babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » feminism   » a debate with some guy on rape

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: a debate with some guy on rape
leechi
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11544

posted 05 April 2006 12:02 PM      Profile for leechi   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I gave up the opportunity to "intelligently debate" this topic. Not unless I wanted to be bombarded with emails, and flamed from the guy. He got all upset and wanked on his site when I blocked him.

As ladies should make intelligent choices (as he said) I made the choice of not sharing with him.

Asking for it.

let's consider the reality of the crime.

Rapes do happen as random attacks when a women, and in bars, but the reality; the notion of "asking for it" could mean she looked at you the wrong way. Rapists like using beliefs like this to excuse their crimes. Many women are sexually abused before a consenting age, and are more often raped by husbands, boyfriends, and acquaintances more often than in bars.

He had some idea rape is about hunting the weakest of the herd; and that weakness to him meant that she was carefree, and a party girl. A stereotype that is used to blame rape victims over and over. I explained that the use of this stereotype is the old school way to only keep women scared from expressing themselves in a public space. It also is a stereotype the rapist will use to excuse their crime. He kept hitting on this situation, and how he knew of these two girls who "asked for it"

He was disgusted, by the sluts, and what he referred to as "Prosti-tots" (under aged sluts), and the debauchery he saw in bars sometimes. And these girls were asking to get nailed (I am sensing anger issues).

Ironically the two girls he thought were sluts, and "asking to get nailed" he had dated. Um so you criticize them for their choices, but then you date them?Interesting. You like what you think is not your equal?

I didn't agree with his ideals as being the norm because they only fuel negative stereotype that gets heavily skewed by rapists. He had commented ladies needed to understand never to go out alone, and then leaped into a completely hypothetical situation of being careless and "asking for it." Since I was only trying to point out the underlying problem with his beliefs, I must be that carefree slut who needs to be beat over the head the rules of bar hopping, to help me to stop "asking for it." He flamed me called me stupid, and insulted me.

I didn't mention to the moron, I drink once in a blue moon when I go out. I certainly don't drink to get drunk. I am the sober girl in my circle of friends who will be telling them when to leave a rowdy bar because the men there are stupid. I will be the one pulling some drunken buddy off my friend because he is an idiot. Yes tell me how I deserve it because I apparently I don't know how to operate myself in a public space.

He mentioned that women need to stop acting like sluts so as to not fuel the bottom feeders of our societies. Yes, but is it his comments, or their behavior that is fodder for the bottom feeders. I do not like the excuse of asking for it, because it can be applied in so many unfair ways by the rapist.

Human Predators are an interesting breed because they do not always like the weakest of the herd; they like a challenge. Excuses like she was "asking for it", and she was "carefree" and up being heavily skewed to justify the rapists' crimes. And hence why they stay in relationships and manipulate their partners. He made an interesting comment that his ex got raped. He excused the guy because he admitted he just couldn't stop. He said his ex-girlfriend got hot and heavy with the guy and because he took her top off he "couldn't control himself" and ignored her and raped her. He felt it was wrong but he did little to the guy who raped her.

I thought it was interesting how he was angry at his two exes rapists, but then also was angry at them for "asking for it" by letting their guard down. He criticized the one ex for accepting a ride from an acquaintance who raped her (she wasn't raped in the car either). He then criticized his other ex for getting drunk one night, and getting gang raped and pummeled by three guys.

Now with the one ex who got a little drunk, and it can be argued that she let her guard down. However interestingly enough that he was still angrily shaming them and calling them whores 10 years later after he stopped seeing them. So you have a right to feel angry, and shame them? It's a powerful to rage against her rapists, and control her at the same time I guess. It also does not allow them to come self actualization after such a crime has been committed against them. I could point out the guy's unconsciously sadistic ways but i declined.

The guy angrily flamed me when I responded, and filled up my in box. He actually started to understand my post, but only after angrily replying twice with insults and all. I had given one insult when he put me in a stereotypical situation of "asking for it." He was upset I declined to share his idea of an "intelligent debate" and blocked him.

I told him he was a hypocrit for criticizing "whores" and then admitting to dating them. i said "so, you like what disgusts you."

I suggested maybe trying therapy rather than blogging.

I also said he obviously feels no responsibility for anything he says and maybe he should start taking responsibility before spewing garbage.


geesh

[ 05 April 2006: Message edited by: leechi ]

[ 05 April 2006: Message edited by: leechi ]


From: canada | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
writer
editor emeritus
Babbler # 2513

posted 05 April 2006 12:21 PM      Profile for writer     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Leechi, what are you hoping to explore about this issue in this forum? Is this simply a venting?

quote:
Now with the one ex who got a little drunk, and it can be argued that she let her guard down.

I find this statement disturbing. A woman's life should not be structured around constant vigilance to being raped. We have the right to be free, without apology. Rape can happen at any time. It is a tool of hate and oppression. Whether a woman has been drinking or not is irrelevant. The rape is the issue.


From: tentative | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
farnival
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6452

posted 05 April 2006 12:27 PM      Profile for farnival     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
rape is assault. period. there is no justification or rationale that can be put forward to explain this away. this asshat sounds like he is promoting the theory that men can't control themselves around women, so women must be on guard all the time, or they are "asking for it". sounds alot like the justifications that were used to make women cover up out of modesty in victorian times, or one of the weird rationales for burkas or full coverings in some societies. fuck that. just because a woman is attractive or wearing something revealing, or drunk even, does not give anyone the right to assault them. ever!
From: where private gain trumps public interest, and apparently that's just dandy. | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
Stargazer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6061

posted 05 April 2006 12:46 PM      Profile for Stargazer     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Wow, I was just reading on another bodybuilding forum I'm on the argument that rape is natural and a normal part of human society.
From: Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist. | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Mr. Magoo
guilty-pleasure
Babbler # 3469

posted 05 April 2006 12:50 PM      Profile for Mr. Magoo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I can't believe bodybuilders would hold such an opinion. They're usually such sensitive, gentle souls.
From: ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, | Registered: Dec 2002  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 05 April 2006 12:52 PM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I don't think much is "natural" in human societies - humans have always been social creatures, and our behaviour changes greatly in different societies and cultures. Rape is indeed normal in situations of war and slavery - so are mass killings, torture, branding people and breaking up family groups - but that doesn't mean any of those abuses should be tolerated.
From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
enki
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11560

posted 05 April 2006 01:08 PM      Profile for enki     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Rape is "normal" in the sense that it's probably impossible to remove it entirely from any given society - but that's true of a lot of things, like murder and greed, and it doesn't make any of those things acceptable.
From: Toronto, ON | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
paxamillion
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2836

posted 05 April 2006 01:13 PM      Profile for paxamillion   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Rape is not about sex. It is about power. There is nothing normal about that.
From: the process of recovery | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 05 April 2006 01:15 PM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
leechi, I think you did the right thing simply to cut this guy off.

All through your report there are signs that this guy hates or is ashamed of his own impulses, as you pretty much concluded. That is sadly common. He is certainly hurting himself; I don't know whether he could hurt anyone else, but you aren't responsible for finding out.


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 05 April 2006 01:16 PM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
paxamillion, I agree with you about rape and power. I was defining normality in social-historic terms - in the same vein, the subjugation of women, slavery and xenophobia have certain been the norm in long stretches of human history, in many societies. I don't think there is such a thing as an ahistoric norm - but there certainly is such a thing as desirable goals, such as eliminating violence against women and other human groups subjected to it.
From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
West Coast Greeny
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6874

posted 05 April 2006 02:33 PM      Profile for West Coast Greeny     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Stargazer:
Wow, I was just reading on another bodybuilding forum I'm on the argument that rape is natural and a normal part of human society.

quote:
Originally posted by Mr. Magoo:
I can't believe bodybuilders would hold such an opinion. They're usually such sensitive, gentle souls.

Would this explain Ah-nolds run ins with sexual harrasment?


From: Ewe of eh. | Registered: Sep 2004  |  IP: Logged
paxamillion
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2836

posted 05 April 2006 02:33 PM      Profile for paxamillion   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Thanks, lagatta. I appreciate your reframing.
From: the process of recovery | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged
Makwa
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10724

posted 05 April 2006 03:01 PM      Profile for Makwa   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by paxamillion:
Rape is not about sex. It is about power. There is nothing normal about that.
This bit of quasi sociology/psychology has always irritated me a bit, because I think it is a reductionist approach to the issue. I think that this asshole has articulated (to stretch the meaning of the term) his perception of sexualized violence and gender relations quite honestly. He is advancing a very typical, angry, brutal and dangerous ideal, of the male being agressive and unchecked in all desires against the female who will unleash such behaviour unless checked by patriarchal rules of behaviour. This, highly 'traditional' encultured male behaviour is designed to denigrate and encapsulate all female behaviour, which in the end, enriches the male power structure, no matter their social class. However, to remove the idea of 'sex' from the equation is to deny that to many men, historically and culturally, sexualized domination is the central image of sexual desire. For men who buy into this dominant image, a passive sexual role is impossible. They would be impotent without their fantasy of constant domination always being played out. I would argue that rape is not only about 'sex', it is about empowered and brutalized sex, which for many men, is the sine qua non of sexualized fantasy.

From: Here at the glass - all the usual problems, the habitual farce | Registered: Oct 2005  |  IP: Logged
leechi
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11544

posted 05 April 2006 04:00 PM      Profile for leechi   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
here is a response I got back from him. I don't really want my eyeballs abused by his idiocy anymore by going back to his site.

There is some valid arguement but I guess it's to hard for him to think of world without women asking for rape.

I dont have enough time to properly educate you, On the purpose and intent of my rant.

But, ill do what i can.

You clearly didnt get it.

Read it again.

I am condemning a woman, Who CHOOSES, to make as many uneducated "risky", Dangerous actions as she possibly can, And expect NOT to attract the unwanted attention.

A rapist, Is a bottom feeder on society, I point out. that there is no excuse for their inability to differentiate between right and wrong. Im not excusing them at all, I would like to see them tried and be-headed for their crime.

But, I am pointing out i have no sympathy for a girl who throws caution to the wind, and ends up being a victim.

I also point out, that i know this doesnt apply to ALL victims of rape.

I am segregating certain cases, your scenarios, appear to me, as those that fall under the "innocent" type, As in you didnt make mistakes, You just crossed paths with the wrong type of guy. For that, I do feel for you..

But had you lead that gentleman on for weeks, flirted, Made out with, flashed, and did just about everything you possibly could to arouse him, And then left.. by yourself walking down a dark alleyway, without a single ounce of caution, and got raped...

Well no offence.

Your an idiot.

You should know better than that.

That would be like a cop walking into a shootout without protective armour, or a gun, and saying..

"Stop, you cant do this".

Hes gonna get shot.

Hes gonna die. And anyone in any situation who disregards the simplest of measures designed to PROTECT them, and ensure, or further ensure their own safety, deserves to know what happens when they are careless.

If i fall from a building at work, And become a parapelegic, I deserve it.
I know how to use ropes, and i have the safety gear.. if i choose not to use it, i deserve the accident.

Re-read the blog.
And then try again to tear me a new asshole.

You missed the point, And clearly your personal opinions misled your brain from understanding the underlying point I was making.

Which was.

Be careful, and dont provoke, Have caution, dont be careless, Or foolish. Maintain some of your intelligence in your evening out. And this will ensure you go home safe.

If you dont, dont expect my sympathy, or anyone elses.
And to be more specific, I am outlining the specific cases of two of my ex girlfriends, who were raped in very preventable circumstances.

What was their mistake?

They didnt think it could happen to them... they thought that the could dress as provacative as they chose, and flirt as much as they wanted... and get drunk, and the guy they met 10 minutes earlier would be a decent guy and drive them home.. (In order to save the $10 cab fare, one of these 2, took a ride with a total stranger alone.)

If you want to hear the entire situation with them, ask.

Maybe then you will get the point.

When i get home i will re-read my blog, and maybe re-write it in crayon, and use smaller words, So as i can make my point a little clearer for the next reader.

Ill also re-read your blog tags. And elaborate this, if i need to.

He responded to my reply when I asked what his deal was behind saying prosti-tots asked to be raped.

I included a vague description of something that happened to me and how i felt too ashamed to report it; I was shamed, and I was told it was nothing. I told his shaming and saying women ask for it only compounds the problem for survivors trying to speak up.

I called BS on his blog so that upset him. Hence his reply.

[ 05 April 2006: Message edited by: leechi ]

[ 05 April 2006: Message edited by: leechi ]

[ 05 April 2006: Message edited by: leechi ]


From: canada | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 05 April 2006 04:01 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
In response to Makwa: I don't think it's that complex at all. I think the clue is right here:

quote:
You like what you think is not your equal?

I think when leechi asked the question she supposed that the male in question considers the "slutty girls" beneath him, not his equal, though he claims to have dated them.

My sense is that he doesn't see them as equals but differently than that perceived by leechi. I think he feels he is sexually inadequate around girls he perceives to be sexually aware and confident, or slutty.

His male ego is threatened by them and rape is a means to exert his masculinity, no matter how frail, over them.

quote:
It is a tool of hate and oppression.

Absolutely correct.

[ 05 April 2006: Message edited by: Frustrated Mess ]


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 05 April 2006 04:04 PM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
leechi: just stop. Plain just stop.

You know, and we know, what is wrong with this guy. Sever all connections. Just stop.


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
leechi
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11544

posted 05 April 2006 04:10 PM      Profile for leechi   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
oh I did stop....just showing you what he filled up my inbox with after my reply. I had 5 replies from him and I stopped upon reading the first email about why he thought his ex asked to be gang raped.

I blocked him. He was on a psycho tirade. I just put up what his first email said to me. I sort of skimmed over the rest. No time, no interest to read them.

Too bad he feels I am the one who needs education.
[ 05 April 2006: Message edited by: leechi ]

[ 05 April 2006: Message edited by: leechi ]

[ 05 April 2006: Message edited by: leechi ]

[ 05 April 2006: Message edited by: leechi ]

[ 05 April 2006: Message edited by: leechi ]

[ 05 April 2006: Message edited by: leechi ]

[ 05 April 2006: Message edited by: leechi ]


From: canada | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
enki
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11560

posted 05 April 2006 04:21 PM      Profile for enki     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It sounds like he's taking the concept of risk aversion, which is important to consider, and overexaggerating it to the point where it becomes the woman's sole responsibility to not make herself a target for rape.

There's a world of difference between intelligently avoiding risk and taking responsibility for a rape. While I wouldn't condemn anyone who advised women to protect themselves, failure to do this by no means implies any degree of responsibility on the part of the victim.

I think of it like so - while I'd probably think that someone waving $20 bills around in a high crime area at night was not very smart for avoiding risk, his getting robbed is by no means his fault.


From: Toronto, ON | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
Stargazer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6061

posted 05 April 2006 04:27 PM      Profile for Stargazer     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Magoo, the forum I am on re: bodybuilding is a vegan body building forum. The argument there was essentially what Makwa was saying.

Great post btw Makwa.


From: Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist. | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 05 April 2006 04:27 PM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
leechi, I did not mean to sound as though I was giving you orders, although I did, didn't I. Sorry.

It's just that when I start reading that stuff, all I can hear from him is a desire for self-destruction, which he might or might not act out upon others.

I found Makwa's comment above interesting, and I think we could go on discussing that psychology usefully.

But I don't know how useful it is just to keep listening to some guy who hates himself and therefore takes it out on whatever part of the rest of the world he can.

[ 05 April 2006: Message edited by: skdadl ]


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
leechi
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11544

posted 05 April 2006 04:36 PM      Profile for leechi   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
no offense taken skdadl.

Just wanted to post an example of what he wrote me. Sadly this was on a blog, and a part of the guy's dating profile. I am sure he will only attract women who are not educated enough to see his attitude and behavior are psychotic.

A psychological discussion would be useful. I strongly agree.


From: canada | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
writer
editor emeritus
Babbler # 2513

posted 05 April 2006 04:48 PM      Profile for writer     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
think of it like so - while I'd probably think that someone waving $20 bills around in a high crime area at night was not very smart for avoiding risk, his getting robbed is by no means his fault.

Not a useful analogy. Unless you consider the world inside and out of a home a "high crime area" for women in which we are waving our "$20 bills."

We mostly get raped at home. By those we know, and often love. Some of us go out, have fun, get drunk and are raped outside of the home, maybe by someone we don't know so well, or don't know at all.

Both scenarios are not acceptable - not because of our behaviour, but because of the rape.


From: tentative | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
paxamillion
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2836

posted 05 April 2006 04:55 PM      Profile for paxamillion   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Makwa:
This bit of quasi sociology/psychology has always irritated me a bit, because I think it is a reductionist approach to the issue. ... I would argue that rape is not only about 'sex', it is about empowered and brutalized sex, which for many men, is the sine qua non of sexualized fantasy.

When I first heard that statement about rape, I probably shared your annoyance. I think it's a foreground-background think, with the power being the foreground and the sex the background.


From: the process of recovery | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged
leechi
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11544

posted 05 April 2006 05:33 PM      Profile for leechi   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
It sounds like he's taking the concept of risk aversion, which is important to consider, and overexaggerating it to the point where it becomes the woman's sole responsibility to not make herself a target for rape.

I totally agree there, and it frustrated him that I refused to debate this.

He had also thrown in the way of dress, and the use of attitude women use to attract men as a factor. Now use of attitude I can understand in attracting the "wrong kind of person"; and in his case just look at how he seems to attract women through some sort of wish fulfillment through his blog/ dating profile. I obviously don't think some women have a wish fulfillment to be raped, but in a lot of cases women who experience childhood violence sometimes repeat the patterns later in life. I have heard of victims who say they put themselves in potentially dangerous situations as a way to angrily tempt fate, and sometimes to "make right" to avenge what happened in the past. Again I am not justifying women "asking for it" especially because a lot of women who do this are in need of recovery from their own issues.

I tried to ask him to consider other things, like the ways in which we expect women to dress in ways to be considered attractive and worthy (ie especially for young women- too short skirts, ultra low riders), and then we ( and he did) call them whores for how they look, and suggest they ask to be raped; we then also expect them to act sexually aggressive, and then condem them again for being raped. I tried to get him thinking on the path to how mixed, schizophrenic messages sent to both men and women can be a factor.

[ 05 April 2006: Message edited by: leechi ]

[ 05 April 2006: Message edited by: leechi ]

[ 05 April 2006: Message edited by: leechi ]


From: canada | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
Makwa
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10724

posted 05 April 2006 05:45 PM      Profile for Makwa   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by leechi:
I totally agree there, and it frustrated him that I refused to debate this.
Forget it. The man is a vicious and angry misogynist. Continuing to engage his will probably be perceived as baiting.

From: Here at the glass - all the usual problems, the habitual farce | Registered: Oct 2005  |  IP: Logged
leechi
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11544

posted 05 April 2006 05:49 PM      Profile for leechi   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I have forgotten him, but he does provide an interesting example to part of the problem that I don't think he is even aware of.
From: canada | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
leechi
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11544

posted 05 April 2006 05:56 PM      Profile for leechi   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
I obviously don't think some women have a wish fulfillment to be raped, but in a lot of cases women who experience childhood violence sometimes repeat the patterns later in life. I have heard of victims who say they put themselves in potentially dangerous situations as a way to angrily tempt fate, and sometimes to "make right" to avenge what happened in the past. Again I am not justifying women "asking for it" especially because a lot of women who do this are in need of recovery from their own issues.

Tempting fate from a survivors perspective- I read of one who walked angrily down dark alleys to tempt fate. Was she ever raped again- no. In a sexually compromising situation ie. one women mentioned kissing multiple men at a party, admittedly because she felt she was re-enacting early childhood sexual abuse, but the difference was is she would get to a point with all the men and then say no. She was re-enacting parts of her abuse to take back her no.


From: canada | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
The Evil Twin
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11561

posted 05 April 2006 06:26 PM      Profile for The Evil Twin     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Mr. Magoo:
I can't believe bodybuilders would hold such an opinion. They're usually such sensitive, gentle souls.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

and then, someone else came up with this deep thought:

quote:

Would this explain Ah-nolds run ins with sexual harrasment?

While I won't deny that some who get into bodybuilding/weight-training have insecurity issues, I doubt very much that rapists and sexists are disproportionately represented among us more so than in other group. As for Ah-nold, why single out that loser....what about the millions of skinny, out of shape guys that are violent misogynists?


From: Toronto | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
Hephaestion
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4795

posted 05 April 2006 06:28 PM      Profile for Hephaestion   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
x
From: goodbye... :-( | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Doug
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 44

posted 05 April 2006 08:20 PM      Profile for Doug   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Stargazer:
Wow, I was just reading on another bodybuilding forum I'm on the argument that rape is natural and a normal part of human society.

Well, it is both natural and normal, but that still doesn't make it right.

Oh - and another thought. I wonder what he'd say to the prospect of a gay man raping him because he wore jeans that were too tight. Should've known he was asking for it....

[ 05 April 2006: Message edited by: Doug ]


From: Toronto, Canada | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 05 April 2006 08:30 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Well, it is both natural and normal

You mean like torture and murder?


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Doug
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 44

posted 05 April 2006 11:19 PM      Profile for Doug   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Frustrated Mess:

You mean like torture and murder?


Which are also natural (in the sense of existing in all current and previous human societies and many animal ones) and normal in the sense that they aren't all that uncommon.


From: Toronto, Canada | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 05 April 2006 11:48 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I know what you mean, but I still wouldn't want to describe deviance and sadism as being "natural and normal" like we are discussing teenage sexual attraction.
From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
deBeauxOs
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10099

posted 05 April 2006 11:50 PM      Profile for deBeauxOs     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'm wondering if there would be any corelation that has been documented regarding whether taking steroids to enhance the bodybuilding / muscle mass bulking increases sexual agression. Just asking ...
From: missing in action | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 06 April 2006 12:04 AM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Actually, they cause users to become impotent and they make men's testicles shrink with long term use.

They do make people more prone to rages and outbursts, though, sometimes physical. "'Roid Rage".


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Yst
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9749

posted 06 April 2006 03:51 AM      Profile for Yst     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well this seems pertinent:


Duke lacrosse coach resigns

Duke men’s lacrosse coach Mike Pressler resigned today, shortly after the unsealing of a warrant related to a Durham police investigation of a reported rape at an offcampus party attended by members of Pressler’s team.

and

The documents made public today included the text of an e-mail message sent from the e-mail account of team member Ryan McFadyen, a sophomore defenseman from Mendham, N.J. In the message, sent about 30 minutes after an escort service stripper told police on March 14 she had been raped at the party, the writer talks of hiring strippers for another party and killing them.

“Tomorrow night, after tonights show, ive decided to have some strippers over,” the message read. “However there will be no nudity. i plan on killing bitches as soon as the walk in and proceeding to cut their skin off.”

and the backstory

The actions follow allegations by a woman hired to dance at a lacrosse team house party March 13 that she was raped by three players. No criminal charges have been filed in the case, as investigators await results of DNA samples. McFadyen's name does not match the three names the woman gave to police as those of her attackers.

Brodhead and Alleva had faced mounting criticism for a slow reaction to the allegations by the dancer at the party, where witnesses said they also saw drunken members of the squad shout racial slurs at a passerby, and at the woman as she fled. All 46 team members under investigation are white, and the alleged victim and another dancer are black. The team's only black member has been eliminated as a suspect, since the accuser says the alleged attackers were white.

[ 06 April 2006: Message edited by: Yst ]


From: State of Genderfuck | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged
enki
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11560

posted 06 April 2006 01:50 PM      Profile for enki     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Frustrated Mess:
I know what you mean, but I still wouldn't want to describe deviance and sadism as being "natural and normal" like we are discussing teenage sexual attraction.

Which is a problem with the way we discuss teenage sexual attraction, not the definition of normal or natural. Natural includes all kinds of twisted things. There's plenty in this world that is natural that is also unquestionably wrong.


From: Toronto, ON | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 06 April 2006 01:54 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
No, I don't think so. When most people think of normal and natural they think of fresh milk, love, and sunshine. To begin describing human depravity as natral and normal might give some the impression there is really nothing wrong with it but some sort of societal hangups because, you know, rape is both natural and normal.

I appereciate they are words, but as the song says, words are all we have.


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
leechi
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11544

posted 06 April 2006 02:58 PM      Profile for leechi   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
ok now this is a personal perspective on how rape is is excused and perpetuated.

A friend of mine dated a guy for a year and a half; he came across like he was Mr. Wonderful- sensitive, brilliant, funny, cute.....

Until he started acting a bit strange with internet porn stuff. To make a long story short- he put up pictures of her on a porn site , without consent.

He claimed her insecurity about the whole thing was based on her fear of being raped by a stranger from the net. She asserted that no- the problem is you- you have disregarded my no and used me as an object. He had peversely used her image as an object of pornogrophy, not erotica, in a non-consensual way.

The problem of rape is so common that even seemingly intelligent men start to cross lines because they are taught in so many ways sex is to be used for their own selfish gain. Pornography demonstrates this that women are plasticized unfeeling objects to be used at their every wim and fancy.

And even the man who posted to me claimed he was evidently so intelligent (and superior to me) even though he was using rare occurances to suggest women "asked for it." He was again, like my friend's boyfriend, suggesting that the problem is not his responsibility, and even went so far to go fishing for an excuse for rape. His related "true life" examples were sad and inexcuseable. Those women were raped. The only thing demonstrated was they were attacked by men with poor impulse control, and who were looking to attack someone. If a woman stops getting drunk is that going to prevent rape? Or is abolishing the attitude out there that a women asks for it when she is drunk going to prevent rape?

Even if he is not a rapist he is still using rape excuses as a sick self empowering need, and thus perpetuating it.

And as the saying goes "Pornography is the theory; rape is the practice."

[ 06 April 2006: Message edited by: leechi ]


From: canada | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca