babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Britain now compared to 1953

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Britain now compared to 1953
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138

posted 04 November 2007 07:19 AM      Profile for Stockholm     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I saw this excerpt comparing life in Britain now with what it was in 1953 when Queen Elizabeth was crowned. Its amazing to consider that for all our complaints, there have been such huge strides and I'm sure similar tales could be told of Canada in 1952.

quote:
The standard of living of the average British family in 1952, when a 25-year-old Princess Elizabeth succeeded to the throne, would seem harsh today even to Romanians or the poorest East Germans.

Few families could afford to drink alcohol except for special occasions.

Wine was unheard of except on Christmas Day.

Elizabeth David had not revolutionised the British palate and most of the food on offer in restaurants and hotels - assuming you were lucky enough to be able to afford it - was awful.

Foreign holidays were for the few, and travellers were restricted in the amount of money they could take

abroad, so it was all but impossible to venture for more than ten days without running out of cash.

A quarter of British homes had inadequate sanitary arrangements - outdoor toilets and bathrooms shared with neighbours.

More than half the adult population aged over 30 had no teeth - received wisdom among dentists was that it was better for your health to have dentures.

The unhappily married stayed unhappy, unless they wished to go through the considerable expense and humiliation of a divorce, in which there always had to be a guilty party and farcical scenes had to be enacted in hotel rooms with retired prostitutes, witnessed by private detectives, in order to provide the evidence of adultery.

Homosexuals were treated as diseased beings, and until the recommendations of the Wolfenden Report were passed into law - which did not happen fully until 1967 - two men over the age of 21 were in breach of the law even if they shared a bed in privacy.

The Lord Chamberlain still exercised censorship over the stage, and until the ludicrous Lady Chatterley trial of 1960, the law made no distinction between works of literature which dealt frankly with sexual matters and sordid pornography.

So yes, when we look back at the reign of Elizabeth II, and recognise the improvements in living standards and the enormous increase in national prosperity and in sexual liberty, it would be perverse not to rejoice.

Consider also the change in the position of women.

For the first 25 years of the Queen's reign, it was permissible for employers to pay women markedly less for doing the same jobs as men, and there were many jobs to which only very privileged women could aspire.

Before 1967, the only abortionists a woman was likely to meet were Vera Drakes with knitting needles, and before the advent of the Pill, many women felt enslaved by marriage and family life.

We are now living in a Britain which does not persecute unmarried mothers, which does not hang those who may (or may not) have committed a murder, which does not ask the poor to live in slums.



From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
Michael Hardner
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2595

posted 04 November 2007 08:30 AM      Profile for Michael Hardner   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Wine and alcohol are widely available, true, but so is marihuana !
From: Toronto | Registered: May 2002  |  IP: Logged
Geneva
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3808

posted 04 November 2007 09:30 AM      Profile for Geneva     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Stockholm : link ?

yes, post-war Britain really took a long long time to get a footing economically, and shortages were endemic right into the mid-1950s, along with school kids going to the Health dept. for their bi-monthly OJ supplement, etc. (to think, the Beatles were kids in that bleak era, and then blossomed in a completely different world in the 60s);
but if you look at some post-war cinema, like the Bicycle Thief of De Sica, the situation was still miserable in Italy and elsewhere, too

all this makes today's pleasure-seeking UK with its obsessive shopping, celebrity gawking sprees and weekends in La Palma seem very far removed from Old Britain

is it happier?


From: um, well | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138

posted 04 November 2007 09:53 AM      Profile for Stockholm     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I think it is a lot happier if you are any of the following people:

Women wanting the right to an abortion and other equal rights
Gays and lesbians wanting NOT to be jailed for having sex with anyone
and many others...

BTW: One thing not mentioned in that article is that today there are 10,000 Indian restaurants in the UK, in 1952 I read that there FIVE!

Happiness can be a relative term. One thing for sure is that if all of a sudden, living conditions were to revert back to the standards of 1952 - most people in the UK would be profoundly angry and unhappy.

I have no time for this attitude of "wasn't it great when we were all noble peasants living in squalid conditions". I've met wealthy people from India who try to reassure me that poor people in India are "happy" and there is no need to worry about them.


From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
Geneva
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3808

posted 04 November 2007 11:27 AM      Profile for Geneva     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
no question that better material conditions and GDP per capita correlate with better standards of longevity, infant mortality, education, nutrition and generally more personal freedom

no dispute about that

my question is whether there are also elements of British life that are grimmer compared with 1953 -- less happy and community supported,

there is a tangible background of anger and aggressiveness in the UK today -- from the drinking-and-vomiting Saturday night youth culture to the staggering rate of property crime (higher than the US) and rising physical attacks in the streets

not that it was Mary Poppins all the time for urban kids in Liverpool and Birmingham back then, but in 1953 no one could have sung Anarchy in the UK or written life being ad nihilistic as Clockwork Orange .. it wasn't

.

[ 05 November 2007: Message edited by: Geneva ]


From: um, well | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 04 November 2007 01:40 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Stockholm:
Its amazing to consider that for all our complaints, there have been such huge strides and I'm sure similar tales could be told of Canada in 1952.

Ah yes, there was an economic mini-boom on in Canada then with the Korean war. It didn't last. My mother came to Canada in 1946 as a warbride. She said there were still open ditches along gravel roads and outhouses in most of Northern Ontario for several decades after the war. Many communities of Northern Ontario are still living in third world conditions today. She remembers doctors bills they couldn't afford. A nextdoor neighbor was told she needed an operation on her thyroid gland or she would die. She wasted away to 90 some pounds and had another child while ill. My parents realized that in Clement Atlee's Britain, our neighbour would not have been denied medical attention for lack of payment. Those were the good old days in Liberal Canada and Conservative Ontario. They needed cleaning out of the halls of power decades ago.


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca