babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » feminism   » NAC is thirty years old

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: NAC is thirty years old
Judes
publisher
Babbler # 21

posted 24 March 2002 01:59 PM      Profile for Judes   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The National Action Committee on the Status of Women is thirty years old this year. I went to a dinner Friday night in celebration. NAC has achieved a lot in those thirty years but has fallen on hard times of late.

Now the women on the NAC Executive are trying to figure out how it can survive and continue to struggle on women's issues.

Some women think a new structure is needed, less hierarchical for example.

Just wondering if babblers have any suggestions?

[ March 24, 2002: Message edited by: Judes ]Here is a NAC history

[ March 24, 2002: Message edited by: Judes ]


From: Toronto | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Femwriter
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1449

posted 25 March 2002 01:12 PM      Profile for Femwriter   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
First, Happy Birthday NAC. I am perplexed as I see many babblers are about NAC's future. I am hoping the lack of response to Judes post is not for lack of interest though.

NAC fell off the media map when they lost their federal funding and their voice has been silenced by the media ever since. They never were given the respect they were due. Maybe, we should look to the women's lobby groups in the U.S. to see how they manage. Many, like NOW and the Feminist Majority Foundation exist on foundation money I believe, and therefore, their existance is not tied to government whims. They did not die when Bush was elected because of their indepenance.

A federal voice for women has never been needed more than now. What is happening with CASAC and their federal initiatives?.. I know they got a pile of money for the women's march, which the media all but ignored. Anyone know what's happening?


From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
spindoctor
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 958

posted 12 April 2002 06:54 PM      Profile for spindoctor   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I have also found the disappearance of NAC to be really interesting and somewhat perplexing. I did hear one explanation about how it was a purposeful decision made by NAC leadership to stop being involved in such a media / high-profile manner in political debates.

Is that correct? I find the absence quite stark. I don't think NAC said a single thing in the last federal election.


From: Kingston, Jamaica.....oh alright....Kingston, Ontario | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
Thandiwe
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1013

posted 15 April 2002 10:01 PM      Profile for Thandiwe   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I can't say much on the funding issue -- at first, private funding seems swell, and it might be a step toward reestablishing NAC as a political force in Canada. However, as anyone knows, private funding doesn't appear with the snap of the fingers. And comparing the Canadian situation to that of the U.S. isn't necessarily always helpful. We have one tenth the population of the U.S., and therefore less of a base to pull funding from, private or otherwise.

That's neither here nor there, really.

If I were to make a suggestion, though, my first one would be to appeal to young women. Like, say, me. NAC -- nor any other feminist organization, really -- has a presence at either of the major universities here in Winnipeg. I might be way off here, but getting young women -- early-mid twenties -- engaged, not necessarily directly involved (though that would be good, too) but aware of issues and the fact that organizations like NAC exist, and have existed, for their good. I know that girls on my campus would be receptive to that, and it seems like a good angle to approach "revitaliazation" from. (I hate that word. But I couldn't think of anything better.)


From: Winnipeg | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
strumpet
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2541

posted 19 April 2002 12:42 PM      Profile for strumpet     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I agree with Thandiwe... I think that there needs to be an appeal to young women to breathe new life into NAC -- but along with that, there also needs to be a committment to listening to what young women are naming as important issues....

I don't think it's necessarily true that young women aren't aware of NAC, the history of NAC or that they need to be educated on the issues, though. I think there are many radical, politically aware feminist young women, who may not necessarily agree with the second wave political bent of NAC previously...

I think generational tensions might keep the dialogue process between current NACers and younger folks a bit stunted, (an occurence I have also noticed within the university setting). But nonetheless, there definitely needs to be more intergenerational dialogue, I think, for NAC and other feminist organizations, to keep up their importance and presence.


From: Winnipeg | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca