babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » labour and consumption   » membership dues unpaid- no service

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: membership dues unpaid- no service
TemporalHominid
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6535

posted 17 February 2006 10:49 AM      Profile for TemporalHominid   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
would this be an indication of where privitisation of esential services could end up going?

Man injured battling the fire

quote:
Rueda said no one told him about the dues policy when he moved in 1 1/2 years ago.


Hispanic Residents not informed of policy

[ 17 February 2006: Message edited by: TemporalHominid ]


From: Under a bridge, in Foot Muck | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
Cougyr
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3336

posted 17 February 2006 12:40 PM      Profile for Cougyr     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Isn't the free market fun?
From: over the mountain | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
Transplant
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9960

posted 17 February 2006 01:11 PM      Profile for Transplant     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Cougyr:
Isn't the free market fun?

Ah, the haves, and the have mores.

There's some asshat from the Frazer Inst that they keep interviewing who's mantra is that everything should be privately owned, including air and water.


From: Free North America | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
robbie_dee
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 195

posted 17 February 2006 01:22 PM      Profile for robbie_dee     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
You know, I wouldn't mind having the option of not paying taxes to have the U.S. military "defend my freedom" in Iraq. Fire services I'll pay for, but I think I could take my chances with Saddam Hussein.
From: Iron City | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Red T-shirt
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5872

posted 18 February 2006 06:41 PM      Profile for Red T-shirt     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
This is how fire protection originated. Private fire brigades protected building bearing a plaque by the front door which identified them as one whose owner paid regular fees to that particular fire brigade. No plaque, no service! Some things are just plain done better as public entities.
From: Port Hope, Ontario | Registered: May 2004  |  IP: Logged
Transplant
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9960

posted 18 February 2006 09:18 PM      Profile for Transplant     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Red T-shirt:
No plaque, no service! Some things are just plain done better as public entities.

Unfortunately it's been long enough now that some people have not even had the opportunity to forget that.


From: Free North America | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
Vincent Vega
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8874

posted 19 February 2006 08:33 AM      Profile for Vincent Vega        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Of course you understand that there are two sides to every story.Sure he says that he didn't know about the policy, but he's been living there for a year and a half.Maybe he chose to not pay and take his chances that he wouldn't have a fire.I agree that it is a sad story and a senseless policy, however....
From: Back of the bus! | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 19 February 2006 09:34 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
How would he know if no one told him about it? It would never even occur to me to wonder whether I had to become a member of a fire department since I've never even heard of that before, having never lived in a community where you had to pay for fire-fighting in that manner.
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Transplant
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9960

posted 19 February 2006 01:26 PM      Profile for Transplant     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Vincent Vega:
Maybe he chose to not pay and take his chances that he wouldn't have a fire.

The point is that should simply never, ever be a choice that needs to be made.


From: Free North America | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
radiorahim
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2777

posted 19 February 2006 03:17 PM      Profile for radiorahim     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Isn't "progress" wonderful?

Another week and we'll be returning to child labour...another month we'll be back to slavery...and give us a year and we'll be back to the stone age.


From: a Micro$oft-free computer | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
BlawBlaw
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11570

posted 20 February 2006 12:50 PM      Profile for BlawBlaw     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The first thing to note is that they didn't save the guy's car and garage, but they would have saved him; they will fight a fire where a person is in danger. So, no, not everything is being bought and sold her, not human life anyhow.

Second thing, has anyone seen Gangs of New York?


From: British Columbia | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
Mr. Magoo
guilty-pleasure
Babbler # 3469

posted 20 February 2006 12:56 PM      Profile for Mr. Magoo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I should think the locals could demand to have the cost of firefighting automatically added to their tazes. But I'm betting that at some point in time they had to fight to take the costs OFF their taxes.
From: ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, | Registered: Dec 2002  |  IP: Logged
Transplant
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9960

posted 20 February 2006 01:03 PM      Profile for Transplant     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Mr. Magoo:
But I'm betting that at some point in time they had to fight to take the costs OFF their taxes.

That's a long stretch even for you Magoo.


From: Free North America | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
Mr. Magoo
guilty-pleasure
Babbler # 3469

posted 20 February 2006 01:05 PM      Profile for Mr. Magoo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'm only suggesting that at some point the local residents decided to go with an "opt in" plan for firefighting. What's the stretch??
From: ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, | Registered: Dec 2002  |  IP: Logged
Transplant
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9960

posted 20 February 2006 01:14 PM      Profile for Transplant     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Mr. Magoo:
I'm only suggesting that at some point the local residents decided to go with an "opt in" plan for firefighting. What's the stretch??

That you are betting that is the case rather than knowing that it is a fact.

So, is it?


From: Free North America | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
Mr. Magoo
guilty-pleasure
Babbler # 3469

posted 20 February 2006 01:24 PM      Profile for Mr. Magoo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
A fact? No, I don't know that it is. But I thought I was clear about that.

I'll try to be more clear: It's my bet that locals — and I'm assuming they're rural — decided at one time to go with "opt in" firefighting service (after all, if your barn is a half hour drive from the fire station, you're probably better off having an emergency plan yourself than waiting a half hour and paying for them to rinse off the embers).

If the locals decided this was a good thing, I doubt they'd decide to go back to paying for firefighting through their taxes.


From: ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, | Registered: Dec 2002  |  IP: Logged
brebis noire
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7136

posted 20 February 2006 01:27 PM      Profile for brebis noire     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Mr. Magoo:
If the locals decided this was a good thing, I doubt they'd decide to go back to paying for firefighting through their taxes.

The opt-out plan always seems good - until the fire at the neighbour's house sets yours on fire.


From: Quebec | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
Transplant
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9960

posted 20 February 2006 02:33 PM      Profile for Transplant     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Mr. Magoo:
No, I don't know that it is.

Ah, so it's just so much idle speculation then.
Thanks for clarifying that.


From: Free North America | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
Mr. Magoo
guilty-pleasure
Babbler # 3469

posted 20 February 2006 02:44 PM      Profile for Mr. Magoo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It was clarified when I wrote it. You just needed extra help.
From: ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, | Registered: Dec 2002  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca