Author
|
Topic: United Nations 'Army' Proposed
|
|
|
|
TK 421
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12140
|
posted 15 June 2006 04:04 PM
In my opinion it is not about having troops available. The real issue is having the will and mandate to use them for other than traditional "blue-beret" observation tasks.If you want to "prevent" or "stop" situations like Rwanda you need to be able to impose your will on another country (or faction in a civil war). That imposition of will is called war. Regardless of the amount of troops standing by on-call, the key ingredient is to have the will and mandate to use them for other than hand-wringing. That is about politics, not the means to implement. My two cents as usual. TK
From: Near and far | Registered: Feb 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
Jerry West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1545
|
posted 15 June 2006 05:33 PM
quote: With an independent force at their disposal, and no obligation to send in their own troops, the Security Council's often squabbling members would have less reason to drag out debates about when to intervene in crises.
Nice fantasy. Security Council members will still jockey around playing for advantage except in those rare instances where nobody has anything at all invested in whatever problem is being addressed. To even begin to get off of the ground this idea has to be combined with a revision of the UN to eliminate the veto power of individual nations in the SC. A two thirds majority of the SC should be adequate to force action. For an international force to truly be effective the UN or alternative body needs to be able to compel resources (tax) from all nations and to have enough support to present a credible countervailing force to any one country, including the US.
From: Gold River, BC | Registered: Oct 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Rgaiason
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5752
|
posted 15 June 2006 07:39 PM
quote: Originally posted by paxamillion: I can see all the "coming rapture" types getting all over this "next step" in the coming world government of the beast.
Yes! Yes! All the "patriot" whackos and New World Order conspiracy theorists must be wetting themselves over this. Of course, many of them believe there has been a secret UN army operating around the world for a long time already - impersonating local police while confiscating firearms from the citizenry, quietly assassinating people who 'know too much', covering up UFO crashes and abductions, etc. etc. So, they may dismiss this announcement as just another attempt to hide the true size and power of the secret portion of the "UN army". I love nutters!
From: edmonton | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Tommy_Paine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 214
|
posted 16 June 2006 07:58 AM
Perhaps a military force would be more acceptable if it did not include chapter seven missions, but stuck to the more traditional peace keeping typified by Cyprus.Failing that, I think there should at least be a rapid reaction capability for natural disasters and emergency relief efforts. And of course, I would favour retired military personel for those jobs. They have the logistical expertise. But as ever, the key to U.N. action is to take a page from Sun Tzu, and accompish what is large while it is still small. Or, as Benny Franklin used to say, "a stitch in time saves nine." The kind of emergencies we want the U.N. to respond to and "fix" are beyond the point of fixing by the time the crisis arrives.
From: The Alley, Behind Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: Apr 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
siren
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7470
|
posted 16 June 2006 07:46 PM
quote: Originally posted by Rgaiason:I'm trying to figure out where this strange piece of disinformation fits into the scheme of things: Bilderbergers
Hah, that's a pretty funny little blog spot. Yours?
quote: Kissinger Eats Banana Republic Participants at last weeks Bilderberg group meeting in Ottawa were reportedly shocked to discover fellow participant Henry Kissinger lying semi-comatose in a hotel hallway, clutching his more than usually distended belly, after having consumed an entire Central American nation.
From: Of course we could have world peace! But where would be the profit in that? | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|