babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » feminism   » Ten worst countries for women

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Ten worst countries for women
rural - Francesca
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14858

posted 09 March 2008 10:53 AM      Profile for rural - Francesca   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Ten worst countries for women

quote:
The image of the 21st century woman is confident, prosperous, glowing with health and beauty.

But for many of the 3.3 billion female occupants of our planet, the perks of the cyber age never arrived. As International Women's Day is celebrated today, they continue to feel the age-old lash of violence, repression, isolation, enforced ignorance and discrimination.

"These things are universal," says Taina Bien-Aime, executive director of New York-based Equality Now. "There is not one single country where women can feel absolutely safe."

In spite of real progress in women's rights around the globe – better laws, political participation, education and income – the bedrock problems that have dogged women for centuries remain. Even in wealthy countries, there are pockets of private pain where women are unprotected and under attack.



From: the backyard | Registered: Dec 2007  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 09 March 2008 11:40 AM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
From the link above:

BEST COUNTRIES TO BE A WOMAN
Measures of well-being include life expectancy, education, purchasing power and standard of living. Not surprisingly, the top 10 countries are among the world's wealthiest.

Iceland
Norway
Australia
Canada
Ireland
Sweden
Switzerland
Japan
Netherlands
France

Intersting that the USA, that bastion of freedom and democracy, doesn't make that list.


From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
Fleabitn
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14927

posted 09 March 2008 11:52 AM      Profile for Fleabitn     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Really surprised that Japan, one of the most misogynist countries in the world , should make this list.
From: between thought and action | Registered: Feb 2008  |  IP: Logged
rural - Francesca
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14858

posted 09 March 2008 12:03 PM      Profile for rural - Francesca   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Boom Boom:

Intersting that the USA, that bastion of freedom and democracy, doesn't make that list.


I found that intersting too


From: the backyard | Registered: Dec 2007  |  IP: Logged
Toby Fourre
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13409

posted 09 March 2008 01:01 PM      Profile for Toby Fourre        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
If I'm right, all the countries on the ten best list have universal health care.
From: Death Valley, BC | Registered: Oct 2006  |  IP: Logged
CMOT Dibbler
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4117

posted 09 March 2008 05:45 PM      Profile for CMOT Dibbler     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Lists like this are a double edged sword. On the one hand they give us an opportunity to point out the triumphs of International Feminism and on the other, it allows suburban soccer moms in places like Darien Connecticut to sigh and shake there heads over their chai lattes and commiserate about how the men in the majority world are so sexist and those women need their help so badly, while not taking into account the sexism in their own societies. Why don't we dispense with top ten lists and just agree that sexism is in every country, and needs to be dealt with in every country. This list only gives more credence to the idea that some nations are "bad", whilst others are "good".
From: Just outside Fernie, British Columbia | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Nanuq
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8229

posted 09 March 2008 07:50 PM      Profile for Nanuq   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The fact that women have attained the freedoms that they have in some countries is something to be celebrated. Yes, there is still progress that needs to be made but look how far we've come already.
From: Toronto | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
CMOT Dibbler
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4117

posted 09 March 2008 08:11 PM      Profile for CMOT Dibbler     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Isn't there a danger of resting on our laurels to much?

People in power can use lists like these to justify ignoring the problems that the rich nations DO have when it comes to women's rights.

[ 09 March 2008: Message edited by: CMOT Dibbler ]


From: Just outside Fernie, British Columbia | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
CMOT Dibbler
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4117

posted 09 March 2008 08:17 PM      Profile for CMOT Dibbler     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 

[ 09 March 2008: Message edited by: CMOT Dibbler ]


From: Just outside Fernie, British Columbia | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 10 March 2008 07:02 AM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I wonder why Canada rated higher than, say, France? After watching Michael Moore's Sicko, it became apparent that women in that country are able to have nannies come to their homes to look after newborns and even do the laundry and paid for by the state? I don't think women and family values rate as highly in Canada. Here we get hollow promises for national daycare. I think what we will get in the end is more of the ideology, which will be big box privatized daycare as per WTO dictates.
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 10 March 2008 08:22 AM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
From the same article ...

quote:
• Afghanistan: The average Afghan girl will live to only 45 – one year less than an Afghan male. After three decades of war and religion-based repression, an overwhelming number of women are illiterate. More than half of all brides are under 16, and one woman dies in childbirth every half hour. Domestic violence is so common that 87 per cent of women admit to experiencing it. But more than one million widows are on the streets, often forced into prostitution. Afghanistan is the only country in which the female suicide rate is higher than that of males.

I guess the blessings of over six years of US/NATO occupation haven't sunk in yet.


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
martin dufresne
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11463

posted 10 March 2008 09:05 AM      Profile for martin dufresne   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The "Dutch Disease"...
Petroleum Feeds Patriarchy
By Shankar Vedantam
The Washington Post, March 10, 2008; A03

Climate change. Pollution. Financial expense.

Our gas-guzzling ways have long been associated with a variety of problems, but disturbing evidence now points to a new dimension of our love affair with petroleum: Oil consumption and high oil prices hurt the political, social and economic development of millions of women in oil-producing nations.

You read that right. The more gas you pump and the higher oil prices get, the more likely you are to harm women's empowerment.

The surprising finding, based on more than four decades of data from 169 countries, provides a novel explanation of why women in Middle Eastern countries such as Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates still do not have the right to vote. Oil wealth, not Islam, is the primary reason that these nations have regressive gender policies, said political scientist Michael Ross at the University of California at Los Angeles.

As implausible as the connection between oil wealth and gender rights might seem, Ross's work is based on a widely observed pattern: As oil prices soar to more than $100 a barrel, oil-producing countries get rich atop a tidal wave of foreign currency. The tsunami of cash strengthens their currencies and makes it cheaper for them to buy everything from textiles to cars from other nations, instead of manufacturing such goods at home.

As a result, the economies of oil-producing nations invariably have stunted manufacturing sectors while boosting construction and services sectors. This pattern is now so familiar that it has a name -- the "Dutch Disease" -- following the reshaping of the Dutch economy after natural gas discoveries set off a boom in the Netherlands.
(...)

[ 10 March 2008: Message edited by: martin dufresne ]


From: "Words Matter" (Mackinnon) | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 10 March 2008 09:20 AM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Martin, you're missing this key concluding element:

quote:
Ross's insight is that this realignment punishes women, because low-wage manufacturing jobs -- especially in the textile industry -- have long been the entry point into the workforce for millions of poor women across the world. Oil booms cause these jobs to vanish. By contrast, the boom in construction helps men, because the industry is heavily male-dominated.

The left has always claimed that the economic empowerment of women, by paid employment, is the foundation of their social and political rights.

[ 10 March 2008: Message edited by: N.Beltov ]


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 10 March 2008 09:39 AM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Oil wealth, not Islam, is the primary reason that these nations have regressive gender policies, said political scientist Michael Ross at the University of California at Los Angeles.[/QB]

... as well as dollar hegemony slash imperialism. Imperialism and basic human rights mix about as well as oil and water.

William Engdahl wrote in "A New American Century: Iraq and the hidden euro-dollar wars"

quote:
Because oil is an essential commodity for every nation, the Petrodollar system, which exists to the present, demands the buildup of huge trade surpluses in order to accumulate dollar surpluses. This is the case for every country but one — the United States which controls the dollar and prints it at will or fiat. Because today the majority of all international trade is done in dollars, countries must go abroad to get the means of payment they cannot themselves issue. The entire global trade structure today works around this dynamic, from Russia to China, from Brazil to South Korea and Japan. Everyone aims to maximize dollar surpluses from their export trade.

To keep this process going, the United States has agreed to be ‘importer of last resort’ because its entire monetary hegemony depends on this dollar recycling.

The central banks of Japan, China, South Korea, Russia and the rest all buy U.S. Treasury securities with their dollars. That in turn allows the United States to have a stable dollar, far lower interest rates, and run a $ 500 billion annual balance of payments deficit with the rest of the world. The Federal Reserve controls the dollar printing presses, and the world needs its dollars. It is as simple as that.


Apparently Henry Kissinger referred to it as recycling petrodollars since the oil shocks of the 1970's.


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
sanizadeh
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14787

posted 10 March 2008 07:20 PM      Profile for sanizadeh        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by martin dufresne:

The surprising finding, based on more than four decades of data from 169 countries, provides a novel explanation of why women in Middle Eastern countries such as Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates still do not have the right to vote. Oil wealth, not Islam, is the primary reason that these nations have regressive gender policies, said political scientist Michael Ross at the University of California at Los Angeles.

Right to vote in what election?

UAE and Saudi Arabia have no vote for men either to being with, and the lack of rights there did not start with oil wealth.

Now United Arab Emirates does not really need election anyways. Every UAE citizen is a member of the oligarchy. And the rest (80% of population) are just temporary workers.


From: Ontario | Registered: Dec 2007  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 10 March 2008 07:27 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The list is political. It is worse to be a woman in Afghanistan than the DRC where "a war that claimed more than 3 million lives has ignited again, with women on the front line. Rapes are so brutal and systematic that UN investigators have called them unprecedented. Many victims die; others are infected with HIV and left to look after children alone. Foraging for food and water exposes women to yet more violence. Without money, transport or connections, they have no way of escape"?

And the comment on Afghanistan ignores the invasion, occupation, and propping up of war lords?

And where is Gaza? How was that missed? Saudi Arabia and Pakistan where rape victims are punsihed with lashes or by stoning?

This list could have been produced by the CIA.


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
writer
editor emeritus
Babbler # 2513

posted 10 March 2008 07:30 PM      Profile for writer     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
A simple reminder: this thread is in the feminism forum.
From: tentative | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 10 March 2008 07:33 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Did I dissent or something? Just to be certain I haven't inadvertently stepped on any toes: The third wave just washes all over me leaving me feeling refreshed and liberated.
From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
martin dufresne
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11463

posted 10 March 2008 08:35 PM      Profile for martin dufresne   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I think what "writer" means is that it is inappropiate for us guys to hog the thread and pull the conversation toward our pet peeves, theories, etc.
Here is part of a great syndicated column (in the Seattle Post-Intelligencer) by Elena Maria Salinas - not available on the Web, unfortunately, unless you sign up for a free trial with Highbeam.com

quote:

VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN LEAST PUNISHED
BY MARIA ELENA SALINAS, SYNDICATED COLUMNIST
THE SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER, March 05, 2008

Riding the bus just became a nonthreatening experience for some women in Mexico City. In parts of this overpopulated metropolis, women can now get on the bus, alone or with their children, and reach their destination without fear of being harassed or assaulted by men.

The drastic measure of establishing "women only" buses was taken by transportation authorities in the Mexican capital this January to ensure their safety in a male-dominated society where women's rights are scarce. Unfortunately, in most of the world, not much is done to protect women from abuse, and there are alarming facts and figures to prove it.

According to recent United Nations reports, violence against women is the most common but least punished crime in the world. Just a few examples: At least one out of every three women has been beaten, coerced into sex or otherwise abused in her lifetime. The abuser usually is a member of her own family.

More than 2 million girls are genitally mutilated each year, at a rate of one every 15 seconds. In India, because of insufficient dowries, about 25,000 brides are burned to death each year by the family of the groom, who is then free to remarry. Between 700,000 and 4 million women per year are forced or sold into prostitution.

These are some of the issues highlighted by women's rights advocates around the world in observance of International Women's Day on Saturday. Of particular concern is the impunity with which abuse of women and girls is treated. In Latin America and the Caribbean, for instance, domestic violence is considered a misdemeanor and not a serious crime, and laws do not protect women from marital rape. In every country in the region, women suffer from acute discrimination in the workplace, according to reports by Human Rights Watch.

One of the countries suffering from this wave of violence against women is Spain, where more than 500 were killed by their spouse or significant other from 2000 to 2007. Just two months into 2008, 14 women had been killed in Spain - four of them in just one day.(...)



I'll post the rest if a mod gives me the nod.

From: "Words Matter" (Mackinnon) | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 11 March 2008 02:19 AM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
I think what "writer" means is that it is inappropiate for us guys to hog the thread and pull the conversation toward our pet peeves, theories, etc.

Oh, so until I posted the the thread hasn't been hogged by guys ... and my pet theory. Which would include Haiti. Haiti, the poorest country on earth, its democratic government overthrown with Canadian complicity doesn't make the list of the ten worst?

Here is UNICEF stats on Haiti:
http://www.unicef.org/infobycountry/haiti_statistics.html

Compare then with Nepal.


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
writer
editor emeritus
Babbler # 2513

posted 11 March 2008 03:55 AM      Profile for writer     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Frustrated Mess, I don't monitor babble threads every moment of every day. And I am a survivor of sexual assault.

Yes, Martin, I clicked when I saw a reference to rape, and saw that this thread is dominated by men and their hobby horses.

And I was very polite about it.

Thanks, Frustrated Mess, for your over-sensitivity. It really makes this forum a pleasure for female feminists. Thanks again.


From: tentative | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Stargazer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6061

posted 11 March 2008 07:56 AM      Profile for Stargazer     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
writer, don't you find it not only odd, but also very telling that the feminist threads are almost exclusively dominated by men? I don't think that makes FM or others anti-feminists, in fact I think FM and a few others are true allies. What I think though, is that these threads start out with great intentions but then women, like myself and you clearly, don't post in them because frankly, I find it too hard to compete with the other voices here (in this thread). I know nothing of Nepal, and I admit I am less than knowledgeable about specifics per country but I do know that women are second class citizens all over the world. I know that we compromise the majority, yet we are treated as a "special interest group". I know that every single country has issues with rape, domestic violence and other crimes against women. Some far greater than others.

I also know that in this lifetime, nor probably for many lifetimes, we will never see true equality. We will never see our medical, physical and financial needs be made a priority.

Why this is is obvious. I have no idea how we can change a world that is not built by us, does not run on our rules, and is openly hostile to us. The obvious answer would be to change the behaviour, thoughts and actions of the dominant voices - men. Frankly, I can't see that happening. The sense that the world can only be run by men (despite the thousands of years of fuck ups) will remain until men acknowledge that maybe, just maybe, this male dominated world experience is not working.

Rambling thoughts.


From: Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist. | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
RosaL
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13921

posted 11 March 2008 08:35 AM      Profile for RosaL     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I have noticed a tendency, which I regard as cultural, i.e., not biologically based: male posters will often take the route of discussing discrete facts. For example, "x did y in 1943". And then someone else will argue, "yeah, but what about z in 1942?" and it becomes a kind of battle (a competition?) of "details" - historical details, political details, details of all kinds. People who are more interested in "general principles" or ideas then find themselves irrelevant to the discussion. I'm not saying that one should be abandoned in favour of the other - principles and what one perceives as fact are (or should be) closely related.
From: the underclass | Registered: Mar 2007  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 11 March 2008 08:56 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I've been patiently awaiting my kudos for not getting involved in this thread. I've been waiting, to be discretely precise, since approximately 10:54 am Pacific time on March 9, 2008.
From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Ghislaine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14957

posted 11 March 2008 09:04 AM      Profile for Ghislaine     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by unionist:
I've been patiently awaiting my kudos for not getting involved in this thread. I've been waiting, to be discretely precise, since approximately 10:54 am Pacific time on March 9, 2008.

Looks like you won't get any Kudos now, lol.


From: L'Î-P-É | Registered: Feb 2008  |  IP: Logged
M. Spector
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8273

posted 11 March 2008 09:06 AM      Profile for M. Spector   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by unionist:
I've been patiently awaiting my kudos for not getting involved in this thread. I've been waiting, to be discretely precise, since approximately 10:54 am Pacific time on March 9, 2008.
Wow, you are psychic!

That's a full hour before the thread was even started!!


From: One millihelen: The amount of beauty required to launch one ship. | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
RosaL
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13921

posted 11 March 2008 09:08 AM      Profile for RosaL     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by unionist:
I've been patiently awaiting my kudos for not getting involved in this thread. I've been waiting, to be discretely precise, since approximately 10:54 am Pacific time on March 9, 2008.

Ha! You call that waiting? I'll show you waiting [google, google] ....


From: the underclass | Registered: Mar 2007  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 11 March 2008 09:11 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Hey, my modest intervention succeeded in getting one more woman to post to this thread! Now I really want some kudos.

quote:
Originally posted by M. Spector
Wow, you are psychic!

That's a full hour before the thread was even started!!


Off topic. Take it to the DST thread.

[ 11 March 2008: Message edited by: unionist ]


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
M. Spector
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8273

posted 11 March 2008 09:17 AM      Profile for M. Spector   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Nothing to do with DST.

Check the babble clock - it's four hours behind the centre of the universe, not 3, as in Pacific time.


From: One millihelen: The amount of beauty required to launch one ship. | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 11 March 2008 09:20 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
@ unionist.

I think Stargazer is right. And I think how these types of threads go depends on how people approach these types of issues. Some people see a list like this and start thinking critically about our interventions in the countries that are on the list, and it becomes a discussion about western colonialism and intervention (which of course IS related). Others see this list and, as happens with most lists whether worst countries for women or ten best pop songs of all time, wonder why they don't see their first choice on the list.

I'm not sure how this thread is supposed to go. It's not clear from the opening post what direction this thread is supposed to take. But yes, probably a bunch of guys going on about world politics is not it.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Ghislaine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14957

posted 11 March 2008 09:30 AM      Profile for Ghislaine     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Okay guys, before this disintegrates into a discussion about whether DST is better or worse for women - maybe we should return to the thread topic?

I will make a real contribution here. Hooray for Canada; we are on the top ten! Should we celebrate this? Yes, in my opinion. Not celebrating this is disrespectful to our foremothers, who fought for the rights I enjoy. Looking at the list of the worst ten, I can say that I am glad to have "won" so to speak in the lottery of life. Being born in Canada as a woman is a huge privilege.

That shouldn't be interpreted as meaning there isn't a lot further to go here in Canada.


From: L'Î-P-É | Registered: Feb 2008  |  IP: Logged
rural - Francesca
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14858

posted 11 March 2008 09:48 AM      Profile for rural - Francesca   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Michelle:

I'm not sure how this thread is supposed to go. It's not clear from the opening post what direction this thread is supposed to take.

I don't like to start a thread with a goal in mind, because sometimes I have to realize I don't know everything.

What struck me about the article was the fact that the US wasn't on the list, wasn't surprised, but was a bit shocked as I thought my impression was just a bit too 'anti USA' and not actually grounded in fact.

I also felt that with Canada on the top 10, that also didn't really make it great. Quotes like this:

quote:
Originally posted by rural - Francesca:
"These things are universal," says Taina Bien-Aime, executive director of New York-based Equality Now. "There is not one single country where women can feel absolutely safe."

...really tell the tale.

It's like having a list of the top 10 least smelly farts, they maybe the least smelly, but they still stink.


From: the backyard | Registered: Dec 2007  |  IP: Logged
RosaL
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13921

posted 11 March 2008 09:52 AM      Profile for RosaL     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
The image of the 21st century woman is confident, prosperous, glowing with health and beauty.

Actually, this quote struck me as bizarre. It's the perspective of someone with a very privileged, sheltered life. Or someone whose notion of reality is defined by the advertising industry. Or both.

I hope I'm not being too mean

[ 11 March 2008: Message edited by: RosaL ]


From: the underclass | Registered: Mar 2007  |  IP: Logged
martin dufresne
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11463

posted 11 March 2008 09:54 AM      Profile for martin dufresne   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Re: smelliest farts. Uh oh, I am smelling major potential thread drift here...

[ 11 March 2008: Message edited by: martin dufresne ]


From: "Words Matter" (Mackinnon) | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
rural - Francesca
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14858

posted 11 March 2008 09:55 AM      Profile for rural - Francesca   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Michelle:

I'm not sure how this thread is supposed to go. It's not clear from the opening post what direction this thread is supposed to take.

I don't like to start a thread with a goal in mind, because sometimes I have to realize I don't know everything.

What struck me about the article was the fact that the US wasn't on the list, wasn't surprised, but was a bit shocked as I thought my impression was just a bit too 'anti USA' and not actually grounded in fact.

I also felt that with Canada on the top 10, that also didn't really make it great. Quotes like this:

quote:
Originally posted by rural - Francesca:
"These things are universal," says Taina Bien-Aime, executive director of New York-based Equality Now. "There is not one single country where women can feel absolutely safe."

...really tell the tale.

It's like having a list of the top 10 least smelly farts, they maybe the least smelly, but they still stink.


From: the backyard | Registered: Dec 2007  |  IP: Logged
Ghislaine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14957

posted 11 March 2008 10:05 AM      Profile for Ghislaine     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I was not surprised that the US wasn't on the list.

For one, women receive only 6 weeks maternity leave! Six weeks - not enough time to even get accustomed to breast feeding.

Also, the rate of violent crime against women is quite high there, there are millions of single mothers without health insurance for themselves or their children. As well, the ratio of women in poverty compared to men in poverty is quite high.


From: L'Î-P-É | Registered: Feb 2008  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 11 March 2008 10:41 AM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I hardly ever participate in the feminist forum but if a list that is blatantly skewed in favour of Liberal/Conservative foreign policy is posted, I find it very difficult to just ignore it. Particularly on a board that is progressive.

I mean, now think about it: Canada is at war in Afghanistan while the same people who coined the term "feminazi" says its all about liberating Afghani woman. And lo and behold here is this report with Afghanistan at the top, conveniently overlooking the invasion and occupation, and not listing potentially embarrassing states like Haiti and the occupied territories. It just reeks of politics to me.


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
CMOT Dibbler
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4117

posted 11 March 2008 12:29 PM      Profile for CMOT Dibbler     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I find it interesting that Iceland, which has a very high rate of alcoholism is on top. It certainly has a good welfare state, but if a country has a culture that promotes drug addiction, and thereby causes many women to have liver problems, shouldn't it have a lower rating on the list?
From: Just outside Fernie, British Columbia | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
kropotkin1951
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2732

posted 11 March 2008 01:02 PM      Profile for kropotkin1951   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Do Icelandic women have a choice to drink or not? If as I suspect they have a choice your comment is very paternalistic.
From: North of Manifest Destiny | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
writer
editor emeritus
Babbler # 2513

posted 11 March 2008 01:07 PM      Profile for writer     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Guys? Guys.
From: tentative | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
CMOT Dibbler
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4117

posted 11 March 2008 05:22 PM      Profile for CMOT Dibbler     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Now that I've completely made myself look like a bafoon, I'll retire for the night. See you all tommorow.
From: Just outside Fernie, British Columbia | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
martin dufresne
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11463

posted 11 March 2008 05:37 PM      Profile for martin dufresne   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Bafoon: Generally observed in web-based forums, the *bafoon* is a cross between a comic, a primate and a woodwind.
From: "Words Matter" (Mackinnon) | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 11 March 2008 08:14 PM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Saudi women use Youtube to protest ban on driving

quote:
Saudi women's rights activists have posted on the web a video of a woman at the wheel of her car, in protest at the ban on female drivers in the kingdom.

Wajeha Huwaider talks of the injustice of the ban and calls for its abolition as she drives calmly along a highway.

She says the film was posted to mark International Women's Day. Thousands have viewed it on the YouTube website.

The last such public show of dissent was in 1990 when dozens of women were arrested for circling Riyadh in cars. [...]

The 1990 protest, coming at the height of the Gulf crisis when US forces had come to defend Saudi Arabia, was followed by a crackdown on the women drivers and their passengers.

The women were jailed for one day, their passports confiscated, and many lost their jobs.



From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca