Author
|
Topic: words that make you cringe
|
|
|
Tommy Shanks
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3076
|
posted 13 June 2003 03:02 PM
I agree. You never hear the police or news-organization announce to the effect that men shouldn't commit crimes like that, or that they should smarten up and behave better. Sure its assumed but wouldn't it be intersting to see the effect an advertising campaign which was long, hard-hitting, serious, and frequent would have? Say on the issue that its unacceptable to, for instance, stalk women? And I am being serious. Perhaps at the very least it would bring home to some guys that their pal's behaviour crosses the line. I've never understood why society accepts half it's population essentially behaving as if under seige and somehow responsible for their own protection and actions while rarely, publicly admonishing those responsible about their role in these issues. And of course I'm not talking about all men.
From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560
|
posted 13 June 2003 05:35 PM
I don't follow much of that advice, Mr. Magoo. I refuse to give in - maybe that's foolhardy of me, but I feel very strongly about living my life at all hours of the day and night.Last night I got together with an older couple I know from Kingston who are in town for a conference. I told them to drop me off at the subway station (it would have been a long drive for them otherwise) and I would find my way home from there. The woman felt bad about doing that, didn't want to, because she didn't want me to walk home from the station at night - it was around 11. I told her that I live alone in the city, and I certainly don't stay inside at night because I'm afraid of walking alone. I lock my door. But I let my son talk to strangers when he's with me because he knows he is safe with me, and he's too young to be walking out by himself anyhow, so what's the point of telling him when I'm standing right next to him not to talk to someone on the street? Baloney. He talks to strangers and charms them completely. The only time I curtail him is when I think the stranger doesn't want to be bothered, and in that case I'm just teaching him good manners. I drive with the windows open and the doors unlocked, carjacking be damned. I carry my money and cards with me in a purse that I carry across my shoulder and neck. I used to walk with my keys laced through my fingers, but I don't bother anymore - I figure anyone who wants to attack me will be able to wrest those keys away from me in about two seconds flat. Don't make eye contact? Baloney. Walk with your head up straight, swing your arms confidently, and look into the face of every person you pass, especially men. It lets people know that you got a good look at their face. You don't have to make it a challenge - I often give a half-nod as I pass, as if I'm just being polite. Don't walk like a victim? Absolutely. That's why you make eye contact. People who are scared avoid eye contact.
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
andrean
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 361
|
posted 13 June 2003 06:46 PM
I'm with Michelle (actually, I practically am - we're neighbours now!) about looking people in the face and making eye contact. You can be pleasant about it and still demonstrate that you're aware of who's approaching. I feel a lot safer being out on my own at night downtown than I ever did when I lived in the 'burbs. Here, there's always traffic, there's always street life, people's homes are close to the street...someone will hear if you call for help. In the suburbs, it's like a ghost town after nightfall. The other night, I was walking down Church Street towards Queen when a man started chatting me as I walked - he a seemed a little high, so I kept my responses minimal and continued on my way. It entered my mind to be nervous, but before I could actual commit to the emotion, the man said, "Be safe getting home" and crossed over to the other side of the street. Sometimes, people pleasantly surprise me.
From: etobicoke-lakeshore | Registered: Apr 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Steve N
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2934
|
posted 13 June 2003 08:28 PM
This makes me think about the "Jane Doe" in Toronto where the police DIDN'T issue a warning about the "Balcony Rapist" and ended up getting sued.Now, hang on, this doesn't justify their attitude and language in the above article, and they were issuing these kinds of warnings for decades before JD, but it's now going to be impossible to get them to change. Any comment that their warnings are coming across as patronizing, and they'll respond that they have to, Jane Doe etc. etc. I'm sure every force in the country now has some official policy on making public warning every time someone is attacked. Personally, I've always thought this is a crock. The police really really want the average citizen to be so scared of crime that they won't walk the streets at night. Then when budget time comes around they can get all the money they want for more cops, more raises, more benefits, more guns, more toys, etc. It's a racket. It doesn't matter if the crime rate is dropping, keep the citizens scared half to death.
From: Toronto | Registered: Aug 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Debra
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 117
|
posted 13 June 2003 08:53 PM
What I resent is "common sense"What common sense prevents you for becoming the victim of a completely unprovoked attack? It just seems very condescending. Apparently the police didn't feel it necessary to issue warnings about someone trying to pick up children around a school.
From: The only difference between graffiti & philosophy is the word fuck... | Registered: Apr 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|