babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Tony Blair hands out peerages for cash?

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Tony Blair hands out peerages for cash?
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 19 March 2006 09:37 PM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
'Cash for peerages' allegation dents Britons' trust in Tony Blair

quote:
A furor over secret loans to Tony Blair's Labour party and charges that he sold seats in the House of Lords to party backers is denting public trust in the British prime minister. Blair has denied he handed out nominations to the Lords in exchange for funds for the party, but his deputy refused Sunday to categorically say the allegations were false.

A new poll showed that nearly half of Britons believed the charges and more than 70 per cent thought Blair's government was at least as sleazy as that of his predecessor, Prime Minister John Major.

That's a worrying statistic for Blair, who trounced Major in 1997 partly because the Tory had been so badly damaged by a string of embarrassing scandals. Blair promised then that his government would be "whiter than white," words some are now throwing back in his face.

Blair has acknowledged his Labour party took nearly 14 million pounds, or about $28 million Cdn, in loans from supporters ahead of last year's general election. The law requires that gifts to political parties must be made public, but it does not cover loans and the party kept them secret until a newspaper reported their existence last weekend.

Blair nominated to seats in the House of Lords several of those who had lent money to Labour. He says he did nothing wrong and that all the men were well-qualified for the jobs in Parliament's upper house. They have withdrawn their names.


Hey -- what about Canadian law? Are "loans" legal here? Is there a loophole?


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
S1m0n
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11427

posted 19 March 2006 10:30 PM      Profile for S1m0n        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Its clear that Tony is NEVER going to keep his promise to Gordon Brown to hand over the leadership of the party.

Blair's going to hang on and hang on until he takes Labour down with him. They'll have to pry his cold dead fingers from the leadership.


From: Vancouver | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
rici
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2710

posted 19 March 2006 10:31 PM      Profile for rici     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
See 424(3) of the Elections Act, which says that for reporting purposes, a loan is treated as a contribution, and therefore must be reported.

From Elections Canada Handbook for Registered Parties:

quote:
A loan is treated as a contribution for disclosure purposes. The chief agent must disclose its source and the amount of the principal in the party’s fiscal return. The chief agent must provide the name and address of the lender, the name of the guarantor, and any conditions on the loan as part of the registered party’s return.

From: Lima, Perú | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
Screaming Lord Byron
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4717

posted 19 March 2006 10:50 PM      Profile for Screaming Lord Byron     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by unionist:
'Cash for peerages' allegation dents Britons' trust in Tony Blair

Hey -- what about Canadian law? Are "loans" legal here? Is there a loophole?


Isn't Blair just doing exactly what our two largest parties have been doing with the Senate since Confederation? This all just underlines the need to get patronage as far away from the hands of incumbent parties as possible.


From: Calgary | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Hephaestion
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4795

posted 20 March 2006 12:21 AM      Profile for Hephaestion   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I am appalled! Flabbergasted! Astounded and confounded!

quote:
A furor over secret loans to Tony Blair's Labour party and charges that he sold seats in the House of Lords to party backers is denting public trust in the British prime minister.


The British public had trust in Toady Bliar?!

How did this happen?!

From: goodbye... :-( | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Heavy Sharper
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11809

posted 20 March 2006 12:37 AM      Profile for Heavy Sharper        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
People trust and vote for sleazy crooks and enemies of democracy all the time: Look at our own Canada, the U.S., Mexico (Yep, some Mexicans actually do vote for PRI without being bribed to.), Hong Kong (40% of the population routinely votes for parties that explicity oppose univeral suffrage, the expansion of civil liberty and human rights protections, and the creation of a welfare state), El Salvador (the political successors to the old far-right death squads currently run the country), and Taiwan (Somehow the Kuomintang and its fascist allies still command the lion's share of the public's support even while 85 - 90% of the population routinely says no to reuniting with Beijing.).
From: Calgary | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca