Author
|
Topic: Does Feminism Control The Bush Administration?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
writer
editor emeritus
Babbler # 2513
|
posted 20 April 2006 03:16 PM
kropotkin, I know we are in sensitive times right now on babble, but I am not trolling. Even feminists can have fun poking at anti-feminists. Please try to relax. P.S. I helped *write* the policy. [ 20 April 2006: Message edited by: writer ]
From: tentative | Registered: Apr 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
kropotkin1951
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2732
|
posted 20 April 2006 04:37 PM
Sorry I should have known who you were so I could have subjectively decided on your post rather than objectively looking at it and determining it was a nasty piece of work that had simply been reposted. I should know by now that this board has different rules depending on whether your really part of this community or merely someone who occasionally posts. My fault I will ask in the future whether the poster is an exempt "real" Babble poster and has carte blanche to post what they like because everyone knows they are good and true Babblers. The rules I presume will still apply to the rest of us?
From: North of Manifest Destiny | Registered: Jun 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
simonvallee
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5141
|
posted 22 April 2006 02:29 AM
quote: Originally posted by Timebandit:
Yeah, because having a penis makes you better at teaching the more difficult subjects.
Not to defend the author, but I think the reasoning is more that men are more competitive whilst women seek more security. So the retirement package would attract more women because they plan ahead for their old days whilst men get bored because they aren't rewarded for being better teachers (or teachers of more difficult matters), so they're repusled by the working conditions. Now, I don't agree with such reasoning, but I think that this is what was meant. Anyway, it's wrong. Unions pretty much everywhere, even in male-dominated sectors, generally favor measures like retirement package and look down on salaries based on personal merit.
From: Boucherville, Québec | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
siren
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7470
|
posted 22 April 2006 02:50 AM
From the article: quote: Nor do we hear anything about spending taxpayer funds to force universities to attract more men into the soft Liberal Arts subjects that now have a big majority of women students.
Interesting that the standard changes here. For the rest of the article the comparison is male/female teachers but when it comes to "soft" Liberal Arts, the comparison is male teacher to female students. Why? FWIW the English Lit profs at my BA university were all male. And viciously sexist to boot. They didn't consider Hemingway novels a "soft" subject matter. Oh, and sure it's all funny and snorty when it's happening in the US -- but look what's happening up here: Topic: Status of Women Canada - REAL women campaigns to abolish it .
From: Of course we could have world peace! But where would be the profit in that? | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|