I hope that, regardless of the results, Wall gets to speak to some of the caucuses at the upcoming Convention. Because she is a woman of colour she may get some additional attention for her campaign from outside the labour movement.
I can't seem to find a Georgetti web site. But I'm sure he is still running for CLC President.
The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives recently send out an e mail to those on their list of an article by Jim Silver and Errol Black. Here are some excerpts from that article:
quote:
The Way Forward for LabourUnion membership in Canada has increased steadily since the 1940s. In 1940
there were 362,000 union members; in 2004, 4,261,000 members. However,
union density - union members as a percent of non-agricultural paid workers
- has declined in recent decades. The decline is significant. If the 37.9 percent union density rate of the 1980s had been
maintained through the 1990s and into the first years of this century, the
number of union members in 2004 would have been 5,319,000 - 25 percent
higher than the actual number of 4,261,000.
....This decline in union density has profoundly affected the capacity of the
labour movement to influence the political, economic and social agendas at
both national and provincial levels.
Two main factors determine the power of labour to shape events: union
density; and the militancy and combativeness of union members and
organizations. The two are interrelated. When union density is on the
increase, it becomes easier to mobilize members and to confront employers
and the state to achieve gains for working people. When union density is
declining, such gains are much more difficult. The marginalization of
labour in all jurisdictions, including those with NDP governments, since the
1980s is testimony to what happens when union density is declining. For
further evidence consider the case of the USA, where union density in the
private sector in 2004 was down to 7.9 % - with disastrous consequences for American working people and their communities.
The corrosive effects associated with the decline in union density create
conditions which accentuate the erosion. Anti-union employers and
governments become more aggressive in their efforts to drive unions from
workplaces and entrench anti-union legislation. This demoralizes those
already in unions, and makes it more difficult to recruit new members.
It is imperative that we find ways to stop the decline in union density, and
increase significantly the numbers in unions. To do this, we must organize
the unorganized.
There has long been survey and other evidence to show that more workers want to be union members than there are union members. Recent evidence is that around 50 per cent of Canadian workers would like to be in unions - 20 percentage points above the present rate of unionization.
There are formidable obstacles facing unions seeking to organize in the
private sector. Recent efforts to unionize Wal-Mart, for example, have met
with some success, but Wal-Mart is a ruthless employer, comparable to the
coal barons and the Eaton¹s and chartered banks of previous eras. Walmart
will stop at nothing to thwart efforts to unionize, including cutting off
its own parts to prevent the spread of unionization.
To organize workers in the Walmarts of this world, organized labour has to
build grassroots support in the communities where Walmart and other such
reactionary employers are located.
Reinventing Labour Councils
Historically, local labour councils mobilized support for workers involved
in industrial disputes with employers; organized educational activities on
political, social and economic issues for workers; and supported efforts to
elect working people to city council, school boards and federal and
provincial legislatures.
These activities were inspired by the belief that the labour movement
represented all working people, and was committed not only to improving
conditions in the workplace, but also to building better communities.
Labour councils led the fights for public libraries, for universal suffrage
in local, provincial and federal elections, for parks and recreation, for
public utilities to provide sewer and water, public transit and public
health services. Labour councils fought in national campaigns in support of
universal pensions, Medicare, unemployment insurance and a social safety net for the poor.
But in recent decades, labour councils have been battered by relentless
attacks on working people and their organizations by employers and
governments. Labour councils have had to fight defensive campaigns to block the GST, stop cuts to Unemployment Insurance, oppose privatization, protect Medicare, and block anti-union legislation. At the same time, many trade unions that had historically encouraged their members to get active in
labour councils, withdrew their support to pursue more narrowly-focused agendas.
If we are to breathe new life into the labour movement, and reverse the
long-term decline in union density, we need once again to look to local
labour councils as a catalyst in building a culture supportive of trade
unionism and progressive social change. It is labour councils that can,
through their active campaigns to support communities, promote a vision that embraces all working people.
To achieve these results, three things need to happen immediately. First,
the Canadian Labour Congress must direct more resources to local labour
councils to support them in expanding their range of activities and
initiatives in local communities. The CLC has previously considered, but
backed away from, requiring affiliates to contribute per capita dues to
labour councils. Perhaps the time has come to revisit this idea.
Second, while money is important, so is active participation by unions in
support of labour councils. The CLC and its affiliates must encourage
local unions to elect/appoint delegates to labour councils, and support and
promote the initiatives of labour councils, including, for example,
information pickets directed at anti-union employers, and election campaigns
in support of progressive labour candidates.
Third, labour councils must build coalitions with other progressive organizations in their communities to unite on issues of common concern, for
example, degradation of the environment, poverty and affordable housing, and the building of community through support for improved public transit, and local library and recreational facilities.
This rejuvenation at the bottom that arises from involvement in local
communities will contribute significantly to building social solidarity,
expanding the ranks of unionized workers, and promoting democracy and social justice.
By Errol Black and Jim Silver
Errol Black and Jim Silver are Board members of the Canadian Centre for
Policy Alternatives-Manitoba, and the co-authors of Building a Better World:
An Introduction to Trade Unionism in Canada.
Whoops, that was a bit too long. I will try to edit the article down for size. It's just so damn good.
I can't yet find an on-line link to the article but there is lots to read at the website. Enjoy. And consider joining!