babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » feminism   » Size 0 is just a little thin on reality

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Size 0 is just a little thin on reality
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 05 May 2002 01:01 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yeah, I know, this subject has been done and done again, but I really enjoyed this article on the subject.

quote:
I once saw a very beautiful size 0 woman begging on the streets in Mexico City in a becoming whiff of rags. Perhaps I should go back and recruit her. I could ask for a finder's fee.

She then goes on to lampoon Vogue's latest "shape" issue, where the variety of women's shapes goes from Kate Moss to Xena, Warrior Princess. Heh. It's a quick, entertaining read, and I was amused in a shake-your-head kind of way.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Rebecca West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1873

posted 06 May 2002 09:56 AM      Profile for Rebecca West     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
There's a billboard ad on the sides of Toronto buses featuring a model who, with absolutely no exaggeration, looks like a concentration camp survivor. It's an ad for some clothing line (I don't recall the name because every time I see it my eyes glaze over in shock at the sight of the model's emaciated form).

In what universe could this starved, skeletal woman be considered attractive?


From: London , Ontario - homogeneous maximus | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
dee
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 983

posted 06 May 2002 10:51 AM      Profile for dee     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Then there are those who are actually naturally underweight (I happen to be one) who get tired of hearing that they are not real women because real women are a size 10 plus.

It gets really tiring to hear about how awful you are because you are thin. I am not allowed to enter into conversations about health an nutritian because people look at me and say "what do you have to worry about, you're skinny". I can't tell someone what size of clothing I wear because I get rolled eyes and comments about how it's not fair. I could go on but I think you get the point.


From: pleasant, unemotional conversation aids digestion | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
Trinitty
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 826

posted 06 May 2002 11:07 AM      Profile for Trinitty     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Me too. If I wear tight-fitting clothing I get numerous "looks". They don't even try to hide the sneers.

I guess it wouldn't bother me so much if I didn't hear the "disorder" comments along with it.

Good article though, I don't read those mags, as I too find them "psychotic". Unfortunately the "teen" mags also have those sized women as the "norm". What an unhealthy society.

[ May 06, 2002: Message edited by: Trinitty ]


From: Europa | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
Rebecca West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1873

posted 06 May 2002 11:17 AM      Profile for Rebecca West     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
That's an unfortunate experience Dee. It's not fair when people make assumptions based on looks. 'Real' women, of course, come in all different shapes and sizes. But I'll venture that it's far more socially stigmatizing to be overweight than underweight. After all, we don't have legions of young women killing themselves to be fat.
From: London , Ontario - homogeneous maximus | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
shelby9
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2193

posted 06 May 2002 11:44 AM      Profile for shelby9     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I find it interesting that while women who are overweight are deemed to just be lazy and unwilling to look after themselves while those women who are underweight are applauded for their ability to stay slim. While the underweight women get "the looks" as Trinitty pointed out, like they are on some kind of Calista Flockart watch, it's not that they don't eat, or work out. I've seen underweight women put away more food than the average firefighter! For whatever reason - it just never shows up on a scale or body fat measurement. Overweight women get those same "looks" when they eat something like cake in public or heaven forbid, wear a short skirt!

I find both situations quite disgusting. My cousin, who is about a size 1, and myself, who let's just say is more than a size 14, went shopping for outifts to wear to a New Year's Eve bash this past year. I'm telling you - the looks, the whispers, the total lack of helpfulness that we both received while trying on various outfits was quite telling of how sicko society has become. She got coddled and treated like she was going to pass out any minute. I got the, honey it ain't going to fit you look and zero help. Mags like Vogue don't help.


From: Edmonton, AB | Registered: Feb 2002  |  IP: Logged
WingNut
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1292

posted 06 May 2002 11:58 AM      Profile for WingNut   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Mags like Vogue don't help.

They are the largest culprits in this entire body image thing. In fact, I think it could be argued, they created it.

It is not for nothing they are constantly looking for the latest tennaged, skinny model to grace their pages. It is not for nothing that among their most covered topics is dieting. It is not for nothing that "diet pills" can be purchased among the ads near the back of all these magazines.

And they start early with Seventeen and other glossy fashion and music mags geared to preteen girls.

Also, it is interesting to note that many young men and teenagers are now finding themselves in the same boat. They are experiencing feelings of inadequacy as they can't measure up to the male models currently figuring in male fashion magazines.


From: Out There | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
dee
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 983

posted 06 May 2002 12:18 PM      Profile for dee     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
But I'll venture that it's far more socially stigmatizing to be overweight than underweight. After all, we don't have legions of young women killing themselves to be fat.

This is exactly the sort of attitude I'm talking about. As far as I'm concerned being extremely underweight is very similar to being overweight but no one wants to hear about it. Underweight people have to put up with comments, looks, and assumptions of eating disorders but if we complain we only hear that it could be worse... we could be fat.

Most people would never think of telling a person that they look fat to their faces but that's not so if you;re skinny. People can be very insensitive and rude without even thinking twice about it.

I'm not trying to say that underweight people have it worse off than overweight people. I agree that there are many more health problems that come with being overweight which I am lucky not to have to worry about. It is easy for me to be active and I'm lucky that I can eat what I want.

I just wish people would acknowledge that being skinny can cause body image problems as much as being overweight can and that those problems and issues are just as valid.


From: pleasant, unemotional conversation aids digestion | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
Trinitty
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 826

posted 06 May 2002 12:27 PM      Profile for Trinitty     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'm with shelby on this one, overwieght people have it worse IMO.

Though I get looks, comments, etc all of the time if I'm dressed for it, I'm not deeply bothered by it. I don't go home and eat a bucket of ice cream trying to "fill out" so I can "fit-in", as opposed to an overweight woman feeling that she needs to purge, starve and run around the block.

When women snarl at me "Do you EAT?!" -yes total strangers- I simply ignore them, they don't hurt my feelings or make me feel bad about myself, all that's running through my head is that those who make those comments are 1) Rude, and 2) Jealous.

When an overweight woman gets tossed those looks and comments, it's only rudeness playing a factor, there isn't that comfort of thinking they are just envious.... so I can can imagine that it would hurt more.


From: Europa | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
dee
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 983

posted 06 May 2002 12:42 PM      Profile for dee     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
overwieght people have it worse IMO.

I agree...

quote:
In what universe could this starved, skeletal woman be considered attractive?

... but comments like this can be hurtful and would never be accepted, for example, by most of the people on this board, if an equal comment was directed towards an overweight person. That's all I am trying to point out.


From: pleasant, unemotional conversation aids digestion | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
Trinitty
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 826

posted 06 May 2002 01:25 PM      Profile for Trinitty     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Agreed.
From: Europa | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 06 May 2002 01:29 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I've never liked the word "skinny", any more than I like the word "fat"... I prefer "slender" and "curvaceous"...

dee has a point about being thin... It can sometimes create a barrier between you and other women. If the conversation turns to diet, nutrition and health issues, you really have to think twice about joining the conversation and if you do, put the self-edit on high. If you say just the wrong thing, or even imply that you understand body image issues, you can get bashed pretty severely.

And many excessively thin women do have body issues. I know people who were teased mercilessly as teenagers for being overweight, and I was teased mercilessly for being small and thin, and late to develop. It's interesting, an old friend and I were chatting about our high school experiences, being opposites in terms of physique, and we both concluded that the pain was the same.

If we women could just accept all shapes and sizes and stop being so damned competitive....

Oh, well, my rant for the morning... Back to work!


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Victor Von Mediaboy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 554

posted 06 May 2002 01:44 PM      Profile for Victor Von Mediaboy   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
How about "snuggly"? The few times I've been with thinner women, I found they weren't nearly as much fun to snuggle.
From: A thread has merit only if I post to it. So sayeth VVMB! | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Rebecca West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1873

posted 06 May 2002 02:23 PM      Profile for Rebecca West     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
This is exactly the sort of attitude I'm talking about.
You criticize my 'attitude', yet you agree with what I've said, that overweight people are more less socially acceptible than underweight, when it's said by another poster. What's that all about?
quote:
... but comments like this can be hurtful and would never be accepted, for example, by most of the people on this board, if an equal comment was directed towards an overweight person. That's all I am trying to point out.

You've taken what I said about the terribly emaciated (yes, emaciated) model completely out of it's social and political context and chosen to take it as some kind of negative aesthetic judgement directed against all thin women. That's simply bizarre. It is quite obvious that my reference had nothing to do with slender, or even thin women. There is simply no way that either extreme of the spectrum - skeletally thin or immensely obese - is healthy or attractive. However, one end of the spectrum is being promoted by the fashion and entertainment industries as the ONLY measure of what is attractive these days.

Despite your protests to the contrary, you seem to want to turn this into a debate about who's the bigger fashion victim - skinny broads or fat chicks. Honey, if we buy into that dichotomy, we're ALL its victims.


From: London , Ontario - homogeneous maximus | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
dee
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 983

posted 06 May 2002 02:42 PM      Profile for dee     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
You criticize my 'attitude', yet you agree with what I've said, that overweight people are more less socially acceptible than underweight, when it's said by another poster. What's that all about?

When I said that I agree that overweight people have things more difficult I was referring to health problems and the pressure to overexercise or undereat.

The attitude that I have a problem with is that (very) underweight people such as myself are expected to listen to comments that they are disgusting, unattractive, and skeletal without complaint. Would you ever tell a woman, no matter how obese, that she was fat, ugly, or unsexy to her face?

There are problems at both ends of the scale. People should be a little more understanding and sensitive to others no matter what their weight.


From: pleasant, unemotional conversation aids digestion | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 06 May 2002 02:55 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Would you ever tell a woman, no matter how obese, that she was fat, ugly, or unsexy to her face?

Personally, no. But I've witnessed other people attacking my closest friend (a 3X) without provocation about her weight. People often say really awful things to obese women, even worse than what they say to underweight women. Trust me. I've seen both sides.

Let it go, dee....


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
dee
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 983

posted 06 May 2002 03:04 PM      Profile for dee     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Let it go, dee....

Done


From: pleasant, unemotional conversation aids digestion | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
Slick Willy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 184

posted 06 May 2002 03:20 PM      Profile for Slick Willy     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
We are a species of preachy sheep. We follow the herd when one person's opinion of what is beautiful becomes the standard we judge all against. Scrawny bean pole or beached whale are observations you accept from others who have no idea who you are nor care.

Other than symptomatic manifestations of illness we look that way we look due to the lifestyle we lead. We live that lifestyle because for the most part we enjoy it.

If you are fat or skinny the opinions of others should be interesting but hardly a basis to judge your own worth on. What's more, is that you would be better to spend your time with the things that bring you happiness rather than killing yourself to become what others think you should be.

What ever you are, try to keep healthy and fit.
Being happy will make you live longer than being miserable and the benefits are great.

And for those who feel it is there place to insult you smile at them and understand they have no idea who or what you are.


From: Hog Heaven | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Rebecca West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1873

posted 06 May 2002 03:31 PM      Profile for Rebecca West     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
The attitude that I have a problem with is that (very) underweight people such as myself are expected to listen to comments that they are disgusting, unattractive, and skeletal without complaint.
As I've already said, it's unfortunate that you've had to deal with such comments, but I'm trying to address broader societal issues here, not the rudeness and insensitivity of your friends and acquaintances.
quote:
Would you ever tell a woman, no matter how obese, that she was fat, ugly, or unsexy to her face?
Hardly. But the fashion and entertainment industry calls perfectly average-bodied women fat and ugly all the time while glorifying the unhealthily thin body.

Naturally thin women, which you say you are one of, can't be compared to women who are emaciated to the point of losing muscle mass (like the model I mentioned). Those women can't lead active healthy lives, which you say you do. Anorexia isn't beautiful. That starved, emaciated look that's so marketable among models isn't beautiful. It's damaging to the self-esteem and health and body image of millions of girls and women of all shapes and sizes.


From: London , Ontario - homogeneous maximus | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
Slick Willy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 184

posted 06 May 2002 04:03 PM      Profile for Slick Willy     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
It's damaging to the self-esteem and health and body image of millions of girls and
women of all shapes and sizes.

Which is a good argument not to be or become sheep. Example, if I called you a goose, would that make you a goose? Or would you thinking that if I say you're a goose, you must be one, make you the goose?

A good lesson to learn here on Babble is to use critical thinking. You can see people promote this idea almost everywhere here. So why does this idea fall apart when someone makes an unrequested opinion of what you (not you personaly) are or should be?


From: Hog Heaven | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Victor Von Mediaboy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 554

posted 06 May 2002 04:05 PM      Profile for Victor Von Mediaboy   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
A good lesson to learn here on Babble is to use critical thinking. You can see people promote this idea almost everywhere here. So why does this idea fall apart when someone makes an unrequested opinion of what you (not you personaly) are or should be?

Because we're human, not Vulcan. We can't shut off our feelings, and our feelings do get hurt.


From: A thread has merit only if I post to it. So sayeth VVMB! | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Rebecca West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1873

posted 06 May 2002 04:26 PM      Profile for Rebecca West     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The personal and the political aren't always seen as separate realms by babblers. Which is why I'm trying (unsuccessfully it seems) to keep the two in opposite corners here.
quote:
Because we're human, not Vulcan.
Speak for yourself. I'm Vulcan on my mother's side.

[edited to add smartass comment]

[ May 06, 2002: Message edited by: Rebecca West ]


From: London , Ontario - homogeneous maximus | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
Slick Willy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 184

posted 06 May 2002 04:28 PM      Profile for Slick Willy     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Sure we're human, but are we drama queens or what?
Some people live from crisis to crisis and if there is no crisis they will find one to get involved in. What I like to think is that there is beauty and there is ugly, but you can take the most beautiful person, peel their skin away and you got ugly. Have a look at Grays anatomy and you should get the picture. We are all the same underneath the skin. And just because someone is prone to making judgments based on looks doesn't mean it has to affect you in anyway.

Take a nice car and put a beat up old 4 cylinder engine in it that is firering on 3 cylinders. Is it still a nice car or a piece of crap?


From: Hog Heaven | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 06 May 2002 04:34 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Naturally thin women, which you say you are one of, can't be compared to women who are emaciated to the point of losing muscle mass (like the model I mentioned). Those women can't lead active healthy lives...

This is exactly the point. Thin to the point of unhealthy is glorified in the mainstream media, and that's not something that works toward healthy attitudes in mainstream society. We need to start glorifying healthy, fit bodies (and I don't mean bodies that work out 5 hours a day, either).

And it's absolutely true that extreme thinness, natural or otherwise, isn't especially healthy. I've been a runner for many years, and at one point lost a lot of weight due to extreme stress. I couldn't work out, my endurance level really dropped, and I just felt crappy all the time. But it's often easier to correct to a healthy level, which is much harder when you are obese.

So let's acknowledge each other's challenges and be who we need to be.

(PS - VVM, my sweetie says to tell you that thin gals are just as snuggly as curvaceous ones. So there! )


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Victor Von Mediaboy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 554

posted 06 May 2002 04:38 PM      Profile for Victor Von Mediaboy   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
(PS - VVM, my sweetie says to tell you that thin gals are just as snuggly as curvaceous ones. So there! )

I'm quite willing to take applications from ladies of various body types who wanna prove their snuggle-superiority. Prove me wrong!

Applicants who are accepted into the study will enjoy a night of snuggles with one VV MediaBoy, and receive a ranking or their snuggliness in the morning. Call 1-900-SNUGGLE to apply.

[ May 06, 2002: Message edited by: Victor Von MediaBoy ]


From: A thread has merit only if I post to it. So sayeth VVMB! | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 06 May 2002 04:40 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
In this case, you'll have to take the blond guy's word for it.... I've had no complaints.

[ May 06, 2002: Message edited by: Zoot Capri ]


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
audra trower williams
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2

posted 07 May 2002 09:14 PM      Profile for audra trower williams   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
There's skinny, and there's, well ...


From: And I'm a look you in the eye for every bar of the chorus | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 07 May 2002 09:18 PM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
... fucking unreal?
From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Tommy_Paine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 214

posted 07 May 2002 09:46 PM      Profile for Tommy_Paine     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It is said, and I belive this, that women dress for other women, (if they are not just dressing for themselves) and not men, most of the time.

If women dressed for men, women would take fashion tips from transvestites, who, being men, know how to dress for men.

It's a crazy, mixed up world, but stay with me, I think I'm going somewhere with this.

So where does this "waif" look come from? If you browse the porno sites aimed at men, or leaf through a Penthouse, Playboy or Hustler, you don't often find models who look like "waifs". We find the classical shape still in evidence. Perhaps not quite as "Rubenesque" (by today's standards) as what we found with 40's and 50's sex symbols, but certainly, there are no waifs.

We find the "waif" look in magazines aimed at women, often published by women, for women. Maybe a case can be made that the fashion scene is dominated by men whose taste in women might lead them to choose models that look a lot like male teens, but it seems to me it's some function of the female mind.

I don't think I'm terribly a-typical amoung heterosexual males. I've found myself attracted to quite a varriation on body shapes/sizes over the years. Yes, sometimes a very thin woman will turn my head, and yes, sometimes a large woman will turn my head.

Wherever the "waif" look came from, and whatever it's pointed to, I really doubt it has anything to do with the heterosexual male mind.

The standards are timeless. We look for signs of health in each other. Shiny hair, clear skin, symetrical features. Weight probably varries as to how it's seen health wise. In previous times, a few extra pounds on men and women bespoke of better health and prosperity. This has changed a bit, but the "waif" look is deffinately a sexual turn off. It goes beyond just being thin, (one can be very thin and still radiate health) but requires blackened eyes..... in short, the "herion" look-- deffinately not something that inspires sexual desire.

I don't see how this ties in with sexuality, so that's what makes me think it springs from some other psychological function.

I think we all resent feeling pushed to look a certain way. I don't have abs of steel, and frankly, I don't have the time or inclination to get them. I would resent anyone telling me I had to have them to fit in.

I think what we have to do, on a personal basis, is let people close to us know they are okay, that they don't have to look a certain way to be loved.

[ May 07, 2002: Message edited by: Tommy_Paine ]


From: The Alley, Behind Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
'lance
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1064

posted 07 May 2002 10:08 PM      Profile for 'lance     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Wherever the "waif" look came from, and whatever it's pointed to, I really doubt it has anything to do with the heterosexual male mind.

I can only guess that it has something to do with fashion designers' desire for hanger-like bodies to drape clothes on. They really seem to want a body that's barely there, the better to push the clothing to the forefront of peoples' attention.


From: that enchanted place on the top of the Forest | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
Tommy_Paine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 214

posted 07 May 2002 10:16 PM      Profile for Tommy_Paine     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I can see that to an extent, but if women who are not "hangers" for these clothes either don't buy them, or are unhappy with them, isn't that self defeating, in a business sort of way?

Or, are designer clothes so pricey, and there are just enough women to buy them that it's enough for the designers?

It just seems to me that the proper business approach would be to design clothes that looked and felt good across the broad spectrum of body shapes and sizes, instead of catering to what is clearly a body size that only shows up in the 4th sigma of a histogram.


From: The Alley, Behind Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
skadie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2072

posted 08 May 2002 11:01 AM      Profile for skadie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It's all a part of an immensely profitable industry. We are sold the image of perfect, which is unattainable, and then we are sold the products to attain it.
From: near the ocean | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged
Slick Willy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 184

posted 08 May 2002 11:29 AM      Profile for Slick Willy     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Who are you?

This is something people would do well to know for a fact rather than searching for who they are through profit biased sources.

Free your mind, the rest will follow.

Put that on your catwalk and flaunt it!


From: Hog Heaven | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 08 May 2002 11:50 AM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
"I once saw a very beautiful size 0 woman begging on the streets in Mexico City in a becoming whiff of rags. Perhaps I should go back and recruit her. I could ask for a finder's fee."
--------------------------------------------------
The article was unusually good for the "National Post". However, most poor people in Mexico, except in the most destitute Aboriginal regions in the south, are becoming quite portly, like poor people in the industrialised countries. An article in the women's supplement (Las 12) of the excellent Argentine daily Pagina/12 (www.pagina12.com.ar) quotes Buenos Aires women complaining about gaining weight in the recent economic crisis. In general, in the First World and the upper tier of the 3rd, enough cheap food is available to provide sufficient calories. But the food available to the poor lacks nutrition and causes people to overeat.
-
For this reason, the development of "fashionable thinness". A thinness that has to be cultivated and is as inaccessable to Joe and Josephine Blow as plumpness was in Rubens' day. It is a phenomenon similar to tanning. Skin cancer scares have changed this a bit but in recent decades it was fashionable to be able to show one could travel and take the sun instead of working away all day in a factory or office. When most poor people were peasants toiling in the hot sun, ladies carried parasols.
-
This does remain a depressing means of controlling women, I can't help but think of stars like Madonna or Kate Winslet who were naturally a bit plump but forced into the scrawny mould. No, it doesn't promote health or fitness, despite the terrible problems of endemic obesity caused by bad urban planning - having to drive everywhere - and a sedentary lifestyle. It means many of us are ashamed to get into a swimsuit or shorts and exercise, even if we are much smaller than the size 3x friend mentioned by one poster who faces such humiliation.

A friend of mine became horribly heavy like that (I mean horribly in terms of her health and mobility, not body fashion) after two difficult pregnancies and many other problems in her life. If we walk along the street or just sit at a terrasse for a coffee she gets vicious and disgusting stared, and was probably sacked from a job (in an assurance company, not as a model or stripper...) for this reason. Can't help wishing the same fate on her tormentors.


From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
bittersweet
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2474

posted 08 May 2002 04:07 PM      Profile for bittersweet     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Last night, while waiting breathlessly for Mansbridge & Co., I watched a fashion bio on CBC. Forget the designer's name (English, I believe), but his gig seemed to be taking "inspiration" from homeless people. So there was this mix of anorexic models on the catwalk wearing rags (expensive ones, to be sure) and "newspaper" pants. Appalling. Not that he was drawing attention to the plight of the homeless. Just being inspired by it. The work was actually quite good, I thought. Too bad it wasn't communicating anything valuable.
From: land of the midnight lotus | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
'lance
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1064

posted 08 May 2002 04:26 PM      Profile for 'lance     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
I can see that to an extent, but if women who are not "hangers" for these clothes either don't buy them, or are unhappy with them, isn't that self defeating, in a business sort of way

Or, are designer clothes so pricey, and there are just enough women to buy them that it's enough for the designers?


I don't know, but at the level of so-called haute couture, it's not really about selling clothes. A designer might sell at most 50 copies of something you see on the runway. It's closer to some kind of art form than to the clothing business.

But such is -- or was -- the prestige of haute couture that the designers who make ready-to-wear stuff, who of course are occasionally (and increasingly) the same designers, follow along in the slipstream -- and so on down the line.

Nowadays, of course, this hierarchy is breaking down somewhat. But it's still recognizably there, and a significant number of women, apparently, take it seriously enough that they'll go to great lengths to fit into original or knock-off versions of this "prestigious" stuff, made for maybe 2% of the female population, rather than demand something more sensible.

You can never discount the influence of a few authoritative taste-makers, or leaders. The excessively thin look we associate with ballerinas, for example, is supposedly partly due to the influence of George Ballanchine, who demanded -- and got -- very thin dancers.


From: that enchanted place on the top of the Forest | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 09 May 2002 12:25 AM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
So where does this "waif" look come from? If you browse the porno sites aimed at men, or leaf through a Penthouse, Playboy or Hustler, you don't often find models who look like "waifs". We find the classical shape still in evidence. Perhaps not quite as "Rubenesque" (by today's standards) as what we found with 40's and 50's sex symbols, but certainly, there are no waifs.

Are you out of your mind?!!!! Do you actually think the women in the mags you are noting are healthy? Or even remotely real?

The "waif" thing may not be in evidence, but most of those women are not a healthy weight. They've got boobs all right, FAKE ONES!!!!!!!!!

Got nothing to do with healthy body weight.

You think any of those ladies have 1950s classic figures? HAH!!!! Watch a Jayne Mansfield movie -- the gal had an ass to match the breasts! Women who have big breasts tend to have hips.

(There's a wonderful monologue done by Rosie O'Donnel in a film called "Beautiful Girls" on the butt/boob conundrum and the male view.... I highly recommend it.)


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Diabolical Fluzie
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2615

posted 09 May 2002 12:53 AM      Profile for Diabolical Fluzie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
OK, I totally agree that Vogue, and Maxim for that matter sell an unrealistic body image that for most is far from realistic. But when does an individual whose personal perception about thier 'body' become a self-esteem issue? Get off your arses, away from your cubicals and actually engage in physical activity. So, who have I pissed off....


From: Trampsilvania | Registered: May 2002  |  IP: Logged
skadie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2072

posted 09 May 2002 02:08 AM      Profile for skadie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
But when does an individual whose personal perception about thier 'body' become a self-esteem issue?

When it's sold to them.

The consumer culture of the industrialized world markets powerful images of what it takes to be successful and brags "our products can give you this!" Look at any media form and ask yourself, do these images/ideas represent me? Do they represent the real world? Do advertisements have anything to do with the products they sell?

Our media and consumer driven society makes it clear that if you ain't their idea of perfect then you ain't good enough to participate in society.

I bet Ally McBeal owns shares at Fitness World!

(Edited to make me sound smarter.)

[ May 09, 2002: Message edited by: skadie ]


From: near the ocean | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged
Rebecca West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1873

posted 09 May 2002 12:55 PM      Profile for Rebecca West     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
There's a wonderful monologue done by Rosie O'Donnel in a film called "Beautiful Girls" on the butt/boob conundrum and the male view.... I highly recommend it.
That was a good one, as I recall. As far as Playboy, Penthouse, etc., many of the models in men's magazines used to be more 'real' and had lovely voluptuous curves. Nowadays in the mid-to-high end of the sex trade the trend is for melon-sized boobs on a toothpick body. Fairly grotesque and not to be found in nature for the most part. This being the industry standard, if you want to get work, you starve your ass and get your boobs done. If you want to maintain a healthy body, you'd better find another line of work.

As far as it being a heterosexual guy thing, some men will always like very thin women, some will be into large women. I was relatively slim until I was about 30ish, and am heavier now (especially since my last pregnancy). What I've noticed is that it doesn't matter whether I'm a skinny broad or a fat chick - men are still attracted to me. Whether I feel attractive is dependent almost entirely on how I feel about myself, not about how I look.

You know, as women we don't have to buy into this industry standard of acceptible body image. We buy the shit, we have a powerful consumer voice. We decide what is beautiful in a woman.


From: London , Ontario - homogeneous maximus | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
Rapunzel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2488

posted 09 May 2002 03:01 PM      Profile for Rapunzel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
My theory is that years ago larger women were seen as desireable because everyone was skinney and starving. Plump women were seen as a rare and special thing.

Nowadays skinny women are perceived as the most desireable because everyone has lots to eat (mostly fattening junk food and high starch stuff) and most women are *ahem* less than skinny. As such, the skinny women are now the rare and special thing. (Certainly all rich and handsome men who can have their pick, always choose thin women)


From: T.O. | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
ronb
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2116

posted 09 May 2002 03:07 PM      Profile for ronb     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Just a reminder, I know it's easy to forget these days... women aren't things, they're people.
From: gone | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged
Victor Von Mediaboy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 554

posted 09 May 2002 03:24 PM      Profile for Victor Von Mediaboy   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
(Certainly all rich and handsome men who can have their pick, always choose thin women)

My gf isn't all that thin. Oh wait. Uh. Never mind...


From: A thread has merit only if I post to it. So sayeth VVMB! | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 09 May 2002 03:25 PM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Rebecca - where on earth do you find men (I mean educated, intellectual, politicised men between say 40 and 60...) who are attracted to women who are not exactly skinny? Or over 30?
-
Not that I'm ugly or obese by any means, but I find post 35 or so and with a bit more bulk than is fashionable, these tend to become very rare... (See my response to auntie.com about the activist rejected by a comrade half his age, and about men attracted to apolitical, often much younger women).
-
Its different in Europe I find, I have lived in Italy and fortunately travel to Europe frequently for political meetings (antiglobalisation stuff) and research. I'm not nearly so invisible there!

Trophy wives, and the gals in men's magazines, is another matter. In the first case, the trophy wife has to project a certain image, sexy but "class", if she looks like Anna Nicole Smith she is seen as a lower-class golddigger. As for men's magazines, I find the body type they now favour verges on paedophilia. Many of us who are busty (as I am) got the boobs a few years before the accompanying "child-bearing" hips, of the Mediterranean mama type...

Of course social class and snobbism have a lot to do with this. (I don't think any higher of women who are only attracted to guys with flashy cars...) Unfortunately in a capitalist society people are objects, little as we like that fact.


From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Rebecca West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1873

posted 09 May 2002 04:03 PM      Profile for Rebecca West     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Rebecca - where on earth do you find men (I mean educated, intellectual, politicised men between say 40 and 60...) who are attracted to women who are not exactly skinny? Or over 30?

All over the place. The men I've dated over the years have varied widely in age, race, culture, interests, and physical type. I haven't noticed that the quality of man I'm able to date has changed with the size of my ass. I'm currently seeing someone who is very intelligent, interesting, politically-minded, and damned sexy. We're both in our early 40s. Needless to say, neither of us will be modelling underwear for Calvin Klein anytime soon, but who gives a fiddler's fart?

From: London , Ontario - homogeneous maximus | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
Victor Von Mediaboy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 554

posted 09 May 2002 04:43 PM      Profile for Victor Von Mediaboy   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
www.cougardate.com
From: A thread has merit only if I post to it. So sayeth VVMB! | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Rebecca West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1873

posted 09 May 2002 05:00 PM      Profile for Rebecca West     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
The most successful cougars are those that married well and got huge divorce settlements. Lesser Cougars were feminists who clawed their way to the top and made their own money...Species characteristics include a penchant for home decorating, an interest in dogs (the only other species they can live with), an avid consumption of home products such as tinfoil and Cheez Whiz, and a limited interest in technology...They have a high fat diet but are usually in shape because of sheer genetics and extensive shopping, dinner party planning and traveling. They often wear clothes that they're a bit too old for such as Spandex and high heels. They dye their hair and wear lots of makeup and jewelry
Hilarious.

From: London , Ontario - homogeneous maximus | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
Victor Von Mediaboy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 554

posted 09 May 2002 05:15 PM      Profile for Victor Von Mediaboy   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The site was more fun before you had to pay to become a subscriber.
From: A thread has merit only if I post to it. So sayeth VVMB! | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
skadie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2072

posted 09 May 2002 05:24 PM      Profile for skadie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
A male friend of mine was telling me about the unspoken rule of thumb, when men are together and a "hot" woman walks by they will roll their eyes and make some sort of comment toward one another. When I asked him why two men who may or may not have anything in common are likely to agree on what "hot" is he looked at me like I was crazy. "Hot" is sold to them too in the media and I often wonder if the rolling of eyes and comments are more for show than for actual appreciation. (I use the term VERY loosely.)

Are men caught in the same trap? Or do they really find the stick/melon combination attractive?


From: near the ocean | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged
Victor Von Mediaboy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 554

posted 09 May 2002 05:31 PM      Profile for Victor Von Mediaboy   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
My friends and I have pretty different tastes in women, actually. We do point hot chix out to each other, but we very often disagree on what constitutes a hot chick.

Also, I'll sometimes point out a chick that I think the group will appreciate, even if I don't think she's all that hot. Keeps the boys distracted as I steal their french fries.

Some guys will berate you if your vision of babeitude isn't the same as theirs, but these tend to be the same dorks who have to be right about EVERYTHING, so their opinions are rarely taken seriously.

Furthermore, If I spot a specimen of babeliciousness that I KNOW the other fellers won't appreciate (philistines that they are), why bother pointing her out?

[ May 09, 2002: Message edited by: Victor Von MediaBoy ]


From: A thread has merit only if I post to it. So sayeth VVMB! | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
'lance
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1064

posted 09 May 2002 05:32 PM      Profile for 'lance     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
"Hot" is sold to them too in the media and I often wonder if the rolling of eyes and comments are more for show than for actual appreciation.

I've been around guys who looked at me with just the faintest suspicion if I wasn't so enthusiastic about some "hottie" walking by, as though I were (in the phrase they'd undoubtedly use, and not in a good way) "queer or something."

And I really don't like the stick-and-melon look, for the record. Give me hips or give me death, I say!


From: that enchanted place on the top of the Forest | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
skadie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2072

posted 09 May 2002 06:19 PM      Profile for skadie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
And I really don't like the stick-and-melon look, for the record. Give me hips or give me death, I say!

WILL YOU MARRY ME?


From: near the ocean | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 09 May 2002 06:22 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Sorry, honey, there's a line up for 'lance.
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
skadie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2072

posted 09 May 2002 06:41 PM      Profile for skadie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Michelle, chances are I'm bigger than you...
From: near the ocean | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 09 May 2002 06:45 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I doubt it!
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 09 May 2002 07:05 PM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Michelle, I told you: Scrape my heels one more time ... (And damn but I wish Wingy would stop backing up on my toes!)
From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
skadie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2072

posted 09 May 2002 07:12 PM      Profile for skadie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well Michelle, I guess we'll never know and neither will 'lance. *sigh*

But that sparks yet another question. Why is it that size in men is considered strong while in women it's considered weak? Why can't a big woman brag about how much she bench press say, and recieve the deserved kudos? Many men wear their weight like a badge while women obsess about it and WANT to look like a weakling.


From: near the ocean | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged
'lance
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1064

posted 09 May 2002 07:47 PM      Profile for 'lance     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
WILL YOU MARRY ME?

O dear skadie... ... terribly sorry, but I'm spoken for these three-and-a-half, nearly four years. Actually, it's closer to 6, but the lovely Maria decided to make an honest man of me back in Sept. 1998.

(This is she, incidentally; in the centre, wearing a red coat).


From: that enchanted place on the top of the Forest | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
rosebuds
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2399

posted 09 May 2002 09:04 PM      Profile for rosebuds     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I've been fascinated by the "industry" perception of beauty, and admittedly programmed by it as well...

Although ideally we'd all rise above it and move on without dramatics, this crap is pounded into the heads of girls and women from the day we are born. Shaking off that kind of conditioning takes a bit more than a "tut-tut - know thyself, loser" to overcome...

And it has a greater impact then simply on our health and self-esteem. It impacts our success in life as well. Studies have shown (I hate that phrase) that "attractive" women are better liked, make more money, and are generally far better off than "unattractive" ones. It's a prejudice issue, just like racism.

What get's me lately is the AGE of these women in magazines or billboard ads. These are 11 and 12 year old kids! It is getting worse and worse as the years go on... Models are not even pubescents anymore, they're PRE-pubescent! They can't be compared to women because they AREN'T WOMEN!!! It's absolutely outrageous.


From: Meanwhile, on the other side of the world... | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged
bittersweet
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2474

posted 10 May 2002 02:45 AM      Profile for bittersweet     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
"attractive" women are better liked, make more money, and are generally far better off than "unattractive" ones.

Have any of you seen the French film Too Beautiful For You? The protagonist, played by Gerard Depardieu, leaves his drop-dead gorgeous (thin, of course) wife for his new secretary, who has a completely different body type (large-breasted-and-hipped), and who does not have the face, or fashion sense, of a Vogue model. She's not even in the same socio-economic class. What was so memorable about the film for me was how they lingered on the way Depardieu gradually fell in love with this woman, despite his bewilderment since he supposedly already had the "perfect" partner. She was shot as sensually as the wife, from Depardieu's loving point of view, which made it relatively easy for the audience to find her beautiful, too. Although the whole film didn't impress me, I can remember those love scenes as distinctly as any involving official female sex icons. These days I can think of dozens of foreign films starring actresses who don't match official sex icon status, but who I find stunningly beautiful. (Eric Rohmer's adult heroines come to mind). If I were a parent, I'd want to expose my son and/or daughter to foreign films so they could experience the sight of a variety of bodies up there on the screen.

The Depardieu film was a remarkable experience for a twenty-something guy (at the time) because it validated my rather inclusive appreciation of female beauty, which at that time I used to keep pretty much to myself. I had a similar epiphany while watching The Crying Game, which allowed me, as a straight guy, to vicariously experience what it would be like to desire/love someone of the same sex--in spite of the initial bewilderment, and socially constructed aversion.

Just thought I'd note the media exceptions that prove the rule. To paraphrase Steve Martin in Grand Canyon, "Everything you need to know about life you can find in the movies." To that I would add, "in the good movies".


From: land of the midnight lotus | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 10 May 2002 04:52 AM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Foreign films? Does bittersweet only watch Canadian movies?

I guess in Montreal we'd never say that.

Josiane Balasko is a fine actress, who has done a wide range of roles. Another French film that would never get remade in North America is Romuald and Juliette, a comedy about race and class in which the black cleaning-woman heroine is also not a Halle Berry model type - she is a very attractive woman, but with a powerful build. Trying to think of the actress's name...

It is true that there is a wider range of body types and simply not always such plasticised beauty in European films than in Hollywood ones, funny in a way because in Paris anyway few people are overweight (that isn't as true in smaller cities and the country).

One thing one notices living in Europe though is that the "best-before" date is much less rigorously applied to female sex-appeal, or existence for that matter.


From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 10 May 2002 08:14 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I know this is probably very anglo-centric of me, but by any chance are these French films subtitled? Because I'd love to watch them but I don't speak French...sigh. Something I'll have to remedy in the future, obviously.
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 10 May 2002 08:28 AM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Kingston (beautiful town, by the way) is not very far from Montreal - great train ride. The University of Montreal has an excellent summer French school.
-
A good place to look for French, and other non-anglophone films subtitled in English, is at the University, that probably screens a lot of interesting films.
-
Use your computer to improve your French. Unfortunately these days Radio-Canada staff are locked-out so there is little on that site, the broadcast networks have shorter stories than newspapers. Read news stories with a Canadian content you have already read in English, or international stories you are already familiar with.
-
Of course you could always volunteer to visit and "godmother" an Francophone prison inmate, but you'd pick up some ... fairly choice expressions!

From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
vickyinottawa
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 350

posted 10 May 2002 10:18 AM      Profile for vickyinottawa   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Michelle, is that video store next to the Kingston Brew Pub still around? I'd be surprised if they didn't have a copy of Too Beautiful for You. And yes, it is subtitled. Forgot about that movie, bittersweet, thanks!
From: lost in the supermarket | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 10 May 2002 10:22 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yeah, Classic Video. I keep hearing that's a great place to get hard-to-find videos! I'll have to check it out this afternoon since I have a few library books to return and it's only a block or two over.
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
vickyinottawa
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 350

posted 10 May 2002 10:35 AM      Profile for vickyinottawa   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
well, I haven't lived in Kingston in a while, but their selection used to be excellent.
From: lost in the supermarket | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Alix
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2279

posted 10 May 2002 10:39 AM      Profile for Alix     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It's still got great selection, and Classic's now getting in a lot of older movie DVDs you won't see anywhere else.
From: Kingston | Registered: Feb 2002  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 10 May 2002 10:40 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
What are the prices like, Alix? I mean, compared with the biggies like Jumbo and Blockbuster? (Of course, if it's like other smaller stores, probably a little cheaper, right?)
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
'lance
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1064

posted 10 May 2002 11:38 AM      Profile for 'lance     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Another French film that would never get remade in North America is Romuald and Juliette, a comedy about race and class in which the black cleaning-woman heroine is also not a Halle Berry model type - she is a very attractive woman, but with a powerful build. Trying to think of the actress's name...

I've seen this movie, but had forgotten the title. However, the Internet Movie Data Base is your friend...

The actress's name is Firmine Richard. Very beautiful, and an excellent picture, as I recall. Also stars Daniel Auteuil, a gifted actor.


From: that enchanted place on the top of the Forest | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
Alix
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2279

posted 10 May 2002 01:18 PM      Profile for Alix     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Comparable, I think, although I honestly haven't rented a movie in so long from Blockbuster or Jumbo. I think Classic's older movies are cheaper, and they certainly go off the "new" wall more quickly. Older DVD rentals are definitely cheaper.

And, as is a nice thing - once they get to know you, they don't charge you if your movie is a couple of hours late.

Oh, and four nights means four nights. That means if I rent a movie on Monday, I have it Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday nights and have to return it by 4 pm on Friday, rather than Thursday by midnight like Blockbuster.

And that's my plug for Classic Video


From: Kingston | Registered: Feb 2002  |  IP: Logged
ronb
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2116

posted 10 May 2002 02:06 PM      Profile for ronb     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
...and then there was Zuckerbaby starring the incomparable Marianne Sagebrecht.
From: gone | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 10 May 2002 03:38 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Thanks for the suggestions!

I called Classic Video and asked them if they have Too Beautiful for You, and he said that it's in his computer but hasn't been rented for 4 years, so he thinks it probably slipped through the cracks, or wasn't returned or something. Too bad! I also asked about Zuckerbaby and Romuald and Juliette and he didn't have those either.

However, since I keep getting rave reviews about that place from several different people, I'll have to check it out anyhow.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Tommy_Paine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 214

posted 11 May 2002 10:01 AM      Profile for Tommy_Paine     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Are you out of your mind?!!!! Do you actually think the women in the mags you are noting are healthy? Or even remotely real?

No, I don't, and my taste in porn does not include those publications for the very reasons you point out. I didn't say they were paragons of health, merely using the example to say that the "waif" or "heroin chic" look wasn't coming from a heterosexual male desire.

There's something not right about implants, ribs that show and a concave stomach. I find implants rather a turn off.


From: The Alley, Behind Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
kamiks
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2575

posted 11 May 2002 02:04 PM      Profile for kamiks     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
POWER.POWER.POWER.

That is what it is all about isn't it? Eating disorders and an abnormal desire to be skinny is a form of power over your own body. Especially, if you have felt powerless in your own life.

The babbler that said that the skinny models in ads are directed to women is bang-on. I think we see them and we think wow that girl has control...(power) We think the opposite when we see obese people.

I have a different story to tell. When I was a teenager, I was "FAT". As I got into my twenties, I progressively lost weight to the point that I'm considered "slim", so I've straddled both sides of the fence. (the weight loss was enduced by crazy dieting either!)

And, it seems to me that whatever your body size, the response you get from which ever gender turns your crank, is in proportion to how good you feel about yourself.

[ May 11, 2002: Message edited by: kamiks ]

[ May 11, 2002: Message edited by: kamiks ]


From: Toronto | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
aRoused
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1962

posted 12 May 2002 01:53 AM      Profile for aRoused     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
For the record: I'm borderline unhealthily underweight (by BMI), and my gf is slightly overweight, and she's hot as hell.

quote:
But that sparks yet another question. Why is it that size in men is considered strong while in women it's considered weak? Why can't a big woman brag about how much she bench press say, and recieve the deserved kudos? Many men wear their weight like a badge while women obsess about it and WANT to look like a weakling.

A gay friend of mine once opined that female fashion models were selected by gay fashion designers because of their resemblance to young boys. I'm intrigued by the possibility, but not convinced.

Regarding size and women, the WWF/WWE may be making great strides towards making big (muscular) women attractive and desireable. Admittedly there is no female equivalent to King Kong Bundy or Andre the Giant (aRoused reveals his age and the last time he paid close attention to pro wrestling), but there seems to be a spate of big, muscular, strong women appearing not only in the ring alongside or parallel to the men, but in the pages of such as Playboy.

Okay, okay, so Playboy isn't exactly a popular feminist magazine. But, I stand behind the comments above by Tommy_Paine IIRC, to the effect that the women in Playboy were more indicative of the thrust (pardon the term) of male standards of physical beauty.

Simply put: the women in Vogue are, well, nasty-looking. Scrawny. And not in a good way (spoken by someone who's self-described as 'scrawny'). The women in Playboy are idealized, and methinks some of them may spend a large amount of time and effort on maintaining that ideal shape, but they're not necessarily fake (as has been imputed), and they're not unhealthy by the standards of fashion modelling.

This is not an incitement to go out and emulate Playboy centerfolds, but you knew that already. This is a comment that 1) fame and recognition for women in the popular press is not contingent on being unhealthily thin, and 2) Given the 'popular' part of 'popular press', it may not be a pan-societal trend towards emaciated women.

Final note: I just remembered this, but apparently Kate Moss (arguably the original waif-model) and Marilyn Monroe have extremly similar proportions in terms of ratio of hip-to-waist ratios.


From: The King's Royal Burgh of Eoforwich | Registered: Dec 2001  |  IP: Logged
kamiks
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2575

posted 12 May 2002 02:11 AM      Profile for kamiks     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
OH SHIT

quote:
(the weight loss "was" enduced by crazy dieting either!)

That should be "WAS NOT" I've never dieted in my life!!

Excuse me while I change my name to TYPO


From: Toronto | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Gir Draxon
leftist-rightie and rightist-leftie
Babbler # 3804

posted 01 June 2004 03:07 AM      Profile for Gir Draxon     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by 'lance:

And I really don't like the stick-and-melon look, for the record. Give me hips or give me death, I say!

Word.


From: Arkham Asylum | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged
audra trower williams
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2

posted 01 June 2004 12:45 PM      Profile for audra trower williams   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Did you search babble for the word "melon", Gir?
From: And I'm a look you in the eye for every bar of the chorus | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Gir Draxon
leftist-rightie and rightist-leftie
Babbler # 3804

posted 01 June 2004 01:03 PM      Profile for Gir Draxon     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by audra trower williams:
Did you search babble for the word "melon", Gir?


I was actually looking for a thread where someone made some comments on some jerks on TV who were slobby, overweight men talking about how their wives need to lose weight. Can't remember many specifics though, but the search picked up this thread.


From: Arkham Asylum | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged
Courage
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3980

posted 01 June 2004 08:57 PM      Profile for Courage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by lagatta:
As for men's magazines, I find the body type they now favour verges on paedophilia. Many of us who are busty (as I am) got the boobs a few years before the accompanying "child-bearing" hips, of the Mediterranean mama type...

I think the 'paedophilia' comment is getting somewhere. To me, the images we are given smack more of a Peter Pan syndrome than an issue of straight-up body size. The androgyny common to models is evidence of this fact as well. Have a look at early teenagers, even those already well into puberty - there is often markedly less 'sexual differentiation' (at least in appearance) at that stage.

Is there some way of relating this to the kind of 'neverending adolescence' that pervades our social patterns and ethos?


From: Earth | Registered: Apr 2003  |  IP: Logged
Courage
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3980

posted 01 June 2004 09:05 PM      Profile for Courage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by skadie:
Well Michelle, I guess we'll never know and neither will 'lance. *sigh*

But that sparks yet another question. Why is it that size in men is considered strong while in women it's considered weak? Why can't a big woman brag about how much she bench press say, and recieve the deserved kudos? Many men wear their weight like a badge while women obsess about it and WANT to look like a weakling.


With some men, they can. My partner is in the hospitality/catering business and has lifted a lot of trays/kegs/cases of food. She also seems to be genetically (I'm basing this on surveys of the women in her family) blessed with a certain strength and defined musculature in her shoulders and arms. I am frequently sent swooning by the lovely shape of her strong arms, shoulders and back in various movements. he fact that she can fight back in a good play-wrestle makes her all the more sexy...


From: Earth | Registered: Apr 2003  |  IP: Logged
Rebecca West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1873

posted 02 June 2004 11:57 PM      Profile for Rebecca West     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
A number of people have recently remarked on my weight loss, and asked me how I've "done" it, or what "diet" I'm on.

"The Stress Diet", I reply. "Get a couple of family members to off themselves within a few months of each other, and the pounds melt away."

This society is so bloody obsessed with dieting, if I hear one more person use the word "carbs" in a sentence, I swear I'll smack them one upside the head.


From: London , Ontario - homogeneous maximus | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 03 June 2004 12:04 AM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The last time I went to the liquor store, they had some poor girl trying to convince us to sample "low-carb" beer.

Honestly.

The world has gone carb-mad (or anti-carb-mad, if you prefer), they really have.

I won't buy low-fat or artificially sweetened foods, nor will I buy low-carb. Blech. Give me real food, just as it's supposed to be.


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Rebecca West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1873

posted 03 June 2004 09:35 AM      Profile for Rebecca West     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Unless you have mobility issues or a medical condition related to weight gain, turning off the tv and getting your ass off the couch is alot more effective than starving yourself. Eat reasonably, get exercise, and your body will be the size and shape it's meant to be.
From: London , Ontario - homogeneous maximus | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
Mandos
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 888

posted 03 June 2004 10:31 AM      Profile for Mandos   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
That's depressing. Does that mean my body is *meant* to be sort of pear-shaped, and not a chiseled, covermodel V?
From: There, there. | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
Rebecca West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1873

posted 03 June 2004 12:37 PM      Profile for Rebecca West     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yes Mandos, that's what it means. Now you put those dreams of being a male supermodel in your back pocket and get on with your life.
From: London , Ontario - homogeneous maximus | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
Mandos
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 888

posted 03 June 2004 12:44 PM      Profile for Mandos   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Spoilsport.
From: There, there. | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
Rebecca West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1873

posted 03 June 2004 12:57 PM      Profile for Rebecca West     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Mandos:
Spoilsport.
I prefer the term "humourless feminist harpie", thankyouverymuch.

From: London , Ontario - homogeneous maximus | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
neeuqdrazil
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4643

posted 04 June 2004 12:50 PM      Profile for neeuqdrazil   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Rebecca West:
I prefer the term "humourless feminist harpie", thankyouverymuch.

ITYM: "Feminazi".

HTH, HAND.


From: Toronto | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca