babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » FBI says, “No hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11”

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: FBI says, “No hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11”
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 17 June 2006 10:07 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
On June 5, 2006, the Muckraker Report contacted the FBI Headquarters, (202) 324-3000, to learn why Bin Laden’s Most Wanted poster did not indicate that Usama was also wanted in connection with 9/11. The Muckraker Report spoke with Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI. When asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden’s Most Wanted web page, Tomb said, “The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.”

Surprised by the ease in which this FBI spokesman made such an astonishing statement, I asked, “How this was possible?” Tomb continued, “Bin Laden has not been formally charged in connection to 9/11.” I asked, “How does that work?” Tomb continued, “The FBI gathers evidence. Once evidence is gathered, it is turned over to the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice than decides whether it has enough evidence to present to a federal grand jury. In the case of the 1998 United States Embassies being bombed, Bin Laden has been formally indicted and charged by a grand jury. He has not been formally indicted and charged in connection with 9/11 because the FBI has no hard evidence connected Bin Laden to 9/11.”


http://www.teamliberty.net/id267.html


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Bobolink
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5909

posted 18 June 2006 07:45 AM      Profile for Bobolink   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
This means that the FBI is simply abiding by the law, as it should. As they have no "hard evidence" or possibly evidence that they do not wish to reveal as it might endanger informants, the most public interest that the FBI would have in bin Laden in connection with 9/11 would be "wanted for questioning". It is good to see that the FBI is abiding by the law as some U.S. government agencies ate not.

On the other hand, bin Laden has publically confessed guilt in the 9/11 attacks on his videotapes.

[ 18 June 2006: Message edited by: Bobolink ]


From: Stirling, ON | Registered: May 2004  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 18 June 2006 07:49 AM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
They can get an idictment against bin Laden without revealing sensitive sources. Don't be a doofus. Please provide me with bin Laden's confession. I do not recall him saying "I did it". And please produce independent corroboration of the authenticity of the confession.
From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 18 June 2006 08:18 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Bobolink:

On the other hand, bin Laden has publically confessed guilt in the 9/11 attacks on his videotapes.


I rate that with Moussaoui's "confession".


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 18 June 2006 11:44 AM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I think a bin Laden trial is the last thing the U.S. shadow government would want at this point. Because if Saddam Hussein's trial is anything to go by, bin Laden would likely expose some of the skull duggery and U.S. complicity with crimes committed in Asia. Both Saddam and bin Laden are former U.S. allies in the Middle East, and bin Laden probably has enough dirt on George Bush Senior to have him arraigned on criminal charges.

Who knew that former Iraqi ambassador, Tariq Aziz, would become a key witness in Saddam's defence?. I think Saddam's trial, like Slobodan Milosovich's trial, has turned into a kangaroo court. Saddam is winning his trial as was Milosovich before his captors murdered him.

The CIA has thousands of agents in every major city in the world, and yet that can't locate a 6'5" Saudi needing regular medical attention. Nor can they find one-eyed, 6'6" mullah Omar. It's all a farce.


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 18 June 2006 11:50 AM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yes, especially if he Day Timer and phone books somehow made it into evidence.
From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
otter
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12062

posted 18 June 2006 05:46 PM      Profile for otter        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Maintaining the FEAR is what is most important. Facts and legalities can be manipulated while the 'truth' will always vary depending on who is doing the telling.
From: agent provocateur inc. | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged
gram swaraj
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11527

posted 22 June 2006 12:10 AM      Profile for gram swaraj   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by otter:
Maintaining the FEAR is what is most important...the 'truth' will always vary depending on who is doing the telling.

Thus, this story?


From: mon pays ce n'est pas un pays, c'est la terre | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Robert MacBain
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10579

posted 22 June 2006 05:33 AM      Profile for Robert MacBain     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
While some Babblers stay up all night exploring ways to prove that Al-Qaeda had nothing to do with 9/11, Al-Qaeda itself seems quite proud of its role and certainly makes no effort to prove that it was not involved.

From Ogrish.com – “Al-Qaeda released a video on the internet Tuesday [06-20-06] showing what al-Qaeda claims was the planned 20th hijacker in the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States.

"The video shows a young Saudi man, Fawaz al-Nashimi, who was killed in clashes in Saudi Arabia in 2004. The identity of the 20th hijacker has been debated since shortly after 9/11. Three planes involved in attacks that day had 5 hijackers onboard. The plane that crashed in Pennsylvania, before reaching its target, only had 4 hijackers on board.”


From: Toronto | Registered: Oct 2005  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 22 June 2006 10:41 AM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Prove bin Laden was involved and that he heads an organization called Al Qaeda.

It is funny, I watched part of The Corporation last night and saw the bit where US industrialists and conservatives had hoped to use a general to mount a coup de'tat against, FDR. And of course there were the plans to blow a plane out of the air and blame it on the Cubans.

Yet some people want to believe a guy in a cave with liver disorder leads a global terrorist empire that carried out a coordinated and sophisticated attack against several targets and with the good fortune of much of the defence forces tied up with war games focused on hi-jacked planes -- the very weapon used.

Yeah, what a coincidence.

And that "second Pearl Harbour" was exactly what the neo-cons needed to put the wheels in motion of their plan for global dominance as outlined in PNAC.

What bad luck. And another coincidence!


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Robert MacBain
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10579

posted 22 June 2006 01:37 PM      Profile for Robert MacBain     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Frustrated Mess seems to believe that: 1.) There was no American Airlines Flight 77 enroute from Washington to Los Angeles on the morning of September 11, 2001; 2.) the manifest listing 58 passengers and six crew was fabricated; 3.) Barbara Olson, who I very much enjoyed on Larry King, is still alive; 4.) Ms. Olson’s husband and the grieving family members and relatives of the other passengers and crew are part of a government-media conspiracy to justify the attack on Iraq.

Given the many times that I have seen and admired Barbara Olson on Larry King Live, I do not believe that she would knowingly participate in that sort of a hoax and spend the rest of her life – without her husband and family – in some sort of witness protection program.

If Frustrated Mess really believes that is what happened on 9/11, he/she is probably convinced that the videos Al-Qaeda distributes to Aljazeera and other outlets on a regular basis are produced by the CIA in Langley, Virginia, using Arab-Americans as stand-ins for Osama bin Laden and assorted spiritual advisers and armed thugs.


From: Toronto | Registered: Oct 2005  |  IP: Logged
Noise
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12603

posted 22 June 2006 01:44 PM      Profile for Noise     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Given the many times that I have seen and admired Barbara Olson on Larry King Live, I do not believe that she would knowingly participate in that sort of a hoax and spend the rest of her life – without her husband and family – in some sort of witness protection program.

You seem to assume that they would be in on the 'Hoax'. You don't think a few hundred citizens being sacrificed is of any consequence to the perpetraters now do you?


From: Protest is Patriotism | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
Robert MacBain
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10579

posted 22 June 2006 01:59 PM      Profile for Robert MacBain     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Which is it, Noise? Did American Airlines Flight 77 actually plow into the Pentagon on 9/11? Or, as so many of the conspiracy theorists on Babble seem to believe, was it actually a missile and there was no Flight 77? Which way is up?
From: Toronto | Registered: Oct 2005  |  IP: Logged
Noise
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12603

posted 22 June 2006 02:15 PM      Profile for Noise     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Hard to answer that question without knowing how far you've dug into the conspiracy theories... But if you were inclined to beleive that 'powers' were willing to send a missile at their own pentagon, it would be safe to assume the same powers wouldn't think twice of sacrificing lives (a few on the grand scale) to cover it.

as per FM

quote:
the good fortune of much of the defence forces tied up with war games focused on hi-jacked planes -- the very weapon used.

How hard do you beleive it is to make a plane disappear when they are running wargames on just that?

It's hard to tell, but I doubt you have done the research that some have on this board... Have you done the reading behind this or are you critisizing before knowing as much as you can?

[ 22 June 2006: Message edited by: Noise ]


From: Protest is Patriotism | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
Robert MacBain
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10579

posted 22 June 2006 03:35 PM      Profile for Robert MacBain     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Noise asks: “Have you done the reading behind this or are you critisizing before knowing as much as you can?”

The key questions, in my mind, are: 1) Did American Airlines Flight 77 depart Washington for Los Angeles on the morning of September 11, 2001? 2) Were there 58 passengers and six crew members on that plane as listed in the manifest? 3) Were any of those people heard from or seen again after the explosion at the Pentagon? 4} Was it American Airlines Flight 77 that plowed into the Pentagon that morning? 5) Or, was the Pentagon hit by a missile fired from a U.S. military jet?

Bottom line: What happened to American Airlines Flight 77 and the 64 people on board?

And, what evidence do you have to substantiate your answer to that question?


From: Toronto | Registered: Oct 2005  |  IP: Logged
thorin_bane
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6194

posted 22 June 2006 04:11 PM      Profile for thorin_bane     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
And what evidence do you have those "people" died. Can you produce all the relatives of a list of names? Cause I bet no one can produce even 1 relative for all the passengers on all the planes.
From: Looking at the despair of Detroit from across the river! | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Robert MacBain
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10579

posted 22 June 2006 04:55 PM      Profile for Robert MacBain     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Thorin_Bane asks: “And what evidence do you have those "people" died. Can you produce all the relatives of a list of names? Cause I bet no one can produce even 1 relative for all the passengers on all the planes.”

You might start with this from CNN and Associated Press.

CREW: Charles Burlingame of Herndon, Virginia, was the plane's captain. He is survived by a wife, a daughter and a grandson. David Charlebois, who lived in Washington's Dupont Circle neighborhood, was the first officer. Michele Heidenberger of Chevy Chase, Maryland, was a flight attendant for 30 years. She left behind a husband, a pilot, and a daughter and son.

Flight attendant Jennifer Lewis, 38, of Culpeper, Virginia, was the wife of flight attendant Kenneth Lewis. Flight attendant Kenneth Lewis, 49, of Culpeper, Virginia, was the husband of flight attendant Jennifer Lewis. Renee May, 39, of Baltimore, Maryland, was a flight attendant.

PASSENGERS: Paul Ambrose, 32, of Washington, was a physician who worked with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the surgeon general to address racial and ethnic disparities in health. Yeneneh Betru, 35, was from Burbank, California. M.J. Booth no details. Bernard Brown, 11, student at Leckie Elementary School in Washington. Suzanne Calley, 42, of San Martin, California, an employee of Cisco Systems Inc. William Caswell no details.

Sarah Clark, 65, of Columbia, Maryland, was a sixth-grade teacher at Backus Middle School in Washington. Asia Cottom, 11, student at Backus Middle School in Washington. James Debeuneure, 58, Upper Marlboro, Maryland, was a fifth-grade teacher at Ketcham Elementary School in Washington. Rodney Dickens, 11, a student at Leckie Elementary School in Washington. Eddie Dillard no details. Charles Droz no details.

Barbara Edwards, 58, Las Vegas, Nevada, was a teacher at Palo Verde High School in Las Vegas. Charles S. Falkenberg, 45, University Park, Maryland, was the director of research at ECOlogic Corp., a software engineering firm. Zoe Falkenberg, 8, daughter of Charles Falkenberg and Leslie Whittingham. Dana Falkenberg, 3, daughter of Charles Falkenberg and Leslie Whittingham.

Joe Ferguson, director of the National Geographic Society's geography education outreach program in Washington. Wilson "Bud" Flagg of Millwood, Virginia, was a retired Navy admiral and retired American Airlines pilot. Dee Flagg no details. Richard Gabriel no details. Ian Gray, 55, of Washington was the president of a health-care consulting firm. Stanley Hall, 68, was from Rancho Palos Verdes, California. Bryan Jack, 48, of Alexandria, Virginia, was a senior executive at the Defense Department.

Steven D. "Jake" Jacoby, 43, of Alexandria, Virginia, was the chief operating officer of Metrocall Inc., a wireless data and messaging company. Ann Judge, 49, of Virginia was the travel office manager for the National Geographic Society. Chandler Keller, 29, was a Boeing propulsion engineer from El Segundo, California. Yvonne Kennedy no details.

Norma Khan, 45, from Reston, Virginia was a nonprofit organization manager. Karen A. Kincaid, 40, a Washington lawyer, was married to Peter Batacan. Norma Langsteuerle no details.Dong Lee no details.

Dora Menchaca, 45, of Santa Monica, California, was the associate director of clinical research for a biotech firm. Christopher Newton, 38, of Anaheim, California, was president and chief executive officer of Work-Life Benefits. He was married and had two children.

Barbara Olson, 45, was a conservative commentator who often appeared on CNN and was married to U.S. Solicitor General Theodore Olson. Ruben Ornedo, 39, of Los Angeles, California, was a Boeing propulsion engineer. Robert Penniger, 63, of Poway, California, was an electrical engineer with BAE Systems. Lisa Raines, 42, was senior vice president for government relations at a biotechnology firm. She was from Great Falls, Virginia, and was married to Stephen Push.

Todd Reuben, 40, of Potomac, Maryland, was a tax and business lawyer. John Sammartino no details. Diane Simmons no details. George Simmons no details.

Mari-Rae Sopper of Santa Barbara, California, was a women's gymnastics coach at the University of California at Santa Barbara. Bob Speisman, 47, was from Irvington, New York. Hilda Taylor was a sixth-grade teacher at Leckie Elementary School in Washington. Leonard Taylor was from Reston, Virginia. Leslie A. Whittington, 45, was from University Park, Maryland. The professor of public policy at Georgetown University in Washington was traveling with her husband, Charles Falkenberg, 45, and their two daughters, Zoe, 8, and Dana, 3. John Yamnicky, 71, was from Waldorf, Maryland. Vicki Yancey no details. Shuyin Yang no details. Yuguag Zheng no details.


From: Toronto | Registered: Oct 2005  |  IP: Logged
Sven
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9972

posted 22 June 2006 09:04 PM      Profile for Sven     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
US astronauts never walked on the moon, either (it was all "trick" photography and special effects).
From: Eleutherophobics of the World...Unite!!!!! | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
Erik Redburn
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5052

posted 22 June 2006 09:40 PM      Profile for Erik Redburn     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Hey, we all Know that Noone can land safely on Moon cheese. Swiss cheese maybe. Essential point made by McBain -what was supposed to have happened to all the people who Didn't die crashing into the Pentagon? Onething to believe a conspiracy by a small cabal -can and does happen- but quite another to draw in random citizens from all over plus members of civil aviation and on and on outward.
From: Broke but not bent. | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 22 June 2006 09:40 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Warren Commission Exhibit CE399 "The Magic Bullet"
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
Erik Redburn
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5052

posted 22 June 2006 10:05 PM      Profile for Erik Redburn     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Ah yes, but only a Handful of victims at most, a handful of active participants posited, and you know, the bullet didn't Have to be 'magic' according to more modern understanding of trigonometry and forensics. Didn't consider back then that a bullet hitting bone and gristle can be significantly altered in trajectory going Through a body. Take a look at the movie JFK again, Garrison's presentation assumes a Straight path through. No need for mid-air course changes. (not necessarily saying that JFK WAs a victim of a 'lone gunman' either, just that it's not necessarily Proof for the other)

Some interesting stuff to consider though, as there Were lots of WhiteHouse lies afterwords (re lack of intercepts for example) which do raise some valid questions. Could be Other reasons for that too though, like standard bureaucratic covering for incompetence, or even closed eyes Re Carlyle groups close links to the bin Laden's. (another once-common conspiracy angle BTW that now seems to be forgotten)

[ 22 June 2006: Message edited by: EriKtheHalfaRed ]


From: Broke but not bent. | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged
Rgaiason
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5752

posted 22 June 2006 10:47 PM      Profile for Rgaiason   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Frustrated Mess:
Prove bin Laden was involved and that he heads an organization called Al Qaeda.

ROFL!

Prove that there is a reality independent of your perception of it.

Prove that I'm not dreaming you, this forum, my computer and my physical existence.

Prove that George Bush is not Osama Bin Laden's twin with a lot of plastic surgery.

Prove that both Bush presidencies were/are not a Saudi Arabian plot to take over Muslim countries using the US military as their proxy.

Prove that Osama Bin Laden is not a cuban exile named Miguel Sanchez.

Prove that Margaret Thatcher is a woman. What evidence do you have?

LMAO!

Thank you.


From: edmonton | Registered: May 2004  |  IP: Logged
Rgaiason
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5752

posted 23 June 2006 03:46 AM      Profile for Rgaiason   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
This game is so much fun...

Margaret Thatcher is a man.

Do you have pictures of her naked, to prove she is a woman? But, pictures can be faked so...

Do you have a report from a gynecologist testifying that she is a woman? Reports can be faked and doctors can be bribed, so...

Have you personally seen her naked? Appearances can be deceiving so...

Have you examined her body with your hands, and personally confirmed she is a woman? No?

Then Margaret Thatcher is a man.


From: edmonton | Registered: May 2004  |  IP: Logged
Sven
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9972

posted 23 June 2006 05:13 AM      Profile for Sven     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Rgaiason, I always suspected that Thatcher was a man. Thank you for the cogent analysis that raises very serious (and no doubt indisputable) evidence regarding her...er, his...manhood.

My only question is this: Isn't the whole "Maggy" charade a cabal among MI-5, South American sugar growers, Elvis and the guardian angel of Ronald Raygun?


From: Eleutherophobics of the World...Unite!!!!! | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
Rgaiason
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5752

posted 23 June 2006 06:18 AM      Profile for Rgaiason   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
"An audiotape allegedly made by Osama bin Laden surfaced May 23 in which the al Qaeda leader says Zacarias Moussaoui, the alleged 20th hijacker on Sept. 11, was not involved in that plot and that bin Laden himself personally assigned the roles for each of the 19 "brothers" involved".

Osama bin Laden says that he knows Moussaoui was not involved in the Septemeber 11th plot, because he (bin Laden) personally assigned the roles of each of the 19 persons involved.

But...the internationally acknowledged leader of Al Qaeda personally claiming to have assigned duties to the Sept 11 plotters still doesn't prove that there is an Al Qaeda, that bin Laden is it's leader, that bin Laden had final say over the Sept 11 plot, that there was a Sept 11 plot, that any planes flew into any buildings...

I have these ocean-front lots in Saskatchewan that people might be interested in - going cheap too!


From: edmonton | Registered: May 2004  |  IP: Logged
Robert MacBain
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10579

posted 23 June 2006 06:27 AM      Profile for Robert MacBain     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
And, according to my sources in the CIA, those ocean-front lots in Saskatchewan are owned by a numbered company with direct links to bin Laden.
From: Toronto | Registered: Oct 2005  |  IP: Logged
Rgaiason
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5752

posted 23 June 2006 06:46 AM      Profile for Rgaiason   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Sven - prove that it is possible to "suspect" something, that there exist intermediate states between knowing and not-knowing...

Robert - prove that numbers exist. If you can't, then there are no numbered companies...


From: edmonton | Registered: May 2004  |  IP: Logged
Robert MacBain
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10579

posted 23 June 2006 07:30 AM      Profile for Robert MacBain     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
OK. I can't table the actual numbers of those numbered companies. But I do know from confidential sources that bin Laden is directly linked to those South American sugar companies Sven referred to. And you know I can't reveal my sources. They'd be taken out by the CIA.
From: Toronto | Registered: Oct 2005  |  IP: Logged
Rgaiason
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5752

posted 23 June 2006 07:40 AM      Profile for Rgaiason   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Robert MacBain:
OK. I can't table the actual numbers of those numbered companies. But I do know from confidential sources that bin Laden is directly linked to those South American sugar companies Sven referred to. And you know I can't reveal my sources. They'd be taken out by the CIA.

LOL!

Sorry...I know that you & Sven were supporting me, but I just can't get over my fascination with extreme skepticism. At least, I think it's me that can't let go of it...these thoughts I'm having could belong to George Bush or Osama bib Laden...if only I could be certain!

Which just about beats this nag to death, I'd say.

By the way, have you looked at the news story I provided a link to in that other thread about somebodies "statement"? It's not what people might expect it to be...I think you'd enjoy it.


From: edmonton | Registered: May 2004  |  IP: Logged
obscurantist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8238

posted 23 June 2006 10:19 AM      Profile for obscurantist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Prove that George Bush is not Osama Bin Laden's twin with a lot of plastic surgery.

Prove that both Bush presidencies were/are not a Saudi Arabian plot to take over Muslim countries using the US military as their proxy.


I dunno, I kind of like those ones. Although I'd go with Bush and Ahmadinejad as twins. The resemblance is even stronger than it is with bin Laden.

From: an unweeded garden | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Rgaiason
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5752

posted 23 June 2006 10:46 AM      Profile for Rgaiason   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Yossarian:
I dunno, I kind of like those ones. Although I'd go with Bush and Ahmadinejad as twins. The resemblance is even stronger than it is with bin Laden.

Actually, it works better if the Bush presidencies are a plot by the Kuwaitis to take over Muslim nations using the US as a proxy.

Remember that it was the Emir of Kuwait that funded the Reagan campaigns "arms for hostages" deal with Iran that got Reagan elected, with Shrub-prime as VP. Then Shrub1 bails out Kuwait during his presidency...and now GW Shrub has completely taken out Saddam and is working on proxy governments in Afghanistan & Iraq...

ooooeeeoooo! It must all be true! The Kuwaitis are taking over the Muslim world using Bush & US military as their muscle.

[ 23 June 2006: Message edited by: Rgaiason ]


From: edmonton | Registered: May 2004  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 23 June 2006 10:59 AM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by EriKtheHalfaRed:
Ah yes, but only a Handful of victims at most, a handful of active participants posited, and you know, the bullet didn't Have to be 'magic' according to more modern understanding of trigonometry and forensics.

The magic bullet theory has been refuted by experts around the world. It's why there has been no official follow up investigation since the botched and slip-shod Warren Commission investigation.


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
Erik Redburn
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5052

posted 23 June 2006 04:09 PM      Profile for Erik Redburn     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well some experts apparently disagree still, but the Kennedy assassination has little to do with this either way. A conspiracy being possible doesn't make them true and it isn't proof for Others.

And Rgaiason -there Were some odd occurances and holes in the official story that were bound to draw suspicions, especially with This current lot of sociopaths in Washington. What more people should be looking at is what we Know happened, what other existing evidence allows for, and which scenario could most likely explain them, instead of getting so caught up in supposed motives and trying to build the case backwards from There. I don't see why it even Has to be an innocent or guilty on all charges case, as there were lots of parties involved and lots of hard to control events. But then I guess I'm just spitting into the wind again, minds seem to be made up already. (shrug)


From: Broke but not bent. | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged
jas
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9529

posted 23 June 2006 11:31 PM      Profile for jas     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Rgaiason:
"An audiotape allegedly made by Osama bin Laden surfaced May 23 in which the al Qaeda leader says Zacarias Moussaoui, the alleged 20th hijacker on Sept. 11, was not involved in that plot and that bin Laden himself personally assigned the roles for each of the 19 "brothers" involved".

Osama bin Laden says that he knows Moussaoui was not involved in the Septemeber 11th plot, because he (bin Laden) personally assigned the roles of each of the 19 persons involved.


- ??

The first paragraph is an unsourced news report. The second paragraph is your paraphrase of an unsourced news report - a paraphrase that, moreover, unquestioningly accepts its truth - ?

Uh sorry, but who exactly are you to be evaluating this information for others ??

quote:
But...the internationally acknowledged leader of Al Qaeda personally claiming to have assigned duties to the Sept 11 plotters still doesn't prove that there is an Al Qaeda, that bin Laden is it's leader, that bin Laden had final say over the Sept 11 plot, that there was a Sept 11 plot, that any planes flew into any buildings...

Uh, yeah. That's right. Not much of anything has been "proven" yet... sorry you're having such a hard time with that concept.

I think it's funny that people whose only possible sources of information can be the news think that they have some kind of inside authority on the "truth" of these events. As if the news is:
1. true
2. complete
3. disinterested
4. authoritative

Whatever. Have fun with that.


From: the world we want | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 23 June 2006 11:42 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by EriKtheHalfaRed:
Well some experts apparently disagree still, but the Kennedy assassination has little to do with this either way. A conspiracy being possible doesn't make them true and it isn't proof for Others.

quote:
he FBI lab that analysed the Zapruder Film, worked out that the gap between the first and last must be between five and six seconds. Three shells where found next to the gun that Oswald had apparently used to kill Kennedy, so the Warren Report concluded that only three shots had been fired.

This means that Oswald would have had to fire three shots in five to six seconds.

One shot missed the motorcade, one shot was the fatal headshot, and so all the other wounds must have been caused by the one remaining bullet. So according to the Warren Report, a magic bullet:


  • Entered Kennedy's back at an angle of 17°
  • Then moved up to leave Kennedy's neck
  • Waited 1.6 seconds
  • Turned right, then left, then right, then left
  • Then it entered Connally at the rear of his right armpit
  • Headed down at an angle of 27°, doing so it pierced a lung, severed a vein, an artery and a nerve, and shattered his right fifth rib.
  • Exited the right side of his chest
  • Turned right
  • Entered Connally's right wrist
  • It 'U' turned and buried itself in his left thigh

ETA: Consider Occam's Razor and Oswald's only public comment on the matter, "I'm being made a patsy."

In all my youth spent hunting and skinning deer and the moose our little rod 'n gun club of the north ever brought down, I never once discovered a bullet shot from a rifle that wasn't mushroomed or misshapen after it struck a bone in the animal. The theory is weak and highly improbable as far as I'm concerned.

[ 24 June 2006: Message edited by: Fidel ]


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca