Author
|
Topic: Pinochet given last rites
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Martha (but not Stewart)
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12335
|
posted 05 December 2006 01:10 AM
quote: Originally posted by Michelle: What DO they excommunicate for, then?
Well ..... this is total thread drift ..... Wikipedia has a pretty good [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Excommunication#Roman_Catholic_Church]article on excommunication[/url]. "Excommunication is intended ... to seriously motivate the offender to repent, and therefore is a penalty with a goal of returning the person to full communion after the offensive action has stopped." As noted earlier, there are two kinds of excommunication: excommunications ordered by canonical declaration and automatic excommunications for certain offences. Wikipedia has an interesting list of people excommunicated by the Roman Catholic Church, presumably by canonical declaration. This list is surely incomplete. Since the year 2000, people have been excommunicated for the following offences: schism, preaching that a living person was the reincarnation of Pope John Paul II, claiming to be an ordained priest though married and female, practicing witchcraft, being ordained against Canon Law, marrying while being a bishop and then ordaining married men as bishops. Some interesting characters appear on the list: Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, ultratraditionalist, who consecrated four bishops against the express prohibition of the Pope; Fidel Castro; Joe DiMaggio; François Duvalier; Sinéad O'Connor (for being a schismatic); Juan Peron; Irish republicans in December 1920; Cervantes (later rescinded); Henry VIII; Martin Luther; Elizabeth I; Jan Hus; William of Ockham; the Patriarch of Constantinople (this led to the Schism between Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy). The following earn a person an automatic excommunication: 1 Apostasy (canon 1364), 2 Heresy (canon 1364), 3 Schism (canon 1364), 4 Desecration of the Eucharist (canon 1367), 5 Physical violence against the Pope (canon 1370), 6 Attempted sacramental absolution of a partner in a sin against the sixth commandment of the Decalogue (canon 1378), 7 Ordination of a bishop without papal mandate (canon 1382), 8 Direct violation of the sacramental seal of confession by a confessor (canon 1388), 9 Procurement of a completed abortion (canon 1398), or 10 Being a conspiring or necessary accomplice in any of the above (canon 1329). - Unless the local ordinary or an ecclesiastical court finds that the offense in question occurred, the obligation to observe an automatic excommunication lies solely on the excommunicated (Can. 1331 §1). - From 1884 to 1977 in the United States, an automatic excommunication applied to divorced Catholics who remarried outside the Church without obtaining an annulment. - since 1996 in the diocese of Lincoln, Nebraska, an automatic interdict (and, under certain conditions, automatic excommunication) applies to members of certain organizations, including Call to Action, the Society of St. Pius X, and DeMolay International. To tell you the truth, I am now surprised that homosexual activity does not earn you an automatic excommunication, but it doesn't.
From: Toronto | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560
|
posted 05 December 2006 08:25 AM
Actually, that's the cool part about any Christian religion. It's a cornerstone of Christian theology that when you ask for forgiveness and you are truly contrite, God will grant it to you.Obviously, there is no way for clergy to know whether someone is truly contrite, so they default to accepting the word of the penitent when granting absolution. But those who are religious Christians know that no matter what the outside world thinks, it's only if they truly repent their sins in their heart that God will grant forgiveness. I've actually always kind of liked that about the Christian religion. I believe in justice tempered by mercy otherwise, so why would I have a problem with it when it comes to religion? Where I have a problem with religious institutions like the Catholic Church is that I don't agree with them on what constitutes "sin", and I don't agree with them when they pick and choose which sins are more "forgivable" than others.
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|