Author
|
Topic: Free Condoms For The Troops
|
Jerry West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1545
|
posted 12 June 2006 10:22 PM
quote: Soldiers at home and abroad snapped up 306,522 condoms from January 2005 to March 2006, said the Canadian Press, citing figures obtained under the Access to Information Act.Canadian Forces members are supplied with free condoms, paid for by the government and handed out through military dispensaries.... In 1999, soldiers used 295,200 military condoms.... While sex between the 2,300 soldiers is forbidden on the Kandahar air base in Afghanistan, the military does supply condoms there. Officials wouldn't speculate what the condoms were being used for, said the report.... CBC article
Other than covering the muzzles of their rifles I wonder what the troops are doing with condoms in Afghanistan?
From: Gold River, BC | Registered: Oct 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jingles
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3322
|
posted 13 June 2006 02:20 PM
quote: Troops do go on leave from here.
Which raises another interesting question, which I'm sure our intrepid free press will doggedly pursue when not checking out how cool they look in a flak vest; where, how, and with whom? Do they go on leave to places where underage prostitution is epidemic? I'm betting yes. Do they, like the American military, consider sexual favours from the local occupied population a right of conquest? I've heard some pretty nasty horror stories from first-hand sources about the CFs conduct in Bosnia with the local women. Soldiers who would think nothing of trading a IMP for a sexual encounter with young women and girls. War is hell. Especially for the ones without the rifles. But hey, if our brave soldiers want to tear off a piece while they protect our freedom and Stephen Harper's currently capitated head, who am I to complain? We don't want our boys suffering the clap while they call down air strikes onto poppy farmers. It would be rather uncomfortable, no? Maybe there's a simpler reason: Harper doesn't want the troops to pull out. [ 13 June 2006: Message edited by: Jingles ]
From: At the Delta of the Alpha and the Omega | Registered: Nov 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
arborman
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4372
|
posted 13 June 2006 06:35 PM
We should be giving out condoms to anyone who wants them. Control over our bodies is a right, and birth control is a part of that.That being said, I have no idea whatsoever whether it would be appropriate to hand out birth control in Afghanistan. I also have no idea what any potential unintended consequences might be, so it might not be a good idea. Hell, I'd be happy if we started handing them out everywhere here in Canada. Make the dispensers in public washrooms provide free condoms, instead of charging a dollar. Give them away at pharmacies. Mail them to every address in the phone book every week. Whatever it takes, make sure that every human being who wants a condom can have one, no matter what. I'm sure we'd make up the cost in health care savings alone. Of course, I'm whistling in a windstorm. The likelihood of Harper's Harpies starting a program like that are comparable with the likelihood of me understanding calculus.
From: I'm a solipsist - isn't everyone? | Registered: Aug 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
jester
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11798
|
posted 13 June 2006 06:54 PM
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Jingles: [QB] Do they go on leave to places where underage prostitution is epidemic? I'm betting yes. Do they, like the American military, consider sexual favours from the local occupied population a right of conquest?
I've heard some pretty nasty horror stories from first-hand sources about the CFs conduct in Bosnia with the local women. For someone who claims 6 years in,you don't know much do you?
From: Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Jingles
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3322
|
posted 13 June 2006 07:17 PM
quote: For someone who claims 6 years in,you don't know much do you?
So you have nothing to say? Whatever. You go on believing the fantasy of the noble warrior and ignore thousands of years of human experience of sexual violence in war because gosh darn it, our boys are just super duper good guys. Like Stephen Colbert says, facts aren't important; truthiness is. The fact is that occupying armies always rape, they always make use of prostitutes, and they inflict horrendous sexual violence with impunity. As far as Bosnia is concerned, recall that UN personnel have been implicated in prostitution scandals involving women who are basically sex slaves. And certain Canadian units with connections to certain Canadian organized crime elements were involved in their own little operation.
From: At the Delta of the Alpha and the Omega | Registered: Nov 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
arborman
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4372
|
posted 13 June 2006 07:52 PM
quote: Originally posted by Jingles:
And certain Canadian units with connections to certain Canadian organized crime elements were involved in their own little operation.
You seem to have a rather simplistic confusion between 'units' and 'individuals'. Show me a report linking a 'unit' to organized crime. Just one would be fine, but it has to have evidence. You are making some pretty appalling generalizations about Canadian troops. Individuals can do terrible things, and no doubt some individuals in the CF have. Sweeping generalizations just make you look foolish.
From: I'm a solipsist - isn't everyone? | Registered: Aug 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443
|
posted 13 June 2006 08:02 PM
quote: Originally posted by arborman:
Show me a report linking a 'unit' to organized crime. Just one would be fine, but it has to have evidence.
Arborman
He was referencing to the Royal 22e Régiment. And I hate to say this but Jingles is correct about the crimes and mafia connections. Note: No Van Doos Battalion has been deployed overseas for the last 4 years for some unknown reason, which may have something to do with the reasons above. quote:
You are making some pretty appalling generalizations about Canadian troops. Individuals can do terrible things, and no doubt some individuals in the CF have. Sweeping generalizations just make you look foolish.
Yes I agree. [ 13 June 2006: Message edited by: Webgear ]
From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Jerry West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1545
|
posted 13 June 2006 08:02 PM
quote: Jingles: The fact is that occupying armies always rape, they always make use of prostitutes, and they inflict horrendous sexual violence with impunity.
To be fair that statement really needs to be qualified more. Although these characteristics may appear to one degree or another, as they do in a lot of other areas besides military, there are considerable differences between units in what is policy, merely permitted, not permitted but more or less tolerated and not tolerated at all. quote: Webgear: I do not see a lot of Muslim nations trying to solve the problem at this time.
And until we do there probably won't be a workable solution. If one buys into the PR spin that we are there to help the Afghans rather than pursue our own agenda, then our efforts may be counter productive since the real changes that need to be made here are cultural and social and must come from within the affected society, not from overt foreign interference.
From: Gold River, BC | Registered: Oct 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
siren
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7470
|
posted 13 June 2006 08:05 PM
On the rather negative side of things (in an otherwise positive article): quote: Capt. Demiray was born in Turkey and immigrated to Canada in 1993. He joined the military a decade later, becoming its first Muslim chaplain. Beyond saying prayers with elders, Capt. Demiray ministers to the 200 Muslims among Canada's 60,000 military personnel. He also advises the forces on cultural issues. He recently tried to persuade the chain of command that soldiers shouldn't give away copies of men's magazines to their Afghan allies, because the photos of scantily clad women could tarnish the Canadians' image among devout Muslims. Globe & Mail
Handing out girlie photos seems a tad stuuuupid in a Muslim society. I wonder how the female soldiers feel about it. Or the Afghan women, should they chance upon the photos. Handing out condoms in Afghanistan would, I propose be a very bad thing as far as improving relations with the populace. And godess help any women who tried to demand their men wear them. OTOH -- if a soldier is asked for condoms by allied Afghans -- hand them out by the bucket full, by all means. edited to add link
[ 13 June 2006: Message edited by: siren ]
From: Of course we could have world peace! But where would be the profit in that? | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443
|
posted 14 June 2006 04:40 PM
quote: Originally posted by siren:
But of course! It is a positive on the side of development when women can control their own reproduction. Condoms don't necessarily help with that, but not every woman wants 12 children -- here or anywhere else.
I am still wondering how we could educate Afghans about the positive results of condoms in a postive manner.
From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|