babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » labour and consumption   » Too much

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Too much
clersal
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 370

posted 21 May 2006 10:35 AM      Profile for clersal     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Skepticool mentioned in another thread that we don't talk about consumer issues.

I have always wondered why we have, this is just an example as there are so many of them, so many different types of cars with so many choices of colours? If we had less choices wouldn't the prices plummet for the consumer?


From: Canton Marchand, Québec | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
clersal
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 370

posted 21 May 2006 12:19 PM      Profile for clersal     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I just looked up cars: compacts, medium types etc.

It really is incredible the amount of choices we have. The unecessary choices. Choices of colours...It is mind boggling the waste.

Why can we not recycle, meaning use again, jam jars in fact all that is made of glass? We re-use beer bottles but not wine bottles?


From: Canton Marchand, Québec | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 21 May 2006 12:54 PM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
After home mortgages, cars, SUVs, trucks, and motorcycles are the biggest financial investments we make, and I think it's been traditionally an act of individual expression in selecting the model and colour of the vehicle we wish to purchase. The concerns about waste and the effect of these vehicles on the environment is a relatively modern issue that we're still grappling with.

There are other issues associated with this, of course, and, for instance, who wants to be the one that proposes changes that potentially could lead to massive job losses and a perception that we're becoming too regimental (read: "communist" ) by proposing to vastly restrict the number of choices we have in our consumer choices.

edited to improve grammar

[ 21 May 2006: Message edited by: Boom Boom ]


From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
clersal
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 370

posted 21 May 2006 01:00 PM      Profile for clersal     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
After home mortgages, cars, SUVs, trucks, and motorcycles are the biggest financial investments we make, and I think it's been traditionally an act of individual expression in selecting the model and colour of the vehicle we wish to purchase. The concerns about waste and effect of these vehicles on the environment is a relatively modern issue that we're still grappling with.

Boom Boom all this is incredibly wasteful and unecessary.
Individual expression? My car takes me from A to B. That is all I want to do. I really hate the thought of paying maybe thousands of $ more because we have been brainwashed into believing about free choice and democracy!


From: Canton Marchand, Québec | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 21 May 2006 01:05 PM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by clersal:
Individual expression? My car takes me from A to B. That is all I want to do. I really hate the thought of paying maybe thousands of $ more because we have been brainwashed into believing about free choice and democracy!

I used to be a member of the Motorsport Club of Ottawa, and I raced and rallyed a Mini Cooper. Believe me, for many people out there, choice of model and colour and options is intensely personal. Another example would be all the various types of car and truck clubs: custom cars, off roaders, rapper's designs, drag racing, sports cars, etc..... it's a serious hobby for many. You call it wasteful (I agree, BTW) but it's an act of expression by many.

However wasteful it is, there's also issues of the unions, the manufacturers, employment, competition, design, advertising, etc... which is all incredibly big business on this planet. And, yes, democratic choice.


From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 21 May 2006 01:18 PM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
On the matter of "too much choice", how about children's toys? Holy cow. Been in the children's section of any of the big department stores recently? Never had anything remotely like that choice available when I was a kid (in the '50s). Back then we had building blocks, puzzles, skipping rope, dolls, and electric trains, and that's about it. Oh, and toy rifles, because of shows like The Lone Ranger and similar stuff.

More: Electronics. Holy moley. I thought personal computers were novel when they came out, but look at personal electronics now: gazillions of mini cellphones with video/computer screens - who the hell needs this stuff? And all the mini stuff to play music on. It's all garbage to me. I play music on my stereo at home, or on the in-dash CD player in my small truck. I've never used a Walkman, cellphone, iPod, or indeed anything more novel than my current personal computer and CD player. I still use my electric typewriter from 1969.

See: mileage does vary.


edited: spelling

[ 21 May 2006: Message edited by: Boom Boom ]


From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
skeptikool
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11389

posted 21 May 2006 01:22 PM      Profile for skeptikool        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
This is an extremely important and often-neglected issue.

I've long maintained that many considered normal in every aspect of their lives will develop borderline insanity when it comes to the automobile.

You won't get this from the mainstream media's "safe" auto writers - understandably, perhaps, with about 20 per cent of the media given over to the auto-related industry in one way or another - but very few types of vehicles are necessary to suit all but the frivolous needs of all motorists.

Many vehicles sold today can be considered anti-social and should be consigned to scrapyards for recycling.

It's about time we start looking at the issue similarly to the ways that tobacco was challenged and with the same vigor.


From: Delta BC | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 21 May 2006 01:31 PM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by skeptikool:
Many vehicles sold today can be considered anti-social and should be consigned to scrapyards for recycling.

That's pretty extreme. I don't think any vehicles are anti-social; their drivers are. No one needs a SUV in the city, for example; but they could be justified in some areas. No one needs a 400hp Corvette (or Mustang, or Ferrari, or...) but if someone wants one and can afford it, and drives responsibly, then so be it. Just mandate better smog devices for them, and better fuel economy.

I have no desire to adopt Henry Ford's dictum wrt to the Model T: you can have any colour you want, as long as it's black. Screw that.


From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 21 May 2006 01:33 PM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by skeptikool:
Many vehicles sold today can be considered anti-social and should be consigned to scrapyards for recycling.

I would start taking you seriously if you included cellphones, iPods, and all that other electronic shit in your list of stuff to be scrapped.


From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
Sanityatlast
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12414

posted 21 May 2006 01:37 PM      Profile for Sanityatlast        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
No. Almost all of the regular working class guys I know have a car and they are quite sane and rational. They have no need to defer to some superior insight into their desires or motivations to have a particular car. It's arrogance to call their needs or desires 'frivolous'. It's no more frivolous than my choice of a cereal, beer, book, pair of socks, music, a movie, etc.

Humans are social animals with complicated interactions and level of satisfaction. I'm quite content to live in a society that embraces individual expression.


From: Alberta | Registered: Apr 2006  |  IP: Logged
skeptikool
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11389

posted 21 May 2006 01:53 PM      Profile for skeptikool        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
First, in answer to clersal's I'm-sure-rhetorical question, yes, all that choice has added monumental costs - and waste.

Boom Boom,

Can one compare choice of toys with choice of vehicles - even if one admits that the vehicle is sometimes viewed as a toy?

On the electronic stuff, I think I'm more concerned with the social implications regarding how they affect youth, particularly. Is its use tending to produce a more insular society? It's power for good can not be denied if one considers the medium we are engaged in this second. It has certainly shrunk the world.


From: Delta BC | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 21 May 2006 01:53 PM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
With regards to motor vehicles and personal transportation, I believe the best solution to ugly and wasteful monster trucks and SUVs is to steadily increase the cost of fuel. That has already had an impact: the H1 Hummer will be discontinued in June, due to declining sales, likely brought about by high gas prices.

A popular expression wrt SUVs is "ban 'em" which I think is idiotic, because it ain't going to happen. What will happen is high gas prices will force the industry to seriously look at replacing their fleet of gashogs with fuel efficient amd low-polluting vehicles, which can be painted and customized to the customer's heart's desires. Low priced autos will even benefit the poor who have to drive.

The H1 is the first to go; the H2, maybe in a few years.

[ 21 May 2006: Message edited by: Boom Boom ]


From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 21 May 2006 02:04 PM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by skeptikool:
Can one compare choice of toys with choice of vehicles - even if one admits that the vehicle is sometimes viewed as a toy?

I didn't start the thread, but why not expand it to include consumer waste in general? Some - me - will not take the issue seriously if you concentrate only on motorized vehicles. The industry set up to manufacture unnecessary consumer electronics can be just as wasteful as any.

By the way, China has been said to be the largest developing consumer market for motorized vehicles - all the manufacturers are lining up to start operations there, so good luck on scrapping cars and trucks. I think the industry in North America (and Japan) is revving up to start exporting in quantities never seen before to mainland China, besides actually setting up manufacturing there. And, China will be exporting their Chery car to North America next year, so I've read. The Japanese automakers are expanding their manufacturing base in Ontario also, by the way.

It's complicated. I'm in favour of raising gas prices to at least the $2/litre level in Canada to slow things down a bit - others may cry 'foul'.


From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
clersal
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 370

posted 21 May 2006 03:01 PM      Profile for clersal     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
However wasteful it is, there's also issues of the unions, the manufacturers, employment, competition, design, advertising, etc... which is all incredibly big business on this planet. And, yes, democratic choice.


You said it Boom Boom, Big Business! I don't agree with democratic choice though. We have been fed this stuff about democracy. Isn't the Shrub making the world democratic? Aren't we happy about that?

quote:
I have no desire to adopt Henry Ford's dictum wrt to the Model T: you can have any colour you want, as long as it's black. Screw that.


What is the cheapest and most visible colour to paint a car? What ever it is all cars should be that colour.

Corvettes, Mustangs and Ferrari's? Please is this really a need in our lives?

It is only complicated because we make it complicated. If we thought about what we were doing instead of calling it free choice and democracy we wouldn't be going extinct.


From: Canton Marchand, Québec | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
skeptikool
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11389

posted 21 May 2006 03:06 PM      Profile for skeptikool        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Boom Boom:

quote:
...why not expand it to include consumer waste in general? Some - me - will not take the issue seriously if you concentrate only on motorized vehicles.

I believe a stand-alone discussion is warranted because of how our choices in transportation hugely impact many aspects of our lives including the environment and, yes, the economy.

There are many other consumer issues that deserve their own threads. I believe that lumping all together may give you a one-day-wonder of diluted messages.


From: Delta BC | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 21 May 2006 03:18 PM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Hmm. I could start a thread on consumer waste in general, and inevitably it'll get around to include car and trucks. No problem. I think I'll do that in the 'environmental' forum later today.
From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 21 May 2006 03:25 PM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by clersal:
What is the cheapest and most visible colour to paint a car? What ever it is all cars should be that colour.]

This is the kind of response that genuinely makes me roll my eyes. Variety is the spice of life, you know.

quote:
Corvettes, Mustangs and Ferrari's? Please is this really a need in our lives?

Yes, of course, as are Smart Cars, Mini Coopers, Volkswagens, etc... different strokes for different folks, and all that. Your needs may not be my needs. But NO ONE needs an SUV in the city.


From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
otter
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12062

posted 21 May 2006 03:40 PM      Profile for otter        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Don't Canadians hold the world record for producing the most per capita garbage?

Of course, in a consumer culture you really are what you purchase. Human identity has gone the way of the dodo.


From: agent provocateur inc. | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 21 May 2006 03:54 PM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The 'disposable culture' is insane. Consumer electronics become out of date (according to advertisers) and everyone needs to have the latest iPod, cellphone with TV, etc... and the original gets dumped. There definitely needs to be more recycling. I'm still using a 1990 SONY stereo system, works fine. I still use a 1968 electric typewriter - in perfect condition. My 1996 CCM bike will probably last ten more years. I have books and magazines that I bought 40 years ago, all in new condition. My television is from 1995, works perfectly. Why should I be interested in replacing any of these?

Corporations producing consumer electronics push innovation over need. I've watched endless advertising on TV and in tech magazines for the latest in miniature electronics, and it's getting completely insane, and highly wasteful, and highly polluting - extremely toxic chemicals involved, which eventually leach out of landfills where they've been dumped when 'obsolete'. It's business, and profit, and labour intensive (I saw a doc on the manufacturing of these things - in one segment, there were roughly 400 people in one over-lit 'clean room' wearing masks and hygenic clothing assembling small, delicate electronic stuff). What's the answer?


From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 21 May 2006 03:58 PM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Boom Boom:
It's complicated. I'm in favour of raising gas prices to at least the $2/litre level in Canada to slow things down a bit - others may cry 'foul'.

A serious problem: rising fuel costs affect the cost of transportation, getting everything to market, which in turn raises the prices of food for the table, not to mention everything else.


From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
clersal
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 370

posted 21 May 2006 04:56 PM      Profile for clersal     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
This is the kind of response that genuinely makes me roll my eyes. Variety is the spice of life, you know.



Variety at the expense of the environment?
I really don't know what SUV's in the city or country make much difference. Aren't they the high polluters? The movie stars and rich people have them? I think they make a lot of brmmm brmm sounds too.

From: Canton Marchand, Québec | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 21 May 2006 05:06 PM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by clersal:
Variety at the expense of the environment?

Oh, good grief. You'd probably like to have
everyone dress in green fatigues, drive a grey Prius, and live communally with thoughts of Chairman ___ playing on the radio all day. Not for me, thanks.


From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
clersal
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 370

posted 21 May 2006 06:06 PM      Profile for clersal     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 

this one

[ 21 May 2006: Message edited by: clersal ]


From: Canton Marchand, Québec | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 21 May 2006 06:19 PM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
clersal:

I'd love a Prius if it wasn't so expensive, and if it could navigate the shitty roads here, and could carry a decent payload. In the meantime, I'll stick to my small grey Mazda pickup truck.


From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 21 May 2006 06:27 PM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 

Me and my Mazda

[ 21 May 2006: Message edited by: Boom Boom ]


From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
clersal
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 370

posted 21 May 2006 06:50 PM      Profile for clersal     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'd like one too but as you say the price.
I'll have to stick with my secondhand dented(my fault) toyota.

I don't have a photo of it as that is a man's thing. 'Me and my car.'


From: Canton Marchand, Québec | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 21 May 2006 07:06 PM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by clersal:
I don't have a photo of it as that is a man's thing. 'Me and my car.'

LOL!!! My truck even has a name: "Misty".


From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
BlawBlaw
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11570

posted 21 May 2006 07:18 PM      Profile for BlawBlaw     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by clersal:
If we had less choices wouldn't the prices plummet for the consumer?

Liquor privatization in Alberta is a fairly good example of this. When they made the change from a state monopoly to private sellers, prices and absolute quantity of alcohol consumption remanined relatively stable. The two big changes were in the wages of workers and the choices available to consumers.

As a unionized, government employee I think that liquor store clerks were making $15.00 per hour or so, while a private store clerk makes about half of that.

What expanded were the number of locations, the number of products available, and the more flexible hours to buy booze.

Consumer choice has a cost for everyone. Monopolisitc competition is first year economics, and the norm for most markets. It is not as efficient as perfect competition.


From: British Columbia | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
skeptikool
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11389

posted 21 May 2006 07:35 PM      Profile for skeptikool        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Boom Boom:

quote:
Me and my Mazda

You are now defined.


From: Delta BC | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 21 May 2006 07:47 PM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Don't forget the vroom vroom.
From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca