babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » labour and consumption   » The new model car company

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: The new model car company
Doug
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 44

posted 30 July 2007 03:56 PM      Profile for Doug   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
http://money.cnn.com/magazines/business2/business2_archive/2007/08/01/100138830/index.htm

quote:
Shuttling between Oslo and California, Willums has raised $78 million from Silicon Valley and European investors captivated by the genial, soft-spoken Norwegian's vision of a carbon-neutral urban car. You might spot him at Buck's, the VC hangout in Woodside, or at a tech conference in Napa. Four months after Willums's investment group acquired Think last year, he was hammering out its strategy at a brainstorming session hosted by Google.

Willums's pitch is this: He's not just selling an electric car; he's upending a century-old automotive paradigm, aiming to change the way cars are made, sold, owned, and driven.

Taking a cue from Dell (Charts, Fortune 500), the company will sell cars online, built to order. It will forgo showrooms and seed the market through car-sharing services like Zipcar. Every car will be Internet-and Wi-Fi-enabled, becoming, according to Willums, a rolling computer that can communicate wirelessly with its driver, other Think owners, and the power grid.

In other words, it's Web 2.0 on wheels. "We want to sell mobility," Willums says. "We don't want to sell a thing called the Think."

That's a lot to ride on one tiny car. And it's a big gamble for consumers, particularly freeway-driving, SUV-loving Americans. But global warming, the boom in green energy, and the changing economics of electric car production -- doing for $100 million what Detroit does for $1 billion -- have unleashed forces that won't be as easy to crush as the EV1 electric car scrapped by General Motors (Charts, Fortune 500) in 2003.



From: Toronto, Canada | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 30 July 2007 04:01 PM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
tat
From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
StrawCat
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10695

posted 30 July 2007 10:25 PM      Profile for StrawCat     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Electric pick ups.
No, not for your guitar.
A pickup truck. Sort of attractive, too.
http://www.phoenixmotorcars.com/

The one flaw is that these probably won't be able to carry a 4x8 sheet of plywood.
However, there are ways around that.

Cheers,

StrawCat


From: Central B.C | Registered: Oct 2005  |  IP: Logged
scooter
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5548

posted 01 August 2007 10:19 AM      Profile for scooter     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
A tiny car....death on wheels. I'm not going to sacrific my safety to offload my carbon emissions onto my local electricity utility.
From: High River | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
jrootham
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 838

posted 01 August 2007 08:11 PM      Profile for jrootham     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
You got a cite for numbers on that assertion?
From: Toronto | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
Doug
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 44

posted 01 August 2007 08:59 PM      Profile for Doug   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by scooter:
A tiny car....death on wheels. I'm not going to sacrific my safety to offload my carbon emissions onto my local electricity utility.

Bigger isn't necessarily safer.


From: Toronto, Canada | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 01 August 2007 09:45 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
That's exactly what more Yanks should be driving to work on sunny days with their ice-free roads in the sun belt. And they should be encouraged to stop burning so much cheap Canadian fossil fuel in those big-ass Dodge Rams and guzzoline-guzzling Blazers with empty passenger seats on the way to Quickee Mart for a chili death dog smothered with eutectic cheese. ETA:

[ 01 August 2007: Message edited by: Fidel ]


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
scooter
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5548

posted 02 August 2007 08:45 AM      Profile for scooter     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by jrootham:
You got a cite for numbers on that assertion?

Basic physics. Tiny cars can not absorb the energy of a high energy impact like a larger vehicle. Yes, there are numerous examples of unsafe large vehicles but that doesn't prove that a tiny car are safer.

Tiny Smart car faces safety questions, MSNBC

Tiny Smart car crash video, amazing how well the Smart car survives the crash but alas the driver would be dead.


From: High River | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
scooter
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5548

posted 02 August 2007 08:48 AM      Profile for scooter     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It's interesting that the company posts no information about their vehicle efficiency.

Check out
this fact sheet from Tesla.


From: High River | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca