babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


  
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » archived babble   » auntie.com   » Student conformity bothers 'moral purist'

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Student conformity bothers 'moral purist'
Sharon
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4090

posted 09 May 2005 11:38 AM      Profile for Sharon     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Can you change the thinking of a gang of fairly conservative, careerist-minded graduate students so they would give up one end-of-term dinner and donate the money saved to a good cause? The suggestion was met with some hostility but auntie has some ideas on how this situation could be handled.

Here she is


From: Halifax, Nova Scotia | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 09 May 2005 11:58 AM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
I agree with auntie. Moral purist's proposal would be rather unthinkable here, where right now there is a renewal of student protest and radicalism. We like to party and to eat a fine meal from time to time!

I'm anything but conservative or conformist, but I'm rather wary of people who look askance at "l'esprit de la fête". Dour puritanism has never helped the left.

And I know auntie and her Doppelgangerin would agree .


From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
voice of the damned
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6943

posted 09 May 2005 12:18 PM      Profile for voice of the damned     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
The problem with moral purist's position is that she doesn't explain why it's such a moral imperative for the students to give up this one particular luxury, as opposed to some other one. Unless MP is living an utterly spartan existence herself, she's probably got a few unneccesary expenditures in her own life that could be put to better use feeding the poor. I mean, does she REALLY need a graduate degree?

[ 09 May 2005: Message edited by: voice of the damned ]


From: Asia | Registered: Sep 2004  |  IP: Logged
fossilnut
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8972

posted 09 May 2005 12:47 PM      Profile for fossilnut        Edit/Delete Post
Tokenism is a touchy-feely to make ourselves feel good and not those that actually need it.

Back in the 60's the equivalent would have been to invite a negro to lunch. Are we doing it feed the Black person or to show how liberated we ourselves are? "Gee, I'm not a racist, I had lunch with a Black person. Look at me."

I always like a quote I once heard (may have been Churchill). 'There is nothing more empty than un untried virtue'. Otherwise, easy to bathe in the glory of tokenism but when the rubber hits the road are you going to be reducing every meal expense by %75 and sending the money to feed the poor? When no one is looking? No one else to pat you on the back?


From: calgary | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 09 May 2005 12:57 PM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
On top of the rather frightening "moral purism" of the well-named question-asker, his or her proposal doesn't make sense. Unless they have wealthy parents or a particuarly exceptional grant, students simply don't have a lot of funds. It would make more sense to work to get wealthier people to contribute to a homeless shelter - or better, advocacy in favour of social housing and the social services homeless people need to help them get off the streets.

Although some graduate programmes are very demanding, students still usually have greater flexibility in terms of time they can volunteer than people working 9 to 5 do, especially if the latter have children.

After May Day here - and the outbreak of police brutality against peaceful demonstrators at the end - rest assured I had a special dinner planned for friends, with foods I had lovingly prepared and an especially good bottle of wine.


From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
paxamillion
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2836

posted 09 May 2005 01:16 PM      Profile for paxamillion   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Let me guess.... she's in an MBA program.
From: the process of recovery | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 09 May 2005 04:12 PM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Mediocre But Average?
From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 09 May 2005 04:27 PM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Well, I feel someone should put in a kind word for "Trying hard" (note: that's what the correspondent called self, not "moral purist"), so I'll do it.

Without question, graduate programs run on fear and self-consciousness and, hence, conformity. I think that's almost a condition of that stage in one's training. One is at one's most obsequious, and that has everything to do with the purpose and structure of graduate programs and the gawdawful dissertation-supervisor/committee process. I don't remember its making me feel more competitive, but I certainly believe that it destroys many people's ability ever to write well or sensibly again. I speak with some authority on that subject.

I agree with auntie's advice about more practical ways for "Trying hard" to find allies. And as others have said above, I also think that a splendid celebration to mark a notable event or passage is great for the spirits and maybe for group spirit, although to me, a potluck would do that even better than a restaurant meal at most of the restaurants we knew as graduate students.


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
FabFabian
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7496

posted 10 May 2005 02:36 AM      Profile for FabFabian        Edit/Delete Post
I don't get it. They sound like selfish pricks to me.
From: Toronto | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged
Crippled_Newsie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7024

posted 10 May 2005 05:07 AM      Profile for Crippled_Newsie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
It seems pointless to me to try to shame others into virtuous acts; if done out of shame they lose their virtue.

It further seems arrogant to me for another to decide precisely which acts shall be deemed 'virtuous' in all circumstances.


From: It's all about the thumpa thumpa. | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
aRoused
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1962

posted 12 May 2005 07:16 AM      Profile for aRoused     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
I'm more concerned about the reaction of the fellow students than that of 'Trying Hard'.

Honestly, a simple suggestion to have a potluck instead of going to a restaurant and suddenly that's 'silencing people with its moral purity'? Do these people start accusing each other of fascism if someone suggests visiting a different pub than usual after work on Fridays?


From: The King's Royal Burgh of Eoforwich | Registered: Dec 2001  |  IP: Logged
GJJ
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9023

posted 12 May 2005 10:23 AM      Profile for GJJ        Edit/Delete Post
quote:

Without question, graduate programs run on fear and self-consciousness and, hence, conformity. I think that's almost a condition of that stage in one's training. One is at one's most obsequious, and that has everything to do with the purpose and structure of graduate programs and the gawdawful dissertation-supervisor/committee process. I don't remember its making me feel more competitive, but I certainly believe that it destroys many people's ability ever to write well or sensibly again. I speak with some authority on that subject.

I think that might depend on the department. My experience was that I and my fellow students were much more conformist as undergrads (between end of term projects, weekly assignments, labs, and studying for 70% finals there wasn't time for much of anything but jumping through the hoops). Then as a grad student there was suddenly lots of freedom (quite common for master's students to change their thesis topic on just a whim, and because there were almost no classes you could always find a bit of free time to get involved in issues ... though the months of actually writing up the thesis is usually nose-to-the-grindstone stuff). As well, because the prof's want to put their name on any paper you write (the good ones only as last author), I found they went out of their way to be encouraging and flexible. Having TA's and RA's helped too ... there was actually some spare cash for beer and the like. A lot of us only became politically active during graduate studies...first time we had the freedom to do so.

As for why the writer got the reaction he/she did, maybe it wasn't an isolated incident. No one likes to be preached to. I agree with Auntie, there are better ways to get folks socially conscious (and unless they have one helluva year end dinner, the contribution of a single meal isn't going to mean much. You want to change their way of thinking, not get a few one-shot dollars).


From: Saskatoon | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
ephemeral
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8881

posted 12 May 2005 10:35 AM      Profile for ephemeral     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
posted by Tape_342:
quote:
It seems pointless to me to try to shame others into virtuous acts;

I didn't get the impression that Trying Hard was trying to coerce anybody to make a charitable contribution. Sounds more like she made a "suggestion", to which a polite 'no' would have sufficed.

Like aRoused, I too am more concerned about the severe reaction of TH's colleagues, than THs puritanical stance.


From: under a bridge with a laptop | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
Lenore
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9104

posted 15 May 2005 10:28 PM      Profile for Lenore     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
I can't help but feel that this issue is a bit more complex than presented, as it isn't clear exactly where the money comes from. In my doctoral program, we had a similar situation arise just before I graduated. We got a small amount of money each year for a PhD dinner, and someone suggested we donate the money. The problem was that the money was technically the university's, even though they gave it to us "to do something with", and the university can't give operating funds to a cause- I don't think that's allowed in Canada. So we really didn't have control over the money, beyond doing something like having dinner or buying a printer or something. I wonder if that is the case here?
From: Ottawa | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
Bundtcake
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9267

posted 20 May 2005 12:41 AM      Profile for Bundtcake     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
"an insolent attack", "I don't take their views very seriously", "the students in this program are sheepishly conventional", "a gang of fairly conservative, careerist-minded graduate students (who I shudder to think will be our future professors)" -- TH's entire message drips with disdain, thinly-veiled condescension, and an elitist anti-intellectualism. I'd agree with others that shame, blame and dour Puritanism aren't exactly effective tools at transforming or politicizing one's colleagues.
From: Toronto | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
Anchoress
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4650

posted 20 May 2005 12:54 AM      Profile for Anchoress     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
I think the writer should be asking her or himself why this whole group reacted so strongly to the suggestion? Of course it's possible that it's just an exceptionally homogenous group of selfish know-it-alls (I'm not being facetious, I really think it's possible), or perhaps the writer has positioned him/herself in such a way as to make people feel defensive?

If it turns out that the former is true, then my advice is to give up the goal of persuading them to contribute to a worthy cause and chalk it up to experience, and if the latter is true then perhaps the writer should work on developing relationships, mending fences, appealing to people in a different way?

Edited to fix a missed metaphor.

[ 20 May 2005: Message edited by: Anchoress ]


From: Vancouver babblers' meetup July 9 @ Cafe Deux Soleil! | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged
Thomas More
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9546

posted 07 June 2005 02:26 AM      Profile for Thomas More     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
fossilnut - I always like a quote I once heard (may have been Churchill). 'There is nothing more empty than untried virtue'. Otherwise, easy to bathe in the glory of tokenism but when the rubber hits the road are you going to be reducing every meal expense by %75 and sending the money to feed the poor? When no one is looking? No one else to pat you on the back?

Fossilnut, I don't think you have to get nearly that drastic. Most people can do something effective if they get together and decide to scale back the drinking on Friday/Saturday night (1 beer/drink instead of the 3 or 4 beers/drinks each person would normally have) and give the extra money to a Soup Kitchen, Shelter, Free Clinic (USA), or a Church which they know works a lot with the poorer members of the community. Believe it or not, not only would the poor benefit, but so does the person learning to get by on one beer a night. and, Since this is a Discipline, it isn't "Tokanism".

I also used to volunteer at a Soup Kitchen in downtown LA. One can help feed 500 or more people a nutritious lunch working in a Soup Kitchen.

You'd obviously have to find one in your neighborhood that accepts volunteers where you feel comfortable.

There are more things people can do, but the idea is to do something useful, not to wear oneself out.

quote:
Bundtcake - "an insolent attack", "I don't take their views very seriously", "the students in this program are sheepishly conventional", "a gang of fairly conservative, careerist-minded graduate students (who I shudder to think will be our future professors)" -- TH's entire message drips with disdain, thinly-veiled condescension, and an elitist anti-intellectualism. I'd agree with others that shame, blame and dour Puritanism aren't exactly effective tools at transforming or politicizing one's colleagues.

I see what you mean. Maybe she needed to alter her approach. The "End of Term Dinner" is probably something that everyone looks forward to as the celebration.

It may have been like asking a family to give up their Thanksgiving or their Christmas Dinners for an Abstraction. People will give up part of their weekly partying for people they know, but not something they've really looked forward to for an abstraction.

If you're trying to shame them, it's just not going to work. YOu'll just make them angry and defensive.

Thomas


From: Los Angeles, CA | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca