapers as saying that the film was not sensationalistic and did not advocate the assassination of Bush.

"It has the combination of a gripping forensic narrative and also some very thought-provoking places where you are encouraged to think about the issues behind the narrative," he said.

Dale said that the focus of the film was on the assassination's aftermath, as the news media rush to judgment and as investigators plumb America's fear and anger, particularly in communities with most cause to be angry at Bush


[ 02 September 2006: Message edited by: oldgoat ]


From: The 10th circle | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
otter
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12062

posted 02 September 2006 02:08 PM      Profile for otter        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I hope the story includes some of the dozens of very real assassinations of foreign leaders that have been sponsored by a variety of u.s. presidents over the years and that this is just those actions coming home to bite them on the ass. And Bush really is a perfect representation of that ass.
From: agent provocateur inc. | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged
Disgusted
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12280

posted 02 September 2006 03:15 PM      Profile for Disgusted        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Not that I'm a conspiracy nut or anything like that (heaven forfend!), but I've always thought a real assassination of Bush by a supposed "terrorist" would be the perfect last-ditch attempt by the current administration to retain power. I'm looking forward to seeing the movie, if it explores this aspect well.

Over at Majablog, the writer has this to say about it:

"I’m just saying I don’t want Bush to be assassinated. Really, truly. Here are the top ten reasons why:

10. Regular television programming would be pre-empted for days, except maybe for the Super Bowl.

9. News coverage of the assassination and state funeral would shine the rosiest light possible on the President’s memory, causing some viewers to think maybe he wasn’t so bad, after all. (In fact, this might be the only way Bush could get his approval numbers over 50 percent again.)

8. Darryl Worley would record a song about it.

7. For the next several months you wouldn’t be able to pass a supermarket tabloid rack without seeing pictures of Bush and Jesus — together forever.

6. You’d have to listen to your wingnut father-in-law rant about it all through Thanksgiving dinner.

5. The Right collectively would become even more paranoid than it is already.

4. For the rest of your life, you’d have to listen to people referring to Bush as a “martyred president.”

3. The assassination would fuel a whole new generation of conspiracy theorists.

2. Bush wouldn’t live long enough to see what historians will write about his presidency.

1. Dick Cheney.

Need I say more?"

So true!


From: Yukon | Registered: Mar 2006  |  IP: Logged
Disgusted
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12280

posted 02 September 2006 03:22 PM      Profile for Disgusted        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Sorry, that should be The Mahablog, with an h, not a j!
From: Yukon | Registered: Mar 2006  |  IP: Logged
Steppenwolf Allende
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13076

posted 02 September 2006 05:27 PM      Profile for Steppenwolf Allende     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
You don't need to be a conspiracy nut to see the obvious: that this is a sensationalized movie looking to put more fear into the US public, so that it's even more paralyzed and complacent, and willing to give up even more of what few freedoms it still has.
From: goes far, flies near, to the stars away from here | Registered: Aug 2006  |  IP: Logged
Briguy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1885

posted 05 September 2006 10:56 AM      Profile for Briguy     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I expect talk show hosts south of the border to ask this of any guest who supports the film, or describes it as art/fiction/freedom of expression:

Why do you want to see the President assassinated? Why do you hate America?

Intelligent discussion of the film will be relegated to, well, probably nowhere.


From: No one is arguing that we should run the space program based on Physics 101. | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
greyflannel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11130

posted 05 September 2006 11:08 AM      Profile for greyflannel        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
This is just one big ego stroke for Bush.
From: canada | Registered: Nov 2005  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca