babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Best & Worst U.S. Presidents

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Best & Worst U.S. Presidents
charlessumner
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2914

posted 06 June 2004 03:16 PM      Profile for charlessumner     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
To try to place Reagan, in my mind, in some sort of context, I decided to sit down and indulge the old rootless historian's hobby of ranking presidents. This is extremely subjective! And I'm posting looking forward to any rebuttals, different lists (including just lists of modern or major presidents - trying to do this completely was really painful), etc, that might come to anybody's mind.

(Edit to note: This is all chronological within the tier. So I'm not deigning to say whether Teddy Roosevelt was better than Truman; he's just listed ahead because he came first.)

So here goes:

Best
Abraham Lincoln
Franklin D. Roosevelt

Mixed-Better
John Quincy Adams
Benjamin Harrison
Teddy Roosevelt
Harry S. Truman
Dwight Eisenhower
Gerald Ford
Jimmy Carter
Bill Clinton

Mixed
George Washington
John Adams
Thomas Jefferson
James Madison
James Monroe
Andrew Jackson
Ulysses S. Grant
Martin Van Buren
Grover Cleveland
Woodrow Wilson
Calvin Coolidge
John F. Kennedy
Lyndon Johnson
George H. W. Bush

Mixed-Lesser
Zachary Taylor
Rutherford B. Hayes
James A. Garfield
Chester A. Arthur
William Howard Taft
Warren Harding
Ronald Reagan

Lesser
William Henry Harrison
John Tyler (he died a Confederate Congressman! so much for hallowing old Presidents)
James K. Polk
Millard Fillmore
Franklin Pierce
James Buchanan
Andrew Johnson
William McKinley
Herbert Hoover
Richard Nixon
George W. Bush

[ 07 June 2004: Message edited by: charlessumner ]


From: closer everyday | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 06 June 2004 03:30 PM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Your list might be more useful and interesting if you included a key issue for each...and how he scored on that particular issue.

For example, the President during the U.S. Civil War, Lincoln, might best be noted for his leadership during that conflict that led to the end of slavery in the U.S. I realize that 1 major issue might not be enough...


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
beverly
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5064

posted 06 June 2004 03:31 PM      Profile for beverly     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I think Kennedy was a great president, albiet a womanizer.

I thought Clinton was a good president, albiet there was hanky panky going on there too.

I have always respected and admired Jimmy Carter as a human being.

Johnson, Nixon, Bush one and two, and Reagan I don't respect as human beings, so I don't think they were very good leaders either.

Editted to add:

I forgot Ford..... I guess he was inconsequential.

[ 06 June 2004: Message edited by: kuba ]


From: In my Apartment!!!! | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged
charlessumner
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2914

posted 06 June 2004 03:51 PM      Profile for charlessumner     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
[N.Beltov is right, but as much as I'm editing now, I'll probably just let discussion of reasons come out in the thread below.]

kuba - Kennedy was one of the ones I really wavered on, but the escalation in Vietnam, to my mind, pushed him to Mixed from Mixed-Better (or Best? The freshman mistake of Bay of Pigs is what's giving me pause).

Had he lived longer, I hope and suspect he would have seen the sense in reversing the escalation in Vietnam. Instead we got the jerk Johnson (and if this was made by my personal fondness, he would be at the absolute bottom of the list).

[ 06 June 2004: Message edited by: charlessumner ]


From: closer everyday | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged
jeff house
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 518

posted 06 June 2004 04:02 PM      Profile for jeff house     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It takes a lot of information to make judgments about each US President. In general, though, I think your list is about right.

But I disagree about James Madison. Even though much of his greatest achievements occurred before he became President, I think he was a reasonably good executive, too.

Ok, he did send troops to attack Toronto. But the Brits burned down Washington, so we are even.

----------
Ulysses Grant sucked as a President. I can't accept him as high as you have him.


From: toronto | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
charlessumner
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2914

posted 06 June 2004 04:27 PM      Profile for charlessumner     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yeah, the 1812 thing kind of hurt my Canadian side. But my American side thinks it was a misplaced priority and a more absolute British victory could have emperilled the fairly young Republic.

Still, you're right. My problem was doing this chronologically; even if his term wasn't outstanding among the first four presidents, putting him in with John Tyler or Nixon is a disgrace. I'm bumping him to Mixed with profuse apologies.

Grant is an interesting conundrum. His main plus to my mind is having given radical Republicans (who I'm obviously keen on) more room to seek racial equality in Reconstruction than any other postwar president. And Grant revisionism is growing lately. But… yes, his weaknesses did betray the chances to do much more. Down one notch to Mixed.


From: closer everyday | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged
jeff house
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 518

posted 06 June 2004 04:49 PM      Profile for jeff house     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I grew up being told that Grant opened the coffers of government to his connected friends. So maybe I underestimate the credit due him for reconstruction. And I was completely unaware of the Smith volume; I had read Smith on John Marshall and consider him reliable.

So you are that same CharlesSumner? I read some of your law reports, specifically Vesey, and also the opinions of Justice Story.

I had forgotten that Sumner opposed the Mexican War. That's a pretty good reflex.


From: toronto | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
josh
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2938

posted 06 June 2004 04:51 PM      Profile for josh     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by charlessumner:

Best
Abraham Lincoln
Franklin D. Roosevelt

Mixed-Better
John Quincy Adams
Benjamin Harrison
Teddy Roosevelt
Harry S. Truman
Dwight Eisenhower
Gerald Ford
Jimmy Carter
Bill Clinton

Mixed
George Washington
John Adams
Thomas Jefferson
James Madison
James Monroe
Andrew Jackson
Ulysses S. Grant
Martin Van Buren
Grover Cleveland
Woodrow Wilson
Warren Harding
Calvin Coolidge
John F. Kennedy
Lyndon Johnson
George H. W. Bush

Mixed-Lesser
Zachary Taylor
Andrew Johnson
Rutherford B. Hayes
James A. Garfield
Chester A. Arthur
William Howard Taft
Ronald Reagan

Lesser
William Henry Harrison
John Tyler (he died a Confederate Congressman! so much for hallowing old Presidents)
James K. Polk
Millard Fillmore
Franklin Pierce
James Buchanan
William McKinley
Herbert Hoover
Richard Nixon
George W. Bush

[ 06 June 2004: Message edited by: charlessumner ]


The top two are fine. But some of the groupings are a bit strange. Ford, Carter and Clinton should not be that high up. And what did Benjamin Harrison ever do to deserve being rated that high? Washington, Jefferson and Wilson grouped with Warren Harding? Andrew Johnson should be in the bottom while McKinley should be higher. Mine would be FDR, Lincoln and Washington at the top. Buchanan and Andrew Johnson at the bottom.


From: the twilight zone between the U.S. and Canada | Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
charlessumner
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2914

posted 06 June 2004 06:02 PM      Profile for charlessumner     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by josh:
The top two are fine. But some of the groupings are a bit strange. Ford, Carter and Clinton should not be that high up.

Gerald Ford is the first and only Republican president truly of the modern era. The principled conservative U.S. leaders of the future are going to look a lot more like Ford more than a quarter-century ago than like Reagan in his time or… either Bush, especially the one now.

Carter, okay, is kind of a sentimental choice. Clinton could have done better but not so much, I think, as to go down to the almost neutral Mixed.

quote:
And what did Benjamin Harrison ever do to deserve being rated that high?

Advances in international diplomacy and commerce without war. The Sherman Anti-Trust Act. His stickhandling of complex trade issues and a growing federal budget was probably more reasonable than not. Strong on civil rights, maybe more in the Senate than in his structurally weak presidential term. Less endearing: trying to annex Hawaii.

quote:
Washington, Jefferson and Wilson grouped with Warren Harding?

Washington and Jefferson did little or nothing against slavery, a condition which besides being atrocious on its own would end up splitting the union. Wilson was famously multilaterist abroad but a nasty racist at home. But maybe Harding was a bit weak for Mixed.

quote:
Andrew Johnson should be in the bottom while McKinley should be higher.

I'll put Johnson down. McKinley stays for imperialism, notably the Spanish-American War.

[ 06 June 2004: Message edited by: charlessumner ]


From: closer everyday | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged
Mel Skiller
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5448

posted 06 June 2004 07:37 PM      Profile for Mel Skiller     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'm not going to pass judgement on all the Presidents, but here are a few that are notable to me.

Good.
Thomas Jefferson
Woodrow Wilson
Dwight D. Eisenhower
FDR

Bad.
Richard Nixon
Harry Truman
Clavin Coolidge
Herbert Hoover

UGLY!
U.S. Grant
Warren G. Harding
Ronald Reagan
Gearge W. Bush

and, of course,
Overrated.
John F. Kennedy
Abraham Lincoln

I started writing my explanations why, but it would take too long to flesh them out.


From: toronto | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
NDP Newbie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5089

posted 06 June 2004 09:23 PM      Profile for NDP Newbie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Eisenhower pisses me off.

He harped about the millitary industrial complex while not allowing Cubans to escape its yoke under Fulgencio Batista, so evil he makes Castro look like an angel.


From: Cornwall, ON | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged
Big Willy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5451

posted 06 June 2004 11:34 PM      Profile for Big Willy        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Best:
Lincoln
Theodore Roosevelt
Reagan
Truman


Good:
Eisenhower
JFK (in a short time did a lot, it kills be to admit because he was a slime ball)
George H.W. Bush (NAFTA)
George W Bush (freed oppressed people, ect)

Worst:
Bill Clinton
Jimmy Carter, this one was hard, he is a great man, probably the best to serve as president. However as president he was non-effective. I have heard him described as the best former president, which I think is true.

Best to never get the job
Bob Dole, Elizabeth Dole, and Howard Dean, lol JJ on that last one

[ 06 June 2004: Message edited by: Big Willy ]


From: The West | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
charlessumner
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2914

posted 07 June 2004 12:10 AM      Profile for charlessumner     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Can I add Eleanor Roosevelt to Best Presidents and Karl Rove to Worst?
From: closer everyday | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged
radiorahim
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2777

posted 12 June 2004 01:56 AM      Profile for radiorahim     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Best to never get the job
Bob Dole, Elizabeth Dole, and Howard Dean, lol JJ on that last one

Hey what about Henry Wallace? He was FDR's vice-president 1940-1944 . FDR dumped him from the ticket because he was too left-wing in the 1944 election in favour of Harry Truman.

Henry Wallace later ran as the Progressive Party candidate in 1948 in opposition to Truman's Cold War policies. He polled over a million votes.


From: a Micro$oft-free computer | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
Rodney Moore
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5737

posted 21 June 2004 10:57 AM      Profile for Rodney Moore     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Best Presidents that could/should/would have been.

Abraham Lincoln-if he'd have finished his 2nd term
Eugene V Debs-Socialist from way back
Huey Pierce Long-The real new dealer
Robert F Kennedy-for obvious reasons
McGovern

Candidates for the Democratic nomination that would have been far better of a choice then John Kerry.

Howard Dean-1st choice
Carolyn Moseley-Braun-2nd choice
Dennis Kucinich-3rd choice

Worst Presidents, recent history not in any particular order.
Ronald Reagan
George W Bush
Jimmy Carter-Love the man, but inept as Prez
Herbert Hoover
Woodrow Wilson-for getting us into WW1
Richard Nixon

Presidents that could have been far better,
William Jefferson Clinton-too centrist, not enough done, especially on gay rights and healthcare
Jimmy Carter-human rights work was important, but foreign policy lacked teeth
Franklin Delano Roosevelt-New Deal didn't go far enough, especially in healthcare, and jobs.
Woodrow Wilson-should have kept America out of WW1, Germany/Austro-Hungary were right in that war.
John F Kennedy-could have been more forcefull in his agenda, like his brother would have been, God Bless his soul and his entire family


From: New Orleans, Louisiana, USA | Registered: May 2004  |  IP: Logged
Rodney Moore
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5737

posted 21 June 2004 11:04 AM      Profile for Rodney Moore     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
PS,,

In 2000's Presidential election, my first choice for the Democratic Party's nomination was Bill Bradley, because Gore was riding on the DLC's new wave of Neo-Conservativism a la parti democratique. Joe Lieberman a rabidly fanatical hassidic joozian homophobe turned me off completely. I didn't vote in the general election because a Gore/Lieberman ticket was as offensive as a Bush/Cheney.

I regret not having voted, but Gore should have picked a Liberal strong on gay rights issues, healthcare and workers rights. Gore would have been a good president, but the thought of Lieberman as VP gives me nightmares.


From: New Orleans, Louisiana, USA | Registered: May 2004  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca