babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Cloned animals.. mmmm..

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Cloned animals.. mmmm..
whyibesowhite
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13064

posted 28 December 2006 03:03 PM      Profile for whyibesowhite     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
So the U.S. has decided not to label meat that has been cloned.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/HEALTH/12/28/cloned.food.ap/index.html


The path that Corporations have taken in the U.S. is now a path followed by Agriculture. We should just mesh the two together. I'm not sure I understand the idea behind putting American farmers out of business by having labs clone animals.

I'm sure it's only a matter of time that someone from the Agriculture dept. finds a way to patent certain types of cloned animals.

Just as Monsanto was able to clone seeds;

http://www.greenpeace.org/international/news/monsanto-pig-patent-111

..and go further as to sue farmers who use this genetically changed seedlings, I expect to see some corporation come in and patent animals in the same nature.

What really bothers me, is the fact that someone will soon develop an animal via cloning to certain specifications, that'll probably cause it to be mutated to an extent, and due to this law NOT having been passed, allows them to sale that very meat on the shelves, unbeknownst to the public.

If there's truly no harm, then the labeling of cloned meat, should be a passed law.

It's not so much of evading a fear developed from cloned animals, due to a lack of understanding, but a choice of ethics. This deprives the people of that very choice. To eat food w/o knowledge of it having been grown in a farm, via a test tube, or genetically mutated.

Thoughts?


From: usa | Registered: Aug 2006  |  IP: Logged
West Coast Greeny
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6874

posted 28 December 2006 03:15 PM      Profile for West Coast Greeny     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The last thing large agribuisnesses want is for consumers to know how they manufacture food. That is why they oppose labeling of any kind.
From: Ewe of eh. | Registered: Sep 2004  |  IP: Logged
thorin_bane
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6194

posted 29 December 2006 05:42 PM      Profile for thorin_bane     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Interesting, because the CBC radio had a thing on the current about this(kinda) just before the holidays. There is a new "farmer" group which is going around informing people that nonorganic (pesticide riden) foods have the same nutrients as organic food. Well duh yes but they don't tell you is that the pesticides will give you cancer. They choose their words very carefully. She said "Why should consumers pay up to 40% more for organic when they have no more nutritional value than nonorganic foods. We just want the consumer to make an informed choice" This is free speach for corporations again! I call shinanigans on this one. At the end of the interview AM tremonti noted that the organisation was funded by the pesticide manufacturers. And there it is. It must be right because monsanto told me so.

I guess people must be piling on enough to the natural/organic/enviromental movement enough to worry the big guys. It is only a matter of time before the modify their message and market it differently. But as stated above it doesn't help that the US FDA isn't doing it's job with BUSH in office. This ties in nicely with that growth hormone they talked about in 'the corporation'. Can't wait for the mutant kids being spawned in the US to get together and file class action lawsuits in 20 years from now.

let the attacks begin

couldn't find the current episode may not have been the current but I thought it was. Anyone remember hearing about his other than me?

[ 29 December 2006: Message edited by: thorin_bane ]


From: Looking at the despair of Detroit from across the river! | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Abdul_Maria
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11105

posted 29 December 2006 06:01 PM      Profile for Abdul_Maria     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
a case of diminishing returns.

spiffy, modern, high tech - and what are the benefits ?

not all technology is good.

monsanto ... "we are so COOL because we have these neat cloned animals and seeds - and we're gonna sue your ass for - letting pollen from out plants blow onto your land !"

amazing that the judge allowed that argument to go forward. Fascism it is.

i would like to see a Monsanto boycott. if not in Canada or the US, maybe in Europe.

[ 29 December 2006: Message edited by: Abdul_Maria ]


From: San Fran | Registered: Nov 2005  |  IP: Logged
Palamedes
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13677

posted 29 December 2006 11:39 PM      Profile for Palamedes        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Here is what I find to be the most disturbing trend:

North American has decided that rather than regulate such things as animal cruelty - we will let the consumers decide - if the consumers don't buy factory farmed products, GMO, or cloned meat - then they will directly affect the market.

But of course, North America also decides that there is no need to actually keep us informed of what we are buying - and safety is the only thing that they wish to tell us.

The lobbyists have them in their back pockets - it's fucking repulsive.


From: Toronto | Registered: Dec 2006  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca