babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » labour and consumption   » Is Dalton Right?

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Is Dalton Right?
sillygoil
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6884

posted 15 February 2005 03:28 PM      Profile for sillygoil     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Ontario demands $5B; P.E.I. wants new deal too -

http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/national/2005/02/15/binns-equalization050215.html

Ugh.. Canada, land of inter-provincial bitching. Okay, is Dalton McGuinty right? Should Ontario get 5 Billion because Ottawa has finally done SOMETHING positive to aid the stagnant East Coast economy?

Your thoughts?


From: Little house on the prairie | Registered: Sep 2004  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 15 February 2005 03:33 PM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Before bitching about the Nfld/Lab/NS deals the Premiers should remember the federal agricultural and auto industry subsidies, amongst many.
From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
kuri
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4202

posted 15 February 2005 04:24 PM      Profile for kuri   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I don't like it when Mr. Klein does this, and it looks just as selfish and snarky when Mr. McGuinty does it.

If we are to be a unified federation, there has to be some level of solidarity amongst the units. As a student of the EU, it always amazes me how much Canada as a whole is very much the same as far as inter-unit fighting and jockeying for power vis-à-vis one another - and we've been a full-fledged country (in the legal sense) for over 150 years!

I would forgive this lack of generosity on Mr. McGuinty's part if he was a separatist (an Ontario separatist: there's an interesting concept! ), because at least it would be consistent with not wanting to be part of Canada, but since he isn't, it's just self-centred of him to want to deny assistence to regions who are suffering.


From: an employer more progressive than rabble.ca | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged
Lard Tunderin' Jeezus
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1275

posted 15 February 2005 04:31 PM      Profile for Lard Tunderin' Jeezus   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
If McGuinty were trying to address the same issue vis-a-vis Toronto, I might just have some sympathy. But he isn't, so I don't.

McGuinty seems perfectly happy to take over 5 billion dollars annually out of the city to subsidize the rest of the province - almost 4 billion more than the province took pre-Harris.


From: ... | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 15 February 2005 05:13 PM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Federal - Provincial consultations are now a fact of life I suppose, and perhaps they haven't been handled well, and I would suggest the problems are mostly political, using Alberta's continuing unhappiness with Ottawa as an example. Maybe we could have a new thread on what it means to be in a confederation, and what the alternatives are. Why does the federal system seemingly have endless powers of taxation while those of the provinces seem miniscule in comparsion. Why is the federal govt civil service so exasperating large? Why maintain the monarchy given the large population of francophones who possibly do not feel the need for an English monarch in Canada? Etc.....
From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
thorin_bane
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6194

posted 15 February 2005 06:13 PM      Profile for thorin_bane     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
A lot of ontarians don't like the fact our tax dollar help subsidize toronto for so many years. Toronto with a population of 3-5 million produces 66 billion in gdp windson/essex has a pop of about 350,000 and we produce 28 billion in gdp. For years we have supported ontario with our auto and agriculture. Then they used us as a guinie pig for the casino. Which was making 1 billion at it's peak the city recieved the jobs but only 5 million when we had been promised 10%. So I am not symapathetic to TO
From: Looking at the despair of Detroit from across the river! | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
thorin_bane
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6194

posted 15 February 2005 06:18 PM      Profile for thorin_bane     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
As a side note, Brian Malroney so hate my city that he never came here. We don't vote blue so he felt it was a waste of time. Even when P Martin Sr died and we had a HUGE funeral with dignitaries from other countries, he couldn't be bothered to come. If anyone should from their own province it our little section of southern ontario, we have a lot of resources, wine, salt, oil, auto, banking, casino, agriculture. LOL of you think sask is flat try essex. there are NO hills it was a lake bottom at one time.
From: Looking at the despair of Detroit from across the river! | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
kuri
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4202

posted 15 February 2005 06:29 PM      Profile for kuri   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Boom Boom:
Maybe we could have a new thread on what it means to be in a confederation, and what the alternatives are. Why does the federal system seemingly have endless powers of taxation while those of the provinces seem miniscule in comparsion. Why is the federal govt civil service so exasperating large? Why maintain the monarchy given the large population of francophones who possibly do not feel the need for an English monarch in Canada? Etc.....

All very interesting questions (and conveniently close to my current interests), but I fear such a thread could very quickly get, er, messy. It's a charged subject for some.


From: an employer more progressive than rabble.ca | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 15 February 2005 07:30 PM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
So - does that call for flak shields and bulletproof vests?
From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
kuri
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4202

posted 15 February 2005 07:41 PM      Profile for kuri   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 

Perhaps something along the lines of this:


From: an employer more progressive than rabble.ca | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 15 February 2005 08:11 PM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The crotch protection could be bigger.
From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
Lard Tunderin' Jeezus
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1275

posted 15 February 2005 08:13 PM      Profile for Lard Tunderin' Jeezus   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Thorin Bane, I am truly bewildered as to where you got your numbers. But let's assume that they have some basis in reality.

When Toronto pays out 11 billion more in taxes annually than it receives in services, why would you ever assume that it is Toronto your taxes are subsidizing?


From: ... | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
Bookish Agrarian
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7538

posted 15 February 2005 09:34 PM      Profile for Bookish Agrarian   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Might I suggest we need each other.
Toronto creates wealth, no doubt about it, but much of that wealth is created by the resources supplied by other parts of Ontario.
You would not have the wealth creation of Toronto without the resource creation of my neighbourhood.

And here is one little subsidy that is my own particular hobbyhorse. Many, many family farmers, particularily the younger ones, work off-farm jobs to support the farm. By doing that we are indirectly subsidising the food you eat. I don't run down Torontonians becuase of that, it shouldn't be assumed though that we are leeches either.

Same situation applies when you look at Canada as a whole. So no Dalton is not right.
Well actually he is, but more of a implementing the Harris/Eves agenda kind of way.

[ 16 February 2005: Message edited by: Grant R. ]


From: Home of this year's IPM | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged
NDP Newbie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5089

posted 16 February 2005 12:40 PM      Profile for NDP Newbie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Everybody needs help in Ontario...My town's taking a huge hit because of Domtar, past efforts to further develop ther North were laudable but nowhere near enough, we all know about family farms being bought by corporate factory farmers, and then there's Toronto's problems.

Before Dalton starts bitching, however, he'd better take a long and hard look at completely reversing Harris' slash-and-burn policies and implementing more progressive ways of earning new revenue for the province.

What we're seeing right now, in my opinion, is pretty well every government, both provincially and federally, implementing some degree of race-to-the-bottom supply side economic and taxation policy, and then bitching at each other when they can't figure out why the fuck they don't have a enough money to fund the social programs that citizens are demanding. (To be fair to the leaders though, citizens demand before fair social programs and deep tax cuts. But no matter who holds the cards of power, somewhere along the bureaucratic or the leadership latter, corruption and ineptitude make this impossible, if it wouldn't already be even if everything were perfect. But with the media's current tilt (either staunchly pro-Liberal or pro-Tory depending on who owns it), informing citizens of this reality becomes more or less impossible.)


From: Cornwall, ON | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged
nister
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7709

posted 16 February 2005 01:44 PM      Profile for nister     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Dalton's bomb throwing. Why go public first, when it wouldn't hurt to suss out a private response?
From: Barrie, On | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
No Yards
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4169

posted 16 February 2005 02:00 PM      Profile for No Yards   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Dalton is as much a jerk as any Albertan whining about the same issue.

How short sighted, mean spirited, and petty can a person get?


From: Defending traditional marriage since June 28, 2005 | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged
Tommy Shanks
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3076

posted 16 February 2005 02:43 PM      Profile for Tommy Shanks     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I think Dalton's right. Lets face it, there are no issues more important that taxes and unequal "equalization". Why should I subsidize any other Canadian? I work hard, and by that hard work I have dragged myself up to a point where I pay an obscene amount of tax. Why should I pay extra so some schmoe in Petty Harbour, Moncton,or Resolute can live like me. They should work as hard as us folks in Ontario, the engine of Canada.

As a youngster I used to think how unseemly, hoiw petty, it was for any politician to essentially say "Hey, we want more, more, more". And I used to think that, regardless of how much tax an individual (or city, or province in a sense) pays, it helps to level out the real and systematic imbalances that exist across Canada that, for the greater good, need to be addressed.

So yeah, I'm with Dalton. Enough of these equalizations games that everyone plays. Gimme, gimme, gimme.


From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
paxamillion
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2836

posted 16 February 2005 02:52 PM      Profile for paxamillion   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Then there's the Province of Toronto concept.
From: the process of recovery | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged
nister
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7709

posted 16 February 2005 03:04 PM      Profile for nister     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Tommy Shanks, what if your source of income is hurting others? [Maybe you sell tobacco or Ladas] See where I'm going with this?
From: Barrie, On | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
Mr. Magoo
guilty-pleasure
Babbler # 3469

posted 16 February 2005 03:26 PM      Profile for Mr. Magoo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Tommy Shanks, what if your source of income is hurting others?

Then it would be illegal.

If it's not illegal, then chances are the "hurting others" is all in your head. The way the religious right feels that swearing on television, on a show they don't even care to watch, "hurts them".


From: ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, | Registered: Dec 2002  |  IP: Logged
Tommy Shanks
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3076

posted 16 February 2005 03:45 PM      Profile for Tommy Shanks     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Tommy Shanks, what if your source of income is hurting others?

How did you know that I run Eastern Canada's largest tack and fry-oil distributorship?.


From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
Tommy Shanks
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3076

posted 16 February 2005 04:29 PM      Profile for Tommy Shanks     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Sigh. Thats great. You got the guns. Too bad about the brains though. Weapons technican? Does that mean you polish the extra triggers? haha, now it makes even less sense.

[ 16 February 2005: Message edited by: Tommy Shanks ]


From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
nister
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7709

posted 16 February 2005 08:26 PM      Profile for nister     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Tommy, Ontario and Alberta extract and burn oil and coal to make the income you want to keep. Our air ends up being the eastern provinces air; they don't deserve that either.
From: Barrie, On | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
kuri
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4202

posted 16 February 2005 08:38 PM      Profile for kuri   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Huh. I thought Tommy Shanks was being sarcastic there.
From: an employer more progressive than rabble.ca | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca