|
Author
|
Topic: CONS screw environmental organization! What will they be like with a majority?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's Me D
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 15152
|
posted 19 September 2008 05:38 PM
quote:
Understand this: Harper will take Canada down a road most Canadians will not want to travel and at the end of it will be a nation far different than the one we have now.
Sure, that is a given for the Cons, and the Libs, and the Greens for that matter. I think advocacy groups should advocate for their cause, as opposed to advocating directly for the political party they feel (mistakenly in this case) will best serve their cause.
From: Parrsboro, NS | Registered: Apr 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312
|
posted 19 September 2008 07:16 PM
quote:
Sure, that is a given for the Cons, and the Libs, and the Greens for that matter.
Oh, really? Why do you say that? quote:
I think advocacy groups should advocate for their cause, as opposed to advocating directly for the political party they feel (mistakenly in this case) will best serve their cause.
Ah, so you would agree it was right to pull funding from women's groups that often were staffed and/or represented by NDP supporters? You would agree with Harper's government style that dollars should be doled out only to groups and organizations that are ideologically compatible with themselves? Is that right? Because if the NDP was elected you would support pulling funding, from, say, the court challenges program as possibly those funds could be used to challenge the right to private health care and the right to own guns, right?
From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Email this thread to someone!
