babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Ballistic missiles in E. Europe threaten Russia - chief of staff

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Ballistic missiles in E. Europe threaten Russia - chief of staff
BetterRed
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11865

posted 24 May 2006 12:51 PM      Profile for BetterRed     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:

Ballistic missiles in E. Europe threaten Russia - chief of staff
17:04 | 24/ 05/ 2006
MOSCOW, May 24 (RIA Novosti) - The deployment of ballistic missiles in eastern Europe poses a threat to Russia, the chief of the country's General Staff said Wednesday.

General Yury Baluyevsky said U.S. plans to deploy ballistic missiles in eastern Europe, possibly in Poland and Romania, as part of its missile shield presented a certain danger to Russia.

"The very fact of the deployment of the first-line missile defenses in this region is unequivocally intended to neutralize Russia's strategic potential," he said.

Baluyevsky said Russia did not need a new round of the arms race, adding that President Vladimir Putin had also addressed this issue in his May 10 state of the nation address.

"In the next five years, we must significantly increase the procurement of modern aircraft, submarines and strategic missiles for the Armed Forces," Putin said.

He said current research was focused on the development of unique high-precision weapons and warheads "whose trajectory could not be predicted by a potential enemy."

The new weaponry will allow the country to maintain the strategic balance of forces in the world, Putin said.


RIA: Russian general protests US missiles

Looks like Cuban Missile Crisis, except Americans are the ones creeping up with their missiles. US missiles just a few hundred kilometres from St.Petersburg.
Still, Russians will show teeth in a different theatre. I.e - read this thread: US losing Central Asia


From: They change the course of history, everyday ppl like you and me | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 24 May 2006 01:53 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Oh yaw, it was ok for missiles in Turkey and pointed at Russia, but a few nukes in Cuba was over the top. MacNamara thought the gig was up. The Soviet navy was half way to the Caribbean at one point.
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
nister
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7709

posted 28 May 2006 05:06 AM      Profile for nister     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Better Red, some of the "teeth" you referred to would be the S-300 PMU-2 air defence system, considered better than the Patriot system, [faint praise, IMO] that Russia has developed and marketed. One facet of the anti-missile umbrella it affords is an electronic counter-measure system that, while hush-hush, almost certainly uses an EMP mimicking microwave burst to blind incoming threats.

The S-300 has been sold to China, who will use it to blunt America's advantages in the Taiwan
Strait.


From: Barrie, On | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 29 May 2006 01:45 AM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Sure Nister. And the Soviets, er, I mean the Russian's are spending half their GDP on military!!!. There must be a missile gap happening somewhere. Just ask RAND Corporation, they'll back me up "cough" Have you been reading Jane's Defense Weekly by any chance ?. "wink" ha ha
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
nister
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7709

posted 29 May 2006 06:11 AM      Profile for nister     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Hi Fidel. You and I seem to talk right past each other. I wasn't addressing Russia's right
of defense; I was pointing to an end product of
Russia's search for an "asymmetrical" advantage
vis-a-vis the Americans.

Jane's is a good source for this stuff; so is www.spacewar.com


From: Barrie, On | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
sgm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5468

posted 29 May 2006 10:01 AM      Profile for sgm     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Pavel Podvig has blogged about the possible placement of interceptors in Poland here.

The upshot: no real defensive purpose; strained relations with Russia.

Not a wise move.


From: I have welcomed the dawn from the fields of Saskatchewan | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
sgm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5468

posted 30 May 2006 12:59 AM      Profile for sgm     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The Arms Control Wonk has another informative post on this matter here.

I've also blogged about a related story: here.

[ 30 May 2006: Message edited by: sgm ]


From: I have welcomed the dawn from the fields of Saskatchewan | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
sgm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5468

posted 31 May 2006 09:06 PM      Profile for sgm     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
And tomorrow, Hans Blix and company will be coming out with a report making the following recommendations:
quote:
OTTAWA — Hans Blix, the UN's former chief weapons inspector, and a blue-ribbon international commission say the United States should halt deployment of its missile defence system and concentrate instead arms control measures.

In a report to be presented to the UN Thursday, Mr. Blix and the Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission warn that missile defence systems like the one being built by the United States threaten global peace and security.

Deployment of such systems risk “creating or aggravating arms races,” says the commission's final report.


More here.

From: I have welcomed the dawn from the fields of Saskatchewan | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca