babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » feminism   » Celebrating feminism!

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Celebrating feminism!
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 27 July 2004 11:23 AM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Hmm, I do think it is imperative to celebrate feminism. So babblers of all sexes, species (humans, felinoids, Klingons, turtles...) and feminist or pro-feminist orientations, let's get out there and celebrate!
From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Screaming Lord Byron
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4717

posted 27 July 2004 11:35 AM      Profile for Screaming Lord Byron     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Feminism. Making the world safe for women who don't believe in feminism.

[ 27 July 2004: Message edited by: Screaming Lord Byron ]


From: Calgary | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 27 July 2004 01:07 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
SLB, that's rather self-congratulatory.

One could easily say: "Soldiers. Making the world safe for those who don't believe in war."

I've never liked that argument much, that whole, "We're doing it for you, and you don't appreciate it." I'm not a feminist for Hailey's sake. I'm a feminist for my own sake. If Hailey happens to benefit, whatever. If Hailey decides that she doesn't want to benefit and she'd rather live in a traditional way, whatever.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Screaming Lord Byron
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4717

posted 27 July 2004 01:15 PM      Profile for Screaming Lord Byron     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Purely a glib, ironic remark, Michelle. Sounded wittier in my head, y'know?
From: Calgary | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 27 July 2004 01:26 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Oh, I sympathized with it, believe me. But then I got thinking, "What's the difference between me saying that to someone about a cause I believe in and they don't, and someone else saying that to me about a cause they believe in and I don't?"
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 27 July 2004 01:35 PM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Michelle:
SLB, that's rather self-congratulatory.

One could easily say: "Soldiers. Making the world safe for those who don't believe in war."

I've never liked that argument much, that whole, "We're doing it for you, and you don't appreciate it." I'm not a feminist for Hailey's sake. I'm a feminist for my own sake. If Hailey happens to benefit, whatever. If Hailey decides that she doesn't want to benefit and she'd rather live in a traditional way, whatever.


Um. I have to differ here. I don't think that that argument is "self"-congratulatory at all. If you are thinking in purely individualist terms, then maybe that's a way of reading it ... although I can't quite see that.

Anyway, that logic is also the basis of the labour-union movement, and it is the antithesis of individualism. It simply is true, and it works both ways: benefits for one really do require benefits for all, and benefits for all will benefit even those people who aren't in unions. Same is true of any collective movement, any social movement.

I hate war and militarism, but I can't see that it is untrue that soldiers make the world safer for the rest of us, or at least that is the idea in theory. Picking the wrong war: that is a political problem.

I'm not sure what being a feminist for my own sake would mean.


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Screaming Lord Byron
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4717

posted 27 July 2004 01:36 PM      Profile for Screaming Lord Byron     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The irony is that someone has the luxury to call themselves an 'anti-feminist' partly because of the gains that were won for them by those feminists.

[ 27 July 2004: Message edited by: Screaming Lord Byron ]


From: Calgary | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Loony Bin
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4996

posted 27 July 2004 01:51 PM      Profile for Loony Bin   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
So, what are the plans for the Yay Feminism party?

We'll need decorations, punch, music, and guests, at the very least...And a location?

Shall we have a Pin the Vote on the Suffragette game? How about Wage Parity Twister?

And who's gonna make the snacks?


From: solitary confinement | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged
Sharon
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4090

posted 27 July 2004 02:27 PM      Profile for Sharon     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Michelle, I was thinking along the same lines as skdadl. Back when people were not so self-conscious about using the expression "women's liberation," people used to ask me if I were a "liberated woman." I always responded by saying that no woman is liberated until all women are liberated.

Speaking of suffragettes, I posted an interesting little story about them this morning. For those who missed it...


From: Halifax, Nova Scotia | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Loony Bin
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4996

posted 27 July 2004 02:34 PM      Profile for Loony Bin   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Can we talk about that article here, or shall we start a new thread for it?
From: solitary confinement | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 27 July 2004 02:47 PM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I loved that story. Bring on the anecdotes!:
---
In Scotland, Helen Archdale - daughter of the editor of The Scotsman, Alexander Russel - was arrested for attempting to disrupt a meeting at which Winston Churchill, then MP for Dundee, was speaking by dropping a 2lb weight through a glass roof.
---
Should rabble formally request that The Scotsman change its name to the Scotswoman? or the gender-neutral Scot?

From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Sharon
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4090

posted 27 July 2004 02:57 PM      Profile for Sharon     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I liked the story too. LB, I think it's okay to discuss it here because it fits with the idea of celebrating feminism, don't you think?

A few years ago, a friend of mine was working on a story and she asked me if I thought she should use the word "suffragist" instead of
"suffragette." No, said I. The suffragettes took that word which had been coined to insult them and wore it proudly. I don't think they would want the triumph of that taken away from them. (There is an allusion to the word "suffragette" in the story.)

[ 27 July 2004: Message edited by: Sharon ]


From: Halifax, Nova Scotia | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Loony Bin
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4996

posted 27 July 2004 04:06 PM      Profile for Loony Bin   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It's similar to the attempts being made to have them pardoned, I guess. Sorta seems it might diminish the whole movement in some way...

quote:
Meg Munn, who chairs the Parliamentary Labour Party’s women’s committee, told Today: "I agree that this was an extremely important moment in our history. They achieved a tremendous amount at great personal cost.

"But I believe a pardon would in some way diminish their achievement. They actually deliberately broke the law and took great personal risk and we should honour that."

Ms Munn said the suffragettes’ memory would be better honoured by improvements in female representation in parliament and in City boardrooms and by ending gender inequality in pay.



From: solitary confinement | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged
neeuqdrazil
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4643

posted 27 July 2004 04:10 PM      Profile for neeuqdrazil   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Sharon:

A few years ago, a friend of mine was working on a story and she asked me if I thought she should use the word "suffragist" instead of
"suffragette."

There is actually a difference between suffragist and suffragette. It depends on who you're talking about - if you're talking about the Pankhursts and their organization, then you're correct in calling them suffragettes.

But there were large numbers of women (the other Pankhurst daughter, for that matter) who were not suffragettes, but who supported women's suffrage - they did not agree with the often violent means that the suffragettes used to make their case. These women were suffragists.

So you can refer to both suffragists and suffragettes, and be correct.

Sorry to be pedantic, but this abutted my main area of study (feminist pacifists in WWI-era England).


From: Toronto | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged
Sharon
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4090

posted 27 July 2004 04:57 PM      Profile for Sharon     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Thank you, neeuqdrazil. It was quite a long time ago but I think in this case, it was actually her editor who wanted the word "suffragette" expunged from the story altogether -- as if the women were diminished by it. I appreciate the distinction though.
From: Halifax, Nova Scotia | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
spatrioter
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2299

posted 27 July 2004 06:49 PM      Profile for spatrioter     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Some quotes...
quote:
I myself have never been able to find out precisely what feminism is: I only know that people call me a feminist whenever I express sentiments that differentiate me from a doormat.
-Rebecca West
And, not that this is directed to anyone in particular :
quote:
If a woman answers no to the question ‘Are you a feminist?’, she should immediately be stripped of her voting rights, her right to institute divorce, her legal protection from domestic violence and marital rape – oh, and her pay should be cut to 19% less than that of her male colleagues.
-Julie Burchill

From: Trinity-Spadina | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged
Black Dog
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2776

posted 27 July 2004 07:13 PM      Profile for Black Dog   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
"In my heart, I think a woman has two choices: either she's a feminist or a masochist."
—Gloria Steinem

And my personal favorite:

quote:
"Feminists are just women who don't want to be treated like shit." -?

[ 27 July 2004: Message edited by: black_dog ]


From: Vancouver | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
Debra
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 117

posted 27 July 2004 07:36 PM      Profile for Debra   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
"Feminism has fought no wars. It has killed no opponents. It has set up no concentration camps, starved no enemies, practiced no cruelties. Its
battles have been for education, for the vote, for better working conditions.. for safety on the streets... for child care, for social welfare...for rape crisis
centers, women's refuges, reforms in the law." (If someone says) 'Oh, I'm not a feminist,' (I ask) 'Why? What's your problem?'"
- Dale Spender


From an old thread. Written by me. Apologies to Lagatta I know she hates the term crone.
quote:
I am a feminazi
Least that is what they say
Because I believe in women's right
Like equal work needs equal pay

If I feel that dangers real while
While walking down the street
I'm unfairly demonizing men
That I have yet to meet.

My own experience of violence
Being niether here nor there
I should put that all behind me
Walk around without a care.

Of course should something happen
It will be my fault
Am I unaware that travelling alone
Can lead to sexual assault?

If as women we want to discuss the things we feel pertain
Most uniquely to us
We must weave through the tears and pain
Of the men that make a fuss.

Because you see there is nothing on earth
That we could say that has any worth
Unless we have a male perspective with which
To see our concerns are a source of mirth.

So feminazis one and all
We will speak our truth
We will support all our sisters
From the wisest crone to the youngest youth

Our stories are that which shape our lives
They've lead us to this day
And those stories can not be silenced
Nor our spirit borne away.



From: The only difference between graffiti & philosophy is the word fuck... | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Wilf Day
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3276

posted 27 July 2004 07:53 PM      Profile for Wilf Day     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
In celebrating all kinds of feminists, I almost overlooked Montreal's Joan Fraser.

In 1978 she became editorial page editor of The Montreal Gazette, and in 1993 Editor-in-Chief, winning two National Newspaper Awards for editorial writing in 1982 and 1991. She has served in the Senate of Canada since September 17, 1998. Since this April she has been President of the International Parliamentary Union's Co-ordinating Committee of Women Parliamentarians, making her a member of the IPU's executive committee.

Although Canada
stands 34th in the world for the proportion of women in our Parliament, ranking behind such bastions of feminism as Turkmenistan, Australia, Switzerland, Uganda, Laos, Mexico, Eritrea, Pakistan and Tanzania, still it's good to see a Canadian woman in such a leading international role. I see that:

quote:
Senator Joan Fraser, a Liberal and former newspaper editor from Quebec who chairs the Senate committee . . crossed swords with owner Conrad Black during her stint as editor in chief of the Montreal Gazette. "He used to complain about people who were left wing, feminist, Liberal - all those good things I qualify under," she says.

[ 27 July 2004: Message edited by: Wilfred Day ]


From: Port Hope, Ontario | Registered: Oct 2002  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 27 July 2004 09:00 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Screaming Lord Byron:
The irony is that someone has the luxury to call themselves an 'anti-feminist' partly because of the gains that were won for them by those feminists.

Women have always had the luxury of calling themselves anti-feminist as long as the term has been about. In fact, it's always been much easier to call yourself an anti-feminist than to call yourself a feminist.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 27 July 2004 09:19 PM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
All of this seriousness is commendable, but we need some music, dance, food and drink! I propose we start off with the late, great Brenda Fassie of South Africa, then segue to an eighties (and late '70s?) set of Rise Up, Sisters are Doing It for Themselves, and Girls Just Wanna Have Fun.

For food, things we can scoop up without dishes - good dips such as my spicy white bean dip with herbs and a seasonal salsa - organic blue corn chips. We'll drink good sparkling wine - I think champagne is overrated and overpriced, we'll try other origins - a good Sangria, not too sweet, and we'll have fresh berries to eat lasciviously, alone or ...

The best high heels will be worn by our drag queen friends, of course.


From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 27 July 2004 09:42 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Oh, come on, lagatta... I can be a good feminist in my high heels!
From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 27 July 2004 09:50 PM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Of course you can, Zoot! What'cha having?
From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 27 July 2004 09:55 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Let's crack a nice, modestly-priced bottle of rosé from the south of France, eh?

Cheers, big-ears, as Ms B loves to say...


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Loony Bin
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4996

posted 28 July 2004 12:49 PM      Profile for Loony Bin   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I like to say that too.
From: solitary confinement | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged
James
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5341

posted 28 July 2004 01:05 PM      Profile for James        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Zoot Capri:
Let's crack a nice, modestly-priced bottle of rosé from the south of France, eh?

WHAT HERESEY says a patriot son from Canada's finest wine producing region. ( our wines regularly win international competitions )

This and many others


From: Windsor; ON | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 28 July 2004 01:19 PM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Those look lovely, JR - unfortunately very few quality Ontario wines are available in Québec. It comes as no surprise that SAQ policy is heavily weighted in favour of French pinard - for example, we have many, many Alsatian wines and almost no German wines of the same cépages. I did pick up a couple of good Ontario wines the last time I was in Ottawa.

There are vintners who attempt to produce wines here, but really our winters are too harsh and the results are disappointing. We'd be better off concentrating on quality ciders.

I want some bubbly. I believe there are good sparkline wines from Ontario - recall reading about an excellent Riesling one of a German/Alsatian type ... Cheers!

Needless to say, we are providing all kinds of non-booze alternatives here at our party. We ARE responsible hosts, after all.


From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Mandos
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 888

posted 28 July 2004 01:40 PM      Profile for Mandos   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Like I said, as long as I can have an extraextra spicy virgin (oops, did I say that?) Caesar, I'm happy. One, or many. Alas, I am moving to the US in a few weeks, where I have discovered (to my chagrin in a US restaurant) that virgin Caesars do not exist in the US. Argh.
From: There, there. | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
Klingon
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4625

posted 28 July 2004 06:08 PM      Profile for Klingon        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
K'pla! It's interesting that a Klingon would be invited on to this string to celebrate feminism. On Kronos, our women are warriors who fight along side the men, unless they are mothers. Then they defend our children when the males are out pillaging.

They fight along side the men and show no mercy for the weak and the timid. While they defend their own children, they kill the entire families of the opposing side. We do not take prisoners. It is dishonourable to both ourselves and those we fight against. If they are honourable people, their souls will go to Stovak'Qkor.

Sex of course must be consensual; otherwise, death is the result (you just shoot the other person if they turn you off). But when a male and female Klingon begin to display signs of mutual attraction (sneering from the male, hissing and showing more skin on the part of the female) it then involves the male having to over-power the female who gallantly resists him. A skilled male warrior usually succeeds. But if he is not careful, she could kill him. Or if he doesn’t use his skills accurately, he could kill her. If he succeeds, it’s marriage. If he fails, it’s over.

The way humans mate would be considered insulting and passion-less. There's no word for sweetheart in Klingon!

On Kronos, affirmative action means killing the leader whenever he or she shows weakness or incompetence, or refuses to retire when s/he knows their time is due. This truly equality of opportunity: no hiring quotas; no workforce re-entry programs; no human rights tribunals; no grievance forms to fill out.

Klingons marry for life, which ends the minute one or the other spouses behaves dishonourably (such as infidelity, lack of concern for the children, cowardice in defending one's family etc.). No counseling; no divorce; no custody hearings. When we say, "til death do us part," we mean it!

Klingons do not "honeymoon" in the human sense. After marriage, the couple goes on a treacherous journey filled with danger and hostile forces. The two must endure hardships like hunger, grilling heat, bitter cold and constant stress, and must engage in glorious battle and vanquish all of their opponents. If they fail, they die. If they succeed (and they usually do) they then must eat the hearts of those who they have killed, washing them down with lots of blood wine, and then engage in passionate lovemaking amid the dead bodies and spilled blood. Ah! Just the thought of it fills me with energy!

The only reason a Klingon couple would go to Club Med is to destroy it by slaughtering every Yuppie in sight and burning it to the ground--then have sex among the ashes (along with more blood wine)!! (Since Yuppies are usually heartless, we don’t bother to check to see if they have one so we can eat it).

I miss Kronos! I miss Klingon women! There is no passion on this cursed planet! And the wine sucks! I will surely go back for a vacation after I am banned from this string for posting this.

Just one question: are you still glad you invited me to celebrate feminism?!


From: Kronos, but in BC Observing Political Tretchery | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 28 July 2004 09:04 PM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
The extension of women's rights is the basic principle of all social progress.

Quote from the French social theorist and early utopian socialist, Charles Fourier (1772-1837)

Socialists. Just a little ahead of everyone else.


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Socrates
sock-puppet
Babbler # 6376

posted 28 July 2004 10:58 PM      Profile for Socrates   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Ahhhh, Fourier was such a good guy!

I thought everyone had forgotten him! I wrote a 15 page paper on him in high school.

Those utopian Socialists had some good ideas, pity about the seas of soda, etc.....


From: Viva Sandinismo! | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Klingon
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4625

posted 29 July 2004 12:17 AM      Profile for Klingon        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
K’pla!

"Ahhhh, Fourier was such a good guy!
I thought everyone had forgotten him!"

Ah, no Socrates. We shall never forget such visionary yet practical minded socialist economists.

I read much of Charles Fourier's involvement with, and writing about, the Phalanx cooperative society movements in the US and Europe. He also played a role in the Icarian movement, along with the Quakers, in the US as well.

Karl Marx and Freddy Engles, as well as numerous other socialist economists and other forward freethinkers, were inspired by his works and spoke highly of him.

It's interesting that so many refer to these movements and organizations, and the individuals who were involved with them as "utopian," when it seems quite obvious that they were very practical and hands-on.


From: Kronos, but in BC Observing Political Tretchery | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged
Hinterland
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4014

posted 29 July 2004 12:58 AM      Profile for Hinterland        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Just one question: are you still glad you invited me to celebrate feminism?!

Absolutely...I think Klingons are the answer to the age-old question of...Who should kill the bug!.

...and I'm pretty sure they'd be helpful with the toilet seat up/down controversy. I find imagining settling this issue with shards of porcelaine strewn all over the bathroom to be strangely gratifying.


From: Québec/Ontario | Registered: Apr 2003  |  IP: Logged
Rufus Polson
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3308

posted 29 July 2004 03:35 AM      Profile for Rufus Polson     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I've never really gotten the toilet seat up/down problem. I mean, if I'm at work or in a public washroom, standing up at a urinal is usefully quick and maybe means I don't have to sit down somewhere questionable.
But at home, I want to sit down. Take the weight off. Relax a bit. Why would I want to stand up and worry about aim and feel rushed? Seat can stay down forever, as far as I'm concerned.

From: Caithnard College | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 29 July 2004 09:21 AM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Sound fellow, our Rufus.
From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 01 August 2004 09:09 AM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Good morning, grils!

After a bit of toe-to-toe in a few other threads, I thought I'd just take a moment here this lovely summer morning to say: Gee, but I feel like a free and fully intelligent human being! Wow! I have actually always felt that way! Wow!

How's about you?


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 01 August 2004 09:12 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I do too!

I was just discussing first periods with a friend. I'm thinking I might even start a thread on it.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 01 August 2004 09:43 AM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
First period? Michelle, I'm not sure I can remember my last one!

Yes, Virginia, they do go away finally.


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca