babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Zionism reloaded

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Zionism reloaded
Lord Palmerston
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4901

posted 21 November 2007 08:49 PM      Profile for Lord Palmerston     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Let's continue here.
From: Toronto | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
Max Bialystock
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13870

posted 22 November 2007 08:11 AM      Profile for Max Bialystock     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
What do you call it when the Arabs expelled Jews living in settlements near Hebron and from the Jewish quarter of Old Jerusalem and also expelled hundreds of thousands of Jews from places like Cairo, Baghdad, Beirut, Yemen etc...and expropriated all their property?

This is a common refrain from Israeli apologists...as if the way Arab countries treated Jews somehow justifies the occupation.

So if Italy mistreats American citizens, does that give the US the right to mistreat Italian Americans?


From: North York | Registered: Feb 2007  |  IP: Logged
St. Paul's Progressive
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12621

posted 23 November 2007 07:43 AM      Profile for St. Paul's Progressive     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
"The days when the chief Israeli puppeteer comes to the United States and meets with the puppet in the White House and then proceeds to Capitol Hill, where he meets with hundreds of other puppets, should be replaced. The Washington Puppet Show should be replaced."

This is offensive - the idea of Jewish "puppeteers" controlling Washington is absurd!


From: Toronto | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 23 November 2007 07:50 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yes, it's offensive and inaccurate, and it promotes the myth that the U.S. government's policy toward the Middle East serves some "foreign" interest - rather than the interest of the U.S. ruling class.

But - where are you quoting from?


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 23 November 2007 08:01 AM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The quote, wherever it comes from, doesn't actually reference "Jewish".
From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
St. Paul's Progressive
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12621

posted 23 November 2007 08:02 AM      Profile for St. Paul's Progressive     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Ralph Nader said that. It sounds like an update version of the Protocols of Zion.

I have no objection to legitimate and constructive criticism of the Israel lobby. But that is beyond the pale. These ethnic stereotypes should be shunned by progressives.

[ 23 November 2007: Message edited by: Sheldon Gordon ]


From: Toronto | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 23 November 2007 08:21 AM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
No its not. You are choosing to read into it something that isn't there. Nader was likely referring to global capital which was my first thought.

For example, I could infer from your response that you are arguing that Jews are superior and not given to the same weaknesses as Western leaders and for that reason the puppet characterization offends you.

Would that be unfair? I would think so because my interpretation would be adding ideas that you never actually articulated and you are doing the same thing, in my view, by taking a quote out of context and adding to it something never said.


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 23 November 2007 09:20 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Frustrated Mess:
The quote, wherever it comes from, doesn't actually reference "Jewish".

That's irrelevant for a host of reasons - not least being the absurd notion that some "chief Israeli puppeteer" pulls the strings of some compliant U.S. president and Congress.

Talk about turning truth on its head!


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 23 November 2007 09:25 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Sheldon Gordon:
I have no objection to legitimate and constructive criticism of the Israel lobby. But that is beyond the pale. These ethnic stereotypes should be shunned by progressives.

Sheldon, while I think Nader is full of shit for suggesting that the U.S. blindly follows Israeli orders, where exactly did you detect some "ethnic stereotype" in his comments?


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 23 November 2007 09:29 AM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
That's irrelevant for a host of reasons - not least being the absurd notion that some "chief Israeli puppeteer" pulls the strings of some compliant U.S. president and Congress.

There are many who argue US foreign policy under Bush and Cheney is acting in the interests of Israeli rather than US interests. There is even a book released bu two US academics arguing essentially the same thing.

From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 23 November 2007 09:39 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Frustrated Mess:

There are many who argue US foreign policy under Bush and Cheney is acting in the interests of Israeli rather than US interests. There is even a book released bu two US academics arguing essentially the same thing.

Ah well, if there's even a book, it must be right.

Have the academics explained why Clinton, Bush Sr., Reagan, Carter, Ford, Nixon, and Johnson (I'll stop there for the moment) did likewise? Or are there more books coming in the series?


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Petsy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12553

posted 23 November 2007 09:55 AM      Profile for Petsy        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I know many rail at this but Unionist when there is reference to an "Israeli puppeteer" that the Israeli is Jewish does not enter your thought process?
From: Toronto | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 23 November 2007 09:58 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Petsy:
I know many rail at this but Unionist when there is reference to an "Israeli puppeteer" that the Israeli is Jewish does not enter your thought process?

When I call Petsy a bad name, does that make me an anti-Semite?

Note: Jews have a bad habit of answering questions with questions, don't they?


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 23 November 2007 10:37 AM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Have the academics explained why Clinton, Bush Sr., Reagan, Carter, Ford, Nixon, and Johnson (I'll stop there for the moment) did likewise? Or are there more books coming in the series?

Perhaps, I haven't read the book. Did all those presidents invade Iraq and threaten to invade Iran?

quote:
It is hard to imagine it wasn’t, because Feith was selected by Cheney and Rumsfeld to run the “alternative” intelligence operation precisely because they knew he was an inveterate hawk, long committed publicly to a rollback strategy that would ensure Israel’s security through regime change in the Arab world, beginning with Iraq.

That radical and dangerous notion, based on a deep hostility to the Israeli-Palestinian peace efforts pursued by all previous presidents, had been clearly outlined by Feith in a 1996 report he co-wrote with Richard Perle and other prominent neoconservatives called “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm,” issued by an Israeli think tank. The report spelled out a rosy scenario under which a new post-Saddam Iraq with a Shiite-majority government would support a pro-Israel position.



Truthdig

There is a lot more like that. Are they all wrong? Everyone of them?

On the other hand, I have also read that prominent Israeli politicians and military officers opposed the war in Iraq and predicted the chaos.

Somewhere lies the truth but denying out of hand won't lead there.


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
ohara
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7961

posted 23 November 2007 11:54 AM      Profile for ohara        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by unionist:

When I call Petsy a bad name, does that make me an anti-Semite?

Note: Jews have a bad habit of answering questions with questions, don't they?



That's being a bit disingenuous. No others (*than on Babble) would associate "petsy" with being Jewish. An "Israeli" puppeteer would more than likely be seen as Jewish.

From: Ottawa | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
CMOT Dibbler
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4117

posted 23 November 2007 01:21 PM      Profile for CMOT Dibbler     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Somewhere lies the truth but denying out of hand won't lead there.


Ok, how's this: America and Israel manipulate each other, but Israelis by no means control the U.S. government.

[ 23 November 2007: Message edited by: CMOT Dibbler ]


From: Just outside Fernie, British Columbia | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Lord Palmerston
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4901

posted 23 November 2007 01:54 PM      Profile for Lord Palmerston     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by unionist:

Ah well, if there's even a book, it must be right.

Have the academics explained why Clinton, Bush Sr., Reagan, Carter, Ford, Nixon, and Johnson (I'll stop there for the moment) did likewise? Or are there more books coming in the series?


The authors of the Israel Lobby don't argue that its influence was limited to the current administration.


From: Toronto | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 23 November 2007 03:55 PM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The U.S. invaded Iraq as a favour to Israel?

Hmm.


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Ken Burch
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8346

posted 23 November 2007 04:02 PM      Profile for Ken Burch     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by ohara:

That's being a bit disingenuous. No others (*than on Babble) would associate "petsy" with being Jewish. An "Israeli" puppeteer would more than likely be seen as Jewish.

A response that is equally disingenuous, since no one outside of Babble would know of "petsy"s existence, let alone his religious affiliation, unless that actually is his name(and if so he has my deepest sympathy and a lot of questions are answered.)

[ 23 November 2007: Message edited by: Ken Burch ]


From: A seedy truckstop on the Information Superhighway | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 23 November 2007 07:52 PM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by ohara:
An "Israeli" puppeteer would more than likely be seen as Jewish.

[Not sure why I'm bothering explaining this, but here goes anyway.]

If I accuse Olmert or Sharon of doing horrible things, the fact that they are (allegedly) Jewish has nothing to do with it. Likewise when I condemn Harper or Dion, their religion (or whatever) is irrelevant.

When Nader claims the Israelis are pulling Washington's strings, it is not anti-Semitic either. He may be a raving Jew-hater for all I know - but that comment is not evidence for it. That comment is merely evidence for the fact that as a loyal American, he can't fully believe that his society is guilty of evil anti-human horrors without looking for some external explanation: UFOs, Commies, Israelis, whatever, we've seen the whole gamut.


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Ken Burch
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8346

posted 23 November 2007 07:55 PM      Profile for Ken Burch     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
You forgot the freemasons and the Bilderbergers.
From: A seedy truckstop on the Information Superhighway | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 23 November 2007 07:57 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
An "Israeli" puppeteer would more than likely be seen as Jewish.

Why? I don't see an "Israeli" puppeteer as any more Jewish than Dick Cheney (his he Methodist and would that explain everything?) who I consider to be the master puppeteer in the whole mess.

Maybe the problem is that you can't see this "Israeli" except as being Jewish.

Is that possible?

[ 23 November 2007: Message edited by: Frustrated Mess ]


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Red Partisan
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13860

posted 23 November 2007 09:33 PM      Profile for Red Partisan        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I believe the thread on How to Wage Economic War on Canada and its allies in the Canadian Politics sector is very relevant to this.
From: Toronto | Registered: Feb 2007  |  IP: Logged
B.L. Zeebub LLD
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6914

posted 25 November 2007 05:08 AM      Profile for B.L. Zeebub LLD     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
So...Zionism...

Is a "liberal Zionism" possible when "being Jewish" is so closely identified with being "Zionist"?


From: A Devil of an Advocate | Registered: Sep 2004  |  IP: Logged
CMOT Dibbler
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4117

posted 25 November 2007 06:20 AM      Profile for CMOT Dibbler     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Maybe the problem is that you can't see this "Israeli" except as being Jewish.

Yes, but is there an Israeli arab politician powerful enough to have influence over ANY aspect of american policy?


From: Just outside Fernie, British Columbia | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 25 November 2007 07:05 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by CMOT Dibbler:

Yes, but is there an Israeli arab politician powerful enough to have influence over ANY aspect of american policy?


I hope you're not another advocate of the theory that Israel dictates foreign policy to the U.S. Or that the "Jews" do. Are you?


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
CMOT Dibbler
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4117

posted 25 November 2007 08:08 AM      Profile for CMOT Dibbler     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
No. I just think that it's reasonable to assume that however many Israeli born power brokers there are in D.C. (and there probably aren't that many), the vast majority of them are ashkanazi Jews.

The power structures that Ben Gourion and his cronies set up make it difficult for Israeli arabs, and to a lesser extent mitzrai Jews, to become influential in political circles.


From: Just outside Fernie, British Columbia | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 25 November 2007 08:25 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It just occurred to me that you misunderstood Nader's comment.

When he says "the chief Israeli puppeteer comes to Washington", he's not talking about some U.S. lobbyist. He's talking about the Israeli head of state.

There are no "Israel-born" members of the Israel lobby. No one born in Israel would be powerful enough to make it into that elite club. The Israeli-born are their cannon fodder - not, as Nader and others would have it, the other way around.


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca