babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Meet the "babylosers" of Europe

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Meet the "babylosers" of Europe
Doug
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 44

posted 11 May 2008 09:20 AM      Profile for Doug   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
In Spain people such as Emilio are known from their pay as the 'mileuristas' (thousand euro-ers). In France they are the 'babylosers' - a term coined by sociologist Louis Chauvel to contrast them with 'babyboomers'. According to Chauvel, 41, a sociologist at the National Foundation for Political Science, for the first time in recent history a generation of French citizens aged between 20 and 40 can expect a lower standard of living than the one before. 'Mileuristas or babylosers: it's the same story,' he said. 'They have an average of three years more education than their parents, a worse job and a lower standard of living.'

This doesn't seem unique to Europe, but hey, so they have a name for it!


From: Toronto, Canada | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
CMOT Dibbler
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4117

posted 11 May 2008 10:13 AM      Profile for CMOT Dibbler     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I thought we just called them generation X
From: Just outside Fernie, British Columbia | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
bigcitygal
Volunteer Moderator
Babbler # 8938

posted 11 May 2008 11:19 AM      Profile for bigcitygal     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I believe Generation X, which is my generation, is the name for the cohort following the baby boomers, which would consist of those of us born from the late 1950s to late 1960s/early 1970s.

Those from age 20 to just under 40 were born from the late 60s and earlier, up until 1988. They aren't Gen X, I thought they were called Gen Y.


From: It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent - Q | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
500_Apples
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12684

posted 11 May 2008 11:32 AM      Profile for 500_Apples   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The baby boom stops around 1960-1965 (1946 to 1964 according to wikipedia) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baby_Boomers.

Generation X is from around 1965 to 1980.

Generation Y are in theory the children of the boomers, those born between 1980 and... 1995? Apparently 1978 to 1994 on the wikipedia page, though some say it starts at 1982. Also called the echo boom. As I'm born in 1983 I'm at the peak of this demographic bulge which may or may not be nice. The millenials come after.

******

A population pyramid:


http://www.statisticum.org/outputs/index.php
We see boomers, generation X, then echo boom...

******

Baby boomers are the greatest voters in history.

In the past few decades we've seen the environment get dilapidated, median incomes are down 15%, governments are heavily in debt and many social programs are headed to insolvency unless something is done.

[ 11 May 2008: Message edited by: 500_Apples ]


From: Montreal, Quebec | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged
-=+=-
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7072

posted 11 May 2008 11:54 AM      Profile for -=+=-   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Its hard to feel sorry for these people:

quote:
'I am angry. I know a lot of people who are in the same situation and our qualifications are not being rewarded,' said Arias. For Nathalie, the weekend in her parents' seaside home will leave 'a bitter taste in my mouth'.

Tough, baby.

Your degree doesn't automatically deliver a second home and an overseas vacation? The heart bleeds.

One guy is complaining about making 2,700 euros a month (that's CDN 48,700/year) in a job he really doesn't care about. That's really sad.

Another guy is worried that now he has a son he won't be able to redo his bathroom. Someone else complains about having to check prices in the supermarket. Please!

The worst case in the article, a "freelance architect" is only making 1,000 euros a month (CDN 18,000/year). Being a "freelance architect" is like being an "aspiring actor", the pay is going to be low for a long, long time.

This article isn't about the middle class, or a generation being squeezed, its about professionals who thought their degrees gave them a ticket to an upper-middle class lifestyle.

Can you say: sense of entitlement?

[ 11 May 2008: Message edited by: -=+=- ]


From: Turtle Island | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 11 May 2008 12:21 PM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I know plenty of youngish people in that situation in various European countries - and there is no point at all in "converting" the € into $CDN because they have to pay for their housing, utilities (often much more expensive than here) and expenses in €.

It is probably worse for working-class young people because their parents had unionised jobs and there has been severe delocalisation and disindustrialisation.

By the way, the guy who re-did his bathroom did it before the baby arrived, if I read the article well. Many houses in Europe don't come with shelving, cupboards, fitted kitchens etc.

These people seem to be the poorest in the article:

quote:
Some of the pressure to graduate also slipped away when I saw one friend get his degree and then only earn €500 a month at an Italian space firm and another get €800 a month at the European Space Agency,' said Di Martino

Rome is less expensive than London or Paris, but unless one can find social housing, not cheap by any means. They might be living with their parents or other relatives, but they may have had to move to another city for work.

Though it must be recalled that not all of us boomers are well off by any means - many of us have been "downsized" or "outsourced" and are living on equally contingent incomes.


From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
bigcitygal
Volunteer Moderator
Babbler # 8938

posted 11 May 2008 12:26 PM      Profile for bigcitygal     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Entitlement, yeah, really!

One thing I forgot to mention is that the Generation X, Y, boomers, echo, etc, are based on very gross and non-specific data, and excludes many significant factors such as poverty, race/culture, immigration status, etc. Basically it's a tool to name the various white middle class demographics. Look, I even do it! I'm so ashamed of myself.

"Baby boomers" is also a very USian concept, and I wonder how much is applicable here in Canada, or in Europe, the article in the OP that started it all.


From: It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent - Q | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
melovesproles
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8868

posted 11 May 2008 12:40 PM      Profile for melovesproles     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It is strange that the article talks about 'mileuristas' and then goes onto use mostly examples of people living above this bracket. The article should have stuck with those earning 1000 euros a month instead of showing how tough it is for those earning two, not that the decline in income for both groups isn't related. And as Lagatta says its silly converting dollars to dollars without calculating differences in living expenses.

Its not just Europe and North America either, its a global phenomena. In Japan they call them 'Freeters'

quote:
Images of stereotypical harried salarymen have characterized Japan’s workforce for generations. Identically clad in blue serge suits and sporting company pins on their lapels, these dedicated workers put in 14-hour days, obeyed their bosses unquestioningly and gave their companies undivided loyalty. In return, corporations provided them with life-long employment.

Guarantees of job security have evaporated due to shifting management styles and an economic slump that has lingered for more than 15 years. As a result, Japan is in a state of crisis. Middle-aged workers, for the first time in postwar history, are scrambling for jobs. The elderly are fretting about dwindling pension funds. But most importantly, young people are becoming increasingly disenchanted with corporate Japan. Many are seeking alternative lifestyles, a trend that has the country very worried.

Each year, corporations are hiring fewer seishain (full-time workers) with all the privileges this status brings. In the current economic climate, companies don’t want to take on the burden of educating raw recruits as they did in the past and to keep them for 40 years. They prefer to hire seasoned employees or part-time personnel.

This year, the number of part-time workers between the ages of 18 and 34 reached 4.5 million. Masahiro Yamada, an economics professor at Tokyo Gakugei University, expects this number to reach 10 million by 2015 despite a steady decline in the number of people in this age group because of the falling birthrate.

The Japanese were quick to pin a label, freeters, on these young part-time workers shortly after the economic bubble burst in the late 1980s. The term is derived from the English word “free” and the German word arbeiter, or “worker.”

If students and homemakers who work part-time were included in the official tally, the number of freeters would surge far beyond 4.5 million.

“Freeters are aging, and their negative influence will impact on every aspect of society,” warns economics professor Horimichi Suwa, who heads the career studies program at Shumei University in Chiba Prefecture. “One problem I foresee is an increase in crime because there are no jobs, but they will also cause problems to our social system because they do not contribute to the tax base or to the retirement fund.”

Freeters fall into three categories: the dreamers, the procrastinators and the ones who have no alternative.


Fretting Over Freeters

Its interesting how its almost always presented in the same way-usually the generation is blamed as being 'lazy' or 'not driven' enough' or full of 'dreamers' for culturally adapting to the new economic reality that the good secure jobs of previous generations are no longer available.


From: BC | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 11 May 2008 01:40 PM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well yes, but it is just as divisive to depict the postwar baby-boom generation as "selfish" (usually this is done by anti-union corporate spokespersons) or across-the-board wealthy and privileged.

bcg, you forgot "sex" or "gender".


From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
ceti
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7851

posted 13 May 2008 05:58 AM      Profile for ceti     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Heck, it is is no secret that 30 somethings these days are caught in the vise of neoliberalism, although I have grown up knowing that this was happening and resigning myself to the decimation of the middle class dream.

Yeah, I am, as Obama says, bitter, but also know that the former lifestyle was just as unsustainable.


From: various musings before the revolution | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
ceti
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7851

posted 13 May 2008 06:02 AM      Profile for ceti     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Also this middling generation is caught out because the babyboomers are only beginning to vacate their positions, only to have their children take over. We in the middle have been screwed as a result, working dead end jobs, only to see hot shot young punks ascend to management.
From: various musings before the revolution | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 13 May 2008 06:17 AM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
In French, the usual term (especially in a European context), referred to the era, not a generation: "Les Trente Glorieuses" - the thirty years of unparallelled economic growth, and improvement of the living standard of the working class and the lower middle class, from the end of the Second World War to the Oil Shock. This of course involved a demographic boom - but also an intake of many immigrant workers (as it did here), development of mass higher education and other changes.

A postwar "baby boom" is a common demographic phenomenon, and the reasons behind it were not so different in Canada or (Western) Europe at least as in the US, as there had been a major war after a major economic slump. The postwar was far more dramatic in Europe as it wasn't just a matter of male wage-earners being away, but also of a much greater death and severe injury level among the population (not only military but also civilian) and a damaged or destroyed infrastructure.


From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca