babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Free Condoms For The Troops

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Free Condoms For The Troops
Jerry West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1545

posted 12 June 2006 10:22 PM      Profile for Jerry West   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:

Soldiers at home and abroad snapped up 306,522 condoms from January 2005 to March 2006, said the Canadian Press, citing figures obtained under the Access to Information Act.

Canadian Forces members are supplied with free condoms, paid for by the government and handed out through military dispensaries....

In 1999, soldiers used 295,200 military condoms....

While sex between the 2,300 soldiers is forbidden on the Kandahar air base in Afghanistan, the military does supply condoms there. Officials wouldn't speculate what the condoms were being used for, said the report....

CBC article


Other than covering the muzzles of their rifles I wonder what the troops are doing with condoms in Afghanistan?


From: Gold River, BC | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged
siren
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7470

posted 12 June 2006 10:39 PM      Profile for siren     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well, the article specifically states they are not allowed to have sex with one another ... so we know they're not doing that.

OR does the report seem to state that not all 2300 of them can have sex together? Wiggle room for a lawyer!


From: Of course we could have world peace! But where would be the profit in that? | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged
Papal Bull
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7050

posted 12 June 2006 10:54 PM      Profile for Papal Bull   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
...Between is such a constraining term.
From: Vatican's best darned ranch | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
TK 421
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12140

posted 12 June 2006 11:25 PM      Profile for TK 421     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Troops do go on leave from here.
From: Near and far | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged
Doug
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 44

posted 13 June 2006 12:53 PM      Profile for Doug   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by siren:
Well, the article specifically states they are not allowed to have sex with one another ... so we know they're not doing that.

As if.

Water balloon fights. Yes, they're having water balloon fights.


From: Toronto, Canada | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Jingles
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3322

posted 13 June 2006 02:20 PM      Profile for Jingles     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Troops do go on leave from here.

Which raises another interesting question, which I'm sure our intrepid free press will doggedly pursue when not checking out how cool they look in a flak vest; where, how, and with whom?

Do they go on leave to places where underage prostitution is epidemic? I'm betting yes. Do they, like the American military, consider sexual favours from the local occupied population a right of conquest?

I've heard some pretty nasty horror stories from first-hand sources about the CFs conduct in Bosnia with the local women. Soldiers who would think nothing of trading a IMP for a sexual encounter with young women and girls. War is hell. Especially for the ones without the rifles.

But hey, if our brave soldiers want to tear off a piece while they protect our freedom and Stephen Harper's currently capitated head, who am I to complain? We don't want our boys suffering the clap while they call down air strikes onto poppy farmers. It would be rather uncomfortable, no?

Maybe there's a simpler reason: Harper doesn't want the troops to pull out.

[ 13 June 2006: Message edited by: Jingles ]


From: At the Delta of the Alpha and the Omega | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
M. Spector
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8273

posted 13 June 2006 04:00 PM      Profile for M. Spector   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I wonder what effect this news has on the morale of the spouses back home? (I hope it's bad.)
From: One millihelen: The amount of beauty required to launch one ship. | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
siren
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7470

posted 13 June 2006 04:22 PM      Profile for siren     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
M. Spector, I know you're not at all in favour of our role in Afghanistan. But to casually hope for psychological harm to come to innocent spouses at home, just hoping their loved ones will return...

It's a little over the top, don't you think?


From: Of course we could have world peace! But where would be the profit in that? | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged
M. Spector
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8273

posted 13 June 2006 04:52 PM      Profile for M. Spector   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
No, I think it's quite reasonable to wish for the demoralization of any imperialist invading army. The sooner that happens, the sooner they will leave.
From: One millihelen: The amount of beauty required to launch one ship. | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 13 June 2006 05:48 PM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
My wife likes the condoms that were provided to me; especially the fruit flavoured ribbed ones. We did not have to buy condoms for the first 5 years of our relationship because of the army.

STDs can bring an army to a halt, its better to provide soldiers condoms that way the army can still function when in the field either here in Canada or overseas.

I thought people would be happy that soldiers were not spreading STDs and were acting responsible for their actions in the bedroom.


From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
arborman
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4372

posted 13 June 2006 06:12 PM      Profile for arborman     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Demoralizing people at home has never had much of an effect on the function of armies abroad.

When I was a cadet, lo these many years ago, they would hand out condoms to anyone who asked at summer camp. This despite the fact that to be caught so much as kissing, nevermind canoodling, was enough to be sent home.

I thought at the time, and I think now, that condoms should be available to everyone and anyone who wants one, without question or cost. Regulations prohibiting people from having sex, like in Afghanistan, are a separate matter.


From: I'm a solipsist - isn't everyone? | Registered: Aug 2003  |  IP: Logged
Jerry West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1545

posted 13 June 2006 06:20 PM      Profile for Jerry West   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:

I thought at the time, and I think now, that condoms should be available to everyone and anyone who wants one, without question or cost.

So do I. I also think that we should be giving them out to the Afghans. Are we doing that?


From: Gold River, BC | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 13 June 2006 06:25 PM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
For curiosity sake, I am wondering what are your reasons for why we should give condoms out to the Afghans? I suppose it could be done and does seem like a good idea.
From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
Jerry West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1545

posted 13 June 2006 06:30 PM      Profile for Jerry West   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I am a big fan of birth control on this grossly overpopulated planet as well as appreciating the disease prevention benefit.

Part of the cultural change that is needed in many places is one to accept population control as a necessary fact of life.

War, as you may have guessed, is not one of my preferred methods for solving the population issue.


From: Gold River, BC | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged
arborman
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4372

posted 13 June 2006 06:35 PM      Profile for arborman     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
We should be giving out condoms to anyone who wants them. Control over our bodies is a right, and birth control is a part of that.

That being said, I have no idea whatsoever whether it would be appropriate to hand out birth control in Afghanistan. I also have no idea what any potential unintended consequences might be, so it might not be a good idea.

Hell, I'd be happy if we started handing them out everywhere here in Canada. Make the dispensers in public washrooms provide free condoms, instead of charging a dollar. Give them away at pharmacies. Mail them to every address in the phone book every week. Whatever it takes, make sure that every human being who wants a condom can have one, no matter what.

I'm sure we'd make up the cost in health care savings alone.

Of course, I'm whistling in a windstorm. The likelihood of Harper's Harpies starting a program like that are comparable with the likelihood of me understanding calculus.


From: I'm a solipsist - isn't everyone? | Registered: Aug 2003  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 13 June 2006 06:36 PM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Jerry West:
Part of the cultural change that is needed in many places is one to accept population control as a necessary fact of life.

I wonder if Afghan males would be offended by condoms being given to them by military or NGO personnel?

I can not recall if the CF has handed out condoms to the general population before on any mission in recent history?


From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
otter
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12062

posted 13 June 2006 06:41 PM      Profile for otter        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I wonder if the relief camp girls and boys are called Hillaries?
From: agent provocateur inc. | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged
Jerry West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1545

posted 13 June 2006 06:44 PM      Profile for Jerry West   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:

I wonder if Afghan males would be offended by condoms being given to them by military or NGO personnel?

Probably, but those are the kinds of attitudes that have to be changed if there is to be any real success. Of course changing these attitudes by imposition from the outside is probably not a winning strategy and one reason we should be pursuing a non-military approach in Afghanistan.


From: Gold River, BC | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged
jester
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11798

posted 13 June 2006 06:49 PM      Profile for jester        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by M. Spector:
No, I think it's quite reasonable to wish for the demoralization of any imperialist invading army. The sooner that happens, the sooner they will leave.


Is this appalling psychosexual dichotomy sanctioned by the Manitoba Communist Party or did you ferment this in the comfort of your own psychosis?


From: Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
jester
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11798

posted 13 June 2006 06:54 PM      Profile for jester        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Jingles:
[QB]


Do they go on leave to places where underage prostitution is epidemic? I'm betting yes. Do they, like the American military, consider sexual favours from the local occupied population a right of conquest?

I've heard some pretty nasty horror stories from first-hand sources about the CFs conduct in Bosnia with the local women.

For someone who claims 6 years in,you don't know much do you?


From: Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 13 June 2006 06:55 PM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Jerry West:

Probably, but those are the kinds of attitudes that have to be changed if there is to be any real success. Of course changing these attitudes by imposition from the outside is probably not a winning strategy and one reason we should be pursuing a non-military approach in Afghanistan.

Changing these attitudes will mostly likely have to be done members of the muslin society, I am not sure if western society will be able to effect a cultural change like this in the short term or even long term. I do think this project would be a benefit to Afghans if this was to happen.


From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
Jerry West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1545

posted 13 June 2006 07:13 PM      Profile for Jerry West   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:

Changing these attitudes will mostly likely have to be done members of the muslin society,....

Exactly, and is one reason why our military involvement there may be counterproductive in the long run.


From: Gold River, BC | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged
Jingles
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3322

posted 13 June 2006 07:17 PM      Profile for Jingles     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
For someone who claims 6 years in,you don't know much do you?

So you have nothing to say? Whatever. You go on believing the fantasy of the noble warrior and ignore thousands of years of human experience of sexual violence in war because gosh darn it, our boys are just super duper good guys. Like Stephen Colbert says, facts aren't important; truthiness is.

The fact is that occupying armies always rape, they always make use of prostitutes, and they inflict horrendous sexual violence with impunity.

As far as Bosnia is concerned, recall that UN personnel have been implicated in prostitution scandals involving women who are basically sex slaves. And certain Canadian units with connections to certain Canadian organized crime elements were involved in their own little operation.


From: At the Delta of the Alpha and the Omega | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 13 June 2006 07:44 PM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Jerry West:

Exactly, and is one reason why our military involvement there may be counterproductive in the long run.


I believe the end state of Afghanistan will be a positive one, of course we will make mistakes at times however I believe that the positive actions we will provide or produce will out weight the negative points of the mission.

I could be wrong about the current options but I am willing to try everything to solve the problem. I do not see a lot of Muslim nations trying to solve the problem at this time.


From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
TK 421
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12140

posted 13 June 2006 07:48 PM      Profile for TK 421     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Armies and soldiers do not always rape, although I fully agree that some armies and some soldiers have and do. Our force here is disciplined and professional. We treat the local population with respect. I'm not saying that we are saints, warrior-monks or angels, but neither are we the demons that you like to portray.

You bring photos from Abu-Graib, which is not in Afghanistan, does not involve Canadian soldiers and involves the treatment of prisoners by guards, not the population by soldiers.


From: Near and far | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 13 June 2006 07:50 PM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by TK 421:

You bring photos from Abu-Graib, which is not in Afghanistan, does not involve Canadian soldiers and involves the treatment of prisoners by guards, not the population by soldiers.



From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
arborman
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4372

posted 13 June 2006 07:52 PM      Profile for arborman     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Jingles:

And certain Canadian units with connections to certain Canadian organized crime elements were involved in their own little operation.

You seem to have a rather simplistic confusion between 'units' and 'individuals'.

Show me a report linking a 'unit' to organized crime. Just one would be fine, but it has to have evidence.

You are making some pretty appalling generalizations about Canadian troops. Individuals can do terrible things, and no doubt some individuals in the CF have. Sweeping generalizations just make you look foolish.


From: I'm a solipsist - isn't everyone? | Registered: Aug 2003  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 13 June 2006 08:02 PM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by arborman:


Show me a report linking a 'unit' to organized crime. Just one would be fine, but it has to have evidence.



Arborman

He was referencing to the Royal 22e Régiment. And I hate to say this but Jingles is correct about the crimes and mafia connections.

Note: No Van Doos Battalion has been deployed overseas for the last 4 years for some unknown reason, which may have something to do with the reasons above.

quote:


You are making some pretty appalling generalizations about Canadian troops. Individuals can do terrible things, and no doubt some individuals in the CF have. Sweeping generalizations just make you look foolish.

Yes I agree.

[ 13 June 2006: Message edited by: Webgear ]


From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
Jerry West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1545

posted 13 June 2006 08:02 PM      Profile for Jerry West   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:

Jingles:
The fact is that occupying armies always rape, they always make use of prostitutes, and they inflict horrendous sexual violence with impunity.

To be fair that statement really needs to be qualified more. Although these characteristics may appear to one degree or another, as they do in a lot of other areas besides military, there are considerable differences between units in what is policy, merely permitted, not permitted but more or less tolerated and not tolerated at all.

quote:

Webgear:
I do not see a lot of Muslim nations trying to solve the problem at this time.

And until we do there probably won't be a workable solution. If one buys into the PR spin that we are there to help the Afghans rather than pursue our own agenda, then our efforts may be counter productive since the real changes that need to be made here are cultural and social and must come from within the affected society, not from overt foreign interference.


From: Gold River, BC | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged
siren
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7470

posted 13 June 2006 08:05 PM      Profile for siren     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
On the rather negative side of things (in an otherwise positive article):

quote:
Capt. Demiray was born in Turkey and immigrated to Canada in 1993. He joined the military a decade later, becoming its first Muslim chaplain. Beyond saying prayers with elders, Capt. Demiray ministers to the 200 Muslims among Canada's 60,000 military personnel. He also advises the forces on cultural issues. He recently tried to persuade the chain of command that soldiers shouldn't give away copies of men's magazines to their Afghan allies, because the photos of scantily clad women could tarnish the Canadians' image among devout Muslims.

Globe & Mail


Handing out girlie photos seems a tad stuuuupid in a Muslim society. I wonder how the female soldiers feel about it. Or the Afghan women, should they chance upon the photos.

Handing out condoms in Afghanistan would, I propose be a very bad thing as far as improving relations with the populace. And godess help any women who tried to demand their men wear them.

OTOH -- if a soldier is asked for condoms by allied Afghans -- hand them out by the bucket full, by all means.


edited to add link

[ 13 June 2006: Message edited by: siren ]


From: Of course we could have world peace! But where would be the profit in that? | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged
BetterRed
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11865

posted 13 June 2006 08:35 PM      Profile for BetterRed     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:

OTOH -- if a soldier is asked for condoms by allied Afghans -- hand them out by the bucket full, by all means.


That would stop the Afghan population boom, right siren?

From: They change the course of history, everyday ppl like you and me | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
siren
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7470

posted 13 June 2006 08:40 PM      Profile for siren     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by BetterRed:
That would stop the Afghan population boom, right siren?

But of course!

It is a positive on the side of development when women can control their own reproduction. Condoms don't necessarily help with that, but not every woman wants 12 children -- here or anywhere else.


From: Of course we could have world peace! But where would be the profit in that? | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 14 June 2006 04:40 PM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by siren:

But of course!

It is a positive on the side of development when women can control their own reproduction. Condoms don't necessarily help with that, but not every woman wants 12 children -- here or anywhere else.


I am still wondering how we could educate Afghans about the positive results of condoms in a postive manner.


From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca