Author
|
Topic: Curves Gym= Barf
|
audra trower williams
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2
|
posted 19 April 2004 04:04 PM
In case anyone cares, Curves Gym is owned and operated by a pro-life-deadbeat-dad. Lots of the club's profits go to fake pregnancy crisis centres.Also: the combination of being anti-choice, while not paying child support? That's uber-classy. More on the owner: Obviously, Mr. Heavin went way beyond just exercising his considerable influence. He stepped up to the plate in a major way. As a result, no longer can Planned Parenthood claim the high moral ground that has deceived the masses by stating they provide services for women that nobody else does. No longer will women be enslaved to receiving "health care" from an odious organization that kills children, spreads immorality, and has provided a safe haven for pedophiles that prey upon our daughters. Mr. Heavin has removed the mask of legitimacy from Planned Parenthood and is helping to make their "services" obsolete. THE DECLINE OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD IN CENTRAL TEXAS
From: And I'm a look you in the eye for every bar of the chorus | Registered: Apr 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Loony Bin
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4996
|
posted 19 April 2004 04:22 PM
A lot of the women in my office are on the Curves kick. They go at lunch all together, and rave about it. It's a little creepy to hear them chatting about their weigh-ins and measurements etc., and not a few of them are on strange diets advocated by the gym, including near-starvation and weird powdered supplements. I wonder if I should send them those links... I hate to that they're using women's concern for their bodies to take away their rights to their bodies...Audra, when you say lots of the money from the franchises goes to fund the anti-choice faux clinics, exactly how much do you think that is, and do you have any idea how it gets funnelled through to his "activism"?? Any links or anything? [ 19 April 2004: Message edited by: Lizard Breath ]
From: solitary confinement | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
swirrlygrrl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2170
|
posted 21 April 2004 01:34 PM
quote: Originally posted by Cougyr: I'm a firm believer that if one walks, or runs, to the gym, one won't need to go inside.
In some respects, yes, but in order to get the full benefits of exercise, one should include weight bearing exercise, such as free weights, to improve bone density and increase lean muscle mass, in addition to cardiovascular work outs. While I run and do calisthenics and use free weights at home, my work out schedule suffers when the weather gets nasty, and my workout has a lot less variety, which can lead to plateaus, and uneven muscle development. I think that gyms have their place - but Curves won't ever get my $$ for a membership.
From: the bushes outside your house | Registered: Feb 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
LukeVanc
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2735
|
posted 22 April 2004 07:07 AM
I think this company is certainly deceptive - but so are many others. Coors Beer Company is owned by a Christian fundamentalist family that funds anti-gay, anti-feminist charities (anyone surprised considering the content of Coors Lite commercials?) Dave Thomas of Wendy's was a well-renowned anti-gay rights activist, and Wendy's conglomerate now owns Tim Horton's, which is also partly owned by a Canadian right-winger whose name escapes me. I think if we were all consciously aware of the dubious links of many American-based transnationals, there would be a lot of boycotts going on! Anyway, I find it ironic that Curves gym is owned by a fundy. There's one right smack in the middle of Kitsilano - one of the most left liberal grass eating environmentalist neighbourhoods in B.C. That place would close down pretty quickly if people knew that the profits were funding anti-abortion centres. If lagatta and others are seeking gyms that cater to less-than-physically-fit women and men, might I recommend the community recreation centre? That's where you'll find most of the amateurs. The downside is that you will also find too many teenagers for your liking, and probably a lot of older equipment in need of replacing, depending on how much money your municipality devotes to such things. Of course, you can always exercise the old fashion way, outside. (Why people buy expensive gym memberships to run on the treadmill all day, I do not understand). I'm guessing one of the problems out east is that there is a lack of gyms in general (people living east of Calgary are notoriously out of shape). In Vancouver proper, there is so much competition in the gym market that you can get a private gym membership for as little as the cost of a monthly adult membership at your community recreation centre. (Yeah yeah, one of the few examples of where market competition really does lower prices).
From: Vancouver | Registered: Jun 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534
|
posted 22 April 2004 09:48 AM
No Luke, actually I'm not seeking a gym of any kind now - cycling season is well underway, and I can use the pool at the Y in kingblake's neighbourhood (a bit far to walk to in the winter, but a ten-minute bicycle ride). I'm talking in general about the obstacles for the people needing exercise the most getting it. Treadmills seem ludicrous, and they are tedious, but they can enable people who can't exercise outside in the winter to get aerobic exercise. Many people (with asthma, etc.) can't tolerate the cold air in their lungs while doing strenuous exercise. Gym is only one reason people in BC tend to be in better shape - the lack of a real winter in the most-populated areas is another big factor! I think it is essential to push for better non-profit community gyms, pools etc as a public service and factor in preventive physical and emotional health. Places like Curves are filling an important gap. Right now I'm translating documents pertaining to the problems of street people with multiple health and addiction problems. If I should happen to raise questions about the need for better programmes for such people, I hope you won't assume I'm in that situation! [ 22 April 2004: Message edited by: lagatta ]
From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|