babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics

Topic Closed  Topic Closed


Post New Topic  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Sarah Palin, McCain's running mate

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Sarah Palin, McCain's running mate
Sine Ziegler
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 225

posted 29 August 2008 08:54 AM      Profile for Sine Ziegler     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
So what do you think about Sarah Palin? I just saw her speech. A few comments...

She mentioned her husband is a proud union member. Pfffft. Republicans hate unions so why even mention?

She said she would help smash the glass ceiling for women. I didn't know Republicans admitted there was a glass ceiling.

I am still somewhat inspired, as a women, about this choice. I am certainly curious. I thought I saw her introduce all her children, and she mentioned her youngest born in April? It COULD be her grandchild but it sounded like it was her own child?? I guess American women take only 6 weeks off but I didn't think a Governor would be pregnant... if so, kudos to her. I just had a child myself in June and I can't imagine!!

Ok your thoughts...


From: Calgary | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 29 August 2008 09:02 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Whoa - you had a baby in June??? Congratulations! That's amazing!
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
ghoris
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4152

posted 29 August 2008 09:06 AM      Profile for ghoris     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
One thing's for sure, this pick will go down in political history as either the shrewdest, most canny VP choice in recent memory, or the biggest blunder since McGovern picked Eagleton. (Sidebar: Democrats keep comparing McCain's pick of Palin to GHW Bush's pick of Quayle, which to me seems to overlook the fact that Bush/Quayle still *won*.)

I've been saying for years that the GOP should look seriously at nominating a female VP candidate. When Democrats have won, the margin of victory has generally been provided by female voters. Clinton trounced Dole among unmarried women, who make up 20% of the voting population, 62-28. He beat Dole among married women (33%) 48-43 but lost among married men (also 33%) 40-48. As Amy Gardner said on The West Wing, "if only men voted, the GOP would be the left-wing party."

Interesting choice, at any rate. I for one don't buy the Democratic line that picking Palin means McCain can't go after Obama on the 'readiness' or 'experience' issue - draft-dodger George Bush managed to go after John Kerry's military record and successfully pulled it off.


From: Vancouver | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Ghislaine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14957

posted 29 August 2008 09:07 AM      Profile for Ghislaine     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Sine Ziegler:
So what do you think about Sarah Palin? I just saw her speech. A few comments...

She mentioned her husband is a proud union member. Pfffft. Republicans hate unions so why even mention?

She said she would help smash the glass ceiling for women. I didn't know Republicans admitted there was a glass ceiling.

I am still somewhat inspired, as a women, about this choice. I am certainly curious. I thought I saw her introduce all her children, and she mentioned her youngest born in April? It COULD be her grandchild but it sounded like it was her own child?? I guess American women take only 6 weeks off but I didn't think a Governor would be pregnant... if so, kudos to her. I just had a child myself in June and I can't imagine!!

Ok your thoughts...


Congratulations as well on your baby!

she is not the grandmother, but the new mother of a baby with Down's Syndrome, who was born in June.


From: L'Î-P-É | Registered: Feb 2008  |  IP: Logged
Sven
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9972

posted 29 August 2008 09:10 AM      Profile for Sven     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Quick assessment (based on not knowing a damned thing about Palin--other than what I've read this morning and what I saw this morning at the announcement):

1. She will likey be a great campaigner giving stump speeches. She will draw in large numbers of the "vast middle" voters who will be able to identify with her background ("Average Jane" who is not a career politico).

2. Given her lack of experience, I have doubts about her debate skills. Although, there is only one VP debate.

Will be fascinating to watch...


From: Eleutherophobics of the World...Unite!!!!! | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
It's Me D
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 15152

posted 29 August 2008 09:10 AM      Profile for It's Me D     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Willowdale Wizard

Palin supports the aerial hunting of wolves and bears, and even spent $400,000 of state money to fund a media campaign to try and convince Alaskans to support aerial shooting (even though Alaskans have voted against it, twice!).


So if she wins you think she'll one-up Dick's duck hunting accident?


From: Parrsboro, NS | Registered: Apr 2008  |  IP: Logged
Sine Ziegler
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 225

posted 29 August 2008 09:11 AM      Profile for Sine Ziegler     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Michelle:
Whoa - you had a baby in June??? Congratulations! That's amazing!

haha thanks Michelle Ugh.. typo on "women" in my initial post, I meant woman. I dislike when people make that mistake... Baby Brain..


From: Calgary | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
kropotkin1951
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2732

posted 29 August 2008 09:13 AM      Profile for kropotkin1951   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Downs Syndrome kids are wonderful to have around although they have substantial challenges that are different than people growing up without the syndrome. Of course her age is relevant bacause Downs is primarily a syndrome that arises in children of mothers who are over forty.

I'm waiting for the shots of her breast feeding while eating apple pie as she proves shes a typical American Mom.


From: North of Manifest Destiny | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
Scout
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1595

posted 29 August 2008 09:13 AM      Profile for Scout     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Palin is strongly opposed to abortion and supports capital punishment. While running for Governor of Alaska, Palin supported the teaching of creationism alongside evolution in schools.
- wiki

quote:
She opposes same-sex marriage, but she has stated that she has gay friends and is receptive to gay and lesbian concerns about discrimination.
- wiki

She's a piece of work. I'm not inspired to have a woman run for VP when's she just as into oppression as the rest of the white dudes.


From: Toronto, ON Canada | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged
Willowdale Wizard
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3674

posted 29 August 2008 09:15 AM      Profile for Willowdale Wizard   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
2008 is the new 1988:

quote:
VP Debate:

Palin: I am older and more experienced than Dan Quayle was

Biden: Gov Palin, I worked with Dan Quayle, I served with Dan Quayle, despite our differences Dan Quayle was a friend of mine. Gov Palin you are no Dan Quayle



From: england (hometown of toronto) | Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged
kropotkin1951
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2732

posted 29 August 2008 09:15 AM      Profile for kropotkin1951   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
In Canadian terms she sounds like a REAL woman to me.
From: North of Manifest Destiny | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
Sine Ziegler
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 225

posted 29 August 2008 09:16 AM      Profile for Sine Ziegler     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Just watching BBC and the commentator said that the crowd didn't really know what to think of her comment about the glass ceiling ( and in reference to Hillary Clinton ). Also just read the comments in the Republican Convention thread about her baby having Downs nd other problems as a result. She sounds like a tough woman. I agree that it seems that women sometimes get a bit further in right wing parties and have more trouble on the left.

I wonder how many American's think she should be at home with her kids instead of campaigning and possibly VP'ing. I have to admit, I had a twinge of that too. Who is taking care of her little one?? Maybe her unionzed husband has special parental leave


From: Calgary | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 29 August 2008 09:16 AM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Sine Ziegler:
Ok your thoughts...

I think McCain successfully took the spotlight off of the DNC and Obama.

I think Obama and his team made a stupid egotistical move in not having Clinton as his running mate.

I do not believe left leaning women in the USA will flock to the Republicans because Palin is McCain's running mate. As such, it is probably a long term non-event for the Repubs, and its only value will be to decrease the post DNC bump in the polls by the democrats by deflecting attention away.


From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Ghislaine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14957

posted 29 August 2008 09:19 AM      Profile for Ghislaine     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Sine Ziegler:

I wonder how many American's think she should be at home with her kids instead of campaigning and possibly VP'ing. I have to admit, I had a twinge of that too. Who is taking care of her little one?? Maybe her unionzed husband has special parental leave


Wiki states that she returned to work 3 days after giving birth. That would not be for me - but all the power to her if she has a supportive husband or family at home to assist. A high-level female politican breastfeeding would be something I would be very interested to see!


From: L'Î-P-É | Registered: Feb 2008  |  IP: Logged
500_Apples
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12684

posted 29 August 2008 09:20 AM      Profile for 500_Apples   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Slate.com's title for this story:

It's a Girl!

They also wonder if she's a better basketball player than Obama.

quote:
McCain's pick of Palin means a fifth presidential/vice presidential debate should be added to the calendar. A cross-ticket game of horse between Barack Obama and Sarah Palin. Obama has the upper hand because he plays regularly, but Palin has played ball on a bigger stage than Obama ever has. It would rival the Michael Jordan vs. Larry Bird showdown.

Basketball


From: Montreal, Quebec | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged
Left J.A.B.
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9046

posted 29 August 2008 09:20 AM      Profile for Left J.A.B.     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
I wonder whether, besides a few exciting days of speculation for political junkies, the choice of VP really matters much at all. It is the Presidential candidates that get focused on very shortly after the VPs brief moments in the sun.

My evidence


From: 4th and Main | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
ghoris
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4152

posted 29 August 2008 09:20 AM      Profile for ghoris     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
2008 is the new 1988:

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VP Debate:
Palin: I am older and more experienced than Dan Quayle was

Biden: Gov Palin, I worked with Dan Quayle, I served with Dan Quayle, despite our differences Dan Quayle was a friend of mine. Gov Palin you are no Dan Quayle


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


See, I don't buy that line. Nobody watches or cares about the VP debate. Quayle got pantsed by Bentsen on national TV and became the butt of every late-night joke, and still went on to victory.

The Palin choice also forces Biden to go into 'statesman' mode rather than 'attack dog' mode. He will only win the debate by appearing more 'Vice Presidential', otherwise he'll just look like a McCain-esque cranky old white guy attacking a younger, woman candidate.

[Edited to add quote so it makes sense. Also, what Left J.A.B. said.]

[ 29 August 2008: Message edited by: ghoris ]


From: Vancouver | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Ghislaine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14957

posted 29 August 2008 09:22 AM      Profile for Ghislaine     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
One thing I have noticed (happily) is that she is being referred to as Palin, rather than Sarah. That is a nice change further to a brief discussion I had on here a few days ago.
From: L'Î-P-É | Registered: Feb 2008  |  IP: Logged
sanizadeh
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14787

posted 29 August 2008 09:23 AM      Profile for sanizadeh        Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by remind:

I do not believe left leaning women in the USA will flock to the Republicans because Palin is McCain's running mate. As such, it is probably a long term non-event for the Repubs, and its only value will be to decrease the post DNC bump in the polls by the democrats by deflecting attention away.

The move was not just to lure women's vote, but also the social conservatives (such as national review and such) who distrusted McCain. Worldnetdaily.com had gone as far as proposing a boycott of the election. Now they all seem happy and energized (see Here. . With this choice, McCain solidified his own base.


From: Ontario | Registered: Dec 2007  |  IP: Logged
500_Apples
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12684

posted 29 August 2008 09:23 AM      Profile for 500_Apples   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Ghislaine:
One thing I have noticed (happily) is that she is being referred to as Palin, rather than Sarah. That is a nice change further to a brief discussion I had on here a few days ago.

How is her last name pronounced?


From: Montreal, Quebec | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged
Mercy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13853

posted 29 August 2008 09:24 AM      Profile for Mercy     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
My post on the other thread:

Certainly capital-F feminists won't be impressed but the "blue-collar" working women who almost put Hillary over the top might be, as will their husbands. She is a working mom with a narrative that rivals obama for inspiration. For the next few days the news cycle will be filled with background stories about this inspiring woman and her interesting story and punditry about how brave McCain was for making this outside-the-box choice. Democrats are likely crapping their pants/looking for dirt.

On abortion, she will argue that she is a Feminist for Life and while that won't impress the Andrea Dworkins of the world I think the silent majority that is generally but not passionately pro-choice will find her more compelling than repelling.

Hope I'm wrong. The Democrats had better get to work immediately to brand this woman.

ADDING:

... Which seems to be what they're up to.

I'm not the "ultra right" tag will work - she fought to keep state-owned business in public hands and veoted bills that would have banned same-sex spousal benefits.

And I'm not sure if the "inexperienced" tag will work either - especially when the Democrats are running a junior Senator for President. I fear that the Dan Quayle comparison is entirely based on the fact that she's an attractive woman - and must therefore be dumb. Even if they do succeed I'll not that the Democrats kicked the shit out of Dan Quayle in 1988 and lost anyway.

Hmmm

[ 29 August 2008: Message edited by: Mercy ]


From: Ontario, Canada | Registered: Feb 2007  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 29 August 2008 09:25 AM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Ghislaine:
One thing I have noticed (happily) is that she is being referred to as Palin, rather than Sarah. That is a nice change further to a brief discussion I had on here a few days ago.

For two reasons: she does not have to differentiate herself from a political husband (as with Bill) nor does she have the instant name recognition of Hillary, as she's quite an unknown to most of the country.


From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
Willowdale Wizard
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3674

posted 29 August 2008 09:26 AM      Profile for Willowdale Wizard   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
PAY-lin.
From: england (hometown of toronto) | Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged
It's Me D
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 15152

posted 29 August 2008 09:26 AM      Profile for It's Me D     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
How is her last name pronounced?

I don't know; I have been assuming its the same as Michael Palin although its probably about all they have in common.

ETA: Well according to the Wizard I am correct then...

[ 29 August 2008: Message edited by: It's Me D ]


From: Parrsboro, NS | Registered: Apr 2008  |  IP: Logged
500_Apples
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12684

posted 29 August 2008 09:27 AM      Profile for 500_Apples   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Willowdale Wizard:
PAY-lin.

Thank you.

I was mentally reading it paah-lin and then i realized that was my inner francophone.


From: Montreal, Quebec | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged
Left J.A.B.
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9046

posted 29 August 2008 09:31 AM      Profile for Left J.A.B.     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
I fear that the Dan Quayle comparison is entirely based on the fact that she's an attractive woman - and must therefore be dumb

I think that's a bit kooky. Unless you are suggesting Quayle was/is a Himbo.

It has much more to do with a thin resume. As well it has been the Republicans that have been using the inexperienced tag. All this does is undermine their big argument against Obama. What do they have left? After last night not very damn much.


From: 4th and Main | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
Sven
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9972

posted 29 August 2008 09:35 AM      Profile for Sven     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by remind:
I do not believe left leaning women in the USA will flock to the Republicans because Palin is McCain's running mate.

I completely agree. But, that’s not who McCain is going after. He’s targeting the vast middle. That’s where this election will be won or lost.


From: Eleutherophobics of the World...Unite!!!!! | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
500_Apples
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12684

posted 29 August 2008 09:38 AM      Profile for 500_Apples   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Left J.A.B.:

I think that's a bit kooky. Unless you are suggesting Quayle was/is a Himbo.

It has much more to do with a thin resume. As well it has been the Republicans that have been using the inexperienced tag. All this does is undermine their big argument against Obama. What do they have left? After last night not very damn much.


1) What is a Himbo?
2) It seems sensible to me that the president would need more experience than the vice president.


From: Montreal, Quebec | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged
ceti
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7851

posted 29 August 2008 09:38 AM      Profile for ceti     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
In reality, Palin can't be worse than Biden whose foreign policy is almost indistinguishable from that of the neo-cons and is a loyal servant to corporate America.
From: various musings before the revolution | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
It's Me D
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 15152

posted 29 August 2008 09:40 AM      Profile for It's Me D     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
no one can be better or worse than anyone, its a US election, don't expect too much!
From: Parrsboro, NS | Registered: Apr 2008  |  IP: Logged
It's Me D
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 15152

posted 29 August 2008 09:44 AM      Profile for It's Me D     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post

[ 29 August 2008: Message edited by: It's Me D ]


From: Parrsboro, NS | Registered: Apr 2008  |  IP: Logged
Ghislaine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14957

posted 29 August 2008 09:46 AM      Profile for Ghislaine     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Ok I have already heard 3 commentators on various networks say that her children will be a liability because people will expect her to be home with them more.... puke
From: L'Î-P-É | Registered: Feb 2008  |  IP: Logged
Mercy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13853

posted 29 August 2008 09:49 AM      Profile for Mercy     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Quayle was a bit of a "himbo" but he earned the charge on his own merits (ie. misspelling potato). I'm a little concerned about how quickly Democrats are jumping on the"beauty queen" angle.

On another note: I don't get the "strongly opposed" to same-sex marriage charge against her.

As far as I can tell, she supports "unions" instead of "marriage" which puts her in the same boat as Obama.

Am I missing something?


From: Ontario, Canada | Registered: Feb 2007  |  IP: Logged
Caissa
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12752

posted 29 August 2008 09:50 AM      Profile for Caissa     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
According to a Google search a Himbo is the male "equivalent" of Bimbo.
From: Saint John | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged
RosaL
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13921

posted 29 August 2008 09:52 AM      Profile for RosaL     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Mercy:
I'm a little concerned about how quickly Democrats are jumping on the"beauty queen" angle.

Why does this concern you?


From: the underclass | Registered: Mar 2007  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 29 August 2008 10:02 AM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Sven:
...He’s targeting the vast middle. That’s where this election will be won or lost.
Funny, I thought it would be won, or lost, with the use of electronic votiong.

From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Mercy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13853

posted 29 August 2008 10:03 AM      Profile for Mercy     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
I try and imagine how outraged Democrats would be if the Republicans were trying to paint one of their candidates as a empty-headed because she happened to be attractive.

We'll see .I don't think anyone's crossed the line but I think, at some point, a Democrat male will say something that goes too far and a lot of American women will be really really turned off.


From: Ontario, Canada | Registered: Feb 2007  |  IP: Logged
Sven
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9972

posted 29 August 2008 10:04 AM      Profile for Sven     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Mercy:
but I think, at some point, a Democrat male will say something that goes too far and a lot of American women will be really really turned off.

...and angry.


From: Eleutherophobics of the World...Unite!!!!! | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
It's Me D
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 15152

posted 29 August 2008 10:06 AM      Profile for It's Me D     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
I try and imagine how outraged Democrats would be if the Republicans were trying to paint one of their candidates as a empty-headed because she happened to be attractive.

I agree; since when is attacking a woman's appearance a "progressive" tactic?


From: Parrsboro, NS | Registered: Apr 2008  |  IP: Logged
Scout
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1595

posted 29 August 2008 10:14 AM      Profile for Scout     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Because they are smarter than me here is an article at Feministing that explains my distaste for this pandering.

Sarah Palin - Feministing

quote:
I want to see more women of all parties involved in politics. But, as we stated over and over in the primaries, a politician's gender isn't everything. It's merely one factor to be considered. And quite frankly, Palin's political views suck.

Having a woman deny other women their rights doesn't make it less vile, it makes it worse actually.

quote:
First up, she's super anti-choice. The forced-pregnancy crowd is thrilled today! (She recently had her fifth child, who has Down's syndrome.) She's against marriage equality and supports a federal gay-marriage ban, but has made sure to note that she "has gay friends."

quote:
Bill Kristol was claiming McCain would pick Palin -- and that would prove that Republicans are "much more open to strong women." Frankly, that's bullshit. Republicans are more open to a certain type of woman -- one who is strongly against things like equal pay, universal health care, and reproductive freedom. In other words, the party is pro-woman-candidates, as long as they enact anti-woman policies.

This is the really kickers for me - she gets ahead by kicking women in the teeth.

quote:
The pick of Palin is dripping with transparent condescension, the notion that the enthusiasm behind Hillary was simply the result of her being a woman, that it had nothing to do with what she actually stood for, and in that sense it's equally sexist.

Exactly.


From: Toronto, ON Canada | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged
RosaL
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13921

posted 29 August 2008 10:17 AM      Profile for RosaL     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Mercy:
I try and imagine how outraged Democrats would be if the Republicans were trying to paint one of their candidates as a empty-headed because she happened to be attractive.

Is it because she's attractive or because she apparently believes beauty pageants are "a good thing".


From: the underclass | Registered: Mar 2007  |  IP: Logged
Mercy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13853

posted 29 August 2008 10:19 AM      Profile for Mercy     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
From where I'm sitting it's a cynical pick, but I'm not sure the Democrats will succeed in branding it that way. A lot depends on Palin herself. She's about to get more scrutiny than she's ever had in her life. If she pulls it off looking smart and personable the Democrats have a serious problem. If not, McCain's done them a favour.
From: Ontario, Canada | Registered: Feb 2007  |  IP: Logged
Ghislaine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14957

posted 29 August 2008 10:22 AM      Profile for Ghislaine     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Scout:
Because they are smarter than me here is an article at Feministing that explains my distaste for this pandering.

Sarah Palin - Feministing

Exactly.


Some of the comments over at that feministing link are quite anti-feminist:

quote:
As the mother of young children myself, my immediate thought was, "What is she doing running for VP with a 4-month old?! That baby needs her around, not traveling all over the country giving stump speeches!" Of course, I then felt immediately guilty for this, and realized that I never once had a similar thought about Obama being absent from his girls' lives. Still, her baby is only 4 months old! I don't know -- I guess I have strongly conflicting feelings about this news.

quote:
I also think that there has to be a way to point out the problem with having the mother of a four-month-old with Down's syndrome on the ticket. Obviously, in no way am I saying that moms shouldn't work (which is exactly how a lot of Republicans will spin it), but I don't know any woman, Democrat or Republican, who would leave a special-needs infant plus four other children to do such an unbelievably difficult and time-consuming job. My mother is a nurse who works with newborns, and her reaction to Palin was along the lines of "is that women batshit crazy?"



From: L'Î-P-É | Registered: Feb 2008  |  IP: Logged
Sven
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9972

posted 29 August 2008 10:25 AM      Profile for Sven     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
I think that is an accurate assessment, scout. Palin will not be gathering up any true Left women voters for McCain.

But, this election will not be decided by the party stalwarts on either the Left or the Right. It’s a foregone conclusion that the Lefties will vote for Obama and the Righties will vote for McCain. Instead, this election will be determined by independent voters. Palin will draw many votes to McCain from the large number of women who are now sitting on the fence. How many? Who knows at this point, but it will be very interesting (and perhaps entertaining) to watch.


From: Eleutherophobics of the World...Unite!!!!! | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
Sven
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9972

posted 29 August 2008 10:26 AM      Profile for Sven     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Mercy:
If she pulls it off looking smart and personable the Democrats have a serious problem. If not, McCain's done them a favour.

Agreed.


From: Eleutherophobics of the World...Unite!!!!! | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
Sven
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9972

posted 29 August 2008 10:29 AM      Profile for Sven     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:

As the mother of young children myself, my immediate thought was, "What is she doing running for VP with a 4-month old?! That baby needs her around, not traveling all over the country giving stump speeches!" Of course, I then felt immediately guilty for this, and realized that I never once had a similar thought about Obama being absent from his girls' lives. Still, her baby is only 4 months old! I don't know -- I guess I have strongly conflicting feelings about this news.

Wow.


From: Eleutherophobics of the World...Unite!!!!! | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
George Victor
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14683

posted 29 August 2008 10:29 AM      Profile for George Victor        Edit/Delete Post
The Republican VP candidate is a product of polling.

Period.


From: Cambridge, ON | Registered: Oct 2007  |  IP: Logged
Mercy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13853

posted 29 August 2008 10:29 AM      Profile for Mercy     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by RosaL:

Is it because she's attractive or because she apparently believes beauty pageants are "a good thing".


Not sure if you're refering to a specific quote or not.

All I know is a lot of American women enter beauty pageants for the same reason they join the army: it's a way to get a scholarship.

I think the worst concievable thing the Democrats can do is start attacking a self-made woman because she competed for Miss Alaska. I can already see Republicans giggling with glee as a professor from New York explains how any American who watches beauty pageants must be a sexist.


From: Ontario, Canada | Registered: Feb 2007  |  IP: Logged
It's Me D
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 15152

posted 29 August 2008 10:35 AM      Profile for It's Me D     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
The pick of Palin is dripping with transparent condescension, the notion that the enthusiasm behind Hillary was simply the result of her being a woman, that it had nothing to do with what she actually stood for, and in that sense it's equally sexist.

Exactly.


So it is sexist to both not select, and select, a female candidate for executive office? Women just can't win.


From: Parrsboro, NS | Registered: Apr 2008  |  IP: Logged
RosaL
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13921

posted 29 August 2008 10:35 AM      Profile for RosaL     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:

All I know is a lot of American women enter beauty pageants for the same reason they join the army: it's a way to get a scholarship.

I think the worst concievable thing the Democrats can do is start attacking a self-made woman because she competed for Miss Alaska. I can already see Republicans giggling with glee as a professor from New York explains how any American who watches beauty pageants must be a sexist.


Beauty pageants are sexist and they are harmful to women and girls everywhere. I'm not sure a scholarship outweighs this harm, morally. Nor am I convinced that's the primary reason women enter beauty pageants. (And surely it would be easier to get a scholarship based on good marks or even athletic achievement than to win a beauty pageant.)

ETA: I could direct them to any number of women - not professors and not from New York - who could explain what is wrong with beauty pageants.

[ 29 August 2008: Message edited by: RosaL ]


From: the underclass | Registered: Mar 2007  |  IP: Logged
Ghislaine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14957

posted 29 August 2008 10:53 AM      Profile for Ghislaine     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by RosaL:

Beauty pageants are sexist and they are harmful to women and girls everywhere. I'm not sure a scholarship outweighs this harm, morally.

[ 29 August 2008: Message edited by: RosaL ]



She did do it for a scholarship according to wiki. How did it harm her though?


From: L'Î-P-É | Registered: Feb 2008  |  IP: Logged
Mercy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13853

posted 29 August 2008 10:54 AM      Profile for Mercy     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
You're right and I am being over-the-top.

I just think it's a dangerous avenue of attack. Most Americans like beuaty pageants, particularly the ones thinking of voting McCain. I think you're better off to go after her inexperience, or the investigation she's facing.


From: Ontario, Canada | Registered: Feb 2007  |  IP: Logged
RosaL
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13921

posted 29 August 2008 10:58 AM      Profile for RosaL     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Mercy:
You're right and I am being over-the-top.

I just think it's a dangerous avenue of attack.


I agree that it's probably not a good political strategy.


From: the underclass | Registered: Mar 2007  |  IP: Logged
RosaL
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13921

posted 29 August 2008 11:03 AM      Profile for RosaL     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Ghislaine:

She did do it for a scholarship according to wiki. How did it harm her though?

I am arguing that beauty pageants harm women and girls. I haven't expanded the point because I've assumed the thesis was familiar. It's an old argument but a good one!

(I'm working on something right now so I'm reluctant to get into this - anyone else want to take this up?)


From: the underclass | Registered: Mar 2007  |  IP: Logged
Mercy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13853

posted 29 August 2008 11:09 AM      Profile for Mercy     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
As the mother of young children myself, my immediate thought was, "What is she doing running for VP with a 4-month old?! That baby needs her around, not traveling all over the country giving stump speeches!" Of course, I then felt immediately guilty for this, and realized that I never once had a similar thought about Obama being absent from his girls' lives. Still, her baby is only 4 months old! I don't know -- I guess I have strongly conflicting feelings about this news.
Palin's reaction to this, and the subsequent reactions of her constituents, indicates that she's pretty savvy.

If she handles herself this well in the coming months the Democrats have a problem.

From: Ontario, Canada | Registered: Feb 2007  |  IP: Logged
Sven
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9972

posted 29 August 2008 11:10 AM      Profile for Sven     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Time Magazine read on Palin:

"After running a strong race for lieutenant governor as an unknown in 2002, she made her mark on Alaska politics as a commissioner of a state oil and gas commission, when she tried to expose GOP officials with improper ties to the industry, and eventually resigned in 2004 after her complaints were ignored."

"She also surprised Alaska's conservatives by vetoing a bill that would have denied state benefits to same-sex couples (though that might help her appeal to less socially conservative independents)."

"Palin boasts an 80% approval rating."


From: Eleutherophobics of the World...Unite!!!!! | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
Mercy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13853

posted 29 August 2008 11:15 AM      Profile for Mercy     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by RosaL:

I am arguing that beauty pageants harm women and girls. I haven't expanded the point because I've assumed the thesis was familiar. It's an old argument but a good one!

(I'm working on something right now so I'm reluctant to get into this - anyone else want to take this up?)


I don't think you have to, I think most people here would agree that judging women solely or largely on their beauty (and that is inherent in BEAUTY pageant) is a sexist tradition. There's no equivalent for men. Enough said.

All that noted, much as people who oppose wars like the one in Iraq end up in the army, women who call themselves feminists end up in beauty pageants.


From: Ontario, Canada | Registered: Feb 2007  |  IP: Logged
Ghislaine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14957

posted 29 August 2008 11:20 AM      Profile for Ghislaine     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Mercy:
Palin's reaction to this, and the subsequent reactions of her constituents, indicates that she's pretty savvy.

If she handles herself this well in the coming months the Democrats have a problem.

Will you tell me what she said? I cannot view videos.


From: L'Î-P-É | Registered: Feb 2008  |  IP: Logged
Left J.A.B.
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9046

posted 29 August 2008 11:29 AM      Profile for Left J.A.B.     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
With this nomination and Obama's nomination and in someways Hilory Rohdam Clinton being considered 'experienced' I am starting to wonder if this is the American Idolization of American politics. You are no longer expected to pay your dues and work your way up. You can just slot in where ever you want based on some kind of talent contest and viola - there you go.
Just a thought.

From: 4th and Main | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
Mercy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13853

posted 29 August 2008 11:39 AM      Profile for Mercy     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Ghislaine:

Will you tell me what she said? I cannot view videos.


"I think a woman can think and work and carry a baby at the same time"

Here's the Democrat attack lines on her.

You know what would have been smart? Finding a WOMAN to comment.

They seem to be focussed on her lack of experience. I guess McCain looks a little hypocritical but, you know, their candidate is a junior Senator. Criticizing her because she's only run a small state is kinda dumb when your candidate's run nothing. Criticizing her because she has no foreign policy experience is kinda dumb when you just finished paying tribute to the Democratic President who had, you guessed it, no foreign policy experience when he took office.


From: Ontario, Canada | Registered: Feb 2007  |  IP: Logged
aka Mycroft
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6640

posted 29 August 2008 11:42 AM      Profile for aka Mycroft     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Since the litmus test for a VP candidate is whether that person is capable of being president at a moment's notice (particularly when in the case of a septegenarian), McCain's pick means that he's all but abandoned the charge that Obama lacks the experience to be president.

Last night Al Gore deftly compared Obama to Lincoln pointing out that Lincoln, like Obama, had served 8 years in the Illinois state legislature and a single term in Congress before becoming President. I had been anticipating McCain's response to be something like: "I served with Abe Lincoln. I knew Abe Lincoln. Abe Lincoln was a friend of mine. Senator, you're no Abe Lincoln."


From: Toronto | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 29 August 2008 11:47 AM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by aka Mycroft:
I had been anticipating McCain's response to be something like: "I served with Abe Lincoln. I knew Abe Lincoln. Abe Lincoln was a friend of mine. Senator, you're no Abe Lincoln."

Best line of the day!

[ 29 August 2008: Message edited by: Boom Boom ]


From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
500_Apples
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12684

posted 29 August 2008 11:48 AM      Profile for 500_Apples   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Off-Topic,

I feel jealous of some parts of the life she has lived:

Wow, looks like good times.


From: Montreal, Quebec | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged
Mercy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13853

posted 29 August 2008 11:49 AM      Profile for Mercy     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
I'll give McCain this.

He's turned Obama's triumphant speech at convention into a one-day news story.


From: Ontario, Canada | Registered: Feb 2007  |  IP: Logged
Sven
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9972

posted 29 August 2008 11:49 AM      Profile for Sven     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Left J.A.B.:
With this nomination and Obama's nomination and in someways Hilory Rohdam Clinton being considered 'experienced' I am starting to wonder if this is the American Idolization of American politics. You are no longer expected to pay your dues and work your way up. You can just slot in where ever you want based on some kind of talent contest and viola - there you go.
Just a thought.

The political field isn't a union shop.


From: Eleutherophobics of the World...Unite!!!!! | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 29 August 2008 11:56 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Scout:
- wiki

She's a piece of work. I'm not inspired to have a woman run for VP when's she just as into oppression as the rest of the white dudes.


The stuff you quoted isn't light years different from Obama. Amerika has different standards. That whole society could use a few sped-up millennia of evolution, if you ask me.


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 29 August 2008 11:56 AM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Mercy:
I'll give McCain this.

He's turned Obama's triumphant speech at convention into a one-day news story.


Undoubtedly - and it looked like he had a very good turnout in Ohio for a meeting that wasn't even a part of the RNC, which is next week. Maybe it's the Dems turn to start "shitting bricks" (an expression coined by a babbler on another thread).


From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
Pogo
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2999

posted 29 August 2008 11:58 AM      Profile for Pogo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Mercy:
I don't think you have to, I think most people here would agree that judging women solely or largely on their beauty (and that is inherent in BEAUTY pageant) is a sexist tradition. There's no equivalent for men. Enough said.

All that noted, much as people who oppose wars like the one in Iraq end up in the army, women who call themselves feminists end up in beauty pageants.


Just to quibble a bit. Men do get judged on their manliness (not saying that they are equivalent). Hence the focus on McCain as a POW.


From: Richmond BC | Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
500_Apples
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12684

posted 29 August 2008 12:02 PM      Profile for 500_Apples   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Pogo:

Just to quibble a bit. Men do get judged on their manliness


Behold, the epitomy of masculinity:


From: Montreal, Quebec | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged
Mercy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13853

posted 29 August 2008 12:11 PM      Profile for Mercy     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Um.

The next time I see a man in a bathing suit being assigned a number based on their attractiveness I'll rescind my comments.


From: Ontario, Canada | Registered: Feb 2007  |  IP: Logged
Left J.A.B.
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9046

posted 29 August 2008 12:15 PM      Profile for Left J.A.B.     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Sven:

The political field isn't a union shop.


Oh really, thanks I was too stupid to know that. I take it you have never heard the term 'pay your dues' it is a common enough term used to describe things like working musicians and the struggle of touring from the crappiest of venues, to shitholes, to crappy venues, to grossly digusting venues, to puke on the floor venues, then on to a unkown bar in Killer Duck, Alberta, then to some larger bars and so on.

American politics seems to have become a place where you can now just say 'hey I know I haven't really done any heavy lifting, but gosh wouldn't it be cool to be President, or if I have to wait Vice President"


From: 4th and Main | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
500_Apples
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12684

posted 29 August 2008 12:17 PM      Profile for 500_Apples   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Left J.A.B.:

Oh really, thanks I was too stupid to know that. I take it you have never heard the term 'pay your dues' it is a common enough term used to describe things like working musicians and the struggle of touring from the crappiest of venues, to shitholes, to crappy venues, to grossly digusting venues, to puke on the floor venues, then on to a unkown bar in Killer Duck, Alberta, then to some larger bars and so on.

American politics seems to have become a place where you can now just say 'hey I know I haven't really done any heavy lifting, but gosh wouldn't it be cool to be President, or if I have to wait Vice President"


There's four people on two tickets.

McCain and Biden have done a ton of heavy lifting.

Obama and Palin are "outsiders" with interesting narratives.

Before that we've recently had a six year texas governor, dick cheney, a former vice president and senator from tennessee, and a long-term massachussetts senator.


From: Montreal, Quebec | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged
kropotkin1951
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2732

posted 29 August 2008 12:18 PM      Profile for kropotkin1951   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Speaking of beauty contests. One frequent winner will speak on behalf of McCain on Monday.

Edited to add link:
No 98 Pound Weaklings Here

[ 29 August 2008: Message edited by: kropotkin1951 ]


From: North of Manifest Destiny | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 29 August 2008 12:26 PM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
A couple of thoughts, regarding the Repubs picking her as running mate to McCain.

Yes, it shores up the "leary" religious right, regarding pro-life actions and possible future laws. But it also plays into their notions of the "end days" and Bible prophecy. In fact, it could signify to them the "new covenent" is on its way.

Sarah, after all, was the wife of Abraham, and God especially blessed "Sarah" to bring the future kingdom of God on earth in, and this stated in the Abrahamic Covenant regarding the end days. Say nothing about the historical conflict set up by the relations between Sarah and Hagar, and their decendants

quote:
"And God said unto Abraham, As for...Sarah...I will bless her, and give thee a son also of her: yea, I will bless her, and she shall be a mother of nations; kings of people shall be of her." (Genesis 17:15-16 KJV)

quote:
As New Covenant believers we become the heirs of Abraham: Romans 9:6-8 "For not all Israelites are true Israelites nor are all Abraham's descendants his children, but as Scripture says, 'through Isaac shall your descendants be called.' That means that it is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God; it is the children of the promise who are to be considered descendants."

http://www.agapebiblestudy.com/charts/Abrahamic%20Covenant.htm

Plus, God, in Genesis, also implores Abraham to listen to Sarah. Therefore, if God has raised a "Sarah" to be VP, then all should listen to her too. I am going to watch for this sentiment to be spread, perhaps covertly, in "Christian" speak, throughout the Republican campaign.

ETA: IMV, it is a brilliant ploy to further suck in the religious right, and perhaps other religious in the USA, who believe that the USA is thee manifest destiny of the world. And non-Christians simply would not get what they are doing propganda wise with this.

The second point is, is there really a middle in the USA at the moment? I believe it is pretty polarized.

[ 29 August 2008: Message edited by: remind ]


From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Sven
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9972

posted 29 August 2008 12:40 PM      Profile for Sven     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by remind:
The second point is, is there really a middle in the USA at the moment?

There is and it’s a very sizable portion of the population. And, the people who compose that middle are the ones who will be selecting the next president.


From: Eleutherophobics of the World...Unite!!!!! | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
kropotkin1951
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2732

posted 29 August 2008 12:46 PM      Profile for kropotkin1951   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
There is no middle on foreign policy. All the candidates agree that America should control all other nations. Any candidate not agreeing with that sentiment doesn't even make it out of the first month of the primary season. Americans only vote for Imperial Oil Candidates.

What scares me is Obama talks of getting off Middle East oil. That means either drilling in the Arctic or accelerating the tar sands development. Both of which are potentially environmental nightmares on a massive scale.


From: North of Manifest Destiny | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
It's Me D
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 15152

posted 29 August 2008 12:54 PM      Profile for It's Me D     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
thx for the biblical stuff remind
From: Parrsboro, NS | Registered: Apr 2008  |  IP: Logged
Sven
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9972

posted 29 August 2008 01:07 PM      Profile for Sven     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
With regard to supporters of Hillary, I’ve read numerous statements that about 25% of her women supporters are undecided between Obama and McCain. Having Palin on the ticket will undoubtedly sway some percentage of those voters to vote for McCain. The million dollar question is: What is that percentage?

I guess we’ll find out in about eight weeks.


From: Eleutherophobics of the World...Unite!!!!! | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
Pogo
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2999

posted 29 August 2008 01:13 PM      Profile for Pogo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Mercy:
Um.

The next time I see a man in a bathing suit being assigned a number based on their attractiveness I'll rescind my comments.


In no way are the issues faced by male candidates at all of the same order faced by woman candidates, but they do exist.


From: Richmond BC | Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 29 August 2008 01:39 PM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
You folks should all be watching CNN - they have Palin on video some time ago calling Hillary Clinton a "whiner", but today calling herself the fulfillment of the Hillary promise and the final shatterer of the 'glass ceiling'. They have a crew in NYC asking women on the sidewalks if they'd vote for Palin on the Repug ticket, and so far it's something like 10 "no" to one "yes".
From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
al-Qa'bong
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3807

posted 29 August 2008 01:47 PM      Profile for al-Qa'bong   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Willowdale Wizard


Palin supports the aerial hunting of wolves and bears, and even spent $400,000 of state money to fund a media campaign to try and convince Alaskans to support aerial shooting (even though Alaskans have voted against it, twice!).


Once she says, "Obama throws like a girl" you might as well get ready for four more years of Republican presidents.


From: Saskatchistan | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 29 August 2008 01:49 PM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Sven:
With regard to supporters of Hillary, I’ve read numerous statements that about 25% of her women supporters are undecided between Obama and McCain. Having Palin on the ticket will undoubtedly sway some percentage of those voters to vote for McCain. The million dollar question is: What is that percentage?

I guess we’ll find out in about eight weeks.


quote:
According to the survey, neither presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama nor Republican presidential nominee John McCain has secured a clear majority of women, who have decided every presidential election since 1968. Obama garnered 49% to McCain's 38%, and 6% of these women said they were only leaning toward a candidate. With 90 days to go until Election Day, 10% of women are firmly undecided, indicating either candidate has a shot at becoming the next president.

...The Race for Women Could Be Tight
• Neither Obama nor McCain has secured support from a majority of women voters. While 49% of women polled said they are supporting Obama and 38% are supporting McCain, 10% of women are undecided, suggesting the race for women could become close.
• While Obama is doing well with minority women, with support from 89% of African-Americans and 62% of Hispanics, McCain garnered support from nearly half of Caucasian women surveyed (47% vs. 38% for Obama). Hispanic women (14%) were more undecided than African-Americans (4%) or Caucasians (11%).

The Veepstakes: Does Gender Matter?
• The majority of women voters polled say gender does not matter. Obama's selection of a woman running mate makes no difference to 55% of women voters, and McCain's selection of a woman as his #2 makes no difference to 62%.
• However, Obama would benefit twice as much as McCain from offering the second slot to a woman (29% more likely to support Obama if he picks a woman vs. 15% who would be more likely to support McCain). Selecting a woman #2 would result in a net negative for McCain. While 15% said they would be more likely to support McCain if he picked a woman, 20% said they would be less likely to pick him if a woman were on his ticket.
• Forty-seven percent of Hillary Clinton's primary voters said they'd be more likely to vote for Obama if he chose a woman running mate, and 4% said less likely. This is the exact breakdown of current Obama supporters overall. However, Hillary's primary supporters were largely unmoved by a woman on McCain's ticket (59%).


The Indie Vote Obama also holds an advantage among Independent women, who favor him by a twelve point margin (42% for Obama to 30% for McCain). However, one out of five Independents are still undecided. Hillary's Women Supporters
• While the majority of women who voted for Hillary in the primary are flocking to Obama (76%), nearly one out of five (18%) says they will vote for McCain for president.*


From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 29 August 2008 01:57 PM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
I think Obama blew his chances by not asking Hillary Clinto be his Veep. The PUMAS interviewed today on CNN said they are undecided where to go.
From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
500_Apples
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12684

posted 29 August 2008 02:00 PM      Profile for 500_Apples   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Boom Boom:
I think Obama blew his chances by not asking Hillary Clinto be his Veep. The PUMAS interviewed today on CNN said they are undecided where to go.

What's a PUMA?

urban dictionary gives a definition that just does not fit into the context of your paragraph.


From: Montreal, Quebec | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged
al-Qa'bong
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3807

posted 29 August 2008 02:05 PM      Profile for al-Qa'bong   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Is that like a COUGAR?
From: Saskatchistan | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 29 August 2008 02:07 PM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
PUMAS = Party unity my ass (aren't you sorry you asked?)
From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
500_Apples
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12684

posted 29 August 2008 02:07 PM      Profile for 500_Apples   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Edited: Thanks boom boom.

[ 29 August 2008: Message edited by: 500_Apples ]


From: Montreal, Quebec | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 29 August 2008 02:11 PM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by It's Me D:
thx for the biblical stuff remind
You are welcome, there is however, more that would shore up, or bolster, the end days beliefs even more in respect McCain himself. After all Cain and Abel come into play at the of end days too.

quote:
Now during the last seven years of Prophet Daniel, Seth descendants will rule first for there and half years whose government will be headed by the biblical prophet and his High Priest prior to the second coming of the Messiah from Above.

While the second three and half years will be ruled by Cain descendants and the first Adams which names were not list in the genealogy of the Sabbath Adam since from the creation of the world from Seth will worship the beast known as the Antichrist and will introduce the official mark of Cain, implying that all the followers of his religion must have his mark which was giving to him since from the creation of the world after he killed Abel because the battle is between Cain and Abel and Abel repents the Lamb slain from the creation of the world, whose blood will be demanded from this evil generation as Jesus also testified, for the fact that Abel was shed in the process of sacrifice, he now represent the Lamb of God slain from the creation of the earth while Cain descendants represents all those whose names were not written in the Abel book of life after the flood who was replaced by Seth and Cain now represent the Devil being the murderer from the beginning as Jesus also testified. Therefore Cain and his associate nations became the nations of Gog and Magog in the end-time.( Gen. 4: 1-end, John 8:44, Mat. 23:33-35 & Rev. 13:5-10).


After all McCain actually means son of Cain.

quote:
On August 7, 2008, the Republican Party chief, George W. Bush, commanded an attack on South Ossetia. The Russians retaliated on August 8, 2008 (8/8/8). All this helped pave the way for “tough guy” John McCain at the Republican convention. He is “Mc Cain”, meaning “Son of Cain” from the Biblical story of Cain and Abel. (Acknowledgement to Rumor Mill News). Cain carries a “mark” (a badge) authorizing his presence wherever he goes.

But the cunning Russians, realizing Son of Cain was being pre-positioned, fired back with their “Hurricane Gun.” And now, Maeve Reston, writing in the Los Angeles Times, foresees the developing Hurricane (Hurry-CAIN) Gustav could postpone the Republican convention. “If there is serious damage in the Gulf Coast, images of Republicans partying in Minneapolis-St. Paul could be an embarrassing reminder of the Bush administration's delayed response to Hurricane Katrina three years ago,” observes Reston. (“Storm could postpone Republican convention”, by Maeve Reston. L.A. Times, Aug. 29, 2008)


http://www.shout.net/~bigred/ExcitingNews.html

quote:
In these passages Yahweh tells his people Israel that he will make that Old Jerusalem a land of abomination and desolation. Matthew 24:2,15.
He will give them a NEW JERUSALEM!
That New Jerusalem is the United States of America.
Psalms 122:3 "Jerusalem is builded together as a city that is compacted [united] together."
Psalms 122:5 "For there are set thrones of judgment, the thrones of the house of David." The United States of America has only one King that is Jesus Christ; Who sit's on the throne of David.
In Zechariah 2:1-4 he said an angle will measure Jerusalem, the breath thereof and the length thereof and that Jerusalem shall be inhabited as towns without walls for the multitude of men and cattle therein.
The United States of America is a land of milk and honey.
A nation that borrows from non and lends to all. Deuteronomy 15:6
It will never be defeated in war and it will be a gathering of my people from my nations!

Nations are families with Kings, which are the tribes of Israel. The nation with representatives gathered into it from all tribes of Israel, the greatest nation that has ever existed in all recorded history. The only nation founded by those who believe in Jesus Christ as the virgin-born Son of God, is the United States of America!

It is also important for Christians to understand the nature of the "temple" that will be built in the New Jerusalem, which God will bless.
Every Christian should know this, so that they will not be deceived by ministers who preach "lying divinations" about the Old Jerusalem and those who call themselves Jews.


http://www.americannationalactionparty.com/youridentity.html


From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Mercy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13853

posted 29 August 2008 03:11 PM      Profile for Mercy     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Boom Boom:
You folks should all be watching CNN - they have Palin on video some time ago calling Hillary Clinton a "whiner", but today calling herself the fulfillment of the Hillary promise and the final shatterer of the 'glass ceiling'. They have a crew in NYC asking women on the sidewalks if they'd vote for Palin on the Repug ticket, and so far it's something like 10 "no" to one "yes".
If the Republicans thought they were going to win in New York this would hurt - but since they haven't carried that State since 1980 I don't think it concerns them.

From: Ontario, Canada | Registered: Feb 2007  |  IP: Logged
Mercy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13853

posted 29 August 2008 03:13 PM      Profile for Mercy     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Is Senator Clinton going to weigh in on McCain's choice?

The silence is deafening.


From: Ontario, Canada | Registered: Feb 2007  |  IP: Logged
martin dufresne
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11463

posted 29 August 2008 03:28 PM      Profile for martin dufresne   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Why her specifically?
(Will you have Jell-O or mud with that wrestling match?)

From: "Words Matter" (Mackinnon) | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 29 August 2008 03:37 PM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
I feel a twinge of sympathy for Hillary right now - I think Obama was a dick for not choosing her, and McCain choosing a far lesser choice than Hillary just rubs it in for her.
From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
kropotkin1951
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2732

posted 29 August 2008 03:59 PM      Profile for kropotkin1951   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Boom Boom:
I feel a twinge of sympathy for Hillary right now - I think Obama was a dick for not choosing her, and McCain choosing a far lesser choice than Hillary just rubs it in for her.
I doubt if any of us know what the actual conversations went like between the two camps. I have no doubt in my mind that the two camps talked and the result was no nomination for Vp for Clinton. It is just as feasible that behind closed doors her team said she didn't want it. If that were the case it would not be good form to offer it too her and would be a very bad political move to have her refuse it. But I don't know.

From: North of Manifest Destiny | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
Doug
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 44

posted 29 August 2008 04:15 PM      Profile for Doug   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Palin, who portrays herself as a fiscal conservative, racked up nearly $20 million in long-term debt as mayor of the tiny town of Wasilla — that amounts to $3,000 per resident. She argues that the debt was needed to fund improvements.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0808/12987.html

Okay, looks like she's qualified to be a Republican President to me.


From: Toronto, Canada | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Willowdale Wizard
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3674

posted 29 August 2008 04:17 PM      Profile for Willowdale Wizard   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
- Whether he picks Palin or not, McCain is still anti-choice and against equal pay. The Obama campaign's job is to get that across over the next 9 weeks.

- HRC put out a statement about 3 hours ago saying:

"We should all be proud of Governor Sarah Palin’s historic nomination, and I congratulate her and Senator McCain. While their policies would take America in the wrong direction, Governor Palin will add an important new voice to the debate."

- People magazine says McCain denies Palin has a short resume:

"She first ran for office back in 1992. I don’t know what Senator Obama was doing then, but the first time she ran was 1992. That’s 16 years. I think that’s a pretty, pretty event-filled and record-filled resume."

Or, if you prefer reality, from 1992 to 2006, she was a city councillor, or mayor, of a town of 8500 people. For two years, she's been the governor of a state with 650 000 people.


From: england (hometown of toronto) | Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged
sanizadeh
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14787

posted 29 August 2008 04:46 PM      Profile for sanizadeh        Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by kropotkin1951:
I doubt if any of us know what the actual conversations went like between the two camps. I have no doubt in my mind that the two camps talked and the result was no nomination for Vp for Clinton. It is just as feasible that behind closed doors her team said she didn't want it. If that were the case it would not be good form to offer it too her and would be a very bad political move to have her refuse it. But I don't know.

I was reading an opinion that Hillary does not believe Obama could beat McCain, so she let Obama lose this one and then will come back as the main candidate in 2012.

Though if she calculated that she would be facing a 76-year old McCain in 2012, she was certainly wrong. McCain is most likely a one term president. Now it could be all more exciting in 2012, a Clinton vs. Palin match!


From: Ontario | Registered: Dec 2007  |  IP: Logged
Jingles
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3322

posted 29 August 2008 04:52 PM      Profile for Jingles     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
As the mother of young children myself, my immediate thought was, "What is she doing running for VP with a 4-month old?! That baby needs her around, not traveling all over the country giving stump speeches!"

I know it's hard for people to understand sometimes, but politicians aren't like regular folk. If you are a Governor, you don't worry about things like "child care".

The woman is a Republican. She has servants to take care of such things.

Probably Mexican.


From: At the Delta of the Alpha and the Omega | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
jester
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11798

posted 29 August 2008 05:03 PM      Profile for jester        Edit/Delete Post
I think the fact that she singlehandedly ashcanned the Republican machine in Alaska more than once speaks to her abilities.

Add to that the fact that Hilbilly will assuredly sabotage Obama so that they can run in 2012, Ms. Palin will recruit all the HRC delegates that consider gender over party politics.


From: Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 29 August 2008 05:28 PM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by jester:
...Ms. Palin will recruit all the HRC delegates that consider gender over party politics.

Tanslation, jester thinks the women who supported Clinton will move to Palin, as feminists will always consider gender over party politics.

Not by a long shot jester, and frankly, IMV it is sexist to say such a thing.

As thinking us little women know sweet fuck all about politics and will choose our own gender intead of loyalty to a party, can be nothing else, except for ill informed bias..


From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Bookish Agrarian
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7538

posted 29 August 2008 05:51 PM      Profile for Bookish Agrarian   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
I was pretty sure I knew the answer to this question but I asked my partner this tonight.

"If you could make history, would you vote for a woman, just because of that?"

Her response, and I will bet for the majority of women not already McCain supporters- No way. If all things were equal maybe, but Conservatives whether here or there never represent equality.

I think that about sums it up!


From: Home of this year's IPM | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged
MCunningBC
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14903

posted 29 August 2008 05:59 PM      Profile for MCunningBC        Edit/Delete Post
Sometimes a bit of local colour helps to understand what's at issue. Here are some links to local Alaska media. Need I remind you all that the state's motto on all its vehicle licence plates is "The Last Frontier"? As you read the articles and letters below, you'll soon see that slogan is no idle boast.


'Troopergate' inquiry lurks

Letters to the editor: (8/4/08)

Anatomy of a scandal

[ 29 August 2008: Message edited by: MCunningBC ]


From: BC | Registered: Jan 2008  |  IP: Logged
Daniel Grice
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7985

posted 29 August 2008 06:13 PM      Profile for Daniel Grice   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
McCain chooses M. Palin: Evens up Ticket Age

DAYTON, OHIO - John McCain camp responded this week to Barack Obama's choice of VP with a stunning choice, bringing on Alaska Governor Sarah Palin.

"Not only will Mrs. Palin help woo Hillary supporters," thought John McCain. "It also ensures the average age of our ticket is 58, only three years off the Obama/O'Biden Ticket."

The choice of Governor Palin brought wide acclaim from across the political spectrum.

"I've never heard of her before," said one pundit, "but then again if the Democrats can nominate someone from Hawaii, then it only makes sense for the Republicans to choose a Vice President from Alaska."

"Sarah Palin does for John McCain, what Joe Biden does for Barack Obama," said a designer. "Her name looks good on his signs. No one wants a name like Pawlenty of Hutchinson on their sign, it would be a campaign killer. Like Obama, McCain chose a candidate whose name sounds similar and who has under than 12 characters between them."

Republicans were equally enthused about the choice.

"It is great to have a woman on the ticket," said one grey haired old guy. "We can get all of the votes and only pay her half as much as the president."

(thedapper.com)

------------------

:-)


From: Vancouver | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
skarredmunkey
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11117

posted 29 August 2008 06:14 PM      Profile for skarredmunkey     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Or, if you prefer reality, from 1992 to 2006, she was a city councillor, or mayor, of a town of 8500 people. For two years, she's been the governor of a state with 650 000 people.
Would you prefer if she was an establishment centrist Democratic Party Senator for 30+ years with one of the most hawkish foreign policies in Congress and representing the monumentally important state of Delaware, population 864,764? If the Dems are going to spin this one to death by using "Experience" and "Alaska" as their talking points, they deserve to lose.

From: Vancouver Centre | Registered: Nov 2005  |  IP: Logged
jrose
babble intern
Babbler # 13401

posted 29 August 2008 06:41 PM      Profile for jrose     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
I'll have to shut this one down for length. Feel free to start a new one.
From: Ottawa | Registered: Oct 2006  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
Open Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca