Author
|
Topic: US military in South America
|
|
|
|
rici
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2710
|
posted 18 February 2006 11:33 PM
The US is always up to something For example, this is from the 2007 International Affairs budget request: (emphasis mine) quote: South America (Bolivia, Ecuador, Paraguay, Peru, Venezuela): $19.5 million to consolidate democratic gains and to address deep-seated economic and social problems in the Andean region and in Paraguay. In Venezuela, and as needed in Bolivia, U.S. funds will support efforts to protect and strengthen civil society, independent media, human rights organizations and democratic political parties. Funds will be used to reform the justice sector, strengthen democratic institutions, promote the rule of law, and make sub-national government practices more effective through improved transparency and accountability. Additionally, funding will facilitate expansion and implementation of free trade agreements, and will be used to fight corruption and promote respect for human rights.
Here's the whole thing. (Try searching for Colombia, and note how much of this budget is aimed at the drug trade. I may post on this some other time.) I presume that this report is what you're talking about with respect to Paraguay. I don't know much more about it, I'm afraid. (But there's a lot of interesting reading there.) Here's my worry: more and more, I'm hearing anti-democratic rumblings from neocons, and the old Venezuela-as-part-of-the-Axis-of-Evil meme is starting to show up again. These are probably linked; in other words, since there is no credible argument any more that Chávez is not legitimately elected, the next move is to deny the value of legitimate elections. And Chávez's belligerence makes him a convenient publicity target. I can only hope that Chávez really knows what he is doing. Even if it is just posturing on both sides, though, it has a chilling effect on democracy in the rest of South America. For example, it is a constraint on Evo Morales. Evo is not a good scarecrow; he's too smart, too diplomatic, and too genuine; you really cannot help liking and respecting him. So it's very convenient to link him to Hugo Chávez; US spin strategy seems to be to never mention Bolivia without suddenly dragging Chávez into the equation; aside from the occasional snide "populist coca-chewer" remarks, the idea seems to be to avoid getting him in the news. These people are not stupid. They're really good games-players, and they start with most of the deck. And they think of it as a game, too, even if their public posture is that it is a moral crusade. I don't think we get anywhere by falling into the moral crusade trap and setting up our own; that road just leads to confrontation, and they will win any confrontation, eventually. That's just my opinion, and it probably doesn't matter much to anyone. But for what its worth, there it is.
From: Lima, Perú | Registered: Jun 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|