babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Bush suggests Obama wants "appeasement"

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Bush suggests Obama wants "appeasement"
Lord Palmerston
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4901

posted 15 May 2008 08:13 PM      Profile for Lord Palmerston     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
JERUSALEM (CNN) – President Bush launched a sharp but veiled attack Thursday on Sen. Barack Obama and other Democrats, suggesting they favor "appeasement" of terrorists in the same way some Western leaders appeased Hitler in the run-up to World War II.

The president did not name Obama or any other Democrat, but White House aides privately acknowledged the remarks were aimed at the presidential candidate and others in his party. Former President Jimmy Carter has called for talks with Hamas.

"Some seem to believe we should negotiate with terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along," Bush said at Israel's 60th anniversary celebration in Jerusalem.

"We have heard this foolish delusion before," Bush said in remarks to Israel's parliament, the Knesset. "As Nazi tanks crossed into Poland in 1939, an American senator declared: 'Lord, if only I could have talked to Hitler, all of this might have been avoided.' We have an obligation to call this what it is — the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history."

The remarks seemed to be a not-so-subtle attempt to continue to raise doubts about Obama with Jewish Americans. Those doubts were earlier stoked by Sen. John McCain, the presumptive Republican nominee in the 2008 presidential election, when he recently charged that Obama is the favored candidate of the Islamic fundamentalist group Hamas, which the U.S. government has listed as a terrorist group.


http://tinyurl.com/4cdy37


From: Toronto | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 15 May 2008 08:17 PM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
You should also quote Obama's cowardly response:

quote:
"George Bush knows that I have never supported engagement with terrorists, and the president's extraordinary politicization of foreign policy and the politics of fear do nothing to secure the American people or our stalwart ally Israel," Obama's statement said.

... He does not favor talks with Hamas, which he has called a terrorist organization.



From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 15 May 2008 08:52 PM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Obama is simply being consistent: Link

excerpt:

An examination of Mr. Obama’s numerous public statements on the subjects indicates that he has consistently condemned Hamas as a “terrorist organization,” has not sought the group’s support and does not advocate immediate, direct or unconditional negotiations with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Iranian president.


From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 15 May 2008 09:01 PM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Boom Boom:
Obama is simply being consistent:

Correct. Consistency when wrong is not a virtue.


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 15 May 2008 09:09 PM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
But Bush and McCain were wrong, obviously.
From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
josh
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2938

posted 16 May 2008 03:06 AM      Profile for josh     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Best response goes to Joe Biden:

quote:

An exasperated Biden skewered Bush over that in a conference call with reporters, calling the comments “pure politics,” “blatant,” “beneath the presidency,” “truly disgraceful,” “outrageous,” “disturbing,” “ridiculous hypocrisy” and “long-distance Swiftboating.” He even said Bush “oughta get a life.”

. . . .

Coupling Bush’s comments with McCain’s assertion that it’s clear who Hamas wants to be president, Biden said he sees “an ugly pattern emerging.”

He said the president should “get in touch with his administration.”

“I assume he’s going to fire his Secretary of State and Secretary of Defense,” Biden said. “They want engagement of Iran.”

He went on. “This is the kind of political rhetoric which continues to masquerade as policy,” Biden said. “All they have is masquerades.”

. . . .

Biden also sharply criticized Bush’s -- and John McCain’s, for that matter -- Mideast policy, or in McCain’s case lack thereof, Biden said. He called Bush’s policy an “abject failure,” “truly delusional” and “backwards.”

“The president’s saber rattling has been the most self-defeating policy imaginable … spurs instability in the Middle East … increase in price of oil … plays into the hands of those Iranian leaders he rails against.

“Since when, since when has talking removed no from the American vocabulary.


http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/15/1027733.aspx

And my personal favorite:

quote:

This is bullshit.



From: the twilight zone between the U.S. and Canada | Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
It's Me D
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 15152

posted 16 May 2008 05:06 AM      Profile for It's Me D     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
But Bush and McCain were wrong, obviously.

As unionist said, I'd be a lot more impressed if Obama was right. Bush is pretty well always wrong, and Obama doesn't really seem to disagree; in this case he's making sure we know he agrees with Bush... Its not very impressive.


From: Parrsboro, NS | Registered: Apr 2008  |  IP: Logged
nister
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7709

posted 16 May 2008 08:03 AM      Profile for nister     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
McCain's tagline on the whole "should we talk to terrorists?" issue was "What would you talk about?" {referring to Ahmadinajad}

I love mischief. If I were Obama I would reply: 'I'd call him a cunt!"


From: Barrie, On | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
Lard Tunderin' Jeezus
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1275

posted 16 May 2008 08:06 AM      Profile for Lard Tunderin' Jeezus   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 

From: ... | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
TemporalHominid
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6535

posted 16 May 2008 08:54 AM      Profile for TemporalHominid   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Bush is engaging in a-historical rhetoric again

the US currently has diplomats talking to North Korea, Chavez in Venezuela, to the Iranians, and has great dialogue with Syria; the CIA uses Syria to torture "enemy combatants", so obviously there is dialogue

Bush's administration sent the diplomats to these countries

Bush is an idiot

[ 16 May 2008: Message edited by: TemporalHominid ]


From: Under a bridge, in Foot Muck | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
farnival
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6452

posted 16 May 2008 09:48 AM      Profile for farnival     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
...We have heard this foolish delusion before," Bush said in remarks to Israel's parliament, the Knesset. "As Nazi tanks crossed into Poland in 1939,...


hmmm, could those Nazi's be the same ones Bush's grandfather Prescott was trading with until 1941?


From: where private gain trumps public interest, and apparently that's just dandy. | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 16 May 2008 11:43 AM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by farnival:


hmmm, could those Nazi's be the same ones Bush's grandfather Prescott was trading with until 1941?


It wasn't until late 1942 when U.S. feds ordered seizure of UBC's Nazi front bank operations on Wall Street. It was approximately the same time that the Nazis key battle at Stalingrad ground to a standstill. Roosevelt and Churchill fully expected the Nazis to occupy the Kremlin in about six week's time from the start of Nazi operation barbarossa, and after Hitler poured two-thirds of the Nazi war machine into the heart of Russia. The Russians were expected to put up a courageous battle as did the Poles, but none of the western leaders or Hitler realized just how well the industrialization of Russia had prepared them for war. Between 1928 and end of the 1930's, steel production in Russia increased by over 500 percent.

[ 16 May 2008: Message edited by: Fidel ]


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca