babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » labour and consumption   » Farmers Should Be Growing GM Wheat

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Farmers Should Be Growing GM Wheat
Aristotleded24
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9327

posted 18 March 2006 07:36 PM      Profile for Aristotleded24   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
According to this economist:

quote:
An agricultural economist from the University of California says it was a big mistake not to license genetically modified wheat in North America.

Colin Carter, who has written extensively about GM crops and agriculture, says that decision is costing western Canadian farmers $200 million a year.

It was two years ago that the chemical company Monsanto decided not to commercialize its "Roundup-ready" wheat because of widespread opposition from farmers.

Roundup is Monsanto's best-known herbicide. Proponents say that by using genetically manipulated crops that can't be killed by Roundup and other herbicides, farmers can spray for weeds more effectively and cheaply.


Here's what really caught my attention, and I'd love to hear from people more knowledgable in ths specific area than I am:

quote:
Ritter also disagreed with Carter's assertion that there are untapped markets for GM wheat in developing countries.

"We have to focus and concentrate on the high-quality, high-paying customers or else Western Canada will not be competitive in the wheat business," Ritter said.

Canadian farmers may have no choice but to go the GM route once China starts growing GM wheat, Carter said.



From: Winnipeg | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 18 March 2006 07:59 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Another scientists sells out to financial interests. Ho hum. If markets are so ripe for GM, then why are they afraid of labelling them and why do they need the WTO to force markets to accept them?
From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
otter
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12062

posted 18 March 2006 08:46 PM      Profile for otter        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
GM crops only make 'organic' producers that much more viable in the marketplace. This is a major reason why they need government intervention and why they do not want labeling as such.
From: agent provocateur inc. | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged
Tehanu
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9854

posted 18 March 2006 09:55 PM      Profile for Tehanu     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Otter, are you saying that organic growers don't want GM labelling or for GM to be halted? 'Cause if so I'd have to seriously challenge you on that!

Organic growers are seriously threatened by any open-pollinated GM crops, because of the potential for contamination of their own crops. In fact, Saskatchewan organic farmers filed a class action lawsuit against Monsanto and Aventis regarding contamination of canola and an injunction against GE wheat. I'd say there are few people more interested in stopping the spread of GM crops.

Organic Agriculture Protection Fund


From: Desperately trying to stop procrastinating | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 18 March 2006 09:58 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
That is not what he is saying.

Has there ever been any thought given to open sourcing seeds?

[ 18 March 2006: Message edited by: Frustrated Mess ]


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Tehanu
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9854

posted 18 March 2006 10:11 PM      Profile for Tehanu     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
That is not what he is saying.

Has there ever been any thought given to open sourcing seeds?


I hope it's not what he's saying! It came across that way, though.

About open-sourcing seeds, well, there are plenty of seedsaver groups working to preserve heritage varieties. But the pharmaceutical companies would have no interest in open-sourcing seeds as their whole premise is to patent their "technology."


From: Desperately trying to stop procrastinating | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
Tehanu
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9854

posted 18 March 2006 10:23 PM      Profile for Tehanu     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Regarding the original article, I'd have to say I wonder how this guy is getting his stats. First, from what I gather he's saying that Canadian farmers are losing $200 million because of weed loss or using more expensive herbicides than Round Up? That's quite a substantial claim. How does he back that up?

Regarding China as a competitor for Canada if they start growing GM wheat - I'm not a agricultural trade expert, but how much does China export now? How much non-GM wheat do they grow? How much do we export to them?

Carter also implies that there's an untapped market in developing countries for GM wheat. So our more affluent customers won't take it; we should dump it in poorer countries?

Also, there's this:

quote:
That opposition was largely based on reports from the Canadian Wheat Board that 80 per cent of its customers did not want GM wheat.

Carter says he has traveled the world and talked to many of those same customers and he believes the opposition to GM wheat is more like 20 per cent. Even if some buyers said they did not want GM wheat, they may not have meant it, he said.


Key words: "he believes." Compared to the market research done by the Canadian Wheat Board, who seem pretty satisfied. So what the CBC should have asked him next was "who funded your study?"

Going off to do some digging


From: Desperately trying to stop procrastinating | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
otter
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12062

posted 18 March 2006 10:57 PM      Profile for otter        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I meant that organic farmers are benefiting from the actions of the GM producers. If there was nothing to worry about GM labeling would not be an issue.

Countries like Cuba that are organic purists largely due to the embargos] are poised to reap huge benefits now with GM hegemony on the horizon elsewhere.

Of course, there is tremendous irony in the idea that the very people supporting and profiting for GM's will also be the ones most able to afford to import the organic produce from places like Cuba.


From: agent provocateur inc. | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 18 March 2006 11:25 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Regarding China as a competitor for Canada if they start growing GM wheat - I'm not a agricultural trade expert, but how much does China export now? How much non-GM wheat do they grow? How much do we export to them?

You can't ask that question from a historical perspective. If I understand where it is coming from, from a historical perspective, China has been a net importer of wheat to feed its own population.

To answer the question, we need to view it from a modern, globalization perspective where wheat is not produced for domestic consumption but for export markets.

In other words, if domestic buyers can't afford domestically produced wheat on the international market, they don't get any. They will have to look for cheaper, foreign produced wheat, or, in otherwords, import wheat purchased from the same international market.

[ 18 March 2006: Message edited by: Frustrated Mess ]


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
simonvallee
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5141

posted 19 March 2006 01:35 AM      Profile for simonvallee   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Frustrated Mess:
Another scientists sells out to financial interests.

I would hesitate a lot to call an economist a scientist.


From: Boucherville, Québec | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca