Author
|
Topic: Any person in uniform is an enemy to women
|
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312
|
posted 25 November 2007 01:15 PM
quote: By rights, Ombeni should be nearing the end of her university life, perhaps fending off marriage requests or applying for teaching posts in the city. But her schooling, and her life's journey, were brutally interrupted almost five years earlier.Back then she was a typical 15-year-old with dreams of university and a better life. Her home was a village in the countryside, where, when she wasn't studying, she helped in the fields. It was while out working one evening that rebel forces captured her carefree innocence. For months she became their slave, both sexual and physical, as they lived in various wooded compounds along the Rwandan border. Heavily pregnant, and near death from lack of food, the rebels returned her to her village so her parents could watch her die.
Before you click this link, beware this is a horrific story. And no one cares. [ 25 November 2007: Message edited by: Frustrated Mess ]
From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Stargazer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6061
|
posted 26 November 2007 06:15 PM
Well FM, at least you weren't disappointed. It resulted in jokes. I read that article today and could barely contain my anger. It was on Digg and most of the responders talked about the rapes as if this were somehow localized to Africa. Digg deleted my comment, which was that it is not localized but seemingly inherent in every culture, and worse during times of war or conflict. I asked that we consider a world that condones this through the assumption that the "culture of masculinity" is never to be discussed, or even admitted to and that this culture is what must be dissected and destroyed before we can do anything. Yeah, did I mention Digg deleted my comment?
From: Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist. | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790
|
posted 26 November 2007 07:23 PM
I'd ask you to refrain from stalking me around the forum to prosecute your personal vendetta against me. As it is now perfectly clear, your real agenda is coming after me for my "bad behaviour" in the "feminist" forum, and really has nothing to do with what I said here. I made it quite clear that I would not be visiting your forum in future, and as far as I was concerned that was the end of the issue. Now, you don't think that the German aid worker, is talking out of both sides of her mouth? What a stupid construction: "Any person in uniform is an enemy of women"? Pulease! She is obviously trying to extend the lesson generally beyond the bounds of the specific, and use it as an example of a more general nature. All people in uniforms are rapists, essentially. I disagree. I posed above what I think is the relationship between wars, uniforms and rape. The thing about people in uniforms is that they generally have more power, and more institutionalized immunity from prosecution, to do what they want. It is certainly not localized to Africa, or anywhere in particular. Rape is often used as a means of "blooding" soldiers, particularly among really battle hardended groups. Mutual engagement in a criminal act, is a way of insuring group loyalty, for one thing. [ 26 November 2007: Message edited by: Cueball ]
From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289
|
posted 26 November 2007 07:48 PM
quote: Originally posted by Cueball: I'd ask you to refrain from stalking me around the forum to prosecute your personal vendetta against me.
Oh please cueball, you wild imaginings that I am stalking are only in your own mind! And frankly, I believe you are using your outrage as a ploy to try and escape your wholely inappropriate commentary to webgear and making a joke in this thread! quote: As it is now perfectly clear, your real agenda is coming after me for my "bad behaviour" in the "feminist" forum, and really has nothing to do with what I said here.
bull shit, it is not perfectly clear, you are trying to shift the sands of YOUR actions in trivializing this and deflect onto me. quote: I made it quite clear that I would not be visiting your forum in future, and as far as I was concerned that was the end of the issue.
Uh, so we are just supposed to excuse your asshattedness in ALL other threads that should be in the feminist forum? quote: Now, you don't think that the German aid worker, is talking out of both sides of her mouth?What a stupid construction: "Any person in uniform is an enemy of women"? Pulease! She is obviously trying to extend the lesson generally beyond the bounds of the specific, and use it as an example of a more general nature. All people in uniforms are rapists, essentially. I disagree. I posed above what I think is the relationship between wars, uniforms and rape. It is certainly not localized to Africa, or anywhere in particular.
oh yes, let's ignore what she was saying and discuss other, like she is talking out of both sides of her mouth! moderators could you please place this in the feminist forum where it should've been in the first place? cueballs continued bad actions are wholely innappropriate. [ 26 November 2007: Message edited by: remind ]
From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790
|
posted 26 November 2007 07:49 PM
Yes, and as usual you have completely ignored anything substantial I have said vis the actual topic of debate, or the issue, in favour of pursuing a personal vendetta against me and others. Completely ignoring the topic, in favour reducing the discussion to an issue of forum etiquette... group hazing: personal politics aka bullshit. What's up with that? [ 26 November 2007: Message edited by: Cueball ]
From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stargazer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6061
|
posted 26 November 2007 08:33 PM
quote: That war is the enemy of women. I think that war provides opportunities for men who would rape to do what they want.
Men rape women. War is an excuse. This thread is about women and rape and you were out of line first with the joke and now with your trivialization of the issue that was raised, and which you refuse to see - that of the culture of masculinity. This is the centre of rape and this is what needs to be dissected. Michelle, we agreed ages ago that threads that were specifically women centered would be moved to the feminist forum so that this kind of thing would not happen again and again and again. We have already lost a lot of women posters due to these issues. Cueball, nor Webgear, should be turning this thread into a thread about uniforms and soldier's macho exercises, especially as a means of using war as an excuse for rape. Can you please move this so we can discuss this on a different level please?
From: Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist. | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560
|
posted 27 November 2007 03:34 AM
I'll be happy to move this to the feminism forum. But moving this thread there doesn't mean that Cueball has done anything wrong in this thread at all.He was challenging the concept in the subject line in this thread that "any person in uniform is an enemy to women". I think that's a legitimate argument. It's a blanket statement and just not true. I don't like what soldiers do any more than anyone else and I don't particularly think it's a moral job, but I also don't think that every soldier on the planet is an "enemy to women" when it comes to rape and such. Cueball brought up some important arguments against it. Yes, he made a wry comment at first, because he saw a SOLDIER in the thread saying that this is an important discussion to have, and that clearly put the lie to the title that ANY person in uniform is an enemy to women. But because of past arguments with Cueball, remind flew off the handle and freaked out on him. And now she is demanding that the moderator back her up on this shadow-moderating and attack on another poster who hasn't done anything except challenge the blanket statement in the thread title? Come on. I don't think so. I think people have to realize that this is still a DISCUSSION forum. People are going to sometimes disagree with what we've written, and sometimes they're going to say so. Sometimes they might even use a different tone than we might like. There's no way I'm going to come down on a decent poster who has done nothing against babble policy. He hasn't posted ANYTHING anti-feminist in this thread. He's not making fun of anyone here (at least not before he was attacked for no real reason). I'm not going to be the babble vendetta enforcement unit.
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|