babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » right brain babble   » humanities & science   » Pirates good/bad?

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Pirates good/bad?
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 04 April 2008 11:34 AM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Ok... you go first...
From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
johnpauljones
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7554

posted 04 April 2008 11:37 AM      Profile for johnpauljones     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
pirates are good. Every September 19th I celebrate international talk like a pirate day.
From: City of Toronto | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged
jrootham
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 838

posted 04 April 2008 11:37 AM      Profile for jrootham     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Myth or reality?
From: Toronto | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
farnival
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6452

posted 04 April 2008 11:37 AM      Profile for farnival     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
yar! i be very good at bein' bad. care to come for a sail thar cueball? see, i have this lovely plank on me ship with an excellent view of the fishes....
From: where private gain trumps public interest, and apparently that's just dandy. | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
Proaxiom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6188

posted 04 April 2008 11:50 AM      Profile for Proaxiom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Pirates bad. Ninjas good.

[ 04 April 2008: Message edited by: Proaxiom ]


From: East of the Sun, West of the Moon | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
farnival
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6452

posted 04 April 2008 12:06 PM      Profile for farnival     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by jrootham:
Myth or reality?

oh, pirates were no myth, but if there is one, it's that they were always, at all times "pirates" or outlaws.

Sir Francis Drake was widely considered by the Spanish to be a pirate, but to the English, and Queen Elizabeth and her very private financiers, he was a privateer, which is a legal pirate, someone who had a "letter of marque" from a soveriegn country to prey on any an all maritime activities by any other country, of any value, which was then divvied up between the privateer and the crown/investors. quite a lucrative situation for most involved. i say most because the crew usually had miserable lives and were paid a pittance.

actually, history shows that "pirates" were one of the earliest modern forms of direct democracy. most pirate crews and captains were deserters from Navies of whatever country they were a national of, at a time where you could be press ganged into service against your will, and likely ended up dying in miserable condidiotns far from home. captains were elected by crews, and served the crew's pleasure. shares of any spoils were divided equally, and a captain could be removed and replaced by a simple vote by the crew, at any time, so it was in his (or in the case of Anne Bonny, her!) best interest to keep the crew happy and well fed.

the fact that you could be a privateer one day, or even an actual naval officer or serviceman one day, and then due to change of circumstance at home, like the overthrow or military defeat of a monarch or government, a pirate and outlaw the next, contributes to the romanticising of pirates and thier lives.

myths abound about how terrible they were too. in the accounts of the infamous Blackbeard, Edward Teach, and his cronies, almost all describe them as gentlemen who were only after the material goods and ships they captured. usually if they cut out a smaller or less useful vessel, they would take what was of value, and leave the people unmolested. some cheeky buggers even gave reciepts! if a desirable ship was captured, pirate crews were transferred to the better ship and the victims transferred to the lesser one and sent on thier way.

and lets not forget that a great deal of pirate crews were escaped slaves from the colonies, exacting revenge on thier former masters. from these accounts, gentlemanly conduct was usually nowhere to be found, as you can imagine.


From: where private gain trumps public interest, and apparently that's just dandy. | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
jrootham
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 838

posted 04 April 2008 12:12 PM      Profile for jrootham     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I was a bit terse. I was not asking the question "Are pirates myth or reality?" I was asking the questions "Is this thread about the myths or realities of pirates?"

With your intervention, we have both.


From: Toronto | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
kropotkin1951
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2732

posted 04 April 2008 12:34 PM      Profile for kropotkin1951   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I like Barrett's Privateers. How I wish I was in Sherbrooke now.
From: North of Manifest Destiny | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
farnival
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6452

posted 04 April 2008 12:37 PM      Profile for farnival     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by jrootham:
I was a bit terse. I was not asking the question "Are pirates myth or reality?" I was asking the questions "Is this thread about the myths or realities of pirates?"

With your intervention, we have both.



yar, jrootham, we call that a double broadside! now duck lad, load the bar shot and prime the wicks, we're swinging round for another go!


From: where private gain trumps public interest, and apparently that's just dandy. | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 04 April 2008 12:37 PM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Oy, kropotkin, I'm close to tears whenever I think of that song:

quote:
God damn them all!
I was told we'd cruise the seas for American gold
We'd fire no guns-shed no tears
Now I'm a broken man on a Halifax pier
The last of Barrett's Privateers.

Here we go:

[ 04 April 2008: Message edited by: unionist ]


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
farnival
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6452

posted 04 April 2008 12:42 PM      Profile for farnival     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
aye, unionist, ye big softy.

from Rogue's Gallery, Pirate ballads, sea songs & Chanteys:

richard thompson-mingulay boat song...brings a similar tear te me eye and a lump in the neck:

Heel ya ho, boys, let her go, boys
Heave her head round to the weather
Heel ya ho, boys, let her go, boys
Sailing homeward to Mingulay

What care we though white the Minch is
What care we boys the wind and weather
When we know that, every inch is
Closer homeward to Mingulay

Heel ya ho, boys, let her go, boys
Heave her head round to the weather
Heel ya ho, boys, let her go, boys
Sailing homeward to Mingulay

Wives are waiting by the pierhead
Gazing seaward from the heather
Heave ahead round and we'll anchor
Ere the sun sets on Mingulay

Heel ya ho, boys, let her go, boys
Heave her head round to the weather
Heel ya ho, boys, let her go, boys
Sailing homeward to Mingulay
Sailing homeward to Mingulay


From: where private gain trumps public interest, and apparently that's just dandy. | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
M. Spector
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8273

posted 04 April 2008 12:43 PM      Profile for M. Spector   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
WTF is this doing in the activism forum?
From: One millihelen: The amount of beauty required to launch one ship. | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 04 April 2008 12:53 PM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The Schooner Fame

Arrrgghhha, its a fine ship and will becoming to the Great Lakes once again this summer.


From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
Proaxiom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6188

posted 04 April 2008 12:53 PM      Profile for Proaxiom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Dunno. Maybe for protesting the RIAA?
From: East of the Sun, West of the Moon | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 04 April 2008 01:04 PM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by M. Spector:
WTF is this doing in the activism forum?

The movement to preserve and promote anti-imperialist culture?


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 04 April 2008 01:08 PM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I once heard a rumour that most modern era pirates were the result of Templars being disbanded and these former knights turned to piracy in order to damage the vaults of the King of France and the Catholic church.
From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
Proaxiom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6188

posted 04 April 2008 01:11 PM      Profile for Proaxiom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
That doesn't pass the smell test, webgear.
From: East of the Sun, West of the Moon | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 04 April 2008 01:12 PM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Pirates ships in the Caribean were mostly democratic institutions. The main leadership positions were elected posts.
From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 04 April 2008 01:17 PM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Arggg, I know that I should kiss the gunner's daughter.

PirateTalk


From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
Proaxiom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6188

posted 04 April 2008 01:21 PM      Profile for Proaxiom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The history of privateering is interesting when considering how much warfare prior to the 19th century was contracted to the private sector. This is true both for land and sea warfare.

They moved away from it in the 1800s, though the trend seems to have come back in some areas.


From: East of the Sun, West of the Moon | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 04 April 2008 01:26 PM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Pirates 1660–1730 by Angus Konstam

This book gives an accurate picture of the pirates who sailed in the waters of the Caribbean and off the American coastline during the 'golden age' of piracy between 1660 and 1730. It traces the origins of piratical activity in the 16th century and examines the Boucaneer (Buccaneer) culture in Jamaica and Hispaniola. It details what drove individuals to a life of piracy, how they dressed, their weaponry, the ships they used and the codes by which they operated. Whether viewed as villains or victims the Pirates were a major threat to shipping and commerce in the western Atlantic for more than 70 years. Elite 67, 69 and 74 are also available in a single volume special edition as ‘Pirates’.


From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 04 April 2008 01:40 PM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Proaxiom:
That doesn't pass the smell test, webgear.
I am not so sur eabout that, moreover, if indeed they were then I say; "good on them".

From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 04 April 2008 03:56 PM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
M. Spector was right.

This is a sub-forum of "walking the talk".

Not "walking the plank".


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 04 April 2008 06:32 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Moving this to...hmm. babble banter? But it's actually gotten into real historical stuff. History is a humanity...humanities and science?

Yeah. Humanities and science it is.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 04 April 2008 07:07 PM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I used to race sailboats as a teenager and young adult. Got a few trophies too. Furthermore, it might amuse some babblers to know that I was also once the Junior Commodore of a yacht club. Dinghy racing is still a great way to get to know boats and the strategy and tactics of competition on the water. It turned out to be a useful preparation for politics as well, for a bunch of reasons.

Anyway, my crew and I used to have a lot of fun racing against the Sea Cadets, whom we trash talked mercilessly. "Eat foam, sea dogs!" we'd yell at them over the transom as we left them in our wake. In a fog we'd bellow in a German accent, "Torpedo ... LOS!" or in cover shout "Prepare to BOARD!" , or suddenly appear abeam barking "Ramming Speed!" just for a good laugh and to terrorize the greenhorns. Heheh.

Anyway, all this is by way of saying that I wanted in those youthful moments to be able to come out of a fog bank, passing all other boats in a furious plane, and hoist the Jolly Roger as we crossed the finish line in a stunning victory.

Not that it ever happened. The Skull and Crossbones was viewed as a most sinister flag by serious racers and as something not to be trifled with.

The truth is, in one race that we won, we'd lost the pin for the port stay and, letting go for a moment to celebrate our victory, suffered the ignimony of seeing the mast slam onto the deck, barely missing our heads, and causing the dinghy to come to a dead stop just across the finish line as the mainsail dragged in the water like the carcass of a dead squid. D'oh!

Won the race though.

[ 04 April 2008: Message edited by: N.Beltov ]


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
oldhat
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 15078

posted 04 April 2008 08:26 PM      Profile for oldhat     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
My boyfriend actually came from a long line of pirates and he came across an old pirate code (each ship had a different code but were very similar). It actually did well to look after it's crew mates, promising a certain amount of money for fingers or limbs lost in battle. There were several rules of course, but the only one that called for the death penalty was if a member of the crew raped a woman. After reading that it really put my thoughts of raping and pillaging pirates into perspective.
From: Toronto | Registered: Mar 2008  |  IP: Logged
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 04 April 2008 09:14 PM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well that is too bad because I was going to ask if crime can be activism. In fact pose it as such in some cases, for example many pirates.
From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 04 April 2008 09:23 PM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well, ya shoulda pursued that in the OP then.
From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 04 April 2008 09:27 PM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Cueball: ... I was going to ask if crime can be activism.

Trade union activity was treated as criminal activity in North America until the passage of the Wagner Act in the USA in 1935 and the passage of similar legislation in Canada a little over 10 years later. Trade union activity was treated as a criminal conspiracy before that.

But it would be better to express it the other way around; activism can be a crime and often is.


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Pride for Red Dolores
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12072

posted 11 April 2008 09:00 AM      Profile for Pride for Red Dolores     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
****Thread drift****

That's what civil disobediance is- breaking one law to protest another.

Back on topic : what about female pirates ? I know there were a few.


From: Montreal | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 11 April 2008 10:47 AM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Actually the most powerful pirate ever was a Chinese female pirate who ran a fleet of 400 pirate ships in the oceans of Indochinese coast and Hainan.
From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
jrootham
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 838

posted 11 April 2008 12:53 PM      Profile for jrootham     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Cueball:
Actually the most powerful pirate ever was a Chinese female pirate who ran a fleet of 400 pirate ships in the oceans of Indochinese coast and Hainan.

Rather similar to Arthur Ransome's
Missee Lee. Although he does not claim that for the basis of the book.


From: Toronto | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 11 April 2008 05:13 PM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
There were two female pirates based in Jamaica area from 1718 to 1720. There names were Anne Bony and Mary Reade.

Both were captured in 1720.


From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
martin dufresne
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11463

posted 11 April 2008 05:35 PM      Profile for martin dufresne   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It's still happening. And you can read about it without the myth that grew to surround ye olde piracy of great-great-grandad, now that was a free spirit for ya...
quote:
PARIS, France (AP) -- April 4, 2008 - Pirates seized control of a French luxury yacht carrying 30 crew members Friday in the Gulf of Aden off Somalia's coast, the French government and the ship's owner said.

Attackers stormed the three-mast Le Ponant as it returned without passengers from the Seychelles, in the Indian Ocean, toward the Mediterranean Sea, said officials with French maritime transport company CMA-CGM.

"This is a blatant act of piracy," Prime Minister Francois Fillon told reporters while on a visit to Brussels. "The Defense and Foreign ministries are mobilized to act as quickly as possible, I hope in the coming minutes or hours to try to win the freedom of these hostages."(...)


CNN story

From: "Words Matter" (Mackinnon) | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 15 April 2008 08:33 AM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Canadian government piracy...

quote:
Fresh out of jail, the captain of the anti-sealing ship Farley Mowat yesterday accused Fisheries Minister Loyola Hearn of lying when he said the vessel was boarded and seized in national waters by Canadian officials in a dramatic showdown this weekend.

Alexander Cornelissen, who hails from the Netherlands, said the ship never strayed into Canada's 12-nautical-mile territorial limit, but cannot prove it because the Canadian government seized the ship, along with the ship logs and GPS-tracking records.

"My message to Mr. Hearn is that he's an absolute liar. He's lying about this, and let him prove it," Mr. Cornelissen said in an interview yesterday upon his release from jail in Sydney, N.S., along with First Officer Peter Hammarstedt, after Canadian author Farley Mowat, the ship's namesake, put up bail money.

"It's an absolute outrage," Mr. Cornelissen said. "How dare they board a foreign vessel in international waters, a Dutch-registered vessel with a Dutch captain? They held the entire crew at gunpoint."


Here's the relevant quote ...

quote:
The angry war of words over the seizure of the ship continued yesterday. Paul Watson, the head of the militant Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, which owns the ship, called Canadian officials "pirates" and charged that officials boarded the ship in international waters to prevent potentially embarrassing footage from being made public - and, he said, possibly putting an end to the seal hunt. He said the Mowat's 17-member crew had videotape footage of seals screaming while being skinned alive.

Sounds like pirates to me. Keel haul Loyola Hearn!


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
M. Spector
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8273

posted 15 April 2008 11:09 AM      Profile for M. Spector   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I have been following the news coverage closely, waiting for someone on the government side to deny that the arrest took place in international waters, and it hasn't been forthcoming.

This makes me believe the Sea Shepherd people were right.


From: One millihelen: The amount of beauty required to launch one ship. | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 15 April 2008 11:25 AM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by M. Spector:
I have been following the news coverage closely, waiting for someone on the government side to deny that the arrest took place in international waters, and it hasn't been forthcoming.

MP Loyola Hearn has been saying the arrests took place in Canadian waters since the arrests were made.


From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
M. Spector
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8273

posted 15 April 2008 12:14 PM      Profile for M. Spector   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Maybe so, but I have never heard him say that in so many words.

I've seen many articles where the journalist states that Hearn claims the ship was in Canadian territorial waters, but I haven't seen any verbatim quotation from Hearn to that effect. It seems to me it would be a very simple thing for the government to hand out to journalists a map with an x on it showing where the Mowat was seized, in order to put the issue to rest. Because if the arrest was in Canadian waters then there would be a lot less public sympathy for the Sea Shepherd people.

And yet, the government still permits the Sea Shepherders to call Hearn a "liar" without refuting the allegation. Either he is a liar, or he's very bad at public relations.

[ 15 April 2008: Message edited by: M. Spector ]


From: One millihelen: The amount of beauty required to launch one ship. | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 15 April 2008 12:28 PM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I live in a fishing village in Quebec, and this story in on the news every hour. Link

excerpt:

Federal Fisheries Minister Loyola Hearn, however, has said the arrests were made within Canadian waters.

I just heard something that gives Canada the authority to arrest outside the 12 mile territorial limit if necessary. I'll look for the link later.


From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
M. Spector
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8273

posted 15 April 2008 12:37 PM      Profile for M. Spector   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Boom Boom:
excerpt:

Federal Fisheries Minister Loyola Hearn, however, has said the arrests were made within Canadian waters.


Like I said, the media keeps saying that Hearn has said that, but they never give an actual quote.
quote:
I just heard something that gives Canada the authority to arrest outside the 12 mile territorial limit if necessary. I'll look for the link later.
I suspect that is the Canadian government's true position - not that the arrest was within the territorial waters of Canada, but that Canada has authority to arrest beyond the 12-mile limit.

Thus the Sea Shepherd people are telling the truth about where the arrest took place, and Loyola Hearn is being careful not to deny it, but asserting a right to lawful arrest anyway. Maybe the gullible and lazy journalists are reading that assertion as a claim that the arrests were made inside the 12-mile limit, without Hearn actually saying so (because he knows it's not true).

[ 15 April 2008: Message edited by: M. Spector ]


From: One millihelen: The amount of beauty required to launch one ship. | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 15 April 2008 12:46 PM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
CTV: Hearn said the vessel was in "Canadian territorial waters" but didn't say if it was within 12 nautical miles (22 kilometres) of the coastline. The minister has also said the Fisheries Act gave him the leeway to act outside the 12-nautical mile limit.

M.Spector has a point.

The Minister accomplished what he set out to, initially, which was to impound the Farley Mowat, dispose of any unpleasant evidence of the practices of the seal hunt, place spying devices and what have you on the vessel, and so on. The Farley Mowat will now be searched, at a snail's pace, for evidence of anything, perhaps including a lengthy search for dangerous bellybutton lint from The Netherlands, after which the seal hunt should be well over and no more evidence can be collected this season.

Watson is right. The Minister, and the Canadian government in general, has taken a horrific propaganda beating from which the seal hunt may never recover.

I don't know why they call clubbing infant seals a "hunt" anyway, when it's more like shooting fish in a barrel or pushing a stroller into rush hour traffic ...


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 15 April 2008 02:01 PM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by M. Spector:
Like I said, the media keeps saying that Hearn has said that, but they never give an actual quote.

Maybe you're not watching the news? Hearn has said right into the reporter's microphones several times now that the vessel was boarded in Canadian waters.


From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 15 April 2008 02:07 PM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Hearn also said - right into the microphones - that the Cabot Strait is within Canada's 200 mile boundary. I'd love to be able togive a link but I haven't seen the story posted yet - I really haven't looked, either.
From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 15 April 2008 02:10 PM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
ps: I agree 100% that Paul Watson has won the PR battle. However, Hearn said he has spoken to the Dutch (Netherlands?) government and that they are on side with him; he asked their govt to revoke Watson's Netherlands boat registration.
From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
M. Spector
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8273

posted 15 April 2008 03:05 PM      Profile for M. Spector   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Boom Boom:
Hearn also said - right into the microphones - that the Cabot Strait is within Canada's 200 mile boundary.
Well, that fact is indisputable, since Cabot Strait is less than 200 miles across, but the relevant boundary for legal jurisdiction is 12 nautical miles.

What has Hearn said about that?

quote:
Originally posted by Boom Boom:
Hearn said he has spoken to the Dutch (Netherlands?) government and that they are on side with him; he asked their govt to revoke Watson's Netherlands boat registration.
Interesting. Again, the country of registry of the boat would only matter if the arrest took place outside the 12-mile limit.

[ 15 April 2008: Message edited by: M. Spector ]


From: One millihelen: The amount of beauty required to launch one ship. | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 15 April 2008 03:13 PM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
M. Spector: Well, that fact is indisputable, since Cabot Strait is less than 200 miles across, but the relevant boundary for legal jurisdiction is 12 nautical miles.
What has Hearn said about that?

Me: He was making reference to Canada's boundaries clearly including ALL of the Cabot Strait. I posted a link to a government map of Canada a few days ago showing this.

M. Spector: Interesting. Again, the country of registry of the boat would only matter if the arrest took place outside the 12-mile limit.

Me: The 12 mile limit is irrelevant to this discussion. Hearn wants the Dutch registry of Watson's boat revoked because Watson has broken Canadian law and he doesn't want that boat back in Canadian waters.

ETA: Hearn said he will be calling the countries of the European Parliament (Union?) to ask that none of them register Watson's boat once it is stripped of Netherlands registry (if indeed it is).

[ 15 April 2008: Message edited by: Boom Boom ]


From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
M. Spector
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8273

posted 15 April 2008 03:26 PM      Profile for M. Spector   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Boom Boom:
He was making reference to Canada's boundaries clearly including ALL of the Cabot Strait. I posted a link to a government map of Canada a few days ago showing this.
Yes, that map showed Canada's Exclusive Economic Zone or Continental Shelf. It's irrelevant to this discussion, because Canada does not have the authority to arrest ships at will throughout that zone.

Canada's arrest authority extends to the limits of its Territorial Sea (12 miles), and to a limited extent, to the limit of the Contiguous Zone (24 miles). Check out Wikipedia for an explanation of the difference.


From: One millihelen: The amount of beauty required to launch one ship. | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 15 April 2008 03:38 PM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by M. Spector:
Yes, that map showed Canada's Exclusive Economic Zone or Continental Shelf. It's irrelevant to this discussion, because Canada does not have the authority to arrest ships at will throughout that zone.

Hearn said that in this case, Canada does have the right (and obligation) to arrest a ship that came dangerously close to sealers doing their work.


From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 15 April 2008 03:48 PM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
another link:

excerpt:

The animal rights group, led by environmental crusader Paul Watson, says the seizure was illegal because the ship was in international waters at the time.

excerpt:

But federal Fisheries Minister Loyola Hearn rejected that claim, saying the Fisheries Act gives him the authority to take action beyond Canada's 12-nautical-mile territorial limit.

excerpt:

Still, the Fisheries Department has confirmed that on March 29 - one day after the hunt started - Foreign Affairs issued a diplomatic note to the Netherlands requesting help dealing with the Mowat "as it is flying a Dutch flag."

A spokesman for the Dutch foreign ministry said the department was looking into the matter.


From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
M. Spector
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8273

posted 15 April 2008 03:56 PM      Profile for M. Spector   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Right, so just as I suspected, the government's position rests on being able to prove to the court that notwithstanding that the Farley Mowat was outside the 12-mile limit the government had the authority to arrest the ship and its crew, based on one of the rather iffy exceptions to the rules against piracy on the high seas.

This would explain why Hearn has never been quoted as saying the boat was within the 12-mile limit - because it wasn't!

BTW the federal Fisheries Act does not confer any internationally recognized jurisdiction on the federal government that it does not already have under the international law of the sea.

[ 15 April 2008: Message edited by: M. Spector ]


From: One millihelen: The amount of beauty required to launch one ship. | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 15 April 2008 04:06 PM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well, not to help the Conservative regime, but isn't Canada responsible for some innovation in the Law of the Sea, and such, including interpretations of the applicability of domestic maritime law? I seem to remember reading about a past Canadian government that was somewhat successful in this regard.
From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 15 April 2008 04:09 PM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I don't have anything to add on this, other than I'm interested as to what happens next (will Hearn's calls to the Netherlands and the EU go unanswered?), and the court cases that will follow.
From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
M. Spector
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8273

posted 15 April 2008 04:16 PM      Profile for M. Spector   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by N.Beltov:
I seem to remember reading about a past Canadian government that was somewhat successful in this regard.
You may be thinking of the so-called Turbot War and the Estai case. The legality of that little bit of piracy was never tested in the International Court of Justice, because it refused to hear Spain's complaint. I forget why.

From: One millihelen: The amount of beauty required to launch one ship. | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
kropotkin1951
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2732

posted 15 April 2008 04:17 PM      Profile for kropotkin1951   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well I guess the fact he wasn't flying a Spanish flag should settle the matter then. We all cheer when Spanish trawlers are ceased.

Does anyone on this site know if the ship was actually endangering the the workers on the ice? Does anyone know if the ship took itself into a close quarters encounter with other ships?
I haven't really been able to get a clear picture of how close the ship was to the people on the ice in relation to safe nautical practices.


From: North of Manifest Destiny | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
M. Spector
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8273

posted 15 April 2008 04:25 PM      Profile for M. Spector   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by kropotkin1951:
We all cheer when Spanish trawlers are ceased.
I didn't cheer. There are very good reasons why one country should not be able to seize another country's ships on the high seas. Would we cheer, for example, if the Rainbow Warrior was arrested on the high seas while tracking whaling ships?
quote:
Does anyone on this site know if the ship was actually endangering the the workers on the ice? Does anyone know if the ship took itself into a close quarters encounter with other ships?
I doubt very much that the ship was endangering the sealers. We do know that the Mowat was rammed by a coast guard vessel. Whose fault was that? I don't know.

[ 15 April 2008: Message edited by: M. Spector ]


From: One millihelen: The amount of beauty required to launch one ship. | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 15 April 2008 04:51 PM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The Turbot War and the Estai case involved matters relating to conservation.

"[Minister Brian] Tobin directed DFO to establish a legal argument which could be made for the seizure of a foreign vessel in international waters using the premise of conservation."

However, unless Watson and the supporters of the crew of the Farley Mowat are arguing that the seal hunt is leading to the decimation or extinction of the seals, then this case is unrelated ... other than that a precedent was set for boarding a vessel in international waters by the Government of Canada for reasons of conservation. The only thing the Government of Canada is preserving is the right to "hunt" seals undisturbed, unphotographed, and unrepentant.

I guess the crew of the Farley Mowat can be thankful that the trigger happy Coast Guard crew didn't open fire on them with a .50 calibre (12.7 mm) machine gun like they did [across the bow mind you!] on the Estai when the latter fled its pursuers.

[ 15 April 2008: Message edited by: N.Beltov ]


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
martin dufresne
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11463

posted 15 April 2008 07:14 PM      Profile for martin dufresne   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Bring back Jean Chrétien and Paul Martin... there's a couple of folks who could teach Paul Watson and the Farley Mowat crew a thing or two about flags of convenience, off-shore adventures, meat-barrel politics and outright piracy...
From: "Words Matter" (Mackinnon) | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 06 August 2008 07:42 PM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Canada and the United Nations to put the hempen halter around Somalia Pirates in the near future.

Arrr there be dark days ahead for thee scum.


From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
Sven
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9972

posted 06 August 2008 08:35 PM      Profile for Sven     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Pirates are definitely good. And the decline in the number of pirates over the last couple of hundred years has caused the increase in global warming over that same period of time. I kid you not.

The proof is here.

Do you want to reduce global warming? Then, then the world desperately needs more pirates!!!


From: Eleutherophobics of the World...Unite!!!!! | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca