babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » labour and consumption   » Romard v. CUPE

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Romard v. CUPE
CUPE_Reformer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7457

posted 11 December 2004 07:05 PM      Profile for CUPE_Reformer   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Should CUPE National have placed CUPE Local 3264 under trusteeship?

[73] I find that CUPE Local 3264 and its Executive failed the plaintiff at every turn. The "not caring" attitude manifested by the Local Executive was inconsistent with the duty of fair representation owed to the plaintiff by the Executive. It was this attitude which led the Local Executive to abandon the plaintiff, his rights and his career. This action and inaction together with the violation of the plaintiff's rights certainly caused him some degree of mental stress. For this and for the violation of the plaintiff's rights I award the plaintiff $25,000.00.

[15] ... The copying of this letter to the National body is the only piece of evidence showing that the National was aware of what was happening in the Local.

[65] In conclusion I find that CUPE National did not owe a duty of fair representation to the plaintiff...

Judge Felix A. Cacchione
Supreme Court of Nova Scotia

http://www.canlii.org/ns/cas/nssc/2000/2000nssc10143.html


From: Real Solidarity | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca