babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » feminism   » Dilemma from a male perspective.

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Dilemma from a male perspective.
Zatamon
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1394

posted 14 August 2002 06:57 PM      Profile for Zatamon     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I just watched a rerun of ‘Voyager’ on TV. In a sudden inspiration, I realized why I dislike Captain Janeway so much. Contrary to some ideas already formed, I have always been a ‘feminist’ male. I hate any kind of discrimination, based on anything whatsoever.

However, Janeway ‘grates’ on me. She reminds me of a female manager I had at IBM. She ‘overcompensates’. And I understand her, I would act the same way in her place, and she still grates on me, because she does not act naturally (how could she under the circumstances -- no one could).

I will be probably torn to shreds over this post, so what else is new? Babble lives on!!!

[ August 15, 2002: Message edited by: Zatamon ]


From: where hope for 'hope' is contemplated | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Tommy_Paine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 214

posted 14 August 2002 07:00 PM      Profile for Tommy_Paine     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I've often wondered what the show would have been like if (pardon my spelling, it's bound to be wrong) Genivieve Bougeau stayed in the part as originally planned.

I'm not sure "Janeway's" unpopularity was a gender thing, as much as it was an acting thing.


From: The Alley, Behind Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Apemantus
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1845

posted 14 August 2002 07:02 PM      Profile for Apemantus        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
You don't explain in what way Janeway grates on you. She grates on me, just because I do not like her voice or her character, not how she does her job, though she is a bit too sickly about it, but none of it is to do with her gender. Not mad keen on Scott Bakula or Captain Kirk either, to be honest.

Anyway, explain more.


From: Brighton, UK | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
'lance
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1064

posted 14 August 2002 07:09 PM      Profile for 'lance     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I could live with Janeway, it was "Voyager" I didn't care for. At all.
From: that enchanted place on the top of the Forest | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
Zatamon
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1394

posted 14 August 2002 07:11 PM      Profile for Zatamon     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It’s her voice. It is unnecessarily hard (harsh?) when she is talking to male crewmen. Exerting her authority in a “challenge me if you dare” kind of way. I understand that captains of starships have to be tough and make decisions and enforce them. But she seems too defensive, does not have the confidence Picard does. And I do understand why and it is not her fault. So I do understand her, I sympathize with her and that is where the dilemma comes from. Every time I feel irritated by her, I feel guilty. I know it is our fault.
From: where hope for 'hope' is contemplated | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
scrabble
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2883

posted 14 August 2002 07:17 PM      Profile for scrabble     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
You sure it's not the rigid pseudomilitary hierarchy that's getting you down?
From: dappled shade in the forest | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged
Zatamon
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1394

posted 14 August 2002 07:21 PM      Profile for Zatamon     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yes, I am sure, because Picard does not irritate me the same way. When Picard gives an order, it does not come across as "challange me if you dare".
From: where hope for 'hope' is contemplated | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
'lance
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1064

posted 14 August 2002 07:23 PM      Profile for 'lance     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I dunno, I don't think that on any of those shows the hierarchy is especially rigid, in practice. Certainly not compared to any actually existing military.

I concluded some time ago that "Deep Space Nine" was the only show I really liked, barring some episodes of others here and there. Struggling to keep a rickety, borrowed enterprise clanking along, under stressful conditions, absent adequate resources... just reminded me of something, somehow. As I suspect it did you too, scrabble.


From: that enchanted place on the top of the Forest | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
Zatamon
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1394

posted 14 August 2002 07:27 PM      Profile for Zatamon     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
My favourite is "Deep Space Nine" as well. Maybe because nobody (except Odo and maybe Bashire) seems to have a chip on his/her shoulder. Not the size of the one Janeway seems to be carrying. I may read things into things.
From: where hope for 'hope' is contemplated | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
scrabble
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2883

posted 14 August 2002 07:31 PM      Profile for scrabble     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Struggling to keep a rickety, borrowed enterprise

You MUST mean "non-Enterprise"...?

Thanks, pal. And you know who I'll be thinking of if I have a nightmare about production night? And seventeen "top" news stories in feature style instead of news style? Each one about a military parade or Martha's stock trade or the Indy500? That all mysteriously disappear? And no wax in the waxer? And the abducted photographers calling in from somewhere on the Alaska Highway? And my thesis still due? Tomorrow?


From: dappled shade in the forest | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged
'lance
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1064

posted 14 August 2002 07:34 PM      Profile for 'lance     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Thanks, pal. And you know who I'll be thinking of if I have a nightmare about production night?

No, no -- you mean, who you'll be thinking of if you have an extremely pleasant dream about... ah, sorry, that pit looms again. As you were.


From: that enchanted place on the top of the Forest | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
nonsuch
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1402

posted 14 August 2002 07:49 PM      Profile for nonsuch     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I like Ben. I don't like Catherine much (Mutiny. Seven for captain - yay!). I was never crazy about James Kirk and, to tell the honest truth, i'm not mad keen on Picard, either (M-class palnet, beautiful redhead. happily ever after. Data for captain - yay!)
It's not a gender thing.
She's a fear-biter, and it's not her fault. The writers gave her all those stupid decisions. If you were forced to make all those stupid decisions, you'd be grating too. I bet her voice is perfectly nice in an unthreatened, relaxed, intimate situation.

From: coming and going | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Zatamon
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1394

posted 14 August 2002 07:54 PM      Profile for Zatamon     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Actually, she has two voices. The agressive one I talked about before, and the throaty, whispery, "I understand and I am on your side" kind of 'motherly' voice. That bugs me even more. Maybe it has nothing to do with gender and all have to do with her acting. But I have heard the 'Janeway voice' far too often from female managers in the IT indsutry to make me wonder. Maybe they all were Janeway fans.
From: where hope for 'hope' is contemplated | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
skadie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2072

posted 14 August 2002 08:55 PM      Profile for skadie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
But I have heard the 'Janeway voice' far too often from female managers in the IT indsutry to make me wonder.

I'd feel guilty about a sentiment like that. Fictional characters are one thing, but when you relate the feeling to actual women you work with it gets offensive. Do you think maybe it could be your interpretation and not their managerial skills you should be questioning?


From: near the ocean | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged
Zatamon
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1394

posted 14 August 2002 09:01 PM      Profile for Zatamon     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I wasn't questioning their managerial skills at all. I was describing an impression I had, about defensive attitudes towards male employees (not only myself) common to many female managers I have known over the last 30 years in Canada.

I did not mean to be offensive, only descriptive.


From: where hope for 'hope' is contemplated | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
nonsuch
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1402

posted 14 August 2002 09:28 PM      Profile for nonsuch     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well, okay, if you transfer the problem to managers, it's still the same problem. Maybe the writers didn't force them to make all those stupid decision; maybe the CEO (usually male) did - or laid down the policy that made stupid decisions necessary. Or not... You can't always tell. In any case, the person, male or female, in the front line who has to announce the stupid decision (whether they agree with it or not) may well be insecure and defensive, and does have to try for an authoritative voice. John isn't any better at this than Cathy: her voice may grate, but his goes up about two octaves and sounds ridiculous.

[ August 14, 2002: Message edited by: nonesuch ]


From: coming and going | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
skadie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2072

posted 14 August 2002 09:29 PM      Profile for skadie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
I was describing an impression I had, about defensive attitudes towards male employees (not only myself) common to many female managers I have known over the last 30 years in Canada.

I just wonder if you are projecting your own defensive attitude onto them?

Or perhaps women in male dominated industries have to be somewhat defensive to be taken seriously? Perhaps being surrounded by a boys club makes them defensive? Perhaps they are simply misinterpreted?


From: near the ocean | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged
nonsuch
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1402

posted 14 August 2002 09:44 PM      Profile for nonsuch     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
No, they're not misintrepreted - they're really scared shitless and they're really despised. The incompetent and semi-competent ones, that is. It's the same with teachers: you can tell by the tone of voice how confident they are in what they're saying. The really competent ones don't care what the guys (or students) think of them, so long as the job gets done. The really competent ones use their normal voice and everybody accepts it, because they themselves have no problem with it.

Face it: there are female managers who don't know what the hell they're doing. Not quite so many as male ones, but some.


From: coming and going | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
skadie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2072

posted 14 August 2002 10:03 PM      Profile for skadie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Face it: there are female managers who don't know what the hell they're doing. Not quite so many as male ones, but some.


Obviously there are a lot of bad managers out there, whether male or female. But if that was the idea behind the thread then why was it put in the feminist forum?

I liken the attitude to "woman driver" jokes. Women cause less accidents than men, but as soon as a woman puts herself into a situation where she is independently in control (over a car or an employee base) she is ridiculed and her faults are interpreted as "womanly" faults.


From: near the ocean | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged
Zatamon
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1394

posted 14 August 2002 10:17 PM      Profile for Zatamon     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
skadie: Or perhaps women in male dominated industries have to be somewhat defensive to be taken seriously?
That is exactly the point I was trying to make (see first post). The dilemma from a male (mine) perspective is the following. Whenever I am in a situation like the one I desscribed, I feel both guilty and irritated. Guilt comes from knowing that my irritation is with the consequences of actions in a male-dominated universe.

From: where hope for 'hope' is contemplated | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
skadie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2072

posted 15 August 2002 12:43 AM      Profile for skadie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Weeeeellll, ok then.
From: near the ocean | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged
nonsuch
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1402

posted 15 August 2002 12:49 AM      Profile for nonsuch     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Industry is male dominated, yes. But the whole damn universe?? Leave your guilt on the launching pad: you won't be able to tell male and female Vogons apart.
From: coming and going | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
WingNut
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1292

posted 15 August 2002 12:56 AM      Profile for WingNut   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
What have we come to?
An actor depicting a fictional character piloting a starship 70 light years from earth and the big issue is whether she is over compensating?
Is she over compensating as an actor playing a traditional male role? Or is she over compensating as a female captain? Or is this thread over compensating for the lack of viable topics here on babble, as of late? Or is my post over compensating for my lack of something more interesting to do on a hot, humid, Thursday night? Excuse me ... I have to pee.

From: Out There | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 15 August 2002 02:34 AM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'm a Voyager junkie. Love it. Think Janeway rocks. Sure, she's a bit grating, and yes, she has to get tough, but the overcompensation aspect of the character seems realistic to me... I'd be overcompensating like hell if I were responsible for the lives of a shipload of people far from home and safety and had to make tough decisions.

Interesting, though... Male characters who overcompensate in similar situations are never commented on.

I also love B'Ellana Torres. An interesting choice for the creators of the program, a woman dealing with human/Klingon natures at war within herself.


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Trisha
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 387

posted 15 August 2002 04:48 AM      Profile for Trisha     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
If a man does it, he's aggressive, if a woman doesn it, she's a bitch. Sorry, sounds like the old double standard to me.
From: Thunder Bay, Ontario | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Apemantus
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1845

posted 15 August 2002 05:10 AM      Profile for Apemantus        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
And I do understand why and it is not her fault.

You do understand what, exactly??? She is a fictional character in a series and you are positive you know her motivation?? What a load of rubbish!!

quote:
Every time I feel irritated by her, I feel guilty. I know it is our fault.

Come ON!! This is ridiculous!! She is a character, you have NO idea whether that is the actress' voice (which could be grating, just like an actor's voice). Maybe you have a big hang up about all women (and your comment about female IT managers makes me think maybe you do), and regularly flagellate yourself over your incapability to distinguish anything women do from their gender, but this is ludicrous!!

Were you ever a Catholic? Never seen such a guilt complex!!!


From: Brighton, UK | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
WingNut
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1292

posted 15 August 2002 07:35 AM      Profile for WingNut   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Were you ever a Catholic? Never seen such a guilt complex!!!

Well, that is a bigotted statement.
Catholics do not have guilt complexes. They have confession for that. Which is why a catholic can order three murders in the morning and attend the church social that same afternoon. Confession is Lysol for the conscience.

From: Out There | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
Apemantus
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1845

posted 15 August 2002 07:53 AM      Profile for Apemantus        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I am a lapsed Catholic myself - I know it is a flippant remark, but it is a relatively common joke.

Sorry to any other Catholics who may be offended by the remark, I am not, because I have a sense of humour about my religion (well, you have to!)


From: Brighton, UK | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
Zatamon
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1394

posted 15 August 2002 08:28 AM      Profile for Zatamon     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Isn't Babble marvelous? My dilemma is "OK" for skadie, "load of rubbish" for Apemantus, and anything in between. I am sure the thread will cover the entire spectrum before it is done. As Terry said in another thread: "consensus is overrated, it is our differences that keep things interesting" (or something to that affect).
From: where hope for 'hope' is contemplated | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Apemantus
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1845

posted 15 August 2002 08:51 AM      Profile for Apemantus        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
If a man does it, he's aggressive, if a woman doesn it, she's a bitch. Sorry, sounds like the old double standard to me.


I am not sure there is a double standard there, so much as a misunderstanding (by others rather than you) of the words. A bitch is, to some extent at least, an agressive woman. Now, I personally would say that being aggressive is not a positive trait, and indeed, when applied to a country, even pro-war people think an aggressive country is a negative thing to be.

It is true that men are seen as supposed to be aggressive, whereas an aggressive woman is acting against the stereotype, supposedly, but in both instances, I would say whether a bitch or an aggressive man, the appraisal is a negative one. Perhaps 'bastard' better describes aggressive men?


From: Brighton, UK | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
Zatamon
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1394

posted 15 August 2002 10:39 AM      Profile for Zatamon     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
WingNut: is this thread over compensating for the lack of viable topics here on babble, as of late?
Ok, so let's talk about 9/11 and Afghanistan, for a change!

From: where hope for 'hope' is contemplated | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Trinitty
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 826

posted 15 August 2002 10:40 AM      Profile for Trinitty     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I understand your problem Zat, I had the same worries when I honestly tried Voyager, and couldn't stand Janeway. She annoyed the crap out of me. I worried that I didn't like a female captain.

I've decided though that it's not just because she's a woman, I liked Tasha Yarr as the security officer, she's just not right for the role. I like female political leaders, and my favourite boss was a female, so my conscience is clear. Vogager was just lame in my trekkie opinion.

Soultion? Find strong female leaders that you do respect and enjoy, I'm sure you'll find them.


From: Europa | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
Zatamon
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1394

posted 15 August 2002 10:45 AM      Profile for Zatamon     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Thanks for the understanding and the advice, Trinitty. I am sure there are many like that. Maybe not in the computer industry, or maybe it was just my own bad luck. I will keep my eyes open.
From: where hope for 'hope' is contemplated | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Rebecca West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1873

posted 15 August 2002 11:48 AM      Profile for Rebecca West     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Voyager sucked because the writing sucked. The writing sucked because they'd whored the whole Trek franchise into oblivion. And besides, Kate Mulgrew, a fairly competent actress, didn't have the acting wherewithal to overcome horrendously stupid scripts. There was a reason she was second choice to Genevieve Bujold.

As for turning it into an angst-filled whine against certain female IT managers? That ranks right up there with the episode where Paris and Kim get Janeway to join their 1930s sci-fi serial on the holodeck. Gag.


From: London , Ontario - homogeneous maximus | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
Zatamon
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1394

posted 15 August 2002 11:55 AM      Profile for Zatamon     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
And I love you too, Rebecca. What a sweet person you are. Really!

The range has just widened at both ends. Isn't it marvelous to think so many different and contradictory things about the exact same topic? I am bracing myself for more.

[ August 15, 2002: Message edited by: Zatamon ]


From: where hope for 'hope' is contemplated | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 16 August 2002 01:31 AM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Ms. West: I concur.
From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Zatamon
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1394

posted 16 August 2002 09:19 AM      Profile for Zatamon     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
OK, OK, OK. Doc, you are sweet too!
From: where hope for 'hope' is contemplated | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
anna_c
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2845

posted 19 August 2002 06:32 PM      Profile for anna_c     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
like wingnut, i am curious,

quote:
She ‘overcompensates’

for what?


From: montreal | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca