babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » UN Appeal for Niger Food Aid

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: UN Appeal for Niger Food Aid
Willowdale Wizard
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3674

posted 03 June 2005 08:44 AM      Profile for Willowdale Wizard   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
bbc news

reuters

all africa.com

quote:
The United Nations says it has not received a single pledge of money in response to its emergency appeal for food aid for Niger.
The UN has called for $16.2m to buy food for more than 3.5m people suffering from recurring drought and a locust infestation. Some 150,000 young children are said to be severely malnourished already.

quote:
Nationally more than three million people are at risk of hunger following successive droughts and swarms of locusts that stripped sparse vegetation bare across the arid country last year, according to Nigerien authorities. About 15 percent of the West African nation's average cereal production and almost 40 percent of the country's livestock was lost in a country that is ranked the second poorest in the world by the UN and some 63 percent of the 12-million strong population live on less than a dollar a day.

NGOs in the field have recorded alarming malnutrition rates in children under five and Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) said that in the southern Tahoua and Maradi districts of Niger, one in five children are at risk of serious malnutrition.



From: england (hometown of toronto) | Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged
katieinniger
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9741

posted 28 June 2005 07:36 AM      Profile for katieinniger     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I just wanted to issue a word of warning:
I am an American working on the groundlevel in Niger...These people need urgent food aid, but DON'T give it to the government. If foreign governments give it $$ to the Nigerien government, they will use it to buy their son a brand-new Mercedes. If you give the government actual food, they will give it to the villages where their political allies are located...not the villages that need it the most. The Nigeriens need food aid, but the only way to ensure that it gets to the people who need it is through NGO's like World Vision and others like it who work on the ground level keeping a close watch on corruption. "Giving" is a great thing, but responsible giving is the only way to go.

From: Niamey, Niger | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 28 June 2005 08:04 AM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Welcome to babble, katieinniger.

We need your practical advice, so thanks.

A tangent, but a horribly ironic one: whenever I hear the word "Niger" now, I think immediately of the Washington political scam/scandal involving Ambassador Wilson, who was sent to, of all places, Niger, to investigate reports that the government there was supplying "yellow-cake" to Saddam Hussein for his mythical WMD.

The continuing scandal in Washington isn't the point here. But that the story might have had any credibility in the first place (it has been discredited) reinforces katie's message above. In a country many of whose people are struggling for mere survival, what is the government doing playing high-stakes games in the economy of international weaponry (even if not with Hussein)?


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Willowdale Wizard
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3674

posted 19 July 2005 09:22 AM      Profile for Willowdale Wizard   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
an update from the BBC on the situation in niger ...
From: england (hometown of toronto) | Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged
puzzlic
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9646

posted 19 July 2005 01:24 PM      Profile for puzzlic     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
A friend of mine was in Niger a couple of weeks ago, and the pics he took were awful ... right before the G8 summit, too -- I'm surprised and disappointed that hardly any international food aid was mobilized. And surprised and disappointed, again, that the story wasn't even picked up by the Globe & Mail or the New York times (at least, not last time I checked, which was about 10 days ago).

People here mostly don't even know about the famine.

Oxfam is working on famine relief in Niger, too ...


From: it's too damn hot | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged
Willowdale Wizard
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3674

posted 01 August 2005 11:36 AM      Profile for Willowdale Wizard   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
IMF and EU blamed for niger crisis:

quote:
Johanne Sekkenes, the mission head of MSF which is mounting the biggest emergency exercise in its history in Niger, says the current emergency could have been avoided. "This is not a famine, in the Somalian way," she said. "The harvest was bad in 2004 and the millet granaries are empty. Yet there is food on the markets. The trouble is that the price of the food is beyond anyone's reach.

Ms Sekkenes said the International Monetary Fund and the European Union had pressed Niger too hard to implement a structural adjustment programme. "No sooner had the government been re-elected [this year] than it was obliged to introduce 19 per cent VAT on basic foodstuffs. At the same time, as part of the policy, emergency grain reserves were abolished."

International agencies say the price of basic foodstuffs has risen between 75 and 89 per cent over the past five years. At the same time, the sale price of livestock - the main income source of the country's nomadic herders - has fallen by about 25 per cent.



From: england (hometown of toronto) | Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 01 August 2005 12:12 PM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It's just madness, isn't it -- the IMF requirements?
From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
A Giant Gopher
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10002

posted 01 August 2005 03:13 PM      Profile for A Giant Gopher     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
This from Anthroblogogy, I found the numbers sickening to say the least, though not unexpected...

"Committee on International Rerlations' Subcommittee on Africa, Global Human Rights and International Operations (Washington)
Publication Date: July 1, 2005

In his testimony before the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee in September 2004, Ghanaian Professor George Ayittey from the American University documented the following amounts of grand embezzlement among African leaders [4]:

* General Sani Abacha of Nigeria: $20 billion
* President Félix Houphoüet-Boigny of Ivory Coast: $6 billion
* General Ibrahim Babangida of Nigeria: $5 billion
* President Mobutu Sese Seko of Zaire: $4 billion
* President Mousa Traore of Mali: $2 billion
* President Henri Bedie of Ivory Coast: $300 million
* President Denis N'guesso of Congo: $200 million
* President Omar Bongo of Gabon: $80 million
* President Paul Biya of Cameroon: $70 million
* President Haile Mariam of Ethiopia: $30 million

In total, Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo estimated, “corrupt African leaders have stolen at least $140 billion from their people in the [four] decades since independence.” [5] Corrupt leaders do not discriminate between foreign aid and other revenue (such as oil wealth) when stocking their Swiss bank accounts, so it is nearly impossible to discern how much pilfered loot came directly from development funds. In many cases, however, it is clear that foreign aid’s only enduring gift to many Africans is a large debt burden, a fact that prompted Lord Bauer to quip that foreign aid was “an excellent method for transferring money from poor people in rich countries to rich people in poor countries.”[6]"



http://unconsciouscountry.blogspot.com/2005/07/little-something-on-african-corruption.html

From: BC | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
Willowdale Wizard
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3674

posted 01 August 2005 05:02 PM      Profile for Willowdale Wizard   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
fine then, GG,

do you think that the IMF was right to insist on:

- 19 per cent VAT on basic foodstuffs
- emergency grain reserves being abolished


From: england (hometown of toronto) | Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 01 August 2005 05:44 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
GG's list is bang on. Shell Oil extracts oil from Nigeria and causing environmental destruction and devastation to the real economy. Over 800 environmentalists protested the destruction of their way of life and were executed by that regime. In 1995, environmental leader Ken Saro-Wiwa and eight associates, were hanged despite an international outcry. The western world is as silent on multinationals doing business with assholes like General Sani Abacha in Nigeria as it was when Standard Oil and Prescott Bush propped-up Hitler.

Pharmaceutical giant, Pfizer, was accused of wreckless experimentation on Nigerian children with a controversial meningitis vaccine. Several children died. It was not known who of their illiterate families signed written consent forms for the backdoor drug trials, and proven drugs like Cuba's own meningitis vaccine were witheld from the study.

This man, Patrice Lumumba, was their hope for a united Africa.

[ 01 August 2005: Message edited by: Fidel ]


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
Willowdale Wizard
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3674

posted 05 August 2005 09:52 AM      Profile for Willowdale Wizard   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
it's not just niger ... it's also burkina faso, mauritania and mali.
From: england (hometown of toronto) | Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 05 August 2005 09:57 AM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I thought that the summit at Gleneagles was supposed to be at least partly focused on exactly these crises. Did that summit produce anything practical?
From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Willowdale Wizard
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3674

posted 05 August 2005 10:09 AM      Profile for Willowdale Wizard   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
the entire "make poverty history" campaign was designed, public relations wise, to be more strength to tony blair and gordon brown's arms for reform *within* the system.

hence, can't criticise the IMF/World Bank, especially if brown sits on WB committees, and the US runs the IMF.

the gleneagles summit won't structurally affect africa. it will raise aid (western countries giving things to africa), help combat disease (western medicine giving things to africa), but you'll need changes, especially in trading structures and subsidies, and the behaviour of the IMF and WB towards africa, to have africa be able to help itself.


From: england (hometown of toronto) | Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged
brebis noire
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7136

posted 05 August 2005 10:10 AM      Profile for brebis noire     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The conditions that created the crisis in Nigeria were known at least nine months ago - that would've been the time to start planning something practical.
Secondly, I saw some pictures in the Guardian yesterday in which food appears to be available in some villages, but at prices that are too high for starving people to pay.
Finally, when even at the best of times you're living on the margins, politically and geographically, you are vulnerable to this kind of crisis. That is the kind of problem that needs to be addressed. An entire population doesn't go from well-fed to skin-and-bones in a period of a few weeks unless their existence is already precarious.

From: Quebec | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
Vansterdam Kid
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5474

posted 08 August 2005 04:16 AM      Profile for Vansterdam Kid   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It's part of a wider problem.

quote:
Hunger is spreading in Africa

Food aid is beginning to flow into Niger, where some 2.9 million people face food shortages.

[snip]

Reasons include the relentless spread of desert and drought, high population growth, bad governance, and the world community's flawed hunger-response system.

[snip]

Yet amid the growing focus on Niger's woes, the broader fact is that the country's 2.9 million hungry people are just a fraction of Africa's 31.1 million food-deprived masses, scattered across Sudan's Darfur region, Zimbabwe, Ethiopia, Uganda, and elsewhere. Despite progress in boosting democracy, ending wars, and economic growth, Africa is the only region in the world becoming less and less able to feed itself.

[snip]

In 1970, sub-Saharan Africa had 18 million malnourished children. By 1997 there were 32 million, according to IFPRI. The global trend, meanwhile, moved in the opposite direction: 203 million hungry children in 1970 down to 166 million in 1997, according to a recent IFPRI report.



From: bleh.... | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 08 August 2005 06:59 AM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
According to Washington/IMF consensus, starving kids need more cash crops and for their families to be shoved off arable land to the desert fringes so that ... more food can be exported to "the market." IMF free market polices are like religion, except that religion at least has the afterlife as a reward for the faithful. Linda McQuaig says free market policies can only offer hundreds of millions of hungry people the economic longrun or death, whichever comes first.
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
Willowdale Wizard
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3674

posted 15 September 2005 11:11 AM      Profile for Willowdale Wizard   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
MSF disagrees with the UN food strategy in niger:

quote:
The UN's World Food Programme said that once the harvest begins next month, it will redirect food to concentrate on those most in need. The UN argues this will allow high food prices, caused by shortages, to fall.

But MSF warns that with almost 1m people not yet fed, next month is too soon to end wide-scale distributions. It says that this could put many mothers and children in particular at risk.



From: england (hometown of toronto) | Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca